OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

CRN 19763-2510 Leadership and Team Management L7 Module Handbook 2026 | LBU

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 10 Apr, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Management
University Leeds Beckett University (LBU) Module Title Leadership and Team Management

Leadership and Team Management Module Handbook | Leeds Beckett University

Module Aims 

This module concerns itself with the development of critical understanding of the different perspectives underpinning concepts, methodologies and techniques involved in leading and managing teams to deliver successful projects.  

Module Learning Outcomes

1.Comprehensive understanding of theoretical concepts of teams, leadership, motivation, organisational culture, cross-cultural management, organisational problems, conflict and negotiation.
2.Systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights in managing conflict, cultural diversity, communication, ethics, change, and innovation.
3.Apply principles of teams, leadership and motivation, cultural models, of the analysis of conflict in the project and project environment, good communication and barriers to the process, managing knowledge sharing, ethics, managing change and innovation.
4.Develop a synthesis of theoretical constructs in a practical application with respect to common project management problems.

Module Learning Activities 

The module will be delivered through a series of lectures that requires the active participation of students in debating the different issues. 

Communication

The module leader will be communicating with students using MyBeckett announcements function.

You must notify your Course Administrator if you are absent for more than one day (for example for an interview, emergency unforeseen circumstances, or for compassionate leave).  If you are going to apply for mitigation you will need to provide written evidence of the reason for your absence (see Extenuating Circumstances and Mitigation for further information).

Looking Plagiarism Free Answers For Leadership and Team Management Assignment Before Deadline?

Chat with Experts & Get Assignment

Weekly Schedule

Contact Hours

The module is delivered in a blended/hybrid learning mode where there are face to face and independent learning sessions.

There are two scheduled hours in person every week for this module. 

In addition, I’m offering a weekly 1 hour drop-in session for those who’d like extra support, have questions about the material, or simply want to discuss leadership-related topics in a more informal setting. Attendance at these drop-ins is entirely optional—you’re welcome to come along as and when you need!
All disabled students requiring additional support or alternative arrangements must declare and provide evidence of their disability to the Disability Advice Team as early as possible:

www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/studenthub/disability-advice.

Week

Lecture

Details

1

Introduction: psychological contract.  

Introduction to the module and its assessment;  To provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the concept of the psychological contract, its significance in the workplace, and the impact of its breach on employee behaviour and organisational outcomes.

2

Project leadership.

Theoretical concepts underpinning leadership approaches. Consideration of situational variables and their influence on project managers’ behaviour and effectiveness.

3

Team Development and Building

The design of teams. Conflict and negotiation in projects. Causes of conflict. Analysis and solutions to conflict. Sources of influence.

4

Motivating the Project Team

Theoretical concepts and case studies that examines the team dynamics and individual behaviour and the role of project managers in enhancing motivation at individual and group level.

5

Aspects Organisational Culture in projects and project organisations.   

Theoretical models of culture with respect to industrial and client organisations. Introduction to recent research findings on the importance of cross-cultural aspects of project management. Cross-cultural factors and issues in projects and project organisations. Reflective Practice.

6

Organisation structures.

Examine the project life cycle as a problem for project organisation design; Consider the wide range of possibilities when designing project organisation structures.

7

Communications and knowledge sharing.

Theoretical models, issues and approaches to communications in project management are addressed. Cover the importance of knowledge sharing in the context of multicultural teams in local and international projects.

8

Project Management of change.

Identification and management of organisational change induced through the design and execution of projects.

9

Management of project innovation.

Understanding the need for innovation and the role of project managers in promoting innovation. Negotiation theory

 

10

Conflict Management

Understanding the nature of conflict in project management, emphasising its inevitability in team settings and its potential to either hinder or enhance team performance. Identify the sources of conflict, recognising its stages, and applying effective conflict resolution strategies to foster a collaborative environment.

