OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Module Handbook 2026 | MDX Dubai

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 01 May, 2026
Category Dissertation Subject Management
University Middlesex University Dubai Module Title MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age
Academic Year 2026

You Can See the related Solution of this brief:- Marketing Assignment Examples
MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age

MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Module Handbook 

Module overview

a. Module narrative
 
Aims:
 
This module is designed to equip you with a comprehensive understanding of marketing management within the evolving digital landscape. It emphasises the creation and implementation of sustainable marketing strategies that enable businesses, both in B2B and B2C contexts, to achieve a competitive edge. Through a strategic and managerial lens, the course delves into the importance of customer-centric approaches in navigating the complexities of rapidly changing digital environments and fostering organisational growth.
 
Learning outcomes:
 
Knowledge
 
On completion of this module, the successful student will be able to:
 
1. Analyse and critically appraise the evolving role of marketing in the digital era, utilising diverse analytical tools to extract market insights and assess the strategic value of organisational resources and competencies.
 
2. Evaluate strategic and tactical alternatives for creating market value through a comprehensive analysis of market trends, external factors, competitive intelligence, and internal organisational dynamics.
 
Skills
 
This module will call for the successful student to demonstrate the ability to:
 
3. Integrate and apply strategic marketing frameworks, concepts, and theories to develop problem-solving solutions, ensuring logical consistency and the support of conclusions with relevant data.
 
4. Plan and manage the necessary resources for implementing chosen strategies, focusing on the development and maintenance of core organisational capabilities and expertise.
 
Syllabus:
  • Holistic Marketing Management and Customer Orientation
  • The Role of the Marketing Manager
  • Marketing Research Techniques
  • Analysing Consumer Markets and Behaviour
  • Digital Marketing
  • Global Brand Management Strategies
  • Strategic Marketing Communications
  • Utilising Marketing Metrics for Decision Making
Learning and teaching strategy:
 
This module carries 20 credit points, which means students are expected to engage with 200 hours of notional student learning time comprised broadly of teaching time, independent study, assessment and feedback. The module will have 48 contact hours delivered via interactive lectures and workshops, using a student-centred, active learning-based pedagogy. The remaining 152 hours will be for personal study time, where students will have weekly reading and tasks to prepare for formative exercises - an integral component of the module design. Students will be expected to engage in independent self-study activities to support their learning and to achieve success in module summative assessments.
 
All classes will be taught in person, face-to-face and on campus.
 
Today it is critical that MBA students develop a deep understanding of "real-world" practice. This is part of their socialisation to the marketplace and provides them with a sense of what will be expected after earning their degrees. The course is designed to probe deeply into both marketing management fundamentals and current practice. To achieve this, there will be a blend of readings, cases, and in-class and virtual exercises that will provide insight into specific marketing management issues.
 
Our class sessions are built around a framework that gives students an actionable tool to address current issues in marketing management. As the course progresses, students will need to analyse changes in the market environment, to anticipate actions of competitors, and to evaluate various areas of marketing activities that focus on the challenge of successfully developing customer demand for new market opportunities and sustaining growth in today's dynamic marketing environments.
 
Additionally, the module will be supported by a comprehensive virtual learning environment. This will host a range of additional resources for independent study, enabling students to engage with the academic rigour of the marketing discipline and to understand the application of theory to practice. MyMDX and other digital learning tools will be incorporated as tools to enhance 'e-learning' but will not be a substitute for in-person attendance.

Research Ethics

The teaching, learning, assessment and research activities undertaken in this module have been considered and are not likely to require ethical approval.
 
However, please seek advice if undertaking the module entails carrying out any research activities involving human participants, human data, animals/animal products, precious artefacts, materials or data systems or social media. If you submit work that includes data gathered from or about people, this may be treated as academic misconduct and could lead to fail grade being awarded.
 
Research ethics approval seeks to ensure all research is designed and undertaken according to certain principles of ethical research. These include:
 
  • Primary concern must be given to the safety, welfare and dignity of participants, researchers, colleagues, the environment and the wider community
  • Consideration of risks should be undertaken before research commences with the aim of minimising risks to those involved – i.e. human participants or animal subjects, colleagues, the environment and the wider community, as well as actual or potential risks to those directly or indirectly affected by the research.
  • Informed consent should be freely given by participants, and only by a trained person when collecting or analysing human tissue.
  • Respect for the privacy, confidentiality and anonymity of participants
  • Consideration of the rights of people who may be vulnerable (by virtue of perceived or actual differences in their age, social status, ethnic origin, gender, mental capacities, or other such characteristics) who may be less competent or able to refuse to give consent to participate
  • For participants below the age of 18, parental consent must be obtained before the study.
  • Researchers have a responsibility to the general public and to their profession; as such, they should balance the anticipated benefits of their research against potential harm, misuse or abuse, which must be avoided
  • Researchers must demonstrate the highest standards of ethical conduct and research integrity. They must work within the limits of their skills, training and experience, and refrain from exploitation, dishonesty, plagiarism, infringement of intellectual property rights and the fabrication of research results. They should declare any actual or potential conflicts of interest, and where necessary, take steps to resolve them.
  • When using human tissues for research, the UK’s Human Tissue Act and Human Tissue Authority (HTA) requirements must be met. Please contact the relevant designated person (DP) in your department or the HTA Designated Individual (DI).
  • Research should not involve any illegal activity, and researchers must comply with all relevant laws
You can apply for research ethical approval using the Middlesex University Dubai Ethics Form. The relevant forms, templates and guidance on the approval process can be obtained from the module folder on MyMDX.
 
Your module leader can provide further guidance. Additionally, documents can be found through the following link: https://bit.ly/35Zp7MZ.

Learning resources

The module will be supported by Middlesex University's online learning environment (MyMDX) as well as book and journal resources in the library and on the web.
 
The following represent indicative reading for this module:
 
a. Essential (students are obliged to purchase):
  • Kotler, P., Keller, K., Chernev, A. (2022). Marketing Management, Global Edition. 16th edition.
Harlow: Pearson.
 
[e-Book available: https://mdx.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/44MUN_INST/8vndsc/alma661003425616504781]
 
b. Recommended:
  • Tuten, T. (2024). Principles of Marketing for a Digital Age. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H. and Setiawan, I., (2023) Marketing 6.0: The Future is Immersive. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[e-Book available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mdx/detail.action?docID=30666452]
 
Recommended academic journals:
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
  • European Journal of Marketing
  • International Journal of Advertising
  • International Journal of Consumer Studies
  • Journal of Advertising
  • Journal of Advertising Research
  • Journal of Brand Management
  • Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
  • Journal of Consumer Behaviour
  • Journal of Consumer Marketing
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Journal of Consumer Research
  • Journal of Interactive Marketing
  • Journal of Marketing
  • Journal of Marketing Communications
  • Journal of Product and Brand Management
  • Journal of Retailing
  • Journal of Service Research
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Marketing Management
  • Marketing Science
  • Psychology G Marketing
For a detailed Library Guide on Middlesex electronic resources, visit: http://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/Marketing_Dubai.

Assessment

The assessment scheme for this course is designed to evaluate your understanding of the course material and your ability to apply it to real-world scenarios. The assessment strategy combines formative and summative assessments to provide you with opportunities for feedback and growth throughout the course. This approach will help you develop your critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills, which are essential for success in the field of marketing management.
 
a. Formative assessment
 
Formative assessments help show you and us that you are learning and understanding the material covered in this course and allow us to monitor your progress towards achieving the learning outcomes for the module. Although formative assessments do not directly contribute to the overall module mark, they do provide an important opportunity to receive feedback on your learning.
 
Formative assessment consists of faculty member and peer feedback on in-class activities, quizzes with immediate feedback, and online discussions.
 
b. Summative assessment
 
Summative assessment is used to check the level of learning on the course. It is summative because it is based on accumulated learning during the course. The point is to ensure that students have met the learning outcomes for the course and are at the appropriate level. It is the summative assessment that determines the grade that you are awarded for the module.
 
Assessment Overview

Module Code Module Title Total Credits Assessment Components Pass Requirement
MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age 20 Individual Marketing Consultancy Report (100%) Minimum 40% Overall (MU Grade 16)
 
The table below specifies the associated deadlines:

Summative assessment Weighting Deadline for Cohort starting Week 1 Word Count/Format
In-Class Activities (to be included in the Appendix section of the Marketing Consultancy Report) 30% Draft for formative feedback to be submitted within 24 hours of the session. Final submission on 17 March 2026 (to be included in the Appendix Section of the Marketing Consultancy Report) Format will be discussed in class. Templates available on MyLearning
Marketing Consultancy Report 70% 17 March 2026 2356 hrs UAE Time 2,500 words(+/- 10%)
To pass this module, you need to pass all assessment tasks with a minimum MU grade of 16 or equivalent.
 
Before you submit your work for final grading, please ensure that you have accurately referenced the work. It is your responsibility to check spelling and grammar, as all written assessments will assess technical proficiency in English.
 
This means accurate and effective spelling, punctuation and grammar. Details of how it will be assessed will be provided in the marking criteria for each assessment and the University overall approach can be found within the Grade Criteria Guide in the University Regulations https://www.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/policies (scroll to university regulations)
Reasonable adjustments will be made for those students who have a declared disability/specific learning condition which would affect performance in this area.
 
If you have submitted a formative or draft assessment, you will receive feedback but no grade. The comments should inform you about how well you have done or tell you about the areas for improvement. All assignments should be submitted online unless specified in the assessment briefs.
 
Reassessment for this module normally takes place in the following way: If students fail the module (fail grades are 17, 18, 16, 20 with an overall mark between 0% and 36%) they are eligible for a re-sit. Students will be re-examined in the assessed component(s), which they have failed (please note that this can be a different assessment task). Information on what element to re-sit will be made available on the module’s MyMDX site approximately two weeks after the module results have been published on MyMDX. Reassessment will take place in June/July/August.
 
Normally you would be entitled to only one reassessment opportunity if you don’t pass at first attempt.
 
Middlesex University is committed to being fair in its approach to assessing student learning following the UK Ǫuality Code for Higher Education (Ǫuality Code) (2024)) and the UK Ǫuality Code - Advice and Guidance: Assessment (2018) and External Expertise (2018). The Assessment Fairness guidance, policies and procedures put in place by Middlesex University is our commitment to ensure fairness in assessment. Further information is available at https://mymdx.mdx.ac.uk/study/assessment/assessment-regulations-guide
 
If you have any queries or would like to know more on how this approach has been applied to modules you are studying, please contact your Campus Programme Leader.
 
