| Category | Report | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Module Title | The Use of Atorvastatin in the Management of Hypercholesterolaemia |
| Word Count | 2000 words |
|---|
Write a 2000-word report on ‘The use of atorvastatin in the management of hypercholesterolaemia’. The report should integrate 2–3 subject disciplines (strands) from the following:
You do not have to include all four strands in your report. You should interweave concepts from different strands in a coherent manner. For example, you may explain the complementary roles of pharmaceutical design and the community pharmacist in ensuring the stability of pharmaceutical products to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome for patients and use this to demonstrate integration of pharmaceutics and pharmacy practice. The report should be in-depth enough to demonstrate integrative thinking and a good knowledge of how the different strands converge on this topic.
You must submit an assessment cover sheet with an appropriate declaration of any AI use. In the cover sheet, include a specified and accurate word count (less the list of references, figures, tables or their captions). A word count of 2000 words ± 5% is acceptable. 10% of the total mark will be deducted if the word limit is not adhered to or if the word count is not indicated on the cover sheet.
Your report must open with an introduction and conclude with a summary. These section headings must be named “Introduction” and “Summary”, respectively. The main body of your report should be between the introduction and the summary. You should organise the main body into other sections as appropriate and create your custom section headings for them. You must also include a list of references after the summary.
The following is an example of how you may structure your report:
Please read the MPharm Report Writing Guidelines for all necessary instructions on how to format your report (fonts, page margins, tables, figures, captions, citation styles, etc.). Note that sections 5.2–5.6 of the MPharm Report Writing Guidelines are irrelevant to this report since they apply specifically to experimental reports, which this is not.
You are strongly advised not to divide the report into sections by strand, as this would make it more difficult for you to sufficiently demonstrate integration of knowledge from the different strands.
Your summative report will be assessed against the following criteria:
Sourcing information (25%)
Your report should demonstrate that you have used appropriate literature sources to search for and retrieve relevant information effectively. The reference sources cited should be fit for purpose (i.e., they should be credible sources that support the statements they are being used to substantiate). The information included should be factually accurate.
Integrating information (40%)
Your report should discuss concepts from different reference sources and subject disciplines in a coherent manner. The discussion should link together concepts or other information from different strands. It should demonstrate effective cross-referencing of information from those different strands and/or different parts of the report.
Presenting information (35%)
Your report should demonstrate effective academic writing skills, including how the report is structured, adherence to assessment guidelines, English language proficiency (e.g., grammar and spelling, use of formal language and appropriate scientific terminology), word processing (e.g., general document formatting, effective use of figures and tables) and referencing (e.g., correct citation and formatting of references, completeness of bibliographical information).
Additional considerations:
Referencing
Please read the online resources on how to correctly reference other people’s work. Failure to cite references appropriately could constitute plagiarism, which is a punishable academic misconduct. It is recommended that you use a referencing software tool to manage your references.
Information sources
Use credible sources that are fit for purpose. Wherever possible, use primary research sources or forms of narrative synthesis or meta-analysis. Textbooks such as Martindale or the BNF are also acceptable. Non-specialist publications such as Wikipedia, NetDoctor, etc. should not be used to support specialist information. The online resources on finding information should help.
Chemical structures
Do not copy and paste chemical structures from another source. You are expected to create your chemical structures (e.g., using ChemDraw). Ensure that you have the correct structure by using an appropriate reference source.
Do You Need a Report on This Question
Order Non-Plagiarised ReportThe following specific learning outcomes will be examined in this assessment; you should ensure your submission addresses them. Due to the nature of this assessment and the choice you have, you may not be able to cover all learning outcomes. This is acceptable.
|
Mark |
Descriptor |
|
80–100% |
Exemplary. Comprehensive coverage, free of errors; focused and directed to the question asked; very well written and structured. Very well integrated with clear development of integrated thought. Extensive and critical use of outside/additional learning resources. High degree of analytical or deductive skills and originality in synthesis of material. |
|
75–79% |
Outstanding. Clearly directed, logical, extensively integrated account covering entire topic, critical use of outside/additional learning resources. Very well written, with evidence of originality in synthesis of material. |
|
70–74% |
Excellent. Clearly directed and well-integrated account with evidence of critical use of outside/additional learning resources. Minor errors and omissions acceptable. Well written, with some evidence of originality in synthesis of material. |
|
65–69% |
Very Good. Well-written and structured report which covers all essential points. Demonstrable of integration, some evidence of development of integrated thought. Less critical grasp of the subject, but evidence of critical use of outside/additional learning resources. A few minor errors of fact permissible. |
|
60–64% |
Good. Straightforward factual account with adequate comprehension. Most essential points included. Uses integrated strands from teaching material. May contain some ambiguities, minor errors of fact, or unclear explanation, but must show evidence of critical use of outside/additional learning resources. |
|
55–59% |
Satisfactory. Straightforward factual account with content restricted to taught material. Written assignment must show structure and retain relevance. Little evidence of integrated thought or exclusive uses of integration strands from teaching examples. The answer must contain the most essential points, be free of significant errors, and show some evidence of critical use of outside/additional learning resources. |
|
50–54% |
Fair. As “Satisfactory” except for ONE of the following: Lacking in detail or poorly structured, Some key facts missing, Lacking clarity or not quite to the point, Lacking critical use of outside/additional learning resources. |
|
45–49% |
Limited, EITHER more than ONE of the defects listed in “fair” or ONE of the following: Factually correct but at an elementary level; Significant gaps in the story; Significant errors of fact or understanding; Muddled; lacking cohesion and direction. |
|
40–44% |
Poor. Typically, more than one of the above failings, but shows evidence of knowledge and understanding appropriate to the level of the qualification. Can include very short essays, possibly due to bad timing, which contain the main ideas in note form. Poorly integrated, complete absence of the student developing their integrative strands. |
|
30–39% |
Fail (narrow). Written assignment narrowly fails to show evidence of knowledge and understanding appropriate to the level of the qualification. May contain serious errors of fact. Demonstrative of unsafe or inappropriate practice in the context of the profession of pharmacy. |
|
0–29% |
Fail. The written assignment shows little or no relevance to the question. Little or no demonstrated comprehension of the topic. A few, if any, unstructured relevant facts. Demonstrative of unsafe or inappropriate practice in the context of the profession of pharmacy. |
Hire Experts to solve this report before your Deadline
Buy Today, Contact UsStruggling with your The Use of Atorvastatin in the Management of Hypercholesterolaemia? Let us help! We offer professional, affordable report writing services that are AI-free, plagiarism-free, and delivered on time. Our team of PhD experts understands what universities expect and creates high-quality content tailored to your needs. We also offer free report writing samples so you can check our quality before booking. We’re available 24/7 to support you with Management assignment help or any subject. Don’t wait until the last minute—contact us now and make your academic life easier with trusted expert help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
