CS5803 Data Visualisation assessment Coursework for 2025/26 Brunel University london

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 22 Jul, 2026
Category Coursework Subject Computer Science
University Brunel University London Module Title CS5803 Data Visualisation

CS5803 Data Visualisation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Main Objective of the Assessment 
Description of the Assessment
Learning Outcomes and Marking Criteria
Format of the Assessment
Submission Instructions
Avoiding Academic Misconduct
Expectations of Artificial intelligence Use
Late Coursework

Assessment Title

Visualisation Design Task

Module Leader

Dr Timothy Cribbin

Distribution Date

03/07/2026

Submission Deadline

07/08/2026

Feedback by

01/09/2026

Contribution to overall module assessment

100%

Indicative student time working on assessment

60 Hours

Word or Page Limit (if applicable)

Maximum of 3000 Words and 20 pages for Report (not including references)

Assessment Type (individual or group)

Individual

 

Marking Scheme for Final Report and Implementation (100%)

Grade

Marking Criteria

A
Met the requirements for B+ grade. Also met, to a good standard:

  • A* - at least five of these criteria

  • A+ - at least four of these criteria

  • A – at least three of these criteria

  • A- – at least two of these criteria
  • An effective porting of the same design to a different visualisation tool or programming language (e.g. MS Power BI, Shiny or Vega). Where visual or interactive elements vary from the Tableau implementation, these are plausibly explained. An annotated screenshot is included in the report and all files needed to run the project have been submitted.

  • A critical comparative evaluation of the two tools used to implement the design. This discussion focuses on the task in hand rather than being generic in nature. Note this criterion can still be passed even if the second implementation was not completely successful.

  • A reasonable discussion of how HCI/UCD theory, principles or methods were considered/applied to improve the usability or user experience of the dashboard. Relevant works are appropriately cited within the body of the report and the References section.

  • Evidence of further learning and application of some visualisation design knowledge or Tableau skills that significantly exceeds what was taught on this module. Relevant learning resources are appropriately cited within the body of the report and the References section.

  • A useful attempt to apply relevant data modelling into some part of the visualisation pipeline (for e.g. visualising the results of a clustering or factor analysis in some useful way)

  • A credible explanation of how the coordination of multiple views was effectively applied to answer the complex question.

  • The Discussion is highly reflective and demonstrates significant insight into personal learning on the module and identifies at least one future learning objective relating to data visualisation and a credible action plan for this might be achieved.



Met the requirements for C+ grade. Also met, to a good* standard:

  • B+ - at least six of these criteria

  • B – at least four of these criteria

  • B- - at least two of these criteria.

* criteria marked as acceptable (partially met) will count as a half mark. E.g. if two criteria were good and two were acceptable then this would achieve a B- (1+1+0.5+0.5=3).

  • A complex question is presented that is clearly expressed, logically extends at least one of the simple questions and ostensibly requires some degree of interaction with the dashboard to answer.

  • The set requirements closely follow the advised format, specifying the correct variables, relationship, chart type for the given questions and a credible prediction of how the answer might be read from the view. In the case of the complex question, appropriate interactions are also described.

  • A justified explanation of how and why the design was changed during the implementation stage. Reasons might include constraints imposed by the Tableau software, feedback received on an earlier proposal or new ideas that occurred during the implementation process.

  • Some clear discussion, supported by relevant references, of how visualisation theory or best practice was applied during the development process.

  • A repeatable Walkthrough, clearly illustrated using Tableau Story point(s), demonstrating how the simple questions were satisfactorily answered using the Tableau implementation.

  • A repeatable Walkthrough, clearly illustrated using Tableau Story point(s), demonstrating how the complex question was satisfactorily answered using the Tableau implementation.

  • A credible explanation of how an interactive filter/parameter widget was effectively applied to answer the complex question.

  • A Discussion that critically and credibly evaluates of the outcomes and overall success of the project.