11

Emotional Intelligence

Explore the concept of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and its critical role in effective project management. We examined how EI enables project managers and team members to navigate interpersonal relationships, manage stress, and foster a collaborative work environment.

12

Empowerment of Project Managers

We explore the dimensions of empowerment, its benefits for individuals and organisations, and practical strategies for cultivating an empowering environment. We discuss how empowered team members and leaders drive motivation, innovation, and resilience in projects.

Key Resources to Support Learning

Tutors will be providing further resources throughout the semester.

McKenna, E. (2020). Business Psychology and Organisational Behaviour. 6th ed. Psychology Press.
Baiden, B. and Price, A. (2010). The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29 (2), pp. 129-136
Dulaimi, M. (2007). Case studies on knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. Journal of Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, vol. 14 (6), pp. 550-567.
Dwivedulaa, R., Christophe N. & Bredillet, C. (2010). Profiling work motivation of project workers. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 28 (2), pp. 158-165.
Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. (2000). Building an innovation factory. Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 157-166.
Kotter, J. P. and Schlesinger, L. A. (1979). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 106-114.
Lane, P. L. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, pp. 461-477.
Müller, R. and Turner, R. (2010).  Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 28 (5), July 2010, pp. 437-448.
Mullins, L. J. (2019). Management and organisational behaviour. 12th ed. England: FT/ Prentice Hall. 
Dulaimi, M. and Langford, D. (1999). Job behaviour of construction project managers: determinants and effectiveness. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, July/August.
Hammuda, I. and Dulaimi, M. (1996). Empowering the organisation: a comparative study of different approaches to empowerment. CIB Beijing International conference. 21-24 October. China: CIB.
Hammuda, I. and Dulaimi, M. (1997). The theory and application of empowerment: a comparative study of the different approaches to empowerment in construction, service, and manufacturing industries. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 5 (5), pp. 289-296.
Handy, C. (2005). Understanding organisations. 4th ed. London: Penguin Books.
Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Pettinger, R. (2000). Mastering organisational behaviour. England: Palgrave.
Robbins, S. & Judge, T. (2018). Organisational behaviour. 18th  ed. Boston:  Prentice Hall.

Disability Advice and Support

All disabled students requiring additional support or alternative arrangements must declare and provide evidence of their disability to the Disability Advice Team as early as possible: https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/student-information/disability-advice/.  

Assessment 

Assessment Summary

Please see Assignment Brief for full details.

Assessment 1

You will be working in a group of 4 to develop and submit this report.

Assessment Method:

Consultancy Report

Re-assessment Method:

Consultancy Report

Assignment

A consultancy style report 4500 words – Group Submission (70%)

Assignment

Redo original assignment to a sufficient standard.

Assessment Date and Time:

15th April 2026 @ 16:00 hours

Re-assessment Date and Time:

 6th July 2026 @ 16:00

Feedback Method:

Via MyBeckett

Feedback Method:

Online

Feedback Date:

4 Weeks after submission deadline

Feedback Date:

TBC

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1, 2, 3, 4.

Assessment 2

This is an individual submission. 

Assessment Method:

Reflective Assignment

Re-assessment Method:

Reflective Assignment

Assignment

1500 word reflective assignment - reflecting on a group project or teamwork experience. (30%)

Assignment

Re-do original assignment to a satisfactory standard.

Assessment Date and Time:

29th April 2026 @ 1600 hours

Re-assessment Date and Time:

 6th July 2026 @ 16:00

Feedback Method:

Via MyBeckett

Feedback Method:

Online

Feedback Date:

4 Weeks after submission deadline

Feedback Date:

TBC

Learning Outcomes Assessed:

1, 2, 3, 4.

Assessment Details 

AI NOTICE!

At Leeds Beckett, we recognise that generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, DALL-E or Scholarcy present opportunities for enhancing learning and enabling a more inclusive learning environment.  However, their use could constitute a breach of academic integrity regulations if they are not used responsibly and without authorisation or acknowledgment in your assessed work.  Please see link: https://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/student-information/academic-skills-and-advice/academic-integrity/ for further information.  