Individual Marketing Consultancy Report

Assessment Brief  
Module code MKT4831
Module title Marketing Management in the Digital Age
PART A: IN-CLASS MARKETING ACTIVITIES (30%)  
Submission time and process Each activity must be uploaded to MyMDX for formative feedback within 24 hours after the class ends. Format of submission will vary based on the in-class activity and will be discussed in class. Deadlines for each individual submission will be discussed in class.
Assessment brief
  • Across the module, you will complete 3 in-class activities that apply weekly concepts to real marketing problems.
  • Activity will involve the application of the concepts/frameworks discussed in class to the company selected by the student for the final report.

In class: Participate in group discussions (4-5 students) for 30-45 minutes to explore concepts, followed by a plenary debrief. While discussion is collaborative, each student must develop their own individual analysis and insights.

After class: Submit an individual write-up demonstrating your personal understanding, integrating insights from class discussions but presenting your own original analysis. The submission must be entirely your own work. The exact format of the submission will be discussed in class.

Requirements (each activity):

a. active participation (recorded by instructor)

b. critical analysis beyond summary.

c. explicit application of the week’s frameworks. 

d. blend of analysis + reflection

e. format instructions provided in class (may vary by activity)

f. demonstration of independent critical thinking and original analysis specific to your chosen organisation

Notes:

g. activities scaffold skills for Part B

h. Each activity aligns with the weekly learning planner.

i. All activities require evidence of knowledge application. j.

j. All submissions (both formative and summative) are individual assessments.

k. While classroom discussions are collaborative to enhance learning, your submitted work must be independently produced

Assignment Structure and Format Activity-specific formats of submission will be discussed in class, and the templates available on MyLearning
Assignment type Individual submission
Feedback type G date

Students will receive written summative feedback. Formative feedback will be given in class, and students can book an appointment within office hours for individual feedback.

Provisional marks are subject to the external examiners’ approval, and they reserve the right to amend marks if it is deemed appropriate for an MBA level.

Your final grades will be available in early June via MyMDX. Please note that academic staff members are not able to release your final results.

Appropriate use of AI

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including ChatGPT, which generates human-like text and DALL-E, which creates images based on text prompts, can generate a wide range of materials, including text, images, code and even ideas. There are important considerations to keep in mind when using these tools, including information security and data privacy, compliance, copyright, and academic integrity. Using AI to support your learning can be beneficial if used responsibly and with integrity. However, submitting work generated by AI as your own work is a serious breach of academic integrity, which carries penalties, including expulsion from the University.

In this assessment, you are only allowed to use Generative AI tools to find relevant literature and brainstorm ideas. Anything that is not your own original creation or thoughts should be appropriately referenced. You will need to acknowledge any use of generative AI output in your work and should provide a full and correctly formatted in-text citation and reference list entry – see https://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/plagiarismreferencing/AI.

Unacceptable use of AI tools includes (but is not limited to): submitting edited or unedited text generated by AI; asking AI your assessment questions to directly generate solutions to parts or the entire task at hand and then using the work fully or with some editing; using AI tools for translating, writing or editing to create or improve any part of your work to a level that cannot be reproduced without the use of such tools; accepting answers provided by AI without any critical examination or careful review for accuracy. Word processing software like MS Word can help with spelling checking and grammar mistakes. If you are using text, images, ideas, etc. from Generative AI:

Don’t try to pass these off as your own

Cite and reference anything that you have used from AI (and anywhere else).

If you use AI tools (for finding literature or brainstorming ideas only), you are required to provide a copy of the AI output as an appendix to your work.

Please use Cite Them Right Online for further information (including the Harvard referencing format). It is strongly recommended that you retain the developmental work (plans, drafts, sketches, AI prompts, etc.) that you have produced when working on your assignment so that you can demonstrate, if requested, the process you undertook to produce the work submitted for assessment. For example, if you used Generative AI tools as your initial background search, you should keep the material they generated and then show through a version history how you developed and moved on from the content to create your own independent work. Please remember the limitations of AI tools: inaccurate or incomplete information, biased or prejudiced responses, limited understanding of real-world context, and fabrication or hallucination of information (including references).

Assessed learning outcomes This part of the Assessment Scheme expects the successful student to demonstrate Learning Outcomes 01, 02, and 03.
Assessment weighting % 30% of the overall module grade
Key reading and learning resources

Students should draw on theoretical concepts/frameworks covered during the lectures and seminars.

Students are also encouraged to search for other theoretical frameworks that can be found in journals recommended in this Handbook.

Students are encouraged to use Marketing Intelligence Databases such as Euromonitor (via the MDX Library Databases).

PART B: INDIVIDUAL MARKETING CONSULTANCY REPORT (70%)  
Submission time and process

Your report should be submitted on Turnitin by 23:56 hrs UAE Time.

You must upload your final work online as an MS Word document, with Font Arial 12 pt, double line spacing. Links that do not upload, files that are illegible/inaccessible due to file type/format or are incomplete will be considered a non-submission.

Assignment brief

You will work independently as a Marketing Consultant for an organisation that you will agree in advance with faculty. You will utilise diverse analytical tools to develop and present a market situation analysis and an internal analysis. You will apply strategic marketing frameworks, concepts, and theories to modify the marketing plan for the organisation. The goal will be to enhance the marketing effectiveness.