C

  • C- - All criteria met to at least an acceptable standard

  • C – As C-, plus at least eight criteria met to a good standard

  • C+ - As above, plus at least twelve criteria have been met to a good standard

    Criteria will be assessed and marked as meeting one of the following thresholds:

  • Good – fully meets this criterion
  • Acceptable – partially meets this criterion

·    Fail – little or no attempt made to meet this criterion

(LO1) The submitted Tableau project …

  • Comprises one interactive dashboard that displays neatly within a screen resolution of 1920x1080 in design and/or presentation mode. All views, filters and legends are visible without scrolling, resizing, or rearranging the dashboard.
  • The implemented dashboard broadly follows the paper landscape presented in the Design section of the report and is generally fit for the purpose of answering the planned questions and verifying key conclusions drawn in the report.
  • The dashboard comprises at least two different chart types
  • The chosen chart types are appropriate choices based on the variables and relationships defined in the requirements.
  • Demonstrates correct visual encoding of variables to chosen charts and overall good presentational practice in the way the views are implemented and arranged on the dashboard.
  • Includes a single Tableau Story sheet comprising at least one relevant story point for each stated question.
  • All project and data files required to run the solution are included in the submitted zip file.
  • Loads and runs without significant remedial action or problem resolution required by the marker.

(LO2) The submitted Report comprises…

  • A clear overview of the dataset describing its provenance (a reference or link to a downloadable source) along with a data dictionary that clearly describes all variables relevant to the final solution.
  • Two or three simple questions that are clearly defined, distinct, and can each be feasibly answered from a single, static chart and the available data. The correct variables and relationship are identified in the requirements section.
  • An annotated design sketch that follows the Paper Landscape format and portrays a hypothetical dashboard that is independent of the capabilities of Tableau, is consistent with the stated requirements and could ostensibly be used to answer the set questions.
  • A screenshot that matches the implemented Tableau dashboard and includes annotations (or a surrounding narrative) which explain changes made since the original Paper Landscape design.
  • A concise and repeatable description of the steps taken to implement the design using Tableau.
    A Conclusion section that clearly summarises the main results of the project and how these were achieved.
  • At least five relevant references cited appropriately, using the Harvard style, in both the body of the report and in full in the References section. At least three of these references are to articles (journal/conference), books or other external academic/professional sources.
  • No more than 3000 words and 20 pages within the main report (excluding references) and the correct section structure as advised in the ‘Format of the Assessment’ section below.

D

Fails to meet one or more C grade criteria

E

Fails to meet three or more C grade criteria

F

Fails to meet five or more C grade criteria spanning both LO1 and LO2

 


































































































FORMAT OF THE ASSESSMENT

This submission will comprise your final report (in both PDF and Word file formats) along with all files required to run your implementation. The PDF will form the main submission with all other files collated into a single archived file (zip or 7z format only) provided as an attachment to the main submission. The report should be prepared as a MS Word file (doc or docx) which should included in the zip file in its original format. The Word and PDF versions of the report should be identical – it is recommended that you create the PDF from within the Word application.

Both the Tableau project file (e.g. twb or twbx) and all data files required to load and run this project should be included in the archived appendix file. If you have created a second implementation, all required files should also be included in the appendix file. It is strongly recommended to save your Tableau project in packaged (twbx) format, as this significantly reduces the likelihood of problems (e.g. missing data or broken file paths) when loading files on another PC. Prior to submission, you are advised to test your zip file by extracting to a different PC with Tableau installed (e.g. a lab PC) and checking that your project opens and runs as expected. The marker will always try their best, but if they are unable to run your solution without errors your work is likely to fail on learning outcome one.

Summarising from the task description above, the final report should contain this section structure:

  • Introduction: A description of the dataset (including source URL) and data dictionary for all variables used, user persona, planned questions and relevant requirements (use the format provided in the Design Exercise in Week 25):
  • Data
  • Persona and questions
  • Requirements
  • Design: You should include both the original prototype design sketch (in Paper Landscape format) and an annotated screenshot of the final implementation. Any changes made during implementation should be clearly highlighted and explained here.
  • Implementation: Describe the steps followed to implement your design using Tableau. This need not be an exhaustive click-by-click tutorial but should be sufficiently detailed to allow a competent user to replicate your solution. If you did a second implementation, provide a brief description (<200 words) that focuses on key differences in the implementation process and outcome.

  • Walkthrough: This should be a clear demonstration of the process you followed to arrive at your final answers and, importantly, what those answers were. This should be illustrated in the report using screenshots from your Tableau Story sheet.