PLEASE NOTE – THE USE OF ANY FORM OF AI IS NOT PERMITTED ON THIS MODULE. 

You MUST submit your work through MyBeckett using the link set up by the tutor.  Receipt of your work will be recorded. The file should be a WORD document.

Your "Turnitin assignments" in MyBeckett can be set up so that you can check your assignment yourself as you submit it. This checking is done by creating an "Originality Report".  If this report shows that there are some problems with your work, such as un-cited quotations, you should be able to make corrections and re-submit the work again before the due date. More information about Turnitin is available online here: http://libguides.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/mybeckett/turnitin 

Please note: Tutors will follow up any suspected unfair practice found after the submission date as per University policy. Late penalties will apply as per University Regulations.

Student Instructions for Submission of Coursework 

This module requires you to submit your work online.

You MUST submit your work through MyBeckett using the link set up on My Beckett. Receipt of your work will be recorded.

Your "Turnitin assignments" in MyBeckett can be set up so that you can check your assignment yourself as you submit it. This checking is done by creating a "Similarity Report".  If this report shows that there are some problems with your work, such as un-cited quotations, you should be able to make corrections and re-submit the work again before the due date. More information about Turnitin is available online here: https://libguides.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/it_support/mybeckett/turnitin
Please note: Tutors will follow up any suspected breach of academic honesty found after the submission date as per University policy. Late penalties will apply as per University Regulations.

Instructions to Students

Please read carefully the assessment and grade/marking descriptors overleaf:

Part 1 – Consultancy Report Assignment Rubric 

Criteria

Weighting

Excellent (70–100%)

Very Good (60–69%)

Good (50–59%)

Pass (40–49%)

Fail (<40%)

1. Depth of Theoretical Understanding

30%

Demonstrates exceptional and critical engagement with a wide range of relevant leadership and team development theories. Theories are integrated fluently, showing originality, synthesis, and awareness of current academic debates.

Demonstrates strong critical understanding of relevant theories with clear engagement and appropriate academic depth. Minor gaps in synthesis.

Demonstrates sound understanding of relevant theories, mostly applied appropriately, though analysis may be more descriptive than critical at times.

Demonstrates basic understanding of theories, with limited critical insight. Application may be superficial or inconsistent.

Shows little or no understanding of relevant theories. Inappropriate, minimal, or incorrect use of academic models.

2. Quality of Analysis and Recommendations

30%

Provides insightful, well-structured analysis clearly linking theory to practice. Recommendations are innovative, feasible, and strongly justified, with excellent critical reasoning.

Analysis is clear and well-reasoned, linking theory to practice effectively. Recommendations are feasible and supported by theory.

Analysis is generally logical but may lack depth or integration. Recommendations are appropriate but may be underdeveloped or generic.

Analysis is limited or descriptive, with weak links between theory and recommendations. Feasibility may be questionable.

Analysis is poor or absent. Recommendations are inappropriate, impractical, or unsupported by theory.

3. Application of Knowledge to Context

20%

Demonstrates excellent contextual awareness, applying theory precisely to the chosen project. Shows strong consideration of ethical, cultural, communication, and diversity issues.

Demonstrates good contextual understanding, with appropriate consideration of relevant contextual factors.

Demonstrates adequate application to the project context, though some contextual factors may be overlooked.

Limited contextualisation; application is generic or weakly connected to the specific project.

Fails to apply knowledge to the given context or ignores key contextual considerations.

4. Teamwork, Structure and Referencing

20%

Clear evidence of excellent collaboration, seamless structure, professional presentation, and accurate Harvard referencing throughout. Report reads as a unified consultancy output.

Strong evidence of collaboration and coherent structure. Referencing is mostly accurate with minor errors.

Adequate structure and collaboration evident, though inconsistencies may appear. Some referencing errors present.

Weak structure or uneven contribution. Referencing is inconsistent or poorly applied.

Little evidence of teamwork. Poor structure, presentation, and referencing.

Part 2 Assignment Rubric 

Criteria

Weighting

Excellent (70–100%)

Very Good (60–69%)

Good (50–59%)

Pass (40–49%)

Fail (<40%)

1. Depth of Reflection

30%

Demonstrates exceptional critical self-reflection, integrating emotions, evaluation, and insight. Shows strong self-awareness and learning from experience.

Demonstrates strong reflection with clear evaluation of personal and group performance. Some deeper insights evident.

Reflection is adequate but may lean toward description rather than critical insight.

Reflection is limited, largely descriptive, with minimal critical evaluation.

Little or no meaningful reflection. Lacks self-awareness or insight.

2. Use of Theoretical Frameworks

25%

Reflective framework is applied critically and fluently, with strong integration of relevant theories and academic literature.

Framework and theories are used effectively to support reflection, with minor gaps in depth.

Framework is applied appropriately but analysis may be surface-level or inconsistent.

Minimal or mechanical use of reflective models and theory.

No meaningful use of reflective frameworks or theory.

3. Action Plan

20%

Presents a clear, realistic, and highly actionable plan, strongly linked to reflection and future professional practice.

Action plan is clear and relevant, though may lack some specificity or depth.

Action plan is appropriate but somewhat general or underdeveloped.

Action plan is vague, unrealistic, or weakly connected to reflection.

No clear action plan or future focus.

4. Structure and Clarity

15%

Excellent structure following the reflective framework. Writing is clear, coherent, and logically sequenced throughout.

Well-structured and clearly written with minor lapses in flow.

Structure is generally clear, though sections may be uneven or repetitive.

Weak structure; ideas may be unclear or poorly organised.

Disorganised, unclear, or difficult to follow.

5. Academic Writing and Referencing

10%

Writing is professional, fluent, and scholarly. Harvard referencing is accurate and consistent.

Academic tone maintained with minor referencing errors.

Generally appropriate academic writing, though some errors in style or referencing.

Frequent errors in academic writing and referencing.

Inappropriate academic style; referencing is absent or incorrect.

Achieve Higher Grades of Leadership and Team Management Assignment & Raise Your Grades

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

At Workingment, we offer tailored support for students tackling Leadership and Team Management at Leeds Beckett University (CRN: 19763-2510). This course emphasizes strategic leadership, team dynamics, and practical management techniques essential for organisational success. Our Management Assignment Help ensures your assignments are accurate, insightful, and professionally presented. With Assignment Help UK services and a Free List of Leeds Beckett University Assignment Samples Answers, we guide you step by step toward academic excellence. Trust Workingment for high-quality, timely assistance that enhances learning outcomes and strengthens your leadership capabilities.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

EAL L3 Eng AUEC3-003 Working efficiently and effectively in advanced manufacturing and engineering Assignment Answers

Category: Assignment

Subject: Engineering

University: EAL Level 3 Diploma in Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering – Technical Support Technician

Module Title: EAL Level 3 AUEC3-003 Working efficiently and effectively in advanced manufacturing and engineering

View Free Samples

QUALIFI L5 BUS503 Business Development Assignment

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business Management

University: Qualifi

Module Title: BUS503- Business Development

View Free Samples

CII M92 – Insurance business and finance Coursework Assignment Answers

Category: CII Assignments

Subject: business

University: _______

Module Title: CII M92 – Insurance business and finance

View Free Samples

ECE5004 Professional Practicum 1: Early Childhood Education and Care Practicum Report Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Healthcare

University: New Zealand School of Education

Module Title: ECE5004 Professional Practicum 1: Early Childhood Education and Care

View Free Samples

BSBWHS414 Contribute to WHS Risk Management Assessment Answers Solution PDF

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: _____

Module Title: BSBWHS414 Contribute to WHS Risk Management

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK