CSIP5301_2025_603 Digital Transformation Coursework Brief 2026 | DMU

Module name:

Digital Transformation (DT)

Module code:

CSIP5301_2025_603

Title of the Assessment:

Assignment 1 – Presentations Portfolio

This coursework item is: (delete as appropriate)

Summative

This summative coursework will be marked anonymously: (delete as appropriate)

Yes

The learning outcomes that are assessed by this coursework are:

(i.e. Please see Page 2- Learning Objectives)

This coursework is: (delete as appropriate)

Individual

This coursework constitutes 50% of the overall module mark.

Date Set:

10^th Feb 2025

Date & Time Due (the deadline):

Wed March 25^th ,2026 12:00 - midday

25/03/2026 at 12.00 noon

In accordance with the University Assessment and Feedback Policy, your marked coursework and feedback will be available to you on:

April 20^th 2026

You should normally receive feedback on your coursework within 15 University working days after the formal hand-in date, provided that you have met the submission deadline.

If for any reason this is not forthcoming by the due date your module leader will let you know why and when it can be expected.

When completed you are required to submit your coursework via:

§ Turnitin (Online Submission) ONLY

Late submission of coursework policy:

Late submissions will be processed in accordance with 5. Unauthorised late submission of assessment Please check the regulations carefully to determine what late submission period is allowed for your programme.

“If an assessment is submitted up to 24 hours past the deadline for submission, the mark

for the work will be capped at the pass mark of 50 per cent for postgraduate modules.

If an assessment is submitted more than 24 hours late the work will receive a mark of zero per cent.”

Academic Offences and Bad Academic Practices:

Please ensure you read the section entitled “Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy” and the relevant sections in particular Section 3.4 “Contract Cheating and the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Generated Content”

Tasks to be undertaken:

Explained in assignment brief.

Deliverables to be submitted for assessment:

Explained in assignment brief.

How the work will be marked:

Explained in the assignment brief.

Criteria

0 to 39%

40 to 49%

50 to 59%

60 to 69%

> 70%

Definition of terms and understanding of concepts.

Little evidence understanding. Basic definitions are wrong.

Basic understanding

Overall good. Clear understanding of area and grasp of fundamental concepts.

Very good.

Text demonstrates that students understand the concepts and can create definitions and explanations which unite several sources.

Excellent understanding of concepts and definition. Critical view of subject area, definitions and terminology express a deep understanding.

Progression and completeness of story. Linkage between presentations and with rest of sessions

Little basic understanding of area. No progression. No recognition of other sessions

Some connection between presentations, little connection to other sessions.

Good. Clear links.

Coherent story. Shows reference to other sessions.

Very good. Clear themes and connections between presentations and clear links to other talks.

There is a good sense that this addresses the module as a whole, and not just isolated subjects.

Excellent story told. Clear how the story links together.

Deep insights and clear explanations. Connects to other sessions

Understanding of subject area

Slides lifted from other sources. No explanations or indication of understanding.

Basic, some understanding of the topics, little evidence of reading.

Good. Clear understanding of the subject area, with some evidence of reading around the topics.

Very Good

Good range of reading. Sources and ideas well explained.

Deep understanding of management issues, technology and purpose. Clear expressions of that understanding produces a presentation which will of use to a wide audience.

Critical analysis

No consideration of issues or commentary.

Basic, little attempt made at critical analysis.

Good, clear evidence of critical analysis in each of the presentations, some attempt made to link the topics (slide sets) together.

Very good commentary shows reflection and insight concerning subject matter.

Excellent professional analysis identifies key industry issues and creativity identifies new issues. Clear synthesis of ideas.

Evidence of revision

Nothing done

Some corrections of mistakes.

Expansion and explanation of concepts. New definitions, some rearranging

Clear learning, reflection, and explanations. Very Good

Excellent. Clear improvements
 and reflection which is incorporated into the notes.

Quality of presentation and notes.

Incomplete, many spelling and grammar mistakes. Some slides clearly cut and paste without

concern for understanding.

Basic, poor presentation of both slides and notes

Good

Not too much text on a slide. Clear, readable.

Very Good

Good use of graphics, not just text.

Excellent Highest quality of presentation, very clear slides, well prepared and very well presented.