UK's No.1 Assignment Help, Trusted Since 2018
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Dissertation | Subject | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Warwick | Module Title | ES97N-60 Project Dissertation |
| Word Count | 10000 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Title | Written Final Technical Report |
| Academic Year | 2026 |
| Intended Learning Outcome(s) (ILOs) | Criterion |
|---|---|
| Display enhanced knowledge and understanding of scientific principles of the engineering topic of their individual project. [M1, M2] | Literature and Subject Knowledge |
| Apply advanced engineering knowledge to problems efficiently and effectively. [M1, M2] | Argumentation and Discussion of Findings |
| Exhibit critical awareness of the state of the art and current developments in the field of the project. [M1,M4] | Literature and Subject Knowledge |
| Design a solution to solve a complex problem taking account of: user/stakeholder needs and requirements, diversity/inclusion, health and safety, and commercial & environmental impact for the whole lifecycle [M5, M7] | Methodology and Project Design |
| Comprehensively analyse and assess results and communicate the feasibility of implementation with technical and non-technical audiences [M17] | Argumentation and Discussion of Findings, Presentation and layout of dissertation |
| Demonstrate experience of conducting and reporting on a piece of ‘original’ individual research or ‘innovative’ design work, including critical evaluation against available technical literature. [M4, M17] | Methodology and Project Design Presentation and layout of the dissertation |
| Demonstrate experience of working effectively both as an individual and within the context of a team with a supervisor, taking responsibility for evaluating performance. [M16] | Conclusions and Future Work |
Notes:-
The submission details for this assignment are:
Note: Submissions should be of an appropriate file size, and students are responsible for ensuring that their work is uploaded successfully before the deadline. If there are technical issues when submitting online, please contact the Engineering Student Office (eng.eso@warwick.ac.uk).
Briefing for the Written Final Technical Report (60% of the project)
Description:
Your individual project is a key element of your MSc, as described in the Project Handbook. The central expectation of the ES97N project is:
To demonstrate that the student has independently contributed primary data and/or a new analysis of secondary data, within their chosen advanced research topic. Projects will be highly variable in nature to reflect the range of topics within the programmes of study, but all will provide students with an opportunity to achieve the learning outcomes. Thus, projects may entail experimentation, modelling, analysis and literary survey skills to develop advanced skills in the discovery and occasionally creation of new knowledge. The module also offers the chance for students to pursue curiosity-driven work guided by an academic supervisor.
It is not an expectation of an MSc project that the work leads to new results or that the results are worthy of publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The project must, however, involve sufficiently advanced-level methods and techniques that are appropriately applied. Students should conduct a detailed analysis of the results and draw valid conclusions. A detailed understanding of the methods/techniques must be in evidence from the dissertation.
The final written technical report is the main component for assessing the ES97N module. The Project Handbook provides detailed information about the dissertation format.
Assessment:
The evaluated learning outcomes are:
1. Display enhanced knowledge and understanding of scientific principles of the engineering topic of their individual project. [M1, M2]
2. Apply advanced engineering knowledge to problems efficiently and effectively. [M1, M2]
3. Exhibit critical awareness of the state of the art and current developments in the field of the
project. [M1,M4]
4. Design a solution to solve a complex problem taking account of: user/stakeholder needs and requirements, diversity/inclusion, health and safety, and commercial & environmental impact for the whole lifecycle. [M5, M7]
5. Comprehensively analyse and assess results and communicate feasibility of implementation with technical and non-technical audiences. [M17]
6. Demonstrate experience of conducting and reporting on a piece of ‘original’ individual research or ‘innovative’ design work including critical evaluation against available technical literature. [M4, M17]
7. Demonstrate experience of working effectively both as an individual and within the context of a team with supervisor, taking responsibility for evaluating performance. [M16]
Three academics are involved in the assessment process. These usually are your supervisor (first assessor), a second assessor (another academic with knowledge of the topic and project supervision) and a moderator (a member of the School of Engineering). Double-blind marking is used as the moderating process.
The two Assessors mark the submission independently of each other, and you should keep this in mind when writing your dissertation, i.e. you should not assume the reader is as familiar with your project as your Supervisor is.
The two Assessors mark out of 100. The overall mark from each Assessor is equal to the sum of marks allocated to several different components as described in the marking scheme. Before the viva, both assessors will have read and marked the dissertation.