Key areas that students will investigate in their research and evaluation of the organisation include:

a. An overview of the organisation that outlines its key products/services, the business model, the brand, its direct competitors, the main customer segment(s), and so on

b. An evaluation of the changes forecasted in the macroenvironment to understand the future opportunities and challenges for the organisation.

c. The assessment of the main goals and objectives that the organisation aims to achieve and the key resources, marketing skills and capabilities it possesses.

d. Based on your macro and micro analysis, identify key strategic objectives and propose modifications to one or more elements of the marketing mix (4Ps). Include main goals, refined target customer segments, and key performance metrics that the organisation should achieve through these modifications [remember: The goal is to enhance revenues and/or income].

e. What are the specific modifications recommended for product/service offerings, brand positioning, pricing strategies, distribution channels, and/or communication tactics? Provide detailed implementation plans for your recommended marketing mix changes.

Notes:

1. Please ensure that the report you submit is your original work.

2. You can choose your own organisation/employer (current or immediate past) for this assignment. If this is not possible, or not desirable, you can propose to use another organisation, but this must be agreed with your academic staff team beforehand.

3. The report should focus on both the external and internal marketing environment.

4. You are expected to use marketing-related theories, concepts, models and/or frameworks you have encountered in your studies up to this point to reflect your learning. As an external Marketing Consultant, you are required to objectively look at data to form insights about the organisation. Please remember to reference your sources (even for well-known and frequently used models, etc.).

5. Use a formal report structure with a table of contents, page and section numbers, labels and titles for diagrams and tables, etc.

6. Use appendices for supporting information that is not needed in the analysis (for example, lists/descriptions of products/services, if provided at all).

7. References should be to a postgraduate standard, with in-text citations and full bibliographical details in the Table of References following the Harvard style.

Word Count Minimum 2,250 – Maximum 2,750 words. Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Reference List and Appendices are not included in this work count.
Assignment type Individual Assessment – Marketing Consultancy Report
Assignment Structure and format

The following structure should be used:

1. Title page: This should include a meaningful title for your report, your name and student ID number, and the report’s word count

2. Executive Summary: A high-level overview of the contents of the Management Consultancy report (one or two paragraphs)

3. Main body of the Management Consultancy report: use appropriate numbered sub-headings

4. Conclusions

5. Referencing: evidence of using ‘good sources’ is important, and therefore, your sources must be correctly cited and fully referenced in the Harvard style. See: www.citethemrightonline.com

Exceeding the word count and/or submission in a form other than a MS Word Document will result in a penalty of 10% of your marks for your work.

Feedback type G date

Students will receive written summative feedback. Any formative feedback can be available during office hours.

Provisional marks are subject to the external examiners’ approval, and they reserve the right to amend marks if it is deemed appropriate for an MBA level.

Your final grades will be available in early June via MyMDX. Please note that academic staff members are not able to release your final results.

Appropriate use of AI

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools including ChatGPT, which generates human-like text and DALL-E, which creates images based on text prompts, can generate a wide range of materials, including text, images, code and even ideas. There are important considerations to keep in mind when using these tools, including information security and data privacy, compliance, copyright, and academic integrity. Using AI to support your learning can be beneficial if used responsibly and with integrity. However, submitting work generated by AI as your own work is a serious breach of academic integrity which carries penalties, including expulsion from the University.

In this assessment, you are only allowed to use Generative AI tools to find relevant literature and brainstorm ideas. Anything that is not your own original creation or thoughts should be appropriately referenced. You will need to acknowledge any use of generative AI output in your work and should provide a full and correctly formatted in-text citation and reference list entry – see https://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/plagiarismreferencing/AI.

Unacceptable use of AI tools includes (but is not limited to): submitting edited or unedited text generated by AI; asking AI your assessment questions to directly generate solutions to parts or the entire task at hand and then using the work fully or with some editing; using AI tools for translating, writing or editing to create or improve any part of your work to a level that cannot be reproduced without the use of such tools; accepting answers provided by AI without any critical examination or careful review for accuracy. Word processing software like MS Word can help with spelling checking and grammar mistakes.

If you are using text, images, ideas, etc. from Generative AI:

  • Don’t try to pass these off as your own
  • Cite and reference anything that you have used from AI (and anywhere else).

If you use AI tools (for finding literature or brainstorming ideas only), you are required to provide a copy of the AI output as an appendix to your work.

Please use Cite Them Right Online for further information (including the Harvard referencing format). It is strongly recommended that you retain the developmental work (plans, drafts, sketches, AI prompts, etc.) that you have produced when working on your assignment so that you can demonstrate, if requested, the process you undertook to produce the work submitted for assessment. For example, if you used Generative AI tools as your initial background search, you should keep the material they generated and then show through a version history how you developed and moved on from the content to create your own independent work. Please remember the limitations of AI tools: inaccurate or incomplete information, biased or prejudiced responses, limited understanding of real-world context, and fabrication or hallucination of information (including references).

Assessed learning outcomes This part of the Assessment Scheme expects the successful student to demonstrate Learning Outcomes 01, 02, 03 and 04.
Assessment weighting % 70% of the overall module grade
Key reading and learning resources Students should draw on theoretical frameworks covered during the lectures and seminars. Students are also encouraged to search for other theoretical frameworks that can be found in journals recommended in this Handbook. Students are encouraged to use Marketing Intelligence Databases such as Euromonitor (via the MDX Library Databases).