  • Discussion (optional): a discussion that critically evaluates the project as a whole including reflections on your personal learning (during the module and looking forwards) and the relative strengths and limitations of the visualisation tool(s) used.

  • Conclusion: a concise, single paragraph summary of the project objectives (data and set questions), the design choices you made, and the key insights gained from your visualisation.

  • References, a list of sources that you cited throughout the report. This should be presented in Harvard format. Any use of generative AI should also be declared here, including the name of the tool and the prompt(s) used.

Use single line spacing and font size of 10. You are free to add sub-sections within these sections, to improve readability, but do not omit, rename, or change the order of these sections. The main body (excluding cover page and references) of the report should contain no more than 3000 words and 20 pages in length. It is important that you adhere to these limits as any significant excess will result in failure on one of LO2 criteria.

Note that your work will be assessed according to the marking scheme by applying the C grade criteria first, followed by the B criteria and then the A criteria. If you fail any of the C grade criteria you will fail the assessment, regardless of whether your work meets any higher criteria. Therefore, please make sure every C grade criterion has been met before submitting your work.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

You must submit your final report on Wiseflow before 11:00 (GMT/BST) on the indicated date.  You can follow the link to Wiseflow through the module’s section on Blackboard Learn or login in directly at https://uk.wiseflow.net/brunel.

Remember, you need to submit two files to Wiseflow for your final report. The first is a PDF of your report document. The second is a Zip file containing your Word file all and all supporting project and data files which you will submit as an appendix. The name of both files should contain your student ID number and, optionally, the module code. For instance, you might submit your appendix file as 2512345.zip or CS5803_252345.zip.

AVOIDING ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT

Before working on and then submitting your coursework, please ensure that you understand the meaning of plagiarism, collusion, and cheating (including contract cheating) and the seriousness of these offences.  Academic misconduct is serious and being found guilty of it results in penalties that can reduce the class of your degree and may lead to you being expelled from the University.  Information on what constitutes academic misconduct and the potential consequences for students can be found in Senate Regulation 6.
You may also find it useful to read this PowerPoint presentation which explains, in plain English, the different kinds of misconduct, how to avoid (even accidently) committing them, how we detect misconduct, and the common reasons that students give for engaging in such activities.  
If you are experiencing difficulties with any part of your studies, remember there is always help available:

  • Speak to your personal tutor.  If you’re not sure who your tutor is, you can find the information on eVision or you can ask at the Student Hub (studenthub@brunel.ac.uk).

  • The Student Hub can also provide advice on support and welfare issues.

EXPECTATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USE

The University has general guidance on using artificial intelligence in your studies. Whilst AI tools (like ChatGPT or Gemini) may be used for early, formative research and learning, under no circumstances should any AI generated output be pasted unmodified and unattributed into coursework submissions. In other words, AI derived content should be used selectively and appropriately cited in the same way as any other secondary source.

LATE COURSEWORK

The clear expectation is that you will submit your coursework by the submission deadline stated in the study guide. In line with the University’s Coursework Submission Policy (revised in January 2025), coursework submitted up to 48 hours late will be accepted but the penalties set out in the ‘Late Submission’ section of the policy will be applied. Work submitted over 48 hours after the stated deadline will automatically be graded NS (non-submission).

Please refer to the Computer Science student information pages and the Coursework Submission Procedure pages for information on submitting late work, penalties applied and procedures in the case of Extenuating circumstances.

Custom CS5803 Data Visualisation Assessment Help before your Deadline

Get Assignment Help on WhatsApp

Looking for help with your CS5803 Data Visualisation Assessment? This coursework requires you to design and implement an interactive Tableau dashboard, create effective visualisations, answer simple and complex questions using data, and produce a detailed report covering the dataset, persona, requirements, design, implementation, walkthrough, discussion and conclusion. Workingment provides expert Data Visualisation Assignment Help, Computer Science Assignment Help and Assignment Help UK to support you with your CS5803 coursework and assessment requirements.

60-Second Quote

Get Your Free Academic Quote

No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential

Workingment Unique Features

Latest Free Samples for University Students

Online Assignment Help in UK