The Moderator's main task is to independently combine the Assessors’ marks to achieve a mark that fairly and accurately reflects your performance. This mark is then agreed and recorded (which may be an average).
Each criterion is marked out of 100%, with the relative weight in the final mark below.
The marking criteria are shown in the following table.
| Mark (%) | Literature and subject Knowledge (20 marks) | Methodology and Project Design (30 marks) | Argumentation and Discussion of Finding (30 marks)s | Conclusions and Future Work (10 marks) | Presentation and layout of dissertation (10 marks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distinction | |||||
| 80-100 | Outstanding subject knowledge. Extremely comprehensive and thorough critical analysis of secondary sources providing clear support & rationale for the investigation. Comprehensive and critical debate of the subject area themes identified in the analysis of the literature. Extensive bibliography/reference list including entirely credible sources. Referencing clear, highly relevant, and entirely accurate. | Imaginative, rigorous, very well-constructed and critically informed research design. Methods are clearly and effectively justified. Innovative techniques, methods and/or materials used. Evidence of a full understanding of the possibilities and limitations of the project. Interdisciplinarity and wider context of project are comprehensively considered. | Compelling argumentation throughout, underpinned by an original, strongly presented central aim/thesis. Detailed and illuminative presentation of data and findings to support overarching arguments and solutions (where relevant). | Evidence of a rigorous, high level of analysis and evaluation that thoroughly explores the topic resulting in judgement based upon evidence that may lead to new insight. Persuasive, well-articulated conclusion clearly linked to the project's question(s), aim(s)s and/or objective(s), with comprehensive recommendations | Fluent and proficient writing style to a professional/academic/technical audience. Excellent clarity of expression and accuracy. Excellent use of figures, graphs and tables to support data analysis. Explicit and logical structure and organisation designed to maximise the development of ideas. |
| 70-79 | Outstanding subject knowledge. Extremely comprehensive and thorough critical analysis of secondary sources providing clear support & rationale for the investigation. Comprehensive and critical debate of the subject area themes identified in the analysis of the literature. Extensive bibliography/reference list including entirely credible sources. Referencing clear, highly relevant, and entirely accurate. | Imaginative, rigorous, very well-constructed and critically informed research design. Methods are clearly and effectively justified. Innovative techniques, methods and/or materials used. Evidence of a full understanding of the possibilities and limitations of the project. Interdisciplinarity and wider context of project are comprehensively considered. | Compelling argumentation throughout, underpinned by an original, strongly presented central aim/thesis. Detailed and illuminative presentation of data and findings to support overarching arguments and solutions (where relevant). | Evidence of a rigorous, high level of analysis and evaluation that thoroughly explores the topic resulting in judgement based upon evidence that may lead to new insight. Persuasive, well-articulated conclusion clearly linked to the project's question(s), aim(s)s and/or objective(s), with comprehensive recommendations | Fluent and proficient writing style to a professional/academic/technical audience. Excellent clarity of expression and accuracy. Excellent use of figures, graphs and tables to support data analysis. Explicit and logical structure and organisation designed to maximise the development of ideas. |
| Merit | |||||
| 65-69 | Very good subject knowledge demonstrated. Comprehensive, critical analysis of the secondary sources with implications for investigation drawn out. Effective debate and discussion of the subject | Well-constructed and informed research design. Methods well-justified. Innovative techniques, methods and/or materials are generally used. Evidence of a broad understanding of the possibilities and | Argumentation well-evidenced throughout, underpinned by a clear central aim/thesis. Clear and appropriate presentation of data and findings to support overarching | Evidence of a depth of analysis and evaluation that explores the topic, resulting in well-articulated judgements. Convincing conclusion is | Effective writing style to a professional/academic/technical audience. Very good and consistent use of figures, graphs and tables to support data analysis. Ideas are clearly expressed. Organisation and structure are presented in a way that |
| 60-64 | area themes identified in the literature analysis. Referencing relevant and mostly accurate and consistent. Wide-ranging bibliography/reference list including mostly credible sources. | limitations of the project. Interdisciplinarity and wider context of project are effectively considered. | arguments and solutions (where relevant). | effectively linked to the project's question(s), aim(s) and/or objectives, with well-defined recommendations. | facilitates the development of ideas. |
| Pass 55-59 | |||||