Assessment Marking Criteria Rubric
 
Part A Marking Criteria (Rubric)

Criterion Weight Fail (<40%) Pass (40–4G%) Pass (50–5G%) Merit (60–6G%) Distinction (70%+)
Application of Marketing Concepts 40% No/incorrect application of weekly concepts Basic application with errors Adequate application of concepts Adequate application of concepts Sophisticated application with critical insights
Critical Thinking G Problem-Solving 30% Descriptive only; no analysis Limited analysis of marketing mix Some analytical depth Clear analytical reasoning with justification Exceptional analysis with innovative solutions
Integration of Class Learning 20% No evidence of incorporating class discussions Minimal reference to class insights Basic integration of class learning Good synthesis of class concepts and discussions Excellent integration showing deep understanding
Communication G Professional Presentation 10% Disorganized; late/missing submissions Incomplete or poorly formatted Adequate structure; submitted on time Well-organized with clear format Professional presentation with exceptional clarity

Part B Marking Criteria (Rubric)

Fail Fail Pass (Borderline) Pass Merit Disctinction
Criterion Fail (<30%) Needs Improvement (30-3G%) Developing (40-4G%) Sufficient (50-5G%) Above Average (60-6G%)
Executive Summary and Introduction (5%) No executive summary or introduction; lacks context, rationale, and clarity. Weak summary with insufficient details; main findings or recommendations are unclear. Minimal context and weak rationale for the proposed idea. Limited summary with minimal details; lacks clarity on methodology or main findings. The rationale is weak and the context is only partially established. Provides a summary with basic coverage of the report’s key points, though some details may be lacking. Introduction offers a limited rationale for the idea. Offers a comprehensive summary covering the report’s purpose, organisation, methodology, and key findings.
Macroenvironment Analysis (15%) Lacks meaningful evaluation of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces. Fails to apply relevant frameworks or consider future trends. Little to no competitor analysis that helps the reader to develop an understanding of market positioning. Weak analysis of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces with vague references to external factors. Limited and/or inaccurate application of marketing frameworks and tools. Future trends and competitor analysis are minimally addressed. Limited analysis of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces with minimal use of strategic marketing frameworks. Focuses more on past or present data/events rather than future trend forecasts. Lacks depth in competitor evaluation. Conducts an adequate evaluation of the external marketing environment with some use of marketing frameworks and tools. Covers a range of factors but may lack future-oriented depth. Similarly, the level of competitor analysis (direct and indirect) could be enhanced to present a comprehensive picture of their strengths and market positioning. Performs a strong analysis of the external marketing environment with relevant strategic tools and frameworks. Includes a range of factors and addresses future economic and regulatory trends. Provides a good comparative analysis of competitor (mostly direct) strategies.
Internal Marketing Environment (15%) Fails to evaluate the internal marketing environment; lacks analysis of business model, key resources or marketing culture. No examples or supporting evidence provided. Weak evaluation with insufficient detail on the business model, market offerings, or internal marketing skills. Few or no examples to support claims. Minimal discussion of marketing culture within the organisation. Limited evaluation of the internal environment; discusses some aspects superficially, such as market offerings or internal skills. Minimal examples provided. Limited analysis of the marketing culture within the organisation. Offers an adequate evaluation of the internal marketing environment, covering main aspects such as business model and internal skills. Identifies key resources and competencies but lacked detailed examples. Provides a basic critique of the marketing culture within the organisation. Performs a strong evaluation of the internal marketing environment with clear analysis of business model, market offerings, and digital capabilities. Identifies key resources and competencies with examples, demonstrating good understanding. Includes a critical view of marketing culture.
Marketing Mix Modifications, Justification and Value Proposition (15%) Marketing mix modifications are poorly defined or missing. The value proposition for changes is vague or generic with no attention to customer needs, differentiation, or stakeholder relevance. The proposed modifications are introduced in basic terms with limited rationale. The value proposition offers only superficial mention of customer benefits or costs. There is minimal attention to how the modifications improve competitive position, and stakeholder needs are largely ignored or mentioned without analysis. The marketing mix modifications are outlined, and a general value proposition is presented, including some reference to customer costs and benefits. However, the rationale lacks detail and improvements to differentiation are not clearly demonstrated. There is some acknowledgement of stakeholder perspectives, but they are not clearly linked to the strategic goals. The marketing mix modifications are outlined with an adequate justification for their implementation. The value proposition includes an explanation of customer benefits and addresses organisational aims. Improvements to market positioning are mentioned but not explored in depth. Some stakeholder value is considered and generally aligned with strategic objectives. with service objectives. The modifications are clearly defined with a solid rationale and alignment to organisational strategy. The value proposition demonstrates a good understanding of how the changes meet customer needs and create value. Enhanced differentiation is evident and stakeholder groups are meaningfully addressed in the justification.
Target Market and Competitors (10%) Fails to identify a relevant target market; does not engage in competitor analysis. No differentiation or strategic rationale for market selection. Vague or simplistic segmentation and competitor analysis. Market selection is not clearly justified and lacks strategic reasoning. Basic segmentation is attempted and competitors are identified, but evaluation is underdeveloped and lacks strategic depth or justification. Defines the target segment and outlines major competitors. Provides a basic justification for the selection but lacks detailed comparative analysis. Provides clear and appropriate segmentation of the market with good competitor benchmarking and some supporting evidence.
Marketing Mix Tactics (15%) Fails to assess marketing tactics; does not address key areas such as product strategies or integrated communication. Limited and inadequate examples or evidence provided. Weak assessment of marketing tactics; minimal detail on key areas like brand management or communication. Lacks supporting examples. Limited assessment of marketing tactics with brief discussion on some areas such as product or pricing. Few or no examples provided. Provides an adequate but largely descriptive outline of marketing tactics, touching on product strategies, service quality, brand, pricing, and communication. Analysis may lack depth or specific examples. Offers a strong assessment of main marketing tactics with clear coverage of product strategies, service quality, brand management, pricing, and communication. Provides relevant examples to support the discussion.
Conclusion and Recommendations (5%) Conclusion provides a limited summary of findings but lacks strong, actionable recommendations or a forward-looking perspective. The link to the report's preceding analysis is weak. The conclusion summarises some key findings and offers actionable recommendations on the next steps. However, it lacks depth in addressing the marketing mix modifications' outcomes and the organisation's long-term strategic considerations. The conclusion provides an adequate summary of the preceding sections and practical recommendations for the next steps. Strategic insights and the link between the marketing mix changes' outcomes and the organisational goals could be more clearly articulated. The conclusion is clear, summarising the previous analysis and bringing it to a logical end. It provides an overview of the next steps and offers a link between the outcomes of the marketing mix modifications and the organisation's long-term goals. The conclusion is impactful, summarising the previous analysis and bringing it to a logical end. It provides an overview of the next steps and offers a link between the outcomes of the marketing mix modifications and the organisation's long-term goals.
Application of Frameworks (5%) Poor use of theories and concepts; fails to apply academic frameworks in any satisfactory way. Minimal use of theories and concepts; unclear connection to the analysis. Limited application of theories and concepts; insufficient integration into the analysis. Uses basic theories and concepts adequately but lacks integration and depth. Applies an adequate range of marketing theories and concepts in a relevant manner.
Structure and Organisation (5%) Lacks a coherent structure; the report seems disorganised and is difficult to follow. Report lacks clear organisation and logical flow; subheadings are missing or inadequate. Structure is basic, with few subheadings and an unclear flow. Adequate structure with some subheadings; flow is inconsistent in some places. Report is appropriately organised with useful subheadings and generally clear structure.
Use of References (5%) No or minimal references; major citation errors or omissions. Minimal references; significant citation errors. Limited use of references, with some inconsistencies in citation format. Adequate use of conventional references cited mostly correctly using Harvard style. Good range of appropriate sources cited correctly in Harvard style.
Overall Presentation and Academic Writing (5%) Very few points are properly supported by evidence. The report is poorly written, lacks clear arguments, and is disorganised. Significant grammar and formatting errors. Points are weakly supported with little relevant evidence. The report has unclear arguments and lacks varied sentence structure or appropriate vocabulary. Several grammar and formatting errors. Some points are not well-supported by evidence from good sources. The report has basic clarity but lacks good editing. Frequent grammar and formatting errors. Most ideas are supported by relevant evidence. The report is adequately written with clear arguments. Some grammar and formatting errors are present. Arguments are well-supported by relevant evidence. The report is well-written and ideas are mostly clear. Few grammar and formatting errors.

