Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Nursing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Derby (UOD) | Module Title | 6NU580 Nursing Therapeutics and Medicines Management |
On successful completion of this assessment and this module, you will have demonstrated your ability to:
| Assessment description: | Nursing Care Plan Analysis and clinical justification for medicines management and wider therapeutics in patient care | ||
| Assessment component: | Assessment weighting: | Assessment limits: | Assessed module learning outcome(s): |
| CW1 | 100% | 3000 words (+/10%) | LO1, LO2, LO3 |
| Submission date/time: | Provisional feedback released: | ||
| Formative assessment: One A4 page draft of your patient scenario
Friday 27th February 2026 by 12:00 midday UK time |
Formative feedback:
We will aim to provide formative feedback for Friday 13th March 2026 by 12-midday UK time. This may vary depending on when formative work is submitted |
||
| Summative assessment:
Thursday 9th April 2026 by 12-midday GMT/BST UK time |
Summative feedback (provisional grade only):
Tuesday 5th May 2026 by 09:00 GMT/BST UK time |
||
| Your work will be marked anonymously: Markers will not be aware of which student has written the work that is being marked. Provisional grades will be reviewed by an Internal Moderator and the External Examiner. You will be notified of the ratified grade one week after the Assessment Board which is held approximately one month after the provisional grade release. | |||
The formative assessment is an opportunity to submit your draft patient scenario so that your tutor can offer feedback for you. Guidance on this is in Planning a Patient Scenario in the next section. The activities at the end of unit two and in unit three will also help you with your patient scenario.
The deadline for posting your draft patient scenario into the formative submission point is 27th February 2026 by 12:00 Uk time. Feedback will then be provided by Friday 13th March.
Please note that you are only to submit the draft patient scenario, including medical diagnosis and the nursing diagnoses on one A4 page word document.
If you miss this formative deadline, you may not get feedback. Please contact your group tutor if you feel you may not meet this deadline.
The summative assessment for this module is a care plan analysis with clinical justification for medicines management and wider therapeutics in patient care. It is a practice-based assessment approach for demonstrating your knowledge, evidence base and critical application for patient care planning. This is in keeping with the learning outcomes for the module.
For the purposes of this assessment, care planning focuses on nursing-specific, individualised care plans only (not multidisciplinary shared care plans or standardised care plans).
You will be developing a patient scenario for the care plan analysis, with a focus on medicines management and related therapeutics. This offers an ideal basis for meeting the learning outcomes for this module.
1. Planning a patient scenario (this section will also help with your formative assessment)
This subsection is part of LO1, LO2 and LO3
The patient care plan must be based on a patient scenario relevant to your practice. Time is set aside for you to plan your patient scenario in the final activity of unit two and in unit three. You may choose to use the example template plan of care provided at the end of this assessment brief, or you may choose to use a format from your organisation or other source.
You are unlikely to use reference material for planning a patient scenario.
Instructions
Identify a patient scenario based on your experiences with previous patients in practice (rather than an actual patient you are currently caring for). You can create a fictitious patient scenario, so long as it represents an accurate example of a patient related to your practice context.
Your patient scenario can be selected in one of two ways:
Important
To meet the learning outcomes for this assignment, your patient scenario should be based on a patient whose care will require medicines management and wider therapeutics
Examples
To make things more manageable for your care plan analysis, it is recommended that your care plan is based on the beginning of a patient care journey for a new medical diagnosis – even if this relates to an ongoing health issue. For example:
2. Completing the patient care plan
This subsection is part of LO1, LO2 and LO3
Please note the care plan will form the basis for your 3000word (+/- 10%) care plan analysis and is a crucial part of your summative assessment. It must be included in an appendix at the end of your work for your markers to refer to throughout. The care plan template in the appendix IS NOT included in the word count.
You are unlikely to use reference material for completing the patient care plan. Time is set aside for you to complete your care plan draft during unit three of the module.
It is important that your patient care plan contains the following information:
Table 1 Mr X’s medications
| Usual medications prescribed | New medications prescribed |
| Seretide 250mcg inhaler BD for prevention of asthma symptoms | Flecainide 100mg tablets BD for atrial fibrillation |
| Ventolin inhaler for relief of asthma symptoms | Nebivolol 2.5mg once daily |
| Over the counter medications | |
| Regular use of Panadol for aches and pains | |
| Daily antihistamine tablet (chlorphenamine) | |
| Antacids |
Looking Plagiarism Free Answers For 6NU580 Nursing Therapeutics and Medicines Management Assignment Before Deadline?
Chat with Experts & Get AssignmentClinical justification for medicines management and wider therapeutics in patient care: 3,000 words (+/-10%).
Your care plan analysis should provide a critical analysis of different stages of care outlined in your patient scenario. Sub-headings should be used. You can refer to your appendix as necessary to direct your marker to your care plan.
This subsection is part of LO1, LO2 and LO3
The following structure, and suggested word count for each section, is advised:
Suggestions:
You can use some of the terms and language in the learning outcomes in your introduction to set the scene for your assessment.
Provide a brief overview of your patient scenario in your introduction (you can then signpost to your appendix where your marker can refer to the full care plan).
You could include a BRIEF overview of the nursing process and the importance of formulating person-centred individualised care planning within healthcare practice.
This section should include a rationale and critical discussion for the nursing diagnoses you plan to analyse.
In BRIEF: why assessment is important and what is meant of the term nursing diagnosis?
How did you formulate your nursing diagnoses? Diagnostic reasoning (unit two learning) can be brought in here – Looking at your patient needs – what information did you need? Signs? Symptoms? Relevant PMH? Who was included in this assessment process? MDT? Patient? Family? How did you ensure a patient-centred/therapeutic approach in your assessment to come up with the nursing diagnosis for your patient? Can you highlight any theories of diagnostic reasoning to support your assessment process for your patient scenario? Intuitive/analytical? Alternatives?
Direct your marker to the care plan in the appendix as required so that they can see that you are analysing the information in the care plan.
It would be useful to highlight why you have selected the three main diagnosis eg. for the purposes of exploring/examining/analysing nursing therapeutics related to practical, legal, and ethical dimensions of medications management. Use the terms in the LO to focus your work and ensure you cover them!
This section should critically analyse expected outcomes and planned interventions for your patient, related to medicines management and wider therapeutics for the nursing diagnoses.
In BRIEF: Why is the planning and implementation stage of the nursing process important? It may also be appropriate to include a couple of sentences about the meaning of nursing therapeutics.
Then concentrate on your patient and care plan.
Think about your patient care plan in terms of the safe, effective and evidenced- based administration of medication along with the therapeutic interventions utilised to reach or maximise your desired outcomes/goals.
Medications management (work through the units for summative content and learning!)
This section should include analysis of patient involvement and analysis of planned shared/collaborative care with MDT.
Suggestions:
The nurse role, practical elements of drug administration, legal framework for administration (five rights), principles of drug administration, safety and compliance, monitoring and assessment, ethical and legal considerations, laws and legislation, accountability, Policies and procedures, education.
Pharmacokinetics (how the body interacts with the drug), pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) and drug calculations ( all of this facilitates competence), adverse drug interactions.
Show an appreciation of other areas of practice in terms of meds management e.g. mental health setting, prison setting, hospital or community?
Nursing Therapeutics in Medications Management
Anayse/examine/discuss/explore
Suggestions:
Clinical skills – monitoring vital signs/physical responses to treatment
Communication, communication theories and strategies, complimentary therapies, social prescribing, patient choice, community groups- smoking cessation group
How did/can the adoption/adaption of these influence patient care?
Even if theses were not implemented can you show an appreciation of them and discuss how they could have been beneficial?
This section should evaluate, from an evidence-based perspective, the intended short and/or longer-term health benefits of the planned care for the patient.
In BRIEF: Overview of the importance of continuous evaluation of patient care and care plan. Why should we do it? What does it achieve?
What were the primary goals for your patient? What were the desired outcomes? Were the interventions successful for your patient? How do you know? Were the goals/desired outcomes met, partially met or not met? Was the plan of care effective? Is modification needed? If so, what?
Reflect on the interventions for your patient from a meds/therapeutics perspective.
Summarise the concluding points related to your care plan analysis.
No new information should be started here!
All sections of your care plan analysis must be evidenced based: Please ensure that you aim to access the most current literature sources available to you. This refers to literature published within the last five years as much as possible, and not using sources that are 10 years old or more, unless referring to seminal literature.
Reference list (not included in the word count)
Referencing correctly demonstrates academic rigor and integrity and therefore is an essential part of your work. You must include a full reference list at the end of your care plan analysis. Even if you have referenced before do take the time to access the library resources and workshops to help you with referencing.
Appendix (NOT included in word count)
This will include your care plan template and medications table.
Feedback, marking criteria and grading of your assessment
This section tells you how the marker will assess your work fairly. All markers aim for our feedback to be timely, individual to you, helpful, empowering and manageable.
They will also offer you opportunities to discuss the marking criteria they intend to use, and the type of feedback they intend to give you. You should create a shared understanding of this with them and your peers during the course of the module. They may also give you opportunities to assess your own work and the work of your peers. Look out for these opportunities.
Assessment markers can give you feedback and allocate marks to you using a range of methods and tools that are appropriate to the specific module and assessment. The marker may make comments within your script (in bubbles) and may also give you written comments in the long box. They may give you a form of audio or video feedback.
When they give you feedback on your assessment, as a minimum, your marker will tell you:
Your work will be marked based on the rubric below. Please familiarise yourself with these criteria as they are used to determine grades for your assessment.
| 70-100%
Excellent/Outstanding |
60-69%
Very good/Commendable |
50-59%
Good/Highly competent |
40-49%
Satisfactory/Competent |
35-39%
Unsatisfactory |
1-34%
Very poor/Nothing of merit |
| Comprehensive knowledge base; extremely well informed; meets learning outcomes (LOs) | Broad knowledge base, relevant, accurate and well-informed; meets LOs | Adequate knowledge base, relevant and accurate; meets learning outcomes (LOs) | Some inaccuracies and inadequacies in knowledge base noted; adequately meets the LOs | Serious inaccuracies / ! inadequacies in knowledge base noted; does not sufficiently meet learning outcomes (LOs) | The discussion includes !
many inaccuracies/ inadequacies/ inappropriate content. Does not meet the LOs |
| Supportive evidence is presented from a wide range of credible sources | Supportive evidence is presented from a range of credible sources | Supportive evidence is presented from a reasonable range of credible sources | Supportive evidence is presented from a limited range of credible sources | Fails to provide sufficient supportive evidence / information from credible sources | Serious inadequacies in / absence of supportive evidence / information |
| Demonstrates relevant, up-to-date reading from primary sources of literature. Clear identification/referencing style (Harvard) for all sources | Demonstrates relevant, up-to-date reading mainly from primary sources of literature. Occasional referencing omissions; generally sources correctly identified | Demonstrates some relevant, up-to-date reading from key primary sources of literature. Persistent minor errors /omissions, although sources identified | Demonstrates limited reading from less relevant or up-to-date sources, inc secondary sources. Inadequate referencing, although most sources identified | Demonstrates that most reading is from secondary/ outdated sources, and those which are not relevant. Serious omissions in acknowledging/referencing ! sources | Demonstrates that reading is irrelevant, outdated and entirely from secondary sources. Fails to acknowledge or reference sources throughout ! |
| Adheres to presentation guidelines; excellent writing style | Generally adheres to presentation guidelines. Very good writing style | Adequately adheres to presentation guidelines. Good writing style | Partially adheres to presentation guidelines. Some errors noted | Does not sufficiently adhere to presentation guidelines. Significant errors in spelling, grammar, etc. | Presentation guidelines not addressed. Numerous errors in spelling, grammar, etc |
| Takes full account of contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices | Clearly recognises contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices | Has a reasonable grasp of contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices | Takes a limited account of contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices | Insufficient recognition of ! contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices | No account taken of ! contemporary professional, ethical and anti-discriminatory codes/practices |
| Personal values, attitudes and practises are exemplary | Personal values, attitudes and practises are very good | Personal values, attitudes and practises are sound | Personal values, attitudes and practises are acceptable; no unsafe practice/attitudes | Personal values, attitudes and practices are questionable and potentially unacceptable | Clear evidence of unsafe/ ! unacceptable personal values, attitudes, practises |
| Insightful reflection demonstrated in a variety of personal learning/practice situations | Meaningful reflection demonstrated in a variety of personal learning/practice situations | Some depth of reflective ability demonstrated in a variety of personal learning/practice situations | Limited depth of reflection demonstrated into personal learning/practice situations | Very limited depth of reflection demonstrated into personal learning/practice situations | No evidence of meaningful reflection into personal learning/practice situations |
| Advanced critical and analytical ability/ application to practice situations | Very good critical and analytical ability/ application to practice situations | Sound critical and analytical ability/ application to practice situations | Satisfactory critical and analytical ability/ application to practice situations | Critical and analytical ability is flawed/opinionated// poorly applied to practice | Little or no critical and analytical ability/ application to practice situations |
| Insightfully links ideas and evidence to formulate a cogent discussion/argument | Successfully links ideas and evidence to offer a reasoned discussion/argument | Fairly successfully links ideas/evidence to offer a reasoned discussion/argument | Attempts to link ideas/ evidence; reasoning is weak | Attempts to link ideas/ evidence; reasoning is flawed/inadequate | Inability to link ideas/ evidence in a reasoned way |
| Demonstrates advanced problem-solving abilities | Demonstrates a range of problem-solving abilities | Demonstrates some problem-solving ability | Some limited evidence of the ability to problem-solve | No clear evidence of the ability to problem-solve | No attempt to solve the problems presented |
| Full account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context | Considerable account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context | Reasonable account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context | Limited account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context | Inadequate account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context | No account taken of relevant contemporary health/social care policies and context |
| Insightful concluding remarks; relating directly to the evidence presented | Logical concluding remarks; relating directly to the evidence presented | Logical concluding remarks, largely based on the evidence presented | Logical concluding remarks, not fully/ accurately based on evidence presented | Concluding remarks are vague; tenuous/inaccurate links to evidence presented | Inaccurate/illogical conclusion. Not based on evidence presented |
| Creative/innovative recommendations made for professional practice | Logical/practicable recommendations made for professional practice | Mainly logical/practicable recommendations made for professional practice | Recommendations made for professional practice are fair | Recommendations made for professional practice are vague/impractical/inadequate | No/inappropriate recommendations made for professional practice |
Presentation is an important part of your academic work. Please follow the presentation guidelines below.
Your title page must include: 1) the name of the university, 2) the course title, 3) the module code and title, 4) the name of the module tutor, 5) the word count, and 6) declarations (see below).
Originality statement
‘I declare that this assessment is my own work and that I have correctly acknowledged the work of others using the Harvard referencing. This assessment is in accordance with University guidance on good academic conduct.’
Confidentiality statement (if applicable)
‘I declare that confidentiality of people discussed in this work is maintained; there is no identifiable information of these individuals.’
Your manuscript needs to;
The standard University assessment regulations apply for this assessment. Please note that in line with the University common assessment regulations, failure to submit coursework (i.e. non-submission) could lead to you failing the module.
Details of assessment regulations are available at: https://www.derby.ac.uk/about/organisation/academic-regulations/ (sections F and G).
Work submitted late will be marked according to University regulation, please see the University guidance on Late Submissions within the UDo Student Portal.
During the course of the module your tutor will offer you a range of help and support. There are contact details for them within the module.
Other colleagues will offer help and guidance on the Student Portal.
In addition, the Academic Administrators will post helpful notices on your module announcement board.
You could also use the following links if you want extra help with:
Referencing and avoiding making an academic offence Study skills support
Get Professional Support for Your 6NU580 Nursing Therapeutics and Medicines Management Assignment
Order Assignment Help NowStruggling with 6NU580 Nursing Therapeutics and Medicines Management Assessment at University of Derby? Get expert Assignment Help UK tailored to boost your grades and understanding. Our Nursing Assignment Help provides well-researched, plagiarism-free solutions designed as per university guidelines. Access a Free List of Assignment Samples Answers to see high-quality work before you order. Whether it’s essays, case studies, or reports, our professionals ensure timely delivery and top-notch content that helps your assignment rank higher and stand out. Join thousands of students who trust our services to excel academically and achieve success in their studies with confidence and ease.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content