Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Dissertation | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Middlesex University Dubai | Module Title | MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age |
| Academic Year | 2026 |
|---|

| Module Code | Module Title | Total Credits | Assessment Components | Pass Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKT4831 | Marketing Management in the Digital Age | 20 | Individual Marketing Consultancy Report (100%) | Minimum 40% Overall (MU Grade 16) |
| Summative assessment | Weighting | Deadline for Cohort starting Week 1 | Word Count/Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Class Activities (to be included in the Appendix section of the Marketing Consultancy Report) | 30% | Draft for formative feedback to be submitted within 24 hours of the session. Final submission on 17 March 2026 (to be included in the Appendix Section of the Marketing Consultancy Report) | Format will be discussed in class. Templates available on MyLearning |
| Marketing Consultancy Report | 70% | 17 March 2026 2356 hrs UAE Time | 2,500 words(+/- 10%) |
| Assessment Brief | |
|---|---|
| Module code | MKT4831 |
| Module title | Marketing Management in the Digital Age |
| PART A: IN-CLASS MARKETING ACTIVITIES (30%) | |
|---|---|
| Submission time and process | Each activity must be uploaded to MyMDX for formative feedback within 24 hours after the class ends. Format of submission will vary based on the in-class activity and will be discussed in class. Deadlines for each individual submission will be discussed in class. |
| Assessment brief |
In class: Participate in group discussions (4-5 students) for 30-45 minutes to explore concepts, followed by a plenary debrief. While discussion is collaborative, each student must develop their own individual analysis and insights. After class: Submit an individual write-up demonstrating your personal understanding, integrating insights from class discussions but presenting your own original analysis. The submission must be entirely your own work. The exact format of the submission will be discussed in class. |
| Requirements (each activity): |
a. active participation (recorded by instructor) b. critical analysis beyond summary. c. explicit application of the week’s frameworks. d. blend of analysis + reflection e. format instructions provided in class (may vary by activity) f. demonstration of independent critical thinking and original analysis specific to your chosen organisation |
| Notes: |
g. activities scaffold skills for Part B h. Each activity aligns with the weekly learning planner. i. All activities require evidence of knowledge application. j. j. All submissions (both formative and summative) are individual assessments. k. While classroom discussions are collaborative to enhance learning, your submitted work must be independently produced |
| Assignment Structure and Format | Activity-specific formats of submission will be discussed in class, and the templates available on MyLearning |
| Assignment type | Individual submission |
| Feedback type G date |
Students will receive written summative feedback. Formative feedback will be given in class, and students can book an appointment within office hours for individual feedback. Provisional marks are subject to the external examiners’ approval, and they reserve the right to amend marks if it is deemed appropriate for an MBA level. Your final grades will be available in early June via MyMDX. Please note that academic staff members are not able to release your final results. |
| Appropriate use of AI |
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including ChatGPT, which generates human-like text and DALL-E, which creates images based on text prompts, can generate a wide range of materials, including text, images, code and even ideas. There are important considerations to keep in mind when using these tools, including information security and data privacy, compliance, copyright, and academic integrity. Using AI to support your learning can be beneficial if used responsibly and with integrity. However, submitting work generated by AI as your own work is a serious breach of academic integrity, which carries penalties, including expulsion from the University. In this assessment, you are only allowed to use Generative AI tools to find relevant literature and brainstorm ideas. Anything that is not your own original creation or thoughts should be appropriately referenced. You will need to acknowledge any use of generative AI output in your work and should provide a full and correctly formatted in-text citation and reference list entry – see https://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/plagiarismreferencing/AI. Unacceptable use of AI tools includes (but is not limited to): submitting edited or unedited text generated by AI; asking AI your assessment questions to directly generate solutions to parts or the entire task at hand and then using the work fully or with some editing; using AI tools for translating, writing or editing to create or improve any part of your work to a level that cannot be reproduced without the use of such tools; accepting answers provided by AI without any critical examination or careful review for accuracy. Word processing software like MS Word can help with spelling checking and grammar mistakes. If you are using text, images, ideas, etc. from Generative AI: Don’t try to pass these off as your own Cite and reference anything that you have used from AI (and anywhere else). If you use AI tools (for finding literature or brainstorming ideas only), you are required to provide a copy of the AI output as an appendix to your work. Please use Cite Them Right Online for further information (including the Harvard referencing format). It is strongly recommended that you retain the developmental work (plans, drafts, sketches, AI prompts, etc.) that you have produced when working on your assignment so that you can demonstrate, if requested, the process you undertook to produce the work submitted for assessment. For example, if you used Generative AI tools as your initial background search, you should keep the material they generated and then show through a version history how you developed and moved on from the content to create your own independent work. Please remember the limitations of AI tools: inaccurate or incomplete information, biased or prejudiced responses, limited understanding of real-world context, and fabrication or hallucination of information (including references). |
| Assessed learning outcomes | This part of the Assessment Scheme expects the successful student to demonstrate Learning Outcomes 01, 02, and 03. |
| Assessment weighting % | 30% of the overall module grade |
| Key reading and learning resources |
Students should draw on theoretical concepts/frameworks covered during the lectures and seminars. Students are also encouraged to search for other theoretical frameworks that can be found in journals recommended in this Handbook. Students are encouraged to use Marketing Intelligence Databases such as Euromonitor (via the MDX Library Databases). |
| PART B: INDIVIDUAL MARKETING CONSULTANCY REPORT (70%) | |
|---|---|
| Submission time and process |
Your report should be submitted on Turnitin by 23:56 hrs UAE Time. You must upload your final work online as an MS Word document, with Font Arial 12 pt, double line spacing. Links that do not upload, files that are illegible/inaccessible due to file type/format or are incomplete will be considered a non-submission. |
| Assignment brief |
You will work independently as a Marketing Consultant for an organisation that you will agree in advance with faculty. You will utilise diverse analytical tools to develop and present a market situation analysis and an internal analysis. You will apply strategic marketing frameworks, concepts, and theories to modify the marketing plan for the organisation. The goal will be to enhance the marketing effectiveness. Key areas that students will investigate in their research and evaluation of the organisation include: a. An overview of the organisation that outlines its key products/services, the business model, the brand, its direct competitors, the main customer segment(s), and so on b. An evaluation of the changes forecasted in the macroenvironment to understand the future opportunities and challenges for the organisation. c. The assessment of the main goals and objectives that the organisation aims to achieve and the key resources, marketing skills and capabilities it possesses. d. Based on your macro and micro analysis, identify key strategic objectives and propose modifications to one or more elements of the marketing mix (4Ps). Include main goals, refined target customer segments, and key performance metrics that the organisation should achieve through these modifications [remember: The goal is to enhance revenues and/or income]. e. What are the specific modifications recommended for product/service offerings, brand positioning, pricing strategies, distribution channels, and/or communication tactics? Provide detailed implementation plans for your recommended marketing mix changes. |
| Notes: |
1. Please ensure that the report you submit is your original work. 2. You can choose your own organisation/employer (current or immediate past) for this assignment. If this is not possible, or not desirable, you can propose to use another organisation, but this must be agreed with your academic staff team beforehand. 3. The report should focus on both the external and internal marketing environment. 4. You are expected to use marketing-related theories, concepts, models and/or frameworks you have encountered in your studies up to this point to reflect your learning. As an external Marketing Consultant, you are required to objectively look at data to form insights about the organisation. Please remember to reference your sources (even for well-known and frequently used models, etc.). 5. Use a formal report structure with a table of contents, page and section numbers, labels and titles for diagrams and tables, etc. 6. Use appendices for supporting information that is not needed in the analysis (for example, lists/descriptions of products/services, if provided at all). 7. References should be to a postgraduate standard, with in-text citations and full bibliographical details in the Table of References following the Harvard style. |
| Word Count | Minimum 2,250 – Maximum 2,750 words. Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Reference List and Appendices are not included in this work count. |
| Assignment type | Individual Assessment – Marketing Consultancy Report |
| Assignment Structure and format |
The following structure should be used: 1. Title page: This should include a meaningful title for your report, your name and student ID number, and the report’s word count 2. Executive Summary: A high-level overview of the contents of the Management Consultancy report (one or two paragraphs) 3. Main body of the Management Consultancy report: use appropriate numbered sub-headings 4. Conclusions 5. Referencing: evidence of using ‘good sources’ is important, and therefore, your sources must be correctly cited and fully referenced in the Harvard style. See: www.citethemrightonline.com Exceeding the word count and/or submission in a form other than a MS Word Document will result in a penalty of 10% of your marks for your work. |
| Feedback type G date |
Students will receive written summative feedback. Any formative feedback can be available during office hours. Provisional marks are subject to the external examiners’ approval, and they reserve the right to amend marks if it is deemed appropriate for an MBA level. Your final grades will be available in early June via MyMDX. Please note that academic staff members are not able to release your final results. |
| Appropriate use of AI |
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools including ChatGPT, which generates human-like text and DALL-E, which creates images based on text prompts, can generate a wide range of materials, including text, images, code and even ideas. There are important considerations to keep in mind when using these tools, including information security and data privacy, compliance, copyright, and academic integrity. Using AI to support your learning can be beneficial if used responsibly and with integrity. However, submitting work generated by AI as your own work is a serious breach of academic integrity which carries penalties, including expulsion from the University. In this assessment, you are only allowed to use Generative AI tools to find relevant literature and brainstorm ideas. Anything that is not your own original creation or thoughts should be appropriately referenced. You will need to acknowledge any use of generative AI output in your work and should provide a full and correctly formatted in-text citation and reference list entry – see https://libguides.mdx.ac.uk/plagiarismreferencing/AI. Unacceptable use of AI tools includes (but is not limited to): submitting edited or unedited text generated by AI; asking AI your assessment questions to directly generate solutions to parts or the entire task at hand and then using the work fully or with some editing; using AI tools for translating, writing or editing to create or improve any part of your work to a level that cannot be reproduced without the use of such tools; accepting answers provided by AI without any critical examination or careful review for accuracy. Word processing software like MS Word can help with spelling checking and grammar mistakes. If you are using text, images, ideas, etc. from Generative AI:
If you use AI tools (for finding literature or brainstorming ideas only), you are required to provide a copy of the AI output as an appendix to your work. Please use Cite Them Right Online for further information (including the Harvard referencing format). It is strongly recommended that you retain the developmental work (plans, drafts, sketches, AI prompts, etc.) that you have produced when working on your assignment so that you can demonstrate, if requested, the process you undertook to produce the work submitted for assessment. For example, if you used Generative AI tools as your initial background search, you should keep the material they generated and then show through a version history how you developed and moved on from the content to create your own independent work. Please remember the limitations of AI tools: inaccurate or incomplete information, biased or prejudiced responses, limited understanding of real-world context, and fabrication or hallucination of information (including references). |
| Assessed learning outcomes | This part of the Assessment Scheme expects the successful student to demonstrate Learning Outcomes 01, 02, 03 and 04. |
| Assessment weighting % | 70% of the overall module grade |
| Key reading and learning resources | Students should draw on theoretical frameworks covered during the lectures and seminars. Students are also encouraged to search for other theoretical frameworks that can be found in journals recommended in this Handbook. Students are encouraged to use Marketing Intelligence Databases such as Euromonitor (via the MDX Library Databases). |
| Criterion | Weight | Fail (<40%) | Pass (40–4G%) | Pass (50–5G%) | Merit (60–6G%) | Distinction (70%+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application of Marketing Concepts | 40% | No/incorrect application of weekly concepts | Basic application with errors | Adequate application of concepts | Adequate application of concepts | Sophisticated application with critical insights |
| Critical Thinking G Problem-Solving | 30% | Descriptive only; no analysis | Limited analysis of marketing mix | Some analytical depth | Clear analytical reasoning with justification | Exceptional analysis with innovative solutions |
| Integration of Class Learning | 20% | No evidence of incorporating class discussions | Minimal reference to class insights | Basic integration of class learning | Good synthesis of class concepts and discussions | Excellent integration showing deep understanding |
| Communication G Professional Presentation | 10% | Disorganized; late/missing submissions | Incomplete or poorly formatted | Adequate structure; submitted on time | Well-organized with clear format | Professional presentation with exceptional clarity |
| Fail | Fail | Pass (Borderline) | Pass | Merit | Disctinction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criterion | Fail (<30%) | Needs Improvement (30-3G%) | Developing (40-4G%) | Sufficient (50-5G%) | Above Average (60-6G%) |
| Executive Summary and Introduction (5%) | No executive summary or introduction; lacks context, rationale, and clarity. | Weak summary with insufficient details; main findings or recommendations are unclear. Minimal context and weak rationale for the proposed idea. | Limited summary with minimal details; lacks clarity on methodology or main findings. The rationale is weak and the context is only partially established. | Provides a summary with basic coverage of the report’s key points, though some details may be lacking. Introduction offers a limited rationale for the idea. | Offers a comprehensive summary covering the report’s purpose, organisation, methodology, and key findings. |
| Macroenvironment Analysis (15%) | Lacks meaningful evaluation of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces. Fails to apply relevant frameworks or consider future trends. Little to no competitor analysis that helps the reader to develop an understanding of market positioning. | Weak analysis of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces with vague references to external factors. Limited and/or inaccurate application of marketing frameworks and tools. Future trends and competitor analysis are minimally addressed. | Limited analysis of the macroenvironment and relevant industry forces with minimal use of strategic marketing frameworks. Focuses more on past or present data/events rather than future trend forecasts. Lacks depth in competitor evaluation. | Conducts an adequate evaluation of the external marketing environment with some use of marketing frameworks and tools. Covers a range of factors but may lack future-oriented depth. Similarly, the level of competitor analysis (direct and indirect) could be enhanced to present a comprehensive picture of their strengths and market positioning. | Performs a strong analysis of the external marketing environment with relevant strategic tools and frameworks. Includes a range of factors and addresses future economic and regulatory trends. Provides a good comparative analysis of competitor (mostly direct) strategies. |
| Internal Marketing Environment (15%) | Fails to evaluate the internal marketing environment; lacks analysis of business model, key resources or marketing culture. No examples or supporting evidence provided. | Weak evaluation with insufficient detail on the business model, market offerings, or internal marketing skills. Few or no examples to support claims. Minimal discussion of marketing culture within the organisation. | Limited evaluation of the internal environment; discusses some aspects superficially, such as market offerings or internal skills. Minimal examples provided. Limited analysis of the marketing culture within the organisation. | Offers an adequate evaluation of the internal marketing environment, covering main aspects such as business model and internal skills. Identifies key resources and competencies but lacked detailed examples. Provides a basic critique of the marketing culture within the organisation. | Performs a strong evaluation of the internal marketing environment with clear analysis of business model, market offerings, and digital capabilities. Identifies key resources and competencies with examples, demonstrating good understanding. Includes a critical view of marketing culture. |
| Marketing Mix Modifications, Justification and Value Proposition (15%) | Marketing mix modifications are poorly defined or missing. The value proposition for changes is vague or generic with no attention to customer needs, differentiation, or stakeholder relevance. | The proposed modifications are introduced in basic terms with limited rationale. The value proposition offers only superficial mention of customer benefits or costs. There is minimal attention to how the modifications improve competitive position, and stakeholder needs are largely ignored or mentioned without analysis. | The marketing mix modifications are outlined, and a general value proposition is presented, including some reference to customer costs and benefits. However, the rationale lacks detail and improvements to differentiation are not clearly demonstrated. There is some acknowledgement of stakeholder perspectives, but they are not clearly linked to the strategic goals. | The marketing mix modifications are outlined with an adequate justification for their implementation. The value proposition includes an explanation of customer benefits and addresses organisational aims. Improvements to market positioning are mentioned but not explored in depth. Some stakeholder value is considered and generally aligned with strategic objectives. with service objectives. | The modifications are clearly defined with a solid rationale and alignment to organisational strategy. The value proposition demonstrates a good understanding of how the changes meet customer needs and create value. Enhanced differentiation is evident and stakeholder groups are meaningfully addressed in the justification. |
| Target Market and Competitors (10%) | Fails to identify a relevant target market; does not engage in competitor analysis. No differentiation or strategic rationale for market selection. | Vague or simplistic segmentation and competitor analysis. Market selection is not clearly justified and lacks strategic reasoning. | Basic segmentation is attempted and competitors are identified, but evaluation is underdeveloped and lacks strategic depth or justification. | Defines the target segment and outlines major competitors. Provides a basic justification for the selection but lacks detailed comparative analysis. | Provides clear and appropriate segmentation of the market with good competitor benchmarking and some supporting evidence. |
| Marketing Mix Tactics (15%) | Fails to assess marketing tactics; does not address key areas such as product strategies or integrated communication. Limited and inadequate examples or evidence provided. | Weak assessment of marketing tactics; minimal detail on key areas like brand management or communication. Lacks supporting examples. | Limited assessment of marketing tactics with brief discussion on some areas such as product or pricing. Few or no examples provided. | Provides an adequate but largely descriptive outline of marketing tactics, touching on product strategies, service quality, brand, pricing, and communication. Analysis may lack depth or specific examples. | Offers a strong assessment of main marketing tactics with clear coverage of product strategies, service quality, brand management, pricing, and communication. Provides relevant examples to support the discussion. |
| Conclusion and Recommendations (5%) | Conclusion provides a limited summary of findings but lacks strong, actionable recommendations or a forward-looking perspective. The link to the report's preceding analysis is weak. | The conclusion summarises some key findings and offers actionable recommendations on the next steps. However, it lacks depth in addressing the marketing mix modifications' outcomes and the organisation's long-term strategic considerations. | The conclusion provides an adequate summary of the preceding sections and practical recommendations for the next steps. Strategic insights and the link between the marketing mix changes' outcomes and the organisational goals could be more clearly articulated. | The conclusion is clear, summarising the previous analysis and bringing it to a logical end. It provides an overview of the next steps and offers a link between the outcomes of the marketing mix modifications and the organisation's long-term goals. | The conclusion is impactful, summarising the previous analysis and bringing it to a logical end. It provides an overview of the next steps and offers a link between the outcomes of the marketing mix modifications and the organisation's long-term goals. |
| Application of Frameworks (5%) | Poor use of theories and concepts; fails to apply academic frameworks in any satisfactory way. | Minimal use of theories and concepts; unclear connection to the analysis. | Limited application of theories and concepts; insufficient integration into the analysis. | Uses basic theories and concepts adequately but lacks integration and depth. | Applies an adequate range of marketing theories and concepts in a relevant manner. |
| Structure and Organisation (5%) | Lacks a coherent structure; the report seems disorganised and is difficult to follow. | Report lacks clear organisation and logical flow; subheadings are missing or inadequate. | Structure is basic, with few subheadings and an unclear flow. | Adequate structure with some subheadings; flow is inconsistent in some places. | Report is appropriately organised with useful subheadings and generally clear structure. |
| Use of References (5%) | No or minimal references; major citation errors or omissions. | Minimal references; significant citation errors. | Limited use of references, with some inconsistencies in citation format. | Adequate use of conventional references cited mostly correctly using Harvard style. | Good range of appropriate sources cited correctly in Harvard style. |
| Overall Presentation and Academic Writing (5%) | Very few points are properly supported by evidence. The report is poorly written, lacks clear arguments, and is disorganised. Significant grammar and formatting errors. | Points are weakly supported with little relevant evidence. The report has unclear arguments and lacks varied sentence structure or appropriate vocabulary. Several grammar and formatting errors. | Some points are not well-supported by evidence from good sources. The report has basic clarity but lacks good editing. Frequent grammar and formatting errors. | Most ideas are supported by relevant evidence. The report is adequately written with clear arguments. Some grammar and formatting errors are present. | Arguments are well-supported by relevant evidence. The report is well-written and ideas are mostly clear. Few grammar and formatting errors. |
| # | Lecture | Reading G online activities | Formative Assessment | Link assessment G Learning Outcome(s) | Case Studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. |
Introduction to the module G handbook. History of Marketing G Overview of Marketing Domain |
Kotler et al (2022), Ch 1 | Class Activity | LO1Coursework Report | Myntra Video Case Study |
| 2. | Value Concept | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 2 | Class Activity | LO1, LO2Coursework Report | Nike Disney |
| 3. | Consumer Behaviour (B2C and B2B) | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 3 G 4 | Class Activity | LO1, LO3Coursework Report | Cappuccino wars Coach |
| 4. | Marketing StrategySegmentation, Targeting and Positioning | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 6 G7 | Class Activity | LO1, LO2, LO4Coursework Report | Nivea Chase |
| 5. | Coursework BriefingStrategy/ Marketing plan | Presentation Slides | Class Activity | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report | M G SCoca Cola |
| 6. | Tools in Marketing | Presentation Slides | Class Activity | LO2. LO3Coursework Report | |
| 7. | Customer Value: Designing and Managing Products | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 8 | Class Activity | LO2, LO3Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment | AppleKim Kardashian |
| 8. | Customer Value: Designing and Managing Services | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 6 | Class Activity | LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment | Premier Inn Pret a Manager |
| 6. | Customer Value: Managing Pricing and Sales Promotions | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 11 | Class Activity | LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment | Easy Jet Uber |
| 10. | Delivering Value: Distribution and Channel Management | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 15 G 16 | Class Activity | LO3, LO4Coursework ReportIn class Activity Assessment | Zara Walmart versus ASDA |
| 11. | Communicating Value: Designing an Integrated Marketing Campaign in the Digital Age | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 12 G 13 | Class Activity | LO1, LO3Coursework Report | SensodyneRealtime Online Communications |
| 12. | Brand Management | Kotler et al (2022), Ch 10 | Class Activity | LO1, LO2, LO3Coursework Report | Muji Burberry |
| 13. | Digital Marketing and AI | Presentation Slides | Class Activity | LO1, LO3Coursework Report | |
| 14. | Revision / Assignment ǪGA | Presentation Slides | Class Activity | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report | |
| 15. | Assignment feedback session | Individual In-Class Consultation | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report | ||
| 16. | Assignment feedback session | Individual In-class Consultation | LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4Coursework Report | Assessment 2 (70%) Submission Deadline17th March 2026 @235G hrs UAE Time |
| 20-point scale | General scale | Classification Level |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80% - 100% | Distinction |
| 2 | 76% - 76% | |
| 3 | 73% - 75% | |
| 4 | 70% - 72% | |
| 5 | 67% - 66% | Merit |
| 6 | 65% - 66% | |
| 7 | 62% - 64% | |
| 8 | 60% - 61% | |
| G | 57% - 56% | Pass |
| 10 | 55% - 56% | |
| 11 | 52% - 54% | |
| 12 | 50% - 51% | |
| 13 | 47% - 46% | Pass |
| 14 | 45% - 46% | |
| 15 | 42% - 44% | |
| 16 | 40% - 41% | |
| 17 | 35% - 36% | Fail |
| 18 | 30% - 34% | |
| 1G | 0% - 26% | |
| 20 | Non-participation | Fail |
Order Custom Answer for MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Assignment
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentNeed expert help with your MKT4831 Marketing Management in the Digital Age Module Handbook? We provide AI-free and plagiarism-free Marketing Assignment Help. Our team of professional writers delivers top-quality assignments that are original and crafted without AI tools, ensuring the highest academic standards. We also offer a free list of assignment samples and answers, written by experts, to guide your work. Get your assignment checked with an AI and plagiarism report for complete peace of mind. Contact us today for reliable, expert assignment help UK and boost your grades!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content