MMN230182 Masters Research Project (MRP) Module Handbook 2025/26 TriA | GCU

Published: 29 Sep, 2025

Category	Dissertation	Subject	Education
University	Glassgow Caledonian University	Module Title	MMN230182 Masters Research Project

Word Count	12000 Words
Assessment Title	Module Handbook
Academic Year	2025-26

1.0 Module Information

1.1 Module Summar
1.2 Module Learning Outcomes

2.0 Module Team

2.1 External Examiner

3.0 Additional Module Support

3.1 Learning Development Centre
3.2 Personal Tutor

4.0 Module Timetable

4.1 Preparation

5.0 Accessibility

5.1 GCU Learn Module-Level Accessibility Statement 8
5.2 Reporting issues with accessibility in this module

6.0 GCU Learn

7.0 Assessment

7.1 Module Pre-Requisite
7.2 Assessment Schedule
7.3 Assessment Format
7.4.1 The Dissertation (12,000 words)
7.4.2 Research Report (10,000 words)
7.4.3 Systematic Literature Review (12,000 words)
7.4.4 Consultancy Project (10,000 words)
7.4.5.1 MADMACC Students only: Multimedia Submission (4,000-6,000 Words)
7.4.5.2 MADMACC Students Only: Textual Analysis (12,000 Words)
7.4.6 LLM Students Only: Law Dissertation (12,000 words)
7.5 Submission Guidelines
7.6 Pass Mark and University Regulations
7.7 Oral Assessment
7.8 Late Submission of assessment/ Failure to submit assessments.
7.8 Fit to Sit

8.0 Module Evaluation

8.1 Student Staff Consultative Groups (SSCG)
8.2 Module Feedback

9.0 The Research Project Assessment

9.1 Project Supervision
9.2 Supervisor and Student Responsibilities
9.3 Project Draft Chapter Deadlines
9.4 Project Marking Criteria and Content
9.4.1 LLM Dissertation Marking Criteria and Content
9.5 Project Word Count

10.0 Referencing

10.1 Quotations
10.2 Internet Sources

11.0 Plagiarism

11.1 Turnitin Plagiarism Check

12.0 Ethical Considerations

12.1 Ethics Procedures for Research

13.0 Quality Assurance Mechanisms

13.1 Module Issues
13.2 Elevating Project Concerns
13.3 Attendance

14.0 Reading

Appendix A: MRP Student Record of Meeting with Supervisor

Appendix B: Master's Research Project Rubric – Dissertation, Research Project & Media Textual Analysis

Appendix C: Master's Research Project Rubric – Systematic Literature Review

Appendix D: Master's Research Project Rubric – Consultancy Report

Appendix E: Multimedia Project Marking Rubric (MADMACC program students only)

Appendix F: Master's Research Project Rubric - Law Dissertation (LLM students only)

Appendix G: General Guide to Layout of Project (excluding MADMACC & LLM International Commercial Law)

Appendix H: Template for Project Front Cover

Appendix I: MRP Declaration for Project

Appendix J: Ethics Consent Form (EC-5/2020)

The main purpose of this module handbook is to provide you with a comprehensive guide for this module. In this handbook, you will find information and advice that should prove helpful as you progress through the module.

MMN230182 Module Information

The following information is contained in GCU Learn:

What the module will cover (summary of content)
What knowledge and/or skills you should have acquired on completion (learning outcomes)
What additional generic skills you will also have developed (transferrable skills)
How your learning will be delivered (teaching and learning strategy)
Recommended books, journals, articles etc. (indicative reading)
What your assessment will consist of (assessment methods)

Further information is contained within the Module Descriptor (see GCU Learn MRP module site). Please read this document carefully and if you have any questions, contact the Module Leader.

Session: 2025/2026

Module Title: Masters Research Project (MRP)

Module Code: MMN230182

Level: 5

Credit Points: 45

Pre-requisite Module: Post-Graduate Research Methods: MMN230181

Module Leader:

MMN230182 Module Summary

Welcome to the MRP module which will introduce you to the key research methods and paradigms commonly utilised in your field of study and give you the opportunity to specialise in an area related to your programme by undertaking an in-depth research project. The Masters Research Project module offers students the opportunity to apply research methodologies to their chosen topic areas, to draw on internationally published academic literature and good practice to inform the development and interpretation of knowledge about business/management/professional practice in their area of study. The subject matter of the project involves the theoretical and evidential investigation of an aspect of business/management/professional practice, relating to topics covered in the student's programme of study.

The Project element of the module offers you the opportunity to apply research methodologies to your chosen topic areas, to draw on internationally published academic literature, good practice, develop and interpret knowledge about management/professional practice in your area of study. The Project subject matter involves the theoretical and evidential investigation of an aspect of business or professional practice, relating to topics covered in your programme of study. It requires you to demonstrate your ability to work independently and will allow you to examine the subject in greater depth than has been previously possible in other taught modules and assessed coursework. You will need to utilise appropriate underpinning theories to frame, inform and construct the output. A dedicated academic Supervisor will be allocated to support you throughout the project stage.

MMN230182 Module Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of the module, you will have demonstrated the ability to:

Undertake a research project relevant to the student’s individual programme context that outlines an appropriate research methodology and design to meet the specified aim and objectives of the project (either a Dissertation, Research Report, Systematic Review, or a Consultancy Project - to be agreed with the supervisor).
Demonstrate an in-depth and critical understanding of academic literature, theories, and concepts relevant to the research project.
Demonstrate that data (primary and/or secondary) have been collected in a structured manner, following appropriate procedures relating to research design and ethics.
Critically analyse, interpret, and appraise the data collected to answer the research objective(s).
Develop conclusions that address the aim and objectives of the Project and provide recommendations that inform future research and/or practice.
Sustain appropriate academic standards of writing and presentation that communicate, clearly and comprehensively, the research undertaken.

MMN230182 Additional Module Support

MMN230182 Learning Development Centre

In addition to receiving support from the module team your School has a Learning Development Centre (LDC) which provides academic writing support for home and international students, ICT support, advice on study skills and other academic support and guidance.

The LDC is inclusive and is committed to providing support for all students including those with disabilities or specific learning and teaching needs. The Centres provide face-to-face and online academic support; through a combination of workshops, small group sessions, one-to-one appointments and tailored teaching within modules. The support available to students is provided in a professional and supportive environment enabling them to develop the skills required to succeed at university.

MMN230182 Module Timetable

See MRP module site in GCU Learn for details regarding the online lecture series.

MMN230182 Preparation

A single lecture on a topic cannot cover everything you ought to know, so you are expected to undertake reading both before and after lectures to deepen your understanding of the topic.

MMN230182 Accessibility

GCU Learn Module-Level Accessibility Statement

The University has an accessibility statement specific to learning and teaching relating to the GCU Learn platform (Blackboard), third-party plug-ins and content uploaded by staff and students. You can read the statement in full using this link to the GCU Learn Institution Page.

GCU Learn enables you to download your module content in five different formats, depending upon your learning preferences and requirements. You can learn more about how to access the different formats in this module via this video.

Reporting issues with accessibility in this module

If you are experiencing issues accessing content within a module, please contact your Module Leader in the first instance. If you are a student with existing arrangements or reasonable adjustments, please contact the GCU Disability Service.

We are always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we are not meeting accessibility requirements.

MMN230182 Assessment

In accordance with the University’s Digital Assessment Policy and Online Similarity Checking Policy all standard academic summative submissions of written assessment, i.e. those that are primarily text-based, will be submitted through similarity-checking software, such as Turnitin. This is applicable to written assessment submissions at all SCQF levels. You may be asked to submit your written assessment online through similarity-checking software, such as Turnitin.

Support and guidance in understanding and interpreting a Turnitin originality report from induction onwards, can be accessed through the Learning Development Centre in your school. More information about referencing and plagiarism can also be found at Cite Them Right.

Where plagiarism is detected this will be dealt with under the Code of Student Conduct.

All marks are provisional and subject to verification by the relevant Progression and Awards Board. All marks are non-negotiable.

MMN230182 Module Pre-Requisite

Students can only proceed with the following assessments of the MRP module providing that students have successfully passed the pre-requisite module: Post-Graduate Research Methods (MMN230181).