| 50-54 | Sufficient subject knowledge demonstrated. Key secondary sources analysed with a general link to the investigation. Adequate rationale for project demonstrated. Key themes relevant to the study identified and satisfactory analysis of the literature presented. Bibliography/reference list contains an appropriate level of relevant and credible sources. Referencing errors evident but of a minor nature.. | Adequate, generally informed research design. Methods are sufficiently justified. Innovative techniques, methods and/or materials are satisfactorily used. Evidence of necessary understanding of the possibilities and limitations of the project. Interdisciplinarity and wider context of project adequately considered. | Evidence of argumentation throughout, which is satisfactorily linked to a central aim/thesis. Adequate presentation of data and findings to support overarching arguments and solutions (where relevant). | Evidence of a satisfactory level of analysis and evaluation that reasonably and sufficiently explores the topic, resulting in appropriate judgements. Conclusion is linked to the project’s question(s), aim(s) and/or objective(s), with adequate recommendations made | Writing style mainly fluent and accurate, with minor errors; work is coherent.. Ideas are adequately expressed. Structure is fairly clear, but the material could be organised more effectively. Consistent and adequate quality of figures, graphs and tables, with only a few minor issues. |
| Insufficient for MSc | |||||
| 40-49 | Superficial level of subject knowledge demonstrated. Limited analysis of secondary sources. Limited rationale provided for the project. Links to the investigation may be superficial or insubstantial. Bibliography/reference list contains a limited range of relevant and credible academic sources. Referencing present but with major inconsistencies/ inaccuracies (academic practice issues seen throughout). | Flawed research design which is acknowledged, and appropriate alternatives suggested and discussed. Techniques, methods and/or materials are irrelevant and/or not innovative in nature. Minimal acknowledgement of possibilities and limitations of the project proposed. Interdisciplinarity and wider context of project insufficiently considered. | Gaps in argumentation throughout, including their links to a central aim/thesis. Some findings presented clearly, but not consistently. May include omissions. Overarching arguments and solutions (where relevant) are not sufficiently supported by the data | Some evidence of analysis and/or evaluation to support ideas. Judgements relatively unclear. Conclusion is not fully connected to the project’s question(s), aim(s), and/or objective(s). Recommendations are made, though not fully developed | Writing style is not always fluent or coherent, but meaning is generally apparent. Ideas are expressed, however, with difficulty. Includes accuracy issues with significant errors. Some organisation of material/ structure evident. The quality of figures, graphs and tables is not consistent. |
| Fail | |||||
| 0-39 | Insufficient level of subject knowledge. Inadequate or no visible use of secondary sources. No rationale was provided for the project. Insufficient or no evidence of ability to construct meaning or linkages to the investigation. Outcomes of the study are not related to the sources. No bibliography/reference list, or bibliography/reference list contains very limited or inappropriate sources. | Flawed research design where the flaws are not recognised and/or there is no justification of the appropriateness of the approach in relation to the topic. Techniques, methods and/or materials are entirely insufficient and/or inappropriate. No acknowledgement of the possibilities and limitations of the project is proposed. Interdisciplinarity and the wider context of the project are not considered. | Lacks argumentation throughout. Unclear links made to a central aim/thesis. Findings are inadequately presented. Omissions significantly impact the quality of the project. Overarching arguments and solutions (where relevant) are not supported by any data. | Minimal/no evidence of analysis to support ideas, and minimal/no links between ideas. The conclusion is limited and not linked to the research question or objectives. (Or conclusion is omitted entirely), No recommendations for further research. Zero: No submission | Unclear writing style, serious accuracy issues. Difficult to identify a coherent structure. Significant organisational problems present. Very poor-quality figures, graphs and tables. Zero: No submission. Referencing has major inconsistencies/ errors or is absent. (Significant academic practice issues). Zero: No submission Zero: No submission Zero: No submission |
Order Custom Answer for ES97N-60 Project Dissertation
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentNeed expert help with your ES97N-60 Project Dissertation? We provide AI-free and plagiarism-free Assignment Help. Our team of professional writers delivers top-quality assignments that are original and crafted without AI tools, ensuring the highest academic standards. We also offer a free list of dissertation samples and answers, written by experts, to guide your work. Get your assignment checked with an AI and plagiarism report for complete peace of mind. Contact us today for reliable, expert assignment help in the UK and boost your grades!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
