Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Marketing |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Henley Business School | Module Title | MMM170 Marketing for a better, sustainable world |

|
Module Code and Title |
MMM170 “Marketing for a better, sustainable world” |
|
Academic Year |
2025-2026 |
|
Module Convenor |
Dr Shayan Shaikh |
|
Type of Assessment |
Individual reflection |
|
Weighting of Assessment |
100% |
|
Individual or Group Assessment |
☒ Individual ☐ Group |
|
Module Convenor Office Hours/Opportunities for advice and feedback |
Please arrange a meeting via email: s.shaikh@henely.ac.uk
|
|
Submission deadline |
01/06/2026 14:00pm |
|
Submission point |
☒ Blackboard ☐ Turnitin ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Item(s) to be submitted |
Individual Assignment |
|
File type |
☐ PDF ☒ Word ☐ PPT ☐ Excel ☐ Video ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Formatting guidelines |
Prepare your report with 1 inch margins all around, double-spaced, font size 12, Arial (inclusive of title page, tables, graphs) for the main body of the text. Deviations from the set formatting guidelines will be penalized with a 5 mark deduction. This level of strictness is to ensure optimal length consistency (and therefore fairness) for all submitted student reports in this module. Do not include your name or student number on the title page. |
|
Structure (e.g. required sub-sections) |
No set required sub-sections. You have the option of including a short Introduction and a brief Conclusion, to frame the assignment. But this is not mandatory. |
|
Size of assessment (word limit or length) and penalty applied |
The word length for the assignment is 2500 words (+/- 10%) |
|
Referencing style |
☒ Harvard ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Task |
In order to demonstrate your broader understanding and learning from studying the 'Marketing for a better, sustainable world' module, you are required to submit a critical reflective essay on a real-life social marketing campaign undertaken by a business or not-for-profit organisation. The aim is to explore how sustainable and social marketing principles are applied in practice, drawing on module content and wider literature. Please read the whole of this briefing before you begin working on your assignment. For your Individual Reflection, you need to consider five points in total: 1. Identify a social marketing campaign by a real life organisation and reflectively review (around 1000 words - guideline): a. How the sustainable marketing theories could be applied to the campaign. b. Decisions regarding marketing strategy ie 4Ps of the campaign 2. Personal reflection (around 1500 words - guideline): a. Your views on sustainable marketing with illustrations by cases/examples b. Your views on what the future looks like for sustainability in marketing c. Skills acquired The individual assignment is where you can showcase critical thinking, reflecting on a real life organisation’s campaign. First, you should reflect on the use of sustainable marketing Theories. The focus will be on social marketing theory. It will, therefore, allow you to demonstrate the breadth of your knowledge about the field. Which theories would help explain/ are evident in the campaign’s design? In what way would these theories allow the organisation to address its aims for the campaign? Then, you would need to assess the campaign decisions regarding the Marketing Strategy, justifying the marketing mix techniques (4Ps) of the campaign. Strong candidates will link the justification to concepts covered in class. Comparisons with approaches followed in other social marketing campaigns are encouraged. For your final Personal Reflection, you are first required to explain your views on sustainable marketing with illustrations by cases/examples. You are asked to reflect on what the future could look like for sustainability in marketing. Again, you can support by real life cases/examples. Finally, you will need to reflect on your learning and identify what Skills and experiences you could now add to your CV (after completing the module). You have the option of including a short Introduction and a brief Conclusion, to frame the assignment. But this is not mandatory. |
Get Help in MMM170 Marketing for a better, sustainable world Assignment before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment|
Among these could be: · Organisation’s website and social media sites. · Online news articles. · Lecture materials. · Resources available in the reading list (core text and recommended readings). · News and journal articles for examples and cases. |
|
Guidance on academic misconduct (including using Turnitin practice area) |
The work you produce must be your own or that of members of your group if it is a group assessment. It must not have been submitted as part of other assessments, at this or another institution. You should ensure that the work you produce adheres to the University’s statement on academic integrity and to the regulations regarding academic misconduct (such as plagiarism and cheating). You can find information about this at: University of Reading Academic misconduct policies. You are encouraged to put a draft of your work through the Turnitin practice area to satisfy yourself that the work is your own original work. You can seek advice from the Module Convenor. |
|
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools
*What do we mean by GenAI? GenAI tools create new content in the form of text, code, images, videos, music etc. The most common GenAI tools at the time of writing are ChatGPT, CoPilot, Claude, Llama and Gemini. Please note that this list is not exhaustive. Please refer to the article here which frequently updates its list of well-known GenAI tools. |
There are three categories of GenAI use in assessments in operation at the University of Reading. The ticked box below indicates which category this assignment belongs to: 1.GenAI tools cannot be used in any way in the assessment 2. GenAI tools can be used to support student learning and development (to sketch initial ideas, find sources, explore unfamiliar concepts, provide structure etc.) 3. The use of GenAI tools is actively encouraged to help students develop their skills in the use of such tools and understand how their use can be incorporated into authentic writing tasks. Specifically: Enter text here If option 2. or 3. above is checked, you must include a statement to acknowledge your use of GenAI tools* within the assessment itself. This statement should be written in complete sentences and include the following information: · Name and version of the GenAI tool used; e.g. ChatGPT-3.5 · Publisher (company that provides the GenAI system); e.g. OpenAI · URL of the AI tool (if applicable) · Brief description (single sentence) of the way in which the GenAI tool was used · Confirmation that the work is your own For example: I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT 3.5 (OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com/) to generate an outline for background study. I confirm that no output generated by GenAI has been presented as my own work. Note: if you have not used GenAI tools to help with your assessment, you must still include a statement to acknowledge this fact, e.g. I declare that no GenAI tools have been used to produce this work. The misuse of GenAI tools, including the failure to appropriately acknowledge the use of such tools, is considered academic misconduct and carries sanctions, as detailed in the Assessment Handbook. Please also refer to student guidance on Using Generative AI Tools at University and GenAI and University Study |
|
Academic misconduct penalties |
☒ The University’s standard policy on academic misconduct applies. ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Late submission point |
☒ Blackboard ☐ Turnitin ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Late submission penalties |
☒ The University’s standard penalties apply. See Standard Penalties. ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Timing of feedback |
☒ Within 15 days of submission deadline ☐ When examination marks are released ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Type of feedback |
☒ Mark ☐ Generic feedback ☒ Individual feedback ☐ Breakdown of mark ☐ Audio feedback ☐ Video feedback ☐ Comments written on the submitted work ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Location of feedback |
☐ Blackboard ☒ Turnitin ☐ Other: Enter text here |
|
Assessment criteria |
80+ Outstanding |
70–79 Excellent |
60–69 Very good |
50–59 Good |
49 and below Satisfactory |
39 and below |
|
Application of sustainable marketing theories |
Outstanding and professional critical analysis of the theories underpinning the chosen campaign, including alternative approaches that could have been more suitable and why. |
Excellent critical analysis of the theories underpinning the chosen campaign, including thoughtful consideration of alternative models. |
Very good analysis of the theories used in the chosen campaign; alternative approaches discussed but not fully developed. |
Good analysis of theories used in the campaign. Could be more critical; alternative approaches underdeveloped or missing. |
Weak analysis of theories used in the campaign; lacks depth and/or critical engagement. |
Very weak or no analysis of theories used in the campaign. |
|
Decisions regarding marketing strategy |
Outstanding analysis of the campaign’s strategic and tactical decisions, with excellent justification of the marketing mix and strong links to module concepts and wider examples. |
Excellent analysis of the campaign’s strategy and use of the marketing mix; very good justification with links to class content and external examples. |
Very good analysis of the campaign’s strategy and marketing mix; some comparison to other examples and module material. |
Good analysis of the marketing mix and strategy; justification is present but underdeveloped. |
Weak or unclear evaluation of the strategy and marketing mix; lacks link to module content or relevant examples. |
Very weak or no evaluation of the marketing strategy; missing or irrelevant justification. |
|
Your views on sustainable marketing and its future |
Outstanding personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing, making links to topics covered in the lectures and to the broader context of sustainability, including links to theory and research in the field (and from other areas of knowledge). |
Excellent personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing, making links to topics covered in the lectures and to the broader context of sustainability, including some links to theory and research in the field. |
Very good personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing, making some links to topics covered in the lectures. |
Good personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing, but lacking links to topics covered in the lectures. |
Weak personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing, explanation of how the team project has influenced the author’s view on the role of marketing in society and sustainability is limited. |
Very weak or no personal reflection on the area of sustainable marketing and explanation of how the team project has influenced the author’s view on the role of marketing in society and sustainability. |
|
Skills |
Outstanding reflection on the skills developed as part of the module, and how these could influence the student’s career. Very good links to concepts covered in other modules. |
Excellent reflection on the skills developed as part of the module, and how these could influence the student’s career. Good links to concepts covered in other modules. |
Very good reflection on the skills developed as part of the module, and how these could influence the student’s career. |
Good reflection on the skills developed as part of the module, but how these could influence the student’s career is not clearly explained. |
Weak reflection on the skills developed as part of the module. Not clearly explained nor linked to the student’s future career. |
Very weak or no reflection on the skills developed as part of the module. Not explained nor linked to the student’s future career. |
|
Structure and presentation |
Outstanding structure, professionally presented. Faultless referencing, spelling and grammar. |
Excellent structure, clearly presented and faultless referencing, spelling and grammar. |
Very good structure and organisation, well presented and on the whole good referencing, spelling and grammar. |
Good structure and organisation with fair presentation: occasional referencing, spelling or grammar lapses. |
Poorly presented with inadequate referencing and mistakes of grammar and spelling. |
Very poorly presented with very poor referencing and mistakes of grammar and spelling throughout. |
Get Professional Support for Your MMM170 Marketing for a better, sustainable world Assignment
Order Assignment Help NowStruggling with your MMM170 Marketing for a better, sustainable world assignment? Get expert guidance from our business marketing assignment help service to make your studies easier and improve your grades. Our team of skilled writers delivers 100% human-written, unique, and easy-to-understand assignments. We also provide a free list of assignment samples examples to help you learn effective writing styles and enhance your work. Choose online assignment help today and achieve academic success with reliable support!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content