MMN230182 Assessment Schedule

Master Research Project
Length	Dependant on format (see table below)
Format	Electronic version via Turnitin in the MPR module site on GCU Learn.
Submission	11^th December 4PM
Weighting	100%
Feedback	Marks released after all the Progression and Awards Boards involved in MRP have met in September
Support	Supervisor and drop in with Module Leader
Resubmission	– In the following semester. Exact date to be determined at a later date

MMN230182 Assessment Format

The assessment of the Masters Research project can be submitted in one of four formats, which are summarised in the table below. The following section (7.4.1-7.4.6) also goes into the detail of the differing formats and the structure of the various submissions. The type of project in which the student wishes to undertake must be discussed and agreed with their supervisor in the first meeting. Students will adhere to the agreed assessment format throughout the entirety of their research. Students may only change their declared assessment format with approval of their supervisor.

Students belonging to MADMACC (MA Digital Media and Content Creation) or LLM (International Commercial Law) programs have specific assessment formats that are exclusive to their programs which they must adopt for their project for the MRP submission.

Master Research Project – Choose one of the following formats
Dissertation	12,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	Normally a written account of findings based on the collection and analysis of primary data and/or analysis of secondary data. Students intending to take this option will be expected to identify the research topic, methodological approach, appropriate research design and evidence why critical and methodological knowledge is appropriate for this area of investigation. This will be addressed in the Prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module.
Research Project:	10,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	The Research Report may be better suited to those students who intend to pursue a career within a specific field or industry and can identify an issue to be investigated and presented in a formal report format. Students intending to take this option will be expected to identify the research topic, appropriate research design and evidence why a research report is appropriate for this area of investigation. This will be addressed in the Prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module.
Systematic Review	12,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	Review would normally use an approved method e.g. Cochrane Collaboration. Students intending to take this option will be expected to identify the research topic, appropriate research design and evidence why a systematic review is appropriate for this area of investigation. This will be addressed in the Prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module. Students wishing to take this option must obtain agreement with their supervisor at the beginning of the project.
Consultancy Project	10,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	The Consultancy Project is normally primary data based and requires the student to adopt the role of a consultant. Students intending to take this option are required to secure an agreement in principal from the client organisation. This will be addressed in the prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module. This will be addressed in the Prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module specifically for media students.
Multimedia Submission (MADMACC Students Only)	4,000-6,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	The project allows students to demonstrate everything they have learned about media and the semiotics of digital media and storytelling. Students are enabled to work with a supervisor to bring forward their major piece of work. Some students will be producing a textual project, others, audio-visual and digital, online portfolios will be focused around one key research challenge or content creation project. Students will submit in one or a mixture of the following formats to the total value of 45 credits. All formats include an accompanying 4,000-6,000 word textual discussion: Audio only project (c. 30 minutes or a shorter serial). Audio-visual programme or campaign videos (usually a series of videos to the total of around 30 mins or less. Digital Content Portfolio, mixed media portfolio of content creation. Online webpages/social media campaign for a single campaign or project.
Textual Analysis Dissertation (MADMACC Students Only)	12,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	A media textual analysis project involves analysing and interpreting multimedia texts such as films, TV shows, advertisements, PR campaigns, social media posts, blogs, vlogs, and many more. You will be expected to identify a research topic, appropriate sample, and theoretical framework. The sample to be analysed in your dissertation (how many episodes, social media posts, videos, etc) will be decided by you with your supervisor’s help. There may be an opportunity for a 12,000-word equivalent to be delivered in audiovisual essay form. Video essays are multimedia forms of textual analysis where the researcher shows the object(s) of analysis and demonstrates the analysis by using media content rather than just writing about it. This type of project will depend on the prerequisite editing skills of the student, the suitability of topic, and the type of text(s) under analysis. Depending on the type of video essay – which can range from more creative to straightforward explanatory works of critical analysis – the project may also require a written component.
Law dissertation (LLM students Only)	12,000 word equivalent
Format/overview	I. Abstract II. Acknowledgements III. Table of Contents IV. List of Abbreviations Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Literature Review Chapter 3: Research Methodology Chapter 4: Legal Analysis Chapter 5 (indicative): Legal Analysis Chapter 6 (indicative): Legal Analysis Chapter 7: Conclusion Bibliography This will be addressed in the Prerequisite Postgraduate Research Methods Module specifically for law students.

The Dissertation (12,000 words)

The Dissertation is an assignment written in a scholarly fashion. The recommended format is below

Dissertation

Title Page/Front Cover

Inside Front Cover

i. Abstract

ii. Acknowledgements

iii. Author’s Declaration

iv. Table of Contents

v. List of Figures

vi. List of Tables

vii. List of Appendices

viii. Abbreviations

I. Introduction

II. Literature Review

III. Methodology

IV. Results and Analysis

V. Conclusions, Limitations and Recommendations

VI. References

VII. Bibliography

VIII. Appendices - must include a copy of the Student Meeting Record and Completed Ethical Approval Form

Title Page/Front Cover

See Appendix A for a delineation of the title page

Inside Front Cover

See Appendix B for an example of the inside front cover for the dissertation

Abstract

The abstract can only be produced after the introduction, body of the dissertation, and conclusions have been completed. An abstract is simply a résumé of the subject matter under investigation; the aim, background setting, how the task was tackled, methods used, the main findings, conclusions and any recommendations. The abstract provides a concise review of the dissertation. It should not normally exceed 400 words.

Acknowledgements

This section gives the student the opportunity to express thanks due to the individuals or employer who have given assistance or advice during the process.

Author’s Declaration (Plagiarism)

See Appendix I for information contained in Declaration page

Table of Contents Page

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Appendices

Chapter I Introduction

The Introduction is meant to set the scene, situation and subject. It should cover the background leading to the situation being examined. It is desirable to place the research into the industrial, geographic, social and other environments in which it has to operate (the context). The aim of a dissertation is of particular importance: it should be clear, concise and easily understood by all potential readers. All the research activity and the submitted dissertation should be related to this initial agreed statement of intent. It is preferable for the aim to have its own separate heading within the Introduction and so stand out as a major point. The content and range of an Introduction may vary to suit the particular circumstances. A short final section of the Introduction should tell the reader what topics are going to be discussed in each of the chapters and how the chapters are related to each other. In this way, the reader, in effect, is being provided with a “road map” of the work ahead. Thus, at a glance, they can see (1) the starting point, (2) the context in which the journey is taking place, (3) where they are going to end up, and, (4) the route which they will take to reach their final destination. Such a “map” will enable the reader to navigate their way through your work much more easily and appreciate to the maximum what you have done.

Chapter II Literature Review

The main reasons for the presence of a literature review in a Master’s dissertation are:

to present and to analyse, in a critical manner, that part of the published literature which is relevant to your research topic and which acts as the basis for a fuller understanding of the context in which you are conducting your research; thus, helping the reader to a more rounded appreciation of what you have completed.
to act as a backdrop against which what you have done in the remainder of the dissertation may be analysed and critically evaluated so as to give the reader the opportunity to assess the worth of your writing, analytical and research skills
to show that not only have you discovered and reported what you have found to be relevant in the literature search, but that you have understood it and that you are able to analyse it in a critical manner
to demonstrate that your knowledge of the area of interest is detailed enough that you are able to identify gaps in the coverage of the topic; thus justifying the reason(s) for your research
to illustrate that you know what the key variables, trends and “actors” are in the environment of your study, i.e. you show that you know what are the important issues are that need to be investigated.
to enable readers to be able to measure the validity of your choice(s) of research methodology, the appropriateness of the process(es) by which you analyse your results, and whether or not your findings are congruent with the accepted research which has gone before.

The Literature Review is presented in the form of a précis, a classification, a comparison and a critical analysis of that material which is germane to a full understanding of a research study. Such published material may be drawn from all, or a combination of, textbooks, academic journal articles, academic and/or industry focused conference papers, reports, case studies, the internet, magazine features or newspaper articles. Emphasis should be given to academic sources. The conclusion of the Literature Review should summarise the major points that the review has uncovered, point out the gap(s) in the literature, if there are any, and use these to emphasise the justification for carrying out the current research project. The Literature Review should lead and justify the research objectives and questions of your dissertation.

Chapter III Research Methodology

The Research Methodology chapter should begin by stating, the research aim(s) and objectives of the project. This chapter justifies to the reader the process by which the research questions, which were derived by an analysis of the relevant literature, are answered. This chapter must, painstakingly, argue for and justify each decision that is taken when arriving at the way in which the research is to be organised and should include the following sections:

Introduction	How is the chapter organised? What are the aim(s) and objectives?
Research Rationale	Primary versus Secondary Research: the justification for primary or secondary data analysis should be made at this juncture of the dissertation.
Research Paradigms	Positivist, realist or interpretivist
Research Approach	Inductive or deductive
Sample Criteria	Justification and description of…
Research Design	Survey, case study, action research, grounded theory…
Research Methods	Observation, semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews, focus groups, questionnaires …
Design and content of data capture tool	Description and justification for questions relating to questionnaire or interview guide
Analysis Methods	Grounded theory analysis, discourse analysis, content analysis, independent samples t-test, correlation analysis, regression analysis…
Research limitations	Limitations of your research methodology
Conclusion	A summary of the research methodology in a table format could be included here. Link to next chapter.

Chapter IV Results and Analysis

The context of the research is presented in the Introduction to the dissertation. In the Literature Review the work of previously published authors is analysed and a set of questions are derived that need to be answered to fulfill the objectives of this study. In the Research Methodology section, the reader is taken through what techniques were available, what their advantages and disadvantages were, and what guided the choices that were made. In the Analysis and Results section, the outcome of the research exercise is presented to the reader.

The introduction of this chapter should remind the reader what the research aim(s) and objectives were. Your review of the literature and your evaluation of the various themes, issues and frameworks, helped you to develop a more specific set of research questions. In essence, your analysis of the data that you have collected from your fieldwork (either primary or secondary) should provide answers to these questions. You should, as a matter of priority, focus attention on data that is directly relevant to the research objectives. You should avoid the mistake of including analysis that might be interesting in a general way, but is not linked to the original direction of the dissertation. Peripheral data can be included as an appendix, however you are reminded that there is a limit of 25 pages for appendices. The introduction should also explain how the results are to be presented.

The main part of the chapter is the presentation of the results. Even projects of relatively moderate dimensions will generate a mass of data which has to be considered. This data must be organised in a logical and coherently ordered whole so that the author’s thought processes and interpretation are clear to the reader.

Whatever analysis of the data has been undertaken must be accomplished with care and attention to detail in the way in which the results are presented. Describe in an accessible manner what the research has uncovered and include only the most pertinent figures as evidence of your findings. Graphs, diagrams, pie-charts, tables etc. are all useful ways of presenting research results as long as they are relevant and illustrate your points.

Not all dissertations contain quantitative data. In many situations, students will have made extensive use of qualitative research techniques such as focus groups and/or in-depth unstructured interviews. While quantitative data lends itself to graphs, tables and so on, qualitative data, and the way it is presented, pose particular challenges for students. As ever, your objective should be based on the belief that the data must be presented in such a manner as to make it easy for the reader to follow the logic of the analysis.

The analysis of qualitative data should be based on the research questions and issues that were explored during fieldwork or organised by themes emanating from the data. Each of these questions or themes should be examined separately. This should be supported with relevant quotations from the transcripts of the interviews. Lengthy quotations should be avoided, unless they are of critical importance.

Chapter V Conclusions, Limitations and Recommendations

In the final section of the report, you must draw from the results, for each of the research objectives, the implications that the findings have for the organisation, or for the portion of business/marketing theory that you have been investigating. Findings should be linked back to the academic literature, demonstrating how the research complements or contradicts the literature. Implications should be drawn logically from the outcome of the data analysis.

Limitations

In the course of the research, problems may have occurred due to all or some of the following reasons:

the constraints of time which were out with your control. Remember you should identify a research design which fits within your time frame.
the degree to which the results can be applied to a larger population.
the potential effects of non-response where relevant to your work.

If any, or all, of the above did occur, then it is important that you bring them to the attention of the reader. Without any discussion of these points, an essential element of the context in which the research took place will be missing. It is important that you demonstrate an appreciation of both the practical limitations of your work and the conceptual limitations in terms of the method adopted and the implications of that method for the data collected.

Recommendations

If you are working for a business, or other organisation, it may be, because of the strategic importance of the decisions that have to be made, that you will have been asked to make any recommendations; the research results being only one input to their process of making policy decisions. If this is the case, great care should be exercised. You must remember that you only have knowledge of the findings of this one particular study, and that this study must be the sole basis on which to base your recommendations. Caution is recommended because of the researcher’s possibly limited knowledge and view of the company’s overall situation. The final section of this, the last chapter should tell the reader what you personally have learned about the subject area, what you have learned about research methodology, and finally, what, if you were to repeat the project, you would do differently.

References

References are placed at the end of the dissertation (in alphabetical order of first author’s surname). It is important that you get citations and references correct. You must always cite the source of your material; inadequate citation could leave you open to the suspicion of plagiarism. A Citation includes any formal mention that you make in your dissertation to something written by someone else. Every citation must be supported by a reference which supplies the details which will enable the reader to follow up that citation. The University employs the Harvard System of Referencing.

Appendices

Appendices are not counted as being within the word guide of a dissertation. Material for appendices (e.g. organisation charts, copy of questionnaires, detailed results, statistical analysis, tables and ethical consent form) should be letter referenced in the sequence in which they are first mentioned in the text. Each appendix should start on a separate page.

Research Report (10,000 words)

The report format is linked to a disciplinary approach and the format should be negotiated/discussed with the supervisor in the first instance. Guidelines for the exact format and sections will then be agreed with your supervisor prior to starting the work.

However, suggested sections could include the following:

Acknowledgements (if relevant)

Author’s Declaration of Originality for Projection

Executive Summary

Introduction

Topic Rationale and Research Problem and Research Question(s)

Review of Relevant Literature and Theoretical Framework

Identification of gaps in the literature/Identification,
Description and evaluation of appropriate framework

Methodology/Methods

Identification and evaluation of appropriate methodological strategy supported by appropriate literature.
Precautions taken to address ethical issues.
Description and justification of data collection instruments and sampling
Steps taken to access the field for data collection, if relevant
Generalisability of results and limitations of research design

Findings

Explanation of the organisation of your report findings
Identification of emergent themes from the data collected and how these were identified.
Consideration of how the findings address the research question(s)

Discussion

Interpretation of findings within the previously identified theoretical framework
Discussion and justification of the significance of findings within the wider topic field of study

Appendices - must include a copy of the Student Meeting Record and Completed Ethical Approval Form

Reference Section & Bibliography

Systematic Literature Review (12,000 words)

The Systematic Review is also dependent on discipline and the format depends on conventions such as the Cochrane Collaboration for example. Therefore, if this is the intended option for the Masters Research Project, it should be discussed with the supervisor in the first instance. Guidelines for the exact format and sections will then be agreed with your supervisor prior to starting the work. However, suggested sections could include the following:

Acknowledgements (if relevant)

Author’s Declaration of Originality for Projection

Do You Need MMN230182 Dissertation of This Question

Order Non-Plagiarized Dissertation

Table of Contents Page

Chapter 1: Introduction to overall study

Introduction, background and rationale to study area and topic

Chapter 2: Methodology and Methods

Eligibility criteria
Types of Studies
Participants
Intervention/Phenomena of Interest
Types of Outcomes.
Context
Search Strategy
Inclusion/Exclusion
Assessment of Methodology
Data Extraction
Data Synthesis

Chapter 3: Results and Analysis

This would include critique of the relevant research designs and your analysis of them bearing in mind their research aim and your own work.

Chapter 4: Discussion

Offer a link between the analysis, research aim and context of the work.

Chapter 5: Limitations and Ethical Issues

Chapter 6: Recommendations for Further Research

Chapter 7: Conclusion

References and Bibliography (if including both)

Appendices must include a copy of the Student Meeting Record and Completed Ethical Approval Form

Consultancy Project (10,000 words)

The Consultancy Project is normally primary data based and requires the student to adopt the role of a consultant. Students intending to take this option are required to secure an agreement in principal from the client organisation. Therefore, it is expected that the project will refer to the identified corporate issue/task and clearly identify the rationale and scope of the project. Guidelines for the exact format and sections will then be agreed with your supervisor prior to starting the work. However, suggested sections could include the following:

Consultancy Project

Title Page (which includes author’s declaration)

1. Executive Summary

2. Introduction and context

3. Client Profile

4. Research aim(s) and objectives

5. Methodology

6. Observations (analysis):Inc Proposed solutions

7. Conclusion

8. References

9. Appendix

10. