BS846 L7 Project Planning and Implementation Assessment Brief Sep26 | ULaw

L7 PROJECT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION (PPI)   ASSESSMENT BRIEF

Module Leader: Boriana Maurice 
Key Details and Requirements

Learning outcomes:

1. Gain experience with the tools and techniques needed to plan and deliver a project successfully.
2.  
3. Understand and apply project management theory in the work environment.
4. Be able to discuss the benefits and (importantly) the limitations of current project management theory when applied to a real project.
5. Understand key aspects of project management, such as liaising with stakeholders, risk management, and other project control techniques

Declaration:

By sitting this assessment, I am confirming:

• That I have worked independently on this assessment submission, and I have not worked together with any current or previous student at the University to produce my submission, other than when officially permitted to do so.
• I also confirm the contents of my submission have not been generated by a third party.
• I have fully referenced and correctly cited the work of others, where required.
• I have not used any generative AI tools to generate, rephrase or otherwise produce content for this submission, except where their use was explicitly permitted, and I have read and understood the University's AI in Higher Education Policy and Protocols.
• I have read the Student Discipline Regulations and understand that any academic misconduct can lead to disciplinary consequences and undermine academic integrity.
• I understand that where applicable, I am expected to engage with my academic work in a manner that meets the professional standards and requirements set by the relevant Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Body (PSRB) or accrediting body for my course.
• By submitting this assessment, I am confirming that I am fit to sit according to the Assessment Regulations.

Assessment details: Individual written report, 100% (2,500 words)

Submission Method: Turnitin - Your work will be put through Turnitin. All submissions will be electronically checked for plagiarism. 
You have the option to upload your work ahead of the deadline, more than once. ULBS will be reviewing your last submission only. You can only upload one file. For example, if your work contains a word document and power point slides/Excel spreadsheet you will need to copy your slides/spreadsheet into the word document.

Note: Keep in mind that self-plagiarism (when you reuse your own specific wording and ideas from work that you have previously submitted without referencing yourself) is also a form of plagiarism and is not allowed.

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS

Project Brief

In your capacity as a Project Manager, you have been commissioned to develop a Project Proposal Document in response to the EU Funding and Tender Opportunity 

Project Proposal Structure

The Project Proposal Document should include the following sections:

1. Project Initiation

• Project Title: A clear, outcome-oriented name.
• Overview - Business Case / Justification:

In this section, briefly explain the problem or opportunity the project addresses and its relevance to the BRIDGE funding priorities. You must clearly identify the proposed project consortium, including the lead Small or Medium Enterprise (SME/MSME) applying for the funding and at least two additional partner organisations (for example local authorities, NGOs, academic institutions, industry associations, or other SMEs). All consortium members must be real organisations, and their relevance to the project and expected contribution to project delivery should be briefly explained.

Justify the choice of city and describe the local digital and/or green innovation ecosystem, demonstrating how the project aligns with donor and funder priorities, relevant national and regional strategies, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Clearly identify the primary beneficiaries of the project and articulate the intended long-term economic, social, and environmental benefits, explaining how the project will deliver sustainable impact beyond the funding period.

2. Project Planning

• Project Scope Statement:

Defines what is included and excluded from the project: Cover geographical area, thematic boundaries (e.g., eco-tourism, aquaculture), and time frame.

• Milestones and Timeline (Gantt Chart):

You must provide a visual project schedule in the form of a Gantt Chart that outlines key milestones, deliverables, dependencies, and timelines, clearly indicating responsible teams or partners. Additionally, a detailed Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) must be included in the Appendices, showing the hierarchical breakdown of the project into major work packages, activities, and tasks.

• Budget and Resource Plan:

You are expected to provide cost estimates per activity/output, a clear allocation of resources (e.g., personnel, equipment, training), and an outline of financial control mechanisms. A structured Budget Sheet must be included in the Appendices to support this section. Explain how the SME and its partners will meet the co-financing (match-funding) requirement, clearly identify the sources of matched funding (e.g. own contribution, private investment, in-kind support, or partner contributions) and justify their realism and sustainability.

3. Project Organisation

• Governance Structure and Roles (RACI Matrix):

Definition of project board, project manager, team leaders, and stakeholders. Set a clear structure for collaboration between Small and Medium Enterprise(s) (MSMEs), and the other members of the consortium (e.g. NGOs, academic institutions, local authorities, etc.). Responsibilities should be clearly assigned using the RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) framework.

• Stakeholder Engagement Plan:

Key stakeholders must be identified, their influence analysed, and a targeted communication and feedback strategy outlined to support effective engagement throughout the project lifecycle. The project should demonstrate a critical approach for community engagement and gender inclusion throughout its design and delivery.

4. Quality Standards, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

This section should present a critically informed discussion that reflects appropriate professional project standards, clearly outlining quality measures, appropriate key performance indicators (KPIs), and impact evaluation, supported by relevant theoretical frameworks and in-text academic references.

5. Risk Management Plan

This section should identify, synthesise, and evaluate the key risks associated with the project, including political, operational, environmental, financial, and reputational risks. Your analysis should be presented through a structured Risk Management Plan that includes a risk matrix assessing the probability and potential impact of each risk, as well as clearly defined mitigation and contingency strategies to prevent, reduce, or respond to potential disruptions throughout the project lifecycle.

6. Project Closure and Sustainability

Exit Strategy: You should outline handover mechanisms to local institutions or governments, capacity-building measures to ensure long-term impact and Project closure arrangements.

7. Appendices:

• WBS
• UN SDGs Mapping Matrix
• Any additional analysis or supporting documents—such as stakeholder maps, needs assessments, feasibility studies, or policy alignment matrices—that provide justification for the project scope and contribute to the clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of project planning and implementation.

Theory and Concept applications

Please note that, alongside a structured and professional project plan, this assessment requires critical academic engagement. You should apply relevant project management theories, frameworks, and tools, adapting them where appropriate and acknowledging their limitations. Each section should begin with a brief critical commentary, supported by the University of Law – Harvard style in-text citations, rather than extended theoretical discussion throughout.

Submission Requirements

Your assignment should be compiled into a single document with the following elements:

1.    Cover Page: Include the assignment title and any other essential information.
2.    Table of Contents: Provide a clear outline of the Project Proposal Document’s sections and their corresponding pages. This part does not contribute to the overall word count.
3.    The text of your report should be concise, with a total word count of 2,500 words, allowing a flexibility of +/- 10%.
4.    Appendices: The appendices may contain up to 5 pages of additional material to support the main text.
5.    References: All cited sources should be listed in the University of Law - Harvard (APA7) referencing format in the references section at the end of your assignment.

Note

• Graphics and Data Tables: Text within graphical elements or tables with predominantly numeric data is not included in the total word count.
• File Format: Ensure your completed assignment is saved and submitted as either a DOC/DOCX or PDF file.

Assessment Criteria

This is an academically rigorous postgraduate assessment designed to evaluate both your analytical and professional capabilities. The assessment criteria focus on the proposal’s strategic relevance, depth of critical analysis, and quality of execution. High-performing submissions will demonstrate strong contextual understanding, the ability to critically apply and evaluate project management theories, and the effective use of tools and frameworks in planning and delivery. Academic integrity, clear structure, and consistent use of Harvard referencing are essential. You are expected to support your analysis with relevant academic and professional sources, reflecting both theoretical insight and practical competence in project design.

Please refer to the marking criteria (below) for a breakdown of how the tasks will be marked.

Assessment Criteria