Category | Dissertation | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | Sheffield Hallam University | Module Title | Research Method in International Business |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
WHAT THE MODULE IS ABOUT- RATIONALE |
PAGE |
2 |
MODULE OVERVIEW |
PAGE |
6 |
MODULE AIMS |
PAGE |
6 |
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES |
PAGE |
6 |
SCHEDULE OF STUDY |
PAGE |
7 |
READING/RESOURCE LIST PAGE 8
TASK BRIEF PAGE 13
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA PAGE 16 and 17
RESEARCH ETHICS PAGE 18
Module Title: Research Methods in International Business |
Module Code: 44-706506 |
||||
Academic Year: 2024/25 |
Level: 7 |
Credits: 15 |
Semester: 2 |
||
Course: MSc in International Business and Management |
|||||
Module Leader: Suale Karimu |
Module Team:
See page 5 |
||||
Assessment Task |
Weighting |
Date to be submitted |
|||
Individual Presentation with supporting slides |
NON-ASSESSED |
W/C 03/03/2025 Presentation in the seminar class |
|||
Individual Report: Research Proposal |
100% |
01 May 2025 Via online BB submission and Turnitin by 3:00pm |
This module is designed to provide postgraduate students of international business and global business with a useful and practical introduction to research methods in international business.
Specifically the module aims to:
On successful completion of this module you will be able to:
University Week |
Date w/com |
Assessment & Feedback |
Notes |
|
26 |
20/01/25 |
Introduction to Research in International Business; Challenges and Opportunities, Research Ethics |
|
|
27 |
27/01/25 |
Research Paradigms |
|
|
28 |
03/02/25 |
Literature Review |
|
|
29 |
10/02/25 |
Qualitative Research Design and data collection/analysis |
|
|
30 |
17/02/25 |
Reading Week No lecture and seminars |
|
|
31 |
24/02/25 |
Case Study Research Strategy and Ethnographic Methodologies |
|
|
32 |
03/03/25 |
No lecture INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION IN CLASS Non-Assessed Presentations are in seminars |
|
Outline of Research Proposal: - Topic - Aims and Objectives - Rationale - Supporting References - Key Theory - Methodological Standpoint |
33 |
10/03/25 |
Quantitative Research Design and data collection/data analysis |
|
|
34 |
17/03/25 |
Mixed Methods Research Design and data collection/ analysis |
|
|
37 |
24/03/25 |
Writing a Research Proposal, and Introduction to the Dissertation |
|
|
38 |
31/03/25 |
Drop in session: Individual Student Support to Research Proposal Assignment |
|
Student/tutor Individual meeting |
RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMISSION – Thursday, 01 May 2025 Online submission to both Blackboard and Turnitin Submission points Before 3:00pm |
||||
02 June 2025 Results and Feedback |
Are You Looking for Answer of This Research Proposal
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment
Key Texts: Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A., Research Methods for Business Students, 8th edition, Prentice- Hall, 2019. Bryman, A. and Bell E. Business Research Methods. 4th edition. 2015 Oxford University Press |
Recommended reading (books): Please also refer to the blackboard site for additional material |
Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S., Doing Critical Management Research, Sage, 2000 Brannick, T. and Roche, W.K. (eds), Business Research Methods, Oak Tree Press, 1997 Bryman, A. & Bell, E., Business Research Methods, 4th ed, OUP, 2015 Burns, R., Introduction to Research Methods, Sage, 2000 Cassell, C. (2015), Conducting Research and Interviews for Business and Management Students, from Series of Mastering Business Research Methods, SAGE Publication Collis, J. and Hussey, R. , Business Research, Third Edition, Palgrave, 2009. Darabi, F. (2016), 'Investigating a University Business School and Industry Collaboration: A General Analytical Inductive Qualitative Research Case', SAGE Cases in Methodology Darabi, F., Sccott J (Forthcoming, 2022), ‘Internationalizing engaged scholarship’: business performance and community development. Research Methods for Business Students, Ninth Edition Saunders et al., Pearson. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2015), Management Research, 5th Edn, London, Sage Ekinci, Y., (2015), Designing Research Questionnaire for Business and Management Students, from Series of Mastering Business Research Methods, SAGE Publication Gill, J. and Johnson, P., Research Methods for Managers, Sage, 2010. Gummesson, E., Qualitative Methods in Management Research, Sage, 1999 Hair, F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., Page, M., Research Methods For Business, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007. Hallebone, E. and Priest, J, Business and Management Research, Palgrave, 2008. Hurd, S. And Mangan, J. (eds), Essential Data Skills for Business and Management, Statistics for Education, 2001 Jankowicz, A.D., Business Research Projects, Thomson Business Press, 4th ed 2005 Maylor, H. & Blackburn, K., Researching Business & Management. Palgrave, 2005 Mehta, A, Business research methods, VDM Publishing, 2011 Quinlan, C., Business research methods, Cengage Learning, 2011 Scherbaum, C., and Shockley, K. (2015), Analysing Quantitative Data for Business and Management Students, from Series of Mastering Business Research Methods, SAGE Publication Silverman, D., Interpreting Qualitative Data, Sage, 2001 Zikmund, W.G. et al, Business Research Methods, Thomson South Western, 2012 Additional Readings on Specific Themes: Research Paradigms/Debates/ Critical Reflection |
Willmott H. C. (1993) Breaking the Paradigm Mentality. Organisation Studies, Vol.14, 5, 681-719. Hassard J. (1991) Multiple Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Organisation Studies,Vol. 12, 2: 275-299. Burrell, G, and and Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis . Gower. 1979. Sanday, P.R. (1979) The Ethnographic Paradigm(s). Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 527-538. Bryman and Bell Business Research Methods ( 2015) : Including: Chapter1 Business Research Strategies Chapter 2 Research Designs Chapter 3 Formulating Research Questions Chapter 5 Ethics in Business Research Chapter 6-15 Quantitative Research: Includes reflection on reliability and validity Chapter 16-23 Qualitative Research: Includes reflection on reliability and validity Tsoukas, H. (1989) The Validity of Idiographic research explanation. Academy of Management Review. 14, 4:551-561. Atkinson, P. The Ethnographic Imagination. Routledge.1990. Hammersley, M. (1992) What's wrong with Ethnography? Routledge. 1992. Hammersley,M. and Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge. 1995. Rosen, M. (1991) Coming to Terms with the field. Understanding and Doing Organizational Ethnography. Journal of Management Studies. 28(1)1-24. Gummesson, E., Qualitative Methods in Management Research, Sage, 1999 Hurd, S. And Mangan, J. (eds), Essential Data Skills for Business and Management, Statistics for Education, 2001 Jankowicz, A.D., Business Research Projects, Thomson Business Press, 4 th ed 2005 Maylor, H. & Blackburn, K., Researching Business & Management. Palgrave, 2005 Silverman, D., Interpreting Qualitative Data, Sage, 2001 Zikmund, W.G., Business Research Methods, Thomson South Western, 2003 Warren, C.A.B. Gender Issues in Field Research. Sage. 1998 Oakley,A. People's ways of knowing: gender and methodology. In Hood et al Critical Issues in Social Research. OUP. 1999. Doing Research in International Business/ Challenges/ Debates Adler, N.J. et. al (1989) In Search of an appropriate methodology: From Outside the People's Republic of China looking in. Journal of International Business Studies. 20, 1: 61-74. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. Doing Critical Management Research. Sage.2000. Buckley, P.J. Is the International Business Research Agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies. 33 (2)365-373. Boyacigillar, N. and Adler, N.J. (1991) The Parochial Dinosaur: Organization Science in a Global Context. Academy of Management Review. 16(2)262-290. Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006) Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking othernesess from the margins. Organization, 13, 463-488. Michailova,S. and K. Liuhto (2000) Organisation and Management Research in Transition Economies: Towards improved research methodologies. Journal of East-West Business 6,3:7-46. Morgan, G. Images of Organization. Sage.1986. |
Nkomo, S.M. (1992) The Emperor has no clothes: re-writing race in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 17(3) 487-513.
Nkomo, S.M. (2011). A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of 'African Leadership and Management in organization studies. Organization, 18,365-386.
Prasad, A. Mills A.J., Elmes, M. and Prasad, A. (eds.) Managing the Organizational Melting Pot. Sage. 1997.
Parkhe, A. (1993) 'Messy Research, methodological predispositions and theory development in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review. 18, 2:227-268.
Redding, G. S. Comparative Management Theory: Jungle, Zoo or Fossil Bed? Organization Studies 5 (3)323-359. 1994.
Sharpe, D.R. (2018) The contributions of critical realist ethnography in researching the multinational organisation. Critical Perspectives on International Business. Volume 14, 4, pp. 383-403.
Vernon, R. (1994) Research on Transnational Corporations: Shedding Old Paradigms. Transnational Corporations 3(1): 137-156.
Weligodapola, M. and Darabi, F. (2018), Developing General Analytical Inductive Qualitative Research Strategy to Explore Small Enterprise Growth in Turbulent Economies, 17th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, At: Universita' Roma TRE, Rome, Italy. Conference proceedings 2018
White, S. (2002) Rigor and Relevance in Asian Management Research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 19:287-352.
Li J. and Tsui A. (2002) A citation analysis of management and organizational research in the Chinese context 1984-1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 19,1: 87-107. C
Cavusgil,S.T. and A. Das (1997) Methodological Issues in empirical cross-cultural research.
Management International Review. 38(1) 71-96.
Zaheer, S. (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreigness. Academy of Management Journal. 18:439- 464.
Yeung, H.W. (1995) Qualitative Personal Interviews in IB Research: Some Lessons from a study of Hong Kong Transnational Corporations. International Business Research: 4,3:313-339.
Tsang,E.W. (1998) Mind your identity when conducting cross national research.
Organization studies 19,3: 511-515.
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.
Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. P. 2017. Leadership of Chinese private enterprises: Insights and interviews. London: Springer.
Jackson T. (2013) Reconstructing the indigenous in African management research. : implications for international management studies in a globalised world. Management International Review. 53, 1, 13- 38.
Jackson, T. 2013. Reconstructing the indigenous in African management research: Implications for international management studies in a globalized world. Management International Review, 53(1): 13–38.
Meyer, A. D. 1991. Visual data in organizational research. Organization Science, 2(2): 218– 236.
Nkomo, S. M. 2011. A postcolonial and anti-colonial reading of ‘African’ leadership and management in organization studies: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities. Organization, 18(3): 365–386.
Oppong, N.Y. (2017) Still the Dark Continent? Towards contextual methodological approaches to management development research in foreign multinational firms in Africa. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 17, 2, 237-256.
P |
Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch C., 2004 Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Edward Elgar. Part 1: For critical reflection on the trends and prospects in International Business Research including a critique of empirical research in international management Part 2: For discussion of the design and conduct of case study research in International Business Part 3: Interviewing in International Business Part 4: Includes discussion of the use of ethnography in International Business research Part 5: Includes the insights of researchers researching outside the TRIAD Part 7: Chapters on validity in qualitative international business research and writing up qualitative research. Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Limited. Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513. Van de Ven, A. H., & Jing, R. 2012. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 123– 137. Van de Ven, A. H., Meyer, A., & Jing, R. 2018. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship. Management and Organization Review, doi: 10-1017/mor.2018.28 Zhang et al. 2012. Understanding indigenous leadership research: Explication and Chinese examples. Leadership Quarterly, 23(6): 1063–1079. 538–566. |
Module Title: |
|
Assessment Title: |
NON-ASSESSED Presentation of the Research Proposal |
Individual/Group: |
Individual |
Weighting: |
0% |
Presentation Date: |
Week Commencing 03/03/2025 |
Presentation Details:
Please provide an outline of Research Proposal on PowerPoint slides including;
1. Your research topic,
2. Background/introduction to research topic
3. Research Aims and Objectives,
4. Rational for why this topic is important to study,
5. What are the key and relevant theories,
6. What is your methodological standpoint
7. What are your supporting references
You will need to present the outline of proposal to your tutor and classmates in the classroom. You are expected to provide your tutor with 6 slides that covers all the above areas and prepare yourself for a clear discussion on each of the above points.
There is no Submission requirements via blackboard or turnitin for this task.
Module Title: |
|
Assessment Title: |
Written Research Proposal |
Individual/Group: |
Individual assignment |
Weighting: |
100% |
Submission Date: |
Thursday, 01 May 2025, 3:00pm Online submission via Blackboard Site and Turnitin |
Instructions to Students for Submission of Coursework
You are required to choose a research topic for purposes of analysis. Write a research proposal suitable for a dissertation, which will:
The total length of the proposal should be around 3500 words.
|
Course Title: |
MSc International Business Management |
|||||||
Module Title: |
Research Methods in International Business |
Level |
MSc |
||||||
Assessment Title: |
Research Proposal |
Weighted: |
100% |
||||||
Criteria & Weighting |
80 - 100% Outstanding Work DISTINCTION |
70 - 79% Excellent WorDISTINCTION |
60 - 69% Good Quality Work
MERIT |
50 - 59% Satisfactory work
PASS |
40 - 49% Work does not meet the assessment criteria MARGINAL FAIL |
0-39% Work does not meet the assessment criteria FAIL |
|
||
Content and research: Identifying the Research problem, justification of the research aims and objectives/ clarity of aims/ location of research in wider literature effectively within International Business Management context |
All subject material is relevant and comprehensive, Selection of references demonstrates critical, rigorous and comprehensive research |
All material is highly relevant, covering a broad range of information within International Business Management A wide range of references has been used. |
All material is directly relevant, covering key information within Several references have been used. |
The majority of material is relevant, covering the basic information |
A majority of the material is irrelevant; there are major gaps in Insufficient evidence of relevant material. |
Fail to locate relevant material to search |
|||
Theory and analysis: Understand and evaluate different research methodologies/techniques and their applications to the research problem in International Business Management |
Reveals an excellent grasp and critical approach to selection use and justification of relevant theory and the ability to apply concepts. Critical rigorous analysis sustained with reflective and reasoned |
Identifies and makes good use of a wide range of relevant theories and concepts. Substantive analysis with fully reasoned evaluation and justification of links between theory and practice. |
Identifies and uses most relevant theories and concepts. Substantive analysis with good evaluation and justification |
Insufficient theories and concepts considered. Basic analysis with some evaluation and justification of links |
.Very limited identification of the relevant theories and concepts. |
Fail to identify the relevant theories and concepts. No attempt at analysis with no |
|||
Written communication: Develop coherent arguments, and draw conclusions about the key considerations in order to justify your research approach |
Relevant and Professional academic language enhances meaning. Logical, cohesive, critically reflective, cohesive and comprehensive structure. Referencing thorough, using APA correctly throughout. Professional |
Conventions of written English; sentence structure used to enhance meaning. Logical and cohesive structure. Referencing is complete, using APA correctly throughout. Professional layout. |
Grammatically correct written English.Logical structure. Extensive referencing, using APA. Reader friendly layout. |
Basic level of written English. Basic structure. Basic referencing follows APA but inconsistent at times. Basic layout. |
Poorly written with errors in grammar and/or vocabulary. Little structure. Referencing is incomplete and does not follow APA. Poorly formatted layout |
Very poor writing, language hinders the meaning, |
Class |
Category |
Grade |
% |
General Characteristics |
Distinction (Exceptional) |
Exceptional Distinction |
16 |
82 |
• Exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding evidenced by own independent in and critical awareness of relevant literature and concepts at the forefront of the discipline; evidence extensive and appropriate independent inquiry operating with advanced concepts, methods and tec to solve problems in unfamiliar contexts. • Cogent arguments and explanations are consistently provided using a range of media. • Demonstrating an ability to communicate effectively in a variety of formats using a sophisticated le the English language in an eloquent and professional manner to both technical and non-technical au • A sustained academic approach to all aspects of the tasks is evidenced; • Academic work extends boundaries of the disciplines and is beyond expectation of the level and m achieve or be very close to publishable or commercial standards. |
Distinction (Excellent) |
High Distinction |
15 |
78 |
• Excellent knowledge and understanding evidenced by some clear independent insight and critical awareness of relevant concepts, some of which are at the forefront of the discipline; evidence of app independent inquiry operating with core concepts, methods and techniques to solve complex proble mostly familiar contexts • Arguments and explanations are provided that is well-supported by the literature and in some case range of media • Demonstrating an ability to communicate effectively in a limited number of formats using own styl suited to both technical and non-technical audiences • A sustained academic approach to most aspects of the tasks is evidenced • One or more aspects of the academic work is beyond the prescribed range and evidences a compe understanding of all of the relevant taught content. |
Mid Distinction |
14 |
75 |
||
Low Distinction |
13 |
72 |
||
Merit (Good) |
High Merit |
12 |
68 |
• Very good knowledge and understanding is evidenced as the student is typically able to independe relate taught facts/concepts together, some of which are at the forefront of the discipline; evidence competent, independent inquiry operating with core concepts, methods and techniques to solve fam problems. • Arguments and explanations are provided that are typically supported by the literature and in som may challenge some received wisdoms; competently uses all taught media and communication meth communicate effectively in a familiar setting. • An academically rigorous approach applied to some aspects of the tasks is evidenced; some beyond prescribed range, may rely on set sources to advance work/direct arguments; demonstrates autono |
RESEARCH ETHICS CHECKLIST (SHUREC1)
This form is designed to help staff and postgraduate research students to complete an ethical scrutiny of proposed research. The SHU Research Ethics Policy should be consulted before completing the form.
Answering the questions below will help you decide whether your proposed research requires ethical review by a Faculty Research Ethics Committee (FREC). In cases of uncertainty, members of the FREC can be approached for advice.
Please note: staff based in University central departments should submit to the University Ethics Committee (SHUREC) for review and advice.
The final responsibility for ensuring that ethical research practices are followed rests with the supervisor for student research and with the principal investigator for staff research projects.
Note that students and staff are responsible for making suitable arrangements for keeping data secure and, if relevant, for keeping the identity of participants anonymous. They are also responsible for following SHU guidelines about data encryption and research data management.
The form also enables the University and Faculty to keep a record confirming that research conducted has been subjected to ethical scrutiny.
- For postgraduate research student projects, the form should be completed by the student and counter-signed by the supervisor, and kept as a record showing that ethical scrutiny has occurred. Students should retain a copy for inclusion in their thesis, and staff should keep a copy in the student file.
- For staff research, the form should be completed and kept by the principal investigator.
Please note if it may be necessary to conduct a health and safety risk assessment for the proposed research. Further information can be obtained from the Faculty Safety Co-ordinator.
General Details
Name of principal investigator or postgraduate research student |
|
SHU email address |
|
Name of supervisor (if applicable) |
|
email address |
|
Title of proposed research |
|
Proposed start date |
|
Proposed end date |
|
Brief outline of research to include, rationale & aims (500 - 750 words). |
|
Where data is collected from human participants, outline the nature of the data, details of anonymisation, storage and disposal procedures if these are required (300 -750 words). |
|
Will the research be conducted with partners & subcontractors? |
No (If YES, outline how you will ensure that their ethical policies are consistent with university policy.) |
1. Health Related Research involving the NHS or Social Care / Community Care or the Criminal Justice System or with research participants unable to provide informed consent
Question |
Yes/No |
1. Does the research involve? • Patients recruited because of their past or present use of the NHS or Social Care • Relatives/carers of patients recruited because of their past or present use of the NHS or Social Care • Access to data, organs or other bodily material of past or present NHS patients • Foetal material and IVF involving NHS patients • The recently dead in NHS premises • Prisoners or others within the criminal justice system recruited for health- related research* • Police, court officials, prisoners or others within the criminal justice system* • Participants who are unable to provide informed consent due to their incapacity even if the project is not health related |
|
2. Is this a research project as opposed to service evaluation or audit? For NHS definitions please see the following website http://www.nres.nhs.uk/applications/is-your-project-research/ |
|
NB FRECs provide Independent Scientific Review for NHS or SC research and initial scrutiny for ethics applications as required for university sponsorship of the research. Applicants can use the NHS proforma and submit this initially to their FREC.
1. Research with Human Participants
Question |
Yes/No |
1. Does the research involve human participants? This includes surveys, questionnaires, observing behaviour etc. Note If YES, then please answer questions 2 to 10 If NO, please go to Section 3 |
|
2. Will any of the participants be vulnerable? Note ‘Vulnerable’ people include children and young people, people with learning disabilities, people who may be limited by age or sickness or disability, etc. See definition |
|
3 Are drugs, placebos or other substances (e.g. food substances, vitamins) to be administered to the study participants or will the study involve invasive, intrusive or potentially harmful procedures of any kind? |
|
4 Will tissue samples (including blood) be obtained from participants? |
|
5 Is pain or more than mild discomfort likely to result from the study? |
|
6 Will the study involve prolonged or repetitive testing? |
|
7 Is there any reasonable and foreseeable risk of physical or emotional harm to any of the participants? Note Harm may be caused by distressing or intrusive interview questions, uncomfortable procedures involving the participant, invasion of privacy, topics relating to highly personal information, topics relating to illegal activity, etc. |
|
8 Will anyone be taking part without giving their informed consent? |
|
9 Is it covert research? Note ‘Covert research’ refers to research that is conducted without the knowledge of participants. |
|
10 Will the research output allow identification of any individual who has not given their express consent to be identified? |
|
If you answered YES only to question 1, you must complete the box below and submit the signed form to the FREC for registration and scrutiny.
If you have answered YES to any of the other questions you are required to submit a SHUREC2A (or 2B) to
the FREC. If you answered YES to question 8 and participants cannot provide informed consent due to their incapacity you must obtain the appropriate approvals from the NHS research governance system.
the FREC. If you answered YES to question 8 and participants cannot provide informed consent due to their incapacity you must obtain the appropriate approvals from the NHS research governance system.
Hire Experts to solve your Research Proposal before your Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment1. Research in Organisations
Question |
Yes/No |
1 Will the research involve working with/within an organisation (e.g. school, business, charity, museum, government department, international agency, etc.)? |
|
2 If you answered YES to question 1, do you have granted access to conduct the research? If YES, students please show evidence to your supervisor. PI should retain safely. |
|
3 If you answered NO to question 2, is it because: A. you have not yet asked B. you have asked and not yet received an answer C. you have asked and been refused access. Note You will only be able to start the research when you have been granted access. |
|
2. Research with Products and Artefacts
Question |
Yes/No |
1. Will the research involve working with copyrighted documents, films, broadcasts, photographs, artworks, designs, products, programmes, databases, networks, processes, existing datasets or secure data? |
|
2. If you answered YES to question 1, are the materials you intend to use in the public domain? Notes ‘In the public domain’ does not mean the same thing as ‘publicly accessible’. - Information which is 'in the public domain' is no longer protected by copyright (i.e. copyright has either expired or been waived) and can be used without permission. - Information which is 'publicly accessible' (e.g. TV broadcasts, websites, artworks, newspapers) is available for anyone to consult/view. It is still protected by copyright even if there is no copyright notice. In UK law, copyright protection is automatic and does not require a copyright statement, although it is always good practice to provide one. It is necessary to check the terms and conditions of use to find out exactly how the material may be reused etc. If you answered YES to question 1, be aware that you may need to consider other ethics codes. For example, when conducting Internet research, consult the code of the Association of Internet Researchers; for educational research, consult the Code of Ethics of the British Educational Research Association. |
|
3. If you answered NO to question 2, do you have explicit permission to use these materials as data? If YES, please show evidence to your supervisor. PI should retain permission. |
|
4. If you answered NO to question 3, is it because: A. you have not yet asked permission B. you have asked and not yet received and answer C. you have asked and been refused access. Note You will only be able to start the research when you have been granted permission to use the specified material. |
|
Adherence to SHU policy and procedures
Personal statement |
|
I can confirm that: - I have read the Sheffield Hallam University Research Ethics Policy and Procedures - I agree to abide by its principles. |
|
Student / Researcher/ Principal Investigator (as applicable) |
|
Name: |
Date: |
Signature: |
|
Supervisor or other person giving ethical sign-off |
|
I can confirm that completion of this form has not identified the need for ethical approval by the FREC or an NHS, Social Care or other external REC. The research will not commence until any approvals required under Sections 3 & 4 have been received. |
|
Name: |
Date: |
Signature: |
|
Additional Signature if required: |
|
Name: |
Date: |
Signature: |
Please ensure the following are included with this form if applicable, tick box to indicate:
Guidance for undergraduate, postgraduate and research students and staff undertaking research.
Topic 1: Introduction to Research in International Business; Challenges and Opportunities, Research Ethics
Seminar Questions and Activities
The first seminar will serve as a 'getting to know you' session and will provide you with opportunities to ask questions about the programme of activities and about the assessment tasks. It will also provide opportunities for the lecturer to gauge the extent and nature of your previous research experience.
Seminar Activities
1.Research Experience Exercise
Did you undertake an undergraduate dissertation? If so, answer the following questions:
2.Group exercise 1
3.Group exercise 2
4.Research Ethics
Read the article by Stening and Skubik (2007) Do International Management Researchers Need a Code of Ethics?
p.107 ' If the varied predicaments associated with research ethics are murky and complicated at the general level, they become significantly more problematic when the research is being undertaken by someone in a country other than his/her own' Discuss
-interdisciplinary nature of IBM
-controversy/ debate surrounding the unit of analysis - i.e. multinational corporations/ global industries/ expatriate managers
-terms used in some literature- Third World/ underdeveloped/ developing etc.
-consider power/ status of the researcher v those being researched
-presumptions/ values of researcher- danger of ethnocentric values
-who could be interested/ impacted by the research? stakeholders.
Additional Reading :
-Bryman and Bell (2015) Chapter 1 The Nature and Process of Business Research
-Saunders et al (2019) Chapter 6 Negotiating Access and Research Ethics
Lecture
Recommended Reading
Saunders et al, (2019). Chapter 4, understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development Bryman and Bell (2015), Chapter 2 Business Research Strategies, Chapter 3 Research Designs,
Seminar Questions and Activities
1.In your group discuss the key features of :
a.A positivist paradigm
b.An interpretivist paradigm
Discuss the key assumptions informing the research approach and how these influence the research approach/ methodology.
Consider what a piece of research informed by a positivist/ interpretivist paradigm would look like. (Discuss drawing on ' a multiple indicator of a concept' reading and 'gaining an insider view of strategic change' reading)
Each group to present their ideas.
Class discussion contrasting the two paradigms/ implications for research.
2.Class discussion on the nature of an inductive v deductive research approach (discuss drawing on 'an example of a deductive study' and 'an example of an inductive study')
3.In your group discuss the meaning of reliability, validity and generalisability using examples.
4.Each member of the group is required to think of a topic which could be suitable for their research proposal. They are then required to choose a methodology they think would be appropriate for this research proposal topic. The findings will be presented by each student to the seminar group as a whole.
Lecture
Recommended Reading
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines Journal of Business Research.
Thomas, D., A., Maria, M., M Tirado, M. M. Jacob, M. (2020). Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda, Research Evaluation, Volume 29, Issue 3, July 2020, Pages 275–288, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa008
Wright, A., & Michailova, S. (2023). Critical literature reviews: A critique and actionable advice. Management Learning, 54(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211073961
Seminar
Questions for class discussion
Individual and group activities
Activity 1.
Working individually, identify a topic of interest to you in the field of international business (This should take 10 to 15 minutes).
Form groups of 3 to 5 members, each member should explain to the group the criteria they use in selecting the topic. This should take 20 minutes.
As a group, discuss the common criteria considered by group members in selecting their topic. Were there any differences in the criteria used by group members? What informs such differences if there any? Each group should then present to the class what were common criteria identified in selecting topics?
Are there common differences? Are there any factors left out?
Discuss this as a class.
Activity 2.
In 30 minutes, write a brief literature review on your topic. Aim to review at least two papers on the topic and write at least a paragraph of 5 lines,
Share your written review with your colleague to provide a peer-review of your work. The reviewer should evaluate your work based on the following.
a)Is the review descriptive?
b)Is the review narrative?
c)Is the review critical?
d)In terms of critical literature review, how could the review be improved?
As a group, share your common observations with the class.
Finally, discuss how you can prevent plagiarism in your research. This should be a class discussion.
Seminar Questions
1.Explain the main features of qualitative research
2.What are the main types of qualitative research?
3.What are the main challenges to qualitative data analysis?
4.What factors need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of qualitative research?
Seminar Activities
1.In your group, you are required to assume that you are preparing for a Master's Dissertation, and you have agreed the following objectives with your supervisor:
2.In your group, discuss the following questions:
a)What are the main advantages of qualitative research?
b)What are the main disadvantages of qualitative research?
c)Why are qualitative research methods so widely used in the field of business?
d)Are there cases where the qualitative approach should definitely be used?
e)Are there cases where the qualitative approach should definitely not be used?
3.In your group, undertake the following exercise:
a)Each member of the group will write the reasons why qualitative research is either appropriate or not appropriate to his or her dissertation;
b)Those members of the group who intend to adopt qualitative research techniques will then explain to the other members of the group what techniques they intend to use, for discussion by the group as a whole;
c)The group will then summarize their findings, for presentation to the cohort as a whole (possibly with the aid of flip charts), giving examples of any problems or difficulties encountered in selecting suitable qualitative research techniques.
4.Case Study Discussion
Read the below Research Cases, discuss and answer the questions at the end of the article.
Weligodapola, M and Darabi, F (2018) ‘Developing General Analytical Inductive Qualitative Research Strategy to Explore Small Enterprise Growth in Turbulent Economies. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, p 482-490. Universita Roma Tre, Rome-Italy, 12-13th July.
Darabi, F. (2016), 'Investigating a University Business School and Industry Collaboration: A General Analytical Inductive Qualitative Research Case', SAGE Research Methods Cases.
Piekkari R. and Welch C. (2011) (Eds.) Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Welch et.al (2011) Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a pluralist future for International Business Research.Journal of International Business Studies, 42: 740-762.
Welch,C. and Piekkari R. (2017) How should we (not) judge the 'quality' of qualitative research? Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 714-725.
R. Piekkari and C. Welch (2004) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for IB. Part II Case Study Research.
Seminar Activities
Activity 1
In your groups consider how you might design a small research project adopting a case study approach to examine one of the following :
a.the training of expatriates within Chinese organisations.
b.cross cultural team working within the multinational
c.corporate social responsibility within the subsidiaries of multinationals
d.an alternative of the group.
Activity 2
1.What are your research aims and objective?
2.Consider whether you are planning to use a case study approach in your dissertation.
2.Discuss in your groups how you will select cases to study. How many cases will you select and why? eg. one single case / multiple cases?
3.What will be the 'case' eg. a company? a team? a process? an event? etc.
4.What sources of data will you collect?
5.Consider how your case study design is connected to your underlying research paradigm- eg. interpretivist? positivist?
6.What procedures will you use to argue the quality of your research? Link to consideration of validity/ reliability/ generalisability
Activity 3
1.What are the issues raised for a researcher choosing to do research in their own organisation?
2.What are the challenges/ issues raised in conducting overt participant observation and how would you seek to manage these?
Activity 4: Case study discussion on ‘Research Strategy’
Please read the below case study which is available under topic 5 in the Blackboard site, and discuss the questions at the end of the case study.
Darabi, F., Sccott J (Forthcoming, 2022), ‘Internationalizing engaged scholarship’: business performance and community development. Research Methods for Business Students, Ninth Edition Saunders et al., Pearson.
Recommended Reading:
Bryman (2015) Chapter 7 The nature of quantitative research, Chapter 8 Sampling in quantitative research
Seminar Questions and Activities
Seminar Questions
1.Explain the main features of quantitative research;
2.Give some examples of the uses of quantitative research in international business;
3.Outline the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative research;
4.What factors need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of quantitative research?
Seminar Activity
1)A list of research questions is provided below. Which research questions could be best answered using quantitative as opposed to qualitative methods? Briefly explain your answer (in a group of 3 or 4).
2)In your groups, discuss how quantitative research might help us to understand trends in the global car industry.
3)Use the SPSS data file available on the BB site and perform regression analysis and interpretate the results.
You can download the SPSS software (free) from the SHU
Recommended/Core Reading
Bryman A. and Bell E. (2011) Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press. 3rd Edition. Chapter Part 4
Giddings, L.S. (2006) Mixed-Methods Research: Positivism in Drag? Journal of Nursing Research. 11 (3) 195-203
Hurmerinta-Peltomäki L. and Nummela N. (2006) Mixed Methods in International Business Research: A Value-added Perspective. Management International Review, 46 (4: 439 – 459)
Seminar Activities
Group Discussion (1)
Please read the case study in slide number 10 (source: Bryman and Bell, 2011), and discuss below questions:
-Why mixed methods research has been considered in this case study?
-How mixed methods has been conducted?
-What are data collection methods?
-Following Gray's (2010) model, which types of mixed methods design has been used in this case?
Group Discussion (2)
Please discuss the below questions.
-Is it appropriate to triangulate, consolidate, or compare quantitative data stemming from a large random sample on equal grounds with qualitative data arising from a small purposive sample?
-How much weight should be placed on qualitative data compared to quantitative data?
-Are quantitatively confirmed findings more important than findings that emerge during a qualitative study component?
Individual work
Think about your Research question and Research Objectives Please discuss;
How do you justify a mixed methods research design in answering your research question? Is mixed methods research necessarily superior to single strategy research?
Buy Answer of your Research Proposal & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentLooking for expert guidance in Research Method in International Business Research Proposal? Worry, no need! We are here to help you with assignments. Whether you need Dissertation Writing Services or well-structured solutions, we will provide everything. You will get free assignment examples that will make your study material stronger. Our expert team is providing all assignment services, you will get accurate, clear, and original content. Now stop worrying about marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what's the delay? Get connected with us now and make your academic journey easy!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content