The following table details the support you will be receiving for this assessment and the feedback opportunities you will have.
 
c. Late Submission
 
Students must submit each component of assessment by the deadline set by the Module Leader. Non-submission of work by the deadline will result in failure in the component concerned (grade 20), unless students make an application and subsequently permission has been granted under the Extenuating Circumstances Policy (https://www.mdx.ac.uk/media/middlesex-university/about-us-pdfs/academic-quality/final_-_policy_and_procedures_for_extenuating_circumstance_24-25.pdf) for an approved deferral of assessment to the next available opportunity.
 
For individual written coursework only, late submission of up to 24 hours from the deadline is permissible, however, the grade for the component is reduced by 10% or equivalent (or less where this would reduce a pass grade below 40%). Students should take into consideration the impact this will have on their deadline schedule and their final grades before selecting this option.
 
d. Assessment support for students of determination
 
Students who have declared special needs or learning differences or an ongoing medical condition may contact the Inclusion Counsellor in the Centre for Academic Success. This will set out the reasonable additional support that will be put in place by the University to assist that student’s learning and assessment. It is the student’s responsibility to make arrangements and follow the procedures set by the Centre of Academic Success in order for reasonable adjustments to be put in place. This may include the option to take up to 5 calendar days late submission on individual written coursework without having a grade reduction. Check the Middlesex University’s Policy and Procedures for Extenuating Circumstances:www.mdx.ac.uk/media/middlesex-university/about-us-pdfs/academic-quality/final_-
_policy_and_procedures_for_extenuating_circumstance_24-25.pdf
 
e. Feedback on your assignments
 
You will be provided with feedback on all coursework that is helpful and informative, consistent with aiding the learning and development process. The nature of the feedback shall be determined at programme level but may take a variety of forms including: written comments; individual and group tutorial feedback; peer feedback; or other forms of effective and efficient feedback.
 
If you have been asked to and have submitted a formative or draft assessment, you will receive feedback but no grade. The comments should inform you about how well you have done or tell you about the areas for improvement. All assignments should be submitted online unless specified in assessment briefs. Feedback on summative assessments will normally be provided within 15 working days of the published submission date.
 
f. How is your assignment mark agreed?
 
External Examiners (external academic experts) review what we deliver at a programme level. The University reviews a sample of your work to quality assure the grades and feedback you received from the person who marked your work. Our External Examiners will sample a selection of modules from a programme, with more focus of outcomes between modules within a programme.
 
The following diagram provides an overview of the marking process for your module assessment. Further information on the role of external examiners can be found at. https://www.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/policies/academic-quality/handbook (section 4).
  • You submit your assignment
  • The first marker grades the work and provides feedback; this could be completed anonymously depending on the assessment type.
  • A moderator or second marker reviews a sample of the work to quality assure the grades and feedback, to ensure they are accurate. A final mark for the work is agreed between the first marker and the moderator or second marker.
  • A sample of work, from a selection of modules across the programme, is sent to the External Examiner to check that the grading and feedback is at the right level and in line with external subject benchmarks (this applies to levels 5, 6 & 7 only)
  • Your final grades are submitted to the Programme assessment board.
g. Results Confirmation
 
First Semester | Provisional Grades: At the end of your first semester, you can see your module grades in the ‘Grades and Progress’ tile within MyMDX. These grades are provisional and not yet confirmed.
Second Semester | Final Grades and Progression: After your second semester, the Programme Assessment Board will confirm your grades. Then, your final module results, progression status, or finalist classification will be posted in the ‘Grades and Progress’ tile within MyMDX.
 
For help or more information:
  • University Guide: Find detailed information in the Grades and Progress tile within MyMDX.
  • Support Team: Ask your Programme team or reach out to Campus Central for advice.
  • Regulations: Check the University regulations for more details.

Learning Planner

# Lecture Reading G online activities Formative Assessment Link assessment G Learning Outcome(s) Case Studies
1.

Introduction to the module G handbook.

History of Marketing G Overview of Marketing Domain

Kotler et al (2022), Ch 1 Class Activity LO1Coursework Report Myntra Video Case Study
2. Value Concept Kotler et al (2022), Ch 2 Class Activity LO1, LO2Coursework Report Nike Disney
3. Consumer Behaviour (B2C and B2B) Kotler et al (2022), Ch 3 G 4 Class Activity LO1, LO3Coursework Report Cappuccino wars Coach
4. Marketing StrategySegmentation, Targeting and Positioning Kotler et al (2022), Ch 6 G7 Class Activity LO1, LO2, LO4Coursework Report Nivea Chase
5. Coursework BriefingStrategy/ Marketing plan Presentation Slides Class Activity LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report M G SCoca Cola
6. Tools in Marketing Presentation Slides Class Activity LO2. LO3Coursework Report  
7. Customer Value: Designing and Managing Products Kotler et al (2022), Ch 8 Class Activity LO2, LO3Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment AppleKim Kardashian
8. Customer Value: Designing and Managing Services Kotler et al (2022), Ch 6 Class Activity LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment Premier Inn Pret a Manager
6. Customer Value: Managing Pricing and Sales Promotions Kotler et al (2022), Ch 11 Class Activity LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment Easy Jet Uber
10. Delivering Value: Distribution and Channel Management Kotler et al (2022), Ch 15 G 16 Class Activity LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment Zara Walmart versus ASDA
11. Communicating Value: Designing an Integrated Marketing Campaign in the Digital Age Kotler et al (2022), Ch 12 G 13 Class Activity LO1, LO3Coursework Report SensodyneRealtime Online Communications
12. Brand Management Kotler et al (2022), Ch 10 Class Activity LO1, LO2, LO3Coursework Report Muji Burberry
13. Digital Marketing and AI Presentation Slides Class Activity LO1, LO3Coursework Report  
14. Revision / Assignment ǪGA Presentation Slides Class Activity LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report  
15. Assignment feedback session   Individual In-Class Consultation LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report  
16. Assignment feedback session   Individual In-class Consultation LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report Assessment 2 (70%) Submission Deadline17th March 2026 @235G hrs UAE Time
 
G. University 20-point Scale
 
The University uses a 1-20 grading scale with 1 being the highest mark. Your coursework (Part A and Part B) will be graded on a general scale of 1% – 100% with higher scores indicating higher levels of achievement. The scores you achieve as percentages will be converted to the Middlesex University 20 point scale shown below using the weightage indicated for each part.

20-point scale General scale Classification Level
1 80% - 100% Distinction
2 76% - 76%  
3 73% - 75%  
4 70% - 72%  
5 67% - 66% Merit
6 65% - 66%  
7 62% - 64%  
8 60% - 61%  
G 57% - 56% Pass
10 55% - 56%  
11 52% - 54%  
12 50% - 51%  
13 47% - 46% Pass
14 45% - 46%  
15 42% - 44%  
16 40% - 41%  
17 35% - 36% Fail
18 30% - 34%  
1G 0% - 26%  
20 Non-participation Fail

MDX Dubai App and Web Portal

MDX Dubai is a dedicated space that provides you with the key information and resources you will need as a Middlesex University Dubai student. You will need to log-in via your @studentmdx.ac credentials. Here you will find a key information about your weekly timetable for learning, attendance, what’s happening on campus and events, live updates about all things Middlesex Dubai, the student helpdesk AskMDX (https://askmdx.mdx.ac.ae), and MDX social accounts.
 
Getting MDX Dubai is easy
  • To access MDX Dubai on your browser, use the link below to log in with your ‘Campus User Account’ details. Your Campus User Account Email ID looks like this: M011111111@studentmdx.ac. You can access the MDX Central – Student Portal on your internet browser via this link: https://mdxcentral.mdx.ac.ae
  • To access the MDX Dubai mobile app, search for and download ‘MDX Dubai’ via the Play Store for Android and the App Store for iOS.
Download the user guides for the MDX Dubai Student Portal and MDX Dubai mobile app for further information about how to use each platform.

Expectations of studying this module

a. Attendance and Engagement
 
The University’s formal regulations about attendance are located in (section C2 in the ‘University Regulations’ section available here: https://www.mdx.ac.uk/about-us/policies. The main points are:
 
You should attend and engage with all scheduled classes and prescribed activities. Studies have shown that a good student engagement has a positive impact on performance and therefore is an important factor in helping you to fulfil your academic potential. In addition, for those who are on student visas, Dubai’s regulatory authorities require attendance to be monitored.
 
Your lecturers will maintain attendance records during scheduled teaching sessions using the MDX Dubai App. You are expected to follow any guidelines and instructions provided for proper recording of your attendance for your learning sessions.
 
The MDX Dubai App (available on iOS and Android) allows students to register their attendance at timetabled classes with a click of a button. All you need to do is:
  • Connect to the internet using the #mdxDUBAI Wi-Fi network
  • Open your MDX Dubai App
  • Log-in via your Campus User ID (M0xxxxxxx@studentmdx.ac) and password
  • Ensure that you have given permission to the MDX Dubai App to access your smartphone’s location and camera settings
  • Find the correct module and timetabled class via the Calendar
  • When the tutor puts up the class ǪR code, use the scanner provided within the MDX App to scan the ǪR code.
  • You will get an automated notification onscreen within the App saying your attendance has been recorded
Middlesex University Dubai supports students, enabling them to achieve their full potential. We provide this support through a number of strategies, all of which provide our students with a supportive learning environment. Online support material on MyMDX is provided as a guide to the content of the class but is no substitute for interaction with your tutor and classmates. In accordance with University Regulation C2.1 for taught programmes of study, it is the responsibility of students to attend scheduled classes and prescribed activities for the modules on which they are registered.
 
Further information on engaging with your programme will be available at your Induction.
 
If you experience difficulties beyond your control, which prevents you from engaging with your module, you should notify your tutor and CampusCentral, who may be able to offer support and guidance.
 
Where your attendance and engagement fail to meet the minimum levels required (normally 75% of scheduled learning sessions and activities but could be higher) to attain the learning outcomes of the module, you may be excluded from the assessment. You may have the opportunity to retake the whole module with permission from the Programme Leader, without grade penalty, though you will have to pay the relevant additional tuition fees for the module re-registration.
 
b. Professional behaviour
 
The programme of study you are undertaking is underpinned by developing professional behaviour and attitude. You are expected to behave in a professional, supportive manner to your peers and teachers – and the same applies to anyone the University comes in contact with related to your study. The Student Code of Conduct and Discipline Rules are available here: www.mdx.ac.ae/about-us/university-regulations/student-conduct-and-discipline-rules.
 
You must come to sessions prepared and ready to contribute where appropriate.
 
Please remember that when you are on campus, your University Student ID should be carried with you always, and you must be able to identify yourself if asked to do so. You must also comply with community health precautions and other health and safety protocols.
 
Please conduct your email communication with fellow students, tutors and all relevant staff formally and courteously.
 
Unacceptable Behaviours in Face-to-Face Interactions
  • Aggressive or abusive behaviour, including shouting, bullying behaviour, physical violence, rudeness, and making threats, inappropriate gestures, or indecent comments
  • Persistently interrupting or disrupting learning activities and events
  • Engaging in antisocial behaviour that impacts others
  • Making derogatory or discriminatory remarks about others
  • Using offensive language or engaging in personal verbal attacks
  • Discussing sensitive matters in public settings
  • Making unsupported claims that the University or individual staff have committed criminal, corrupt, biased or perverse conduct without any evidence
  • Demanding that staff set aside or make exceptions to University regulations
  • Demanding responses within an unreasonable timescale or insisting on seeing specific staff members when not feasible
  • Refusing to accept outcomes or solutions offered or repeatedly seeking further explanations without new information or evidence
Actions to be taken by the University and its Staff Members
  • Highlight the unacceptable behaviour(s) and explain why and what effect it is having
  • Pause or end the discussion or interaction if the unacceptable behaviour remains persistent
  • In serious cases, ask for the removal of individuals from University facilities and report the incident to the relevant Dubai authorities
  • Restrict personal contact and require communication via email or written channels and/or through third parties
  • Referral to appropriate disciplinary procedures

Order Custom Answer for MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Assignment

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Need expert help with your MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Module Handbook? We provide AI-free and plagiarism-free Marketing Assignment Help. Our team of professional writers delivers top-quality assignments that are original and crafted without AI tools, ensuring the highest academic standards. We also offer a free list of assignment samples and answers, written by experts, to guide your work. Get your assignment checked with an AI and plagiarism report for complete peace of mind. Contact us today for reliable, expert assignment help UK and boost your grades!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

NS0629 Critically Examining an Aspect of Nursing Practice to Improve Patient Care Dissertation Sample

Category:

Subject: Nursing

University: Northumbria University Newcastle

Module Title: NS0629 Pressure Ulcer Prevention Nursing Interventions

View Free Samples

ECON480 Economics Dissertation Solution Samples PDF | University of Otago

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Economics

University: University of Otago

Module Title: ECON480 Dissertation

View Free Samples

BUAD917 Dissertation Samples | Auckland Institute of Studies

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Education

University: Auckland Institute of Studies (AIS)

Module Title: BUAD917 Dissertation

View Free Samples

OSCOLA Referencing Bibliography Examples 2026 Complete Guide

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Law

University: ___

Module Title: OSCOLA bibliography

View Free Samples

MG5642 - PG dissertation (M.Sc. International Business) Sample PDF |

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Management

University: Brunel University London

Module Title: MG5642 PG Dissertation

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK