Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Managment |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Oxford Brookes University (OBU) | Module Title | HOTO6005 Leadership & Professional Development in Tourism & Hospitality |
| Word Count | 2,000 words +/- 10% |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Individual written essay |
| Academic Year | 2026/27 |
|
Type of assessment: |
Essay |
|
Individual or group: |
Individual |
|
Component weighting: |
Contributes 40% of the total module grade |
|
Learning outcomes assessed |
1 |
|
Submission date: |
Friday, 19 December |
|
Feedback date: |
[1pm, WEEK 13 - Semester 1] |
To demonstrate that the module learning outcomes detailed above have been achieved, you are required to prepare and submit the following.
ESSAY TITLE: "Effective leading for customer experience: Critically evaluating the strategic role of effective leadership in shaping guest satisfaction in International Hospitality and Tourism Industries (IHTI) through employees, with reference to a contemporary industry role model"
SUMMARY TASK: Individual written essay, 2,000 words +/- 10% excludes Ref List
This essay invites students to critically examine how effective leadership contributes to guest satisfaction within international hospitality and/or tourism settings through their employees (or ‘followers’), while also considering the strategic responsibilities that leaders hold in aligning customer experience with broader strategic organisational goals such as brand reputation, profitability, and sustainability.
The following elements are expected to be specifically included:
To mark your assessment your tutors will use the following assessment criteria,
|
Weighting |
Level 6 educational learning: The skills and competencies required for success |
|
40% |
Evidence-based theoretical comprehension: Demonstrate a systematic understanding of leadership academic theories, concepts, and models and your ability to deploy critical evaluation skills: ✔ a systematic understanding of key aspects of Leadership Studies, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline. ✔ an ability to deploy accurately established techniques of analysis and enquiry ✔ conceptual understanding that enables the student: o to devise and sustain arguments, and/or to solve problems, using ideas and techniques, some of which are at the forefront of a discipline o to describe and comment upon particular aspects of current research, or equivalent advanced scholarship, in the discipline ✔ an appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge ✔ the ability to manage your own learning, and to make use of scholarly reviews and primary sources (for example, refereed research articles and/or original materials appropriate to the discipline). |
|
40% |
Applying theory to practice: . ✔ critically evaluate arguments, assumptions, abstract concepts and data (that may be incomplete), to make judgements, and to frame appropriate questions to achieve a solution - or identify a range of solutions - to frame effective leadership practice |
|
20% |
Communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist and non-specialist audiences ✔ A professionally produced and presented ESSAY, with a logical structure. ✔ Using academic language and communication skills, including excellent grammar, spelling and punctuation. ✔ The essay should contain page numbers. |
|
|
Apply academic study skills methods and techniques that you have learned to ✔ Research skills: to review, consolidate, extend and apply your knowledge and understanding, and to initiate and carry out this task ✔ Critical reading skills: a deep and broad range of academic, peer-reviewed (both generic industry and IHTI-specific) literature and valid/reliable market data sources (as appropriate/relevant). ✔ Academic integrity: Your work must conform to Harvard referencing for in-text citations and presentation of Reference List and aligns with academic integrity regulations. |
Are You Looking Answer for HOTO6005 Coursework 1: CW#1 Individual Leadership Essay?
Request to Buy AnswerYour assignment when submitted should not include your name – we use a system of anonymous marking to reduce the risk of any unconscious bias. For some authentic assessments, there may be an exception to this, so please confirm with your Module Leader.
The authentic and essential requirements for this piece of assessed work are listed below. These requirements form part of your professional and skills development to produce high quality and professional-looking documents, as required in business.
Whilst we acknowledge that learners will prepare and produce assessments in different ways and at different paces, an indication as to how much time it will take you to prepare, produce, edit and submit this assessment is detailed below. Words/pages that exceed the maximum allowed (see table below) will not be marked. If in doubt, you should discuss this with the Module Leader before submission
Once the submission date has passed your module tutors will begin to mark your work. There are a number of phases to this which ensure fairness is maintained across the whole team including a pre-marking calibration meeting, marking and post-marking internal moderation of grades. Following internal moderation, a sample of work is reviewed by the External Examiner for the programme to ensure that the standards applied are comparable to those at other institutions. To read how your work is moderated please go to your programme handbook for details.
Feedback on your work will be provided in a range of ways at various times throughout this module, and different feedback will serve slightly different purposes. Feedback is designed to support your learning and help you to improve subsequent work, so you need to engage and get the most out of the feedback provided.
Please note that feedback is provided throughout the module not just on formally assessed tasks. It will be provided on your work and contribution in class, on the formal assessment tasks and, in some circumstances, during student office hours.
If you would like further information about feedback, or how to use it, please talk to your academic tutor on this module or your Academic Adviser or Programme Lead.
|
Assessment Criteria |
Refer 0-29% |
Marginal Refer 30-39% |
Threshold Pass 40-49% |
Good 50-59% |
Very Good 60-69% |
Excellent 70-84% |
Outstanding 85-100% |
|
A) Theoretical Comprehension (40%) |
Little or no understanding of relevant taught IHTI /Leadership Studies theories, nor UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); major inaccuracies. Descriptive and irrelevant understanding of materials and task. |
Basic awareness of taught IHTI /Leadership Studies theory, and UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); lacks depth and accuracy. Basic ability to describe arguments and counter-arguments using very limited sources.
|
Some understanding of key taught IHTI /Leadership Studies concepts, and UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); ; limited critical insight. Selection of some relevant material, may not be used accurately; limited range of ideas, poorly framed. |
Good understanding of taught IHTI /Leadership Studies theory, or UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); some critical engagement. Evidence of good relevant materials, applied appropriately forming suitable ideas and arguments. |
Very good taught IHTI /Leadership Studies theoretical understanding, and UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); clear critical analysis. Applies very good relevant IHTI theories, concepts and models with precision and insight. Constructs clear, coherent, and persuasive arguments. |
Excellent grasp of taught IHTI /Leadership Studies theory, and UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); insightful and critical evaluation. Applies relevant theories, models, and concepts with high precision and rich insight. Shows depth of understanding and originality in interpretation. |
Exception/outstanding theoretical insight of taught IHTI /Leadership Studies evidence, and UN Strategic Development Goals (SDGs); ; original and sophisticated critique. Applies relevant theories, models, and concepts with exceptional/outstanding precision and insight. Evidences independent inquiry far beyond prescribed materials. |
|
B) Applying theory to practice (40%) |
No meaningful application to practice; lacks relevance. Little or no use of contemporary IHTI leader, or link to IHTI. |
Weak or inappropriate application of theory; minimal relevance to practice. Weak or inappropriate use of a chosen IHTI leader, or inappropriate leader/s selected. |
Attempts to apply theory to practice; lacks consistency or depth. Weak or inappropriate use real IHTI leader and data to illustrate effective leadership. |
Good, reasonable application to practice; examples may lack sophistication. Good analysis of real IHTI leader(s) and some industry data to illustrate effective leadership. |
Very good, effective and relevant application to practice; good use of examples. Very good analysis of real IHTI leader and use of a range of industry data to illustrate effective leadership. |
Strong integration of theory and practice; examples are well-chosen and analysed. Excellent evaluation of real IHTI leader and wide range of industry data to illustrate effective leadership |
Exceptional application to practice; nuanced and innovative analysis. Exceptional to outstanding evaluation of real IHTI leader and very wide range of industry data to illustrate effective leadership. |
|
C) Communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions to both specialist and non-specialist audiences D) Apply academic study skills methods and techniques (20%) |
Ideas are unclear, disorganised, or incoherent. |
Limited clarity; poor structure and flow. |
Communicates basic ideas; structure is present but underdeveloped. |
Ideas are good and mostly clear; structure and argument are generally coherent. |
Very good, clear, well-structured argument; ideas communicated effectively. |
Highly articulate and coherent; persuasive argumentation. |
Exceptionally clear, engaging, and scholarly communication. |
|
|
No or little (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; poor academic skills. No or little use of sources or Reading List. |
Inconsistent or incorrect (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; limited use of sources or Reading List. |
Basic (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; some use of academic sources or Reading List. |
Good, mostly accurate (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; use of relevant sources or Reading List. |
Very good, accurate (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; wide range of appropriate sources or Reading List. |
Excellent (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; extensive and independent research or Reading List. |
Exemplary (Brookes’ Harvard) referencing; deep and wide-ranging independent research and use of Reading List, including SDGs integration. |
Get Professional Support for Your HOTO6005 Coursework 1: CW#1 Individual Leadership Essay
Order Assignment Help NowDo you need help with your HOTO6005 Leadership & Professional Development in Tourism & Hospitality assignment? Our expert Tourism & Hospitality Assignment Help is tailored for UK students, delivering high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free content. Get trusted Assignment Help UK for your CW#1 Individual Leadership Essay with clear structure and strong academic insight. Access a Free List of Assignment Samples Answers to guide your work and boost your confidence. Achieve better grades with professionally written content that meets university standards and strengthens your leadership knowledge in hospitality and tourism.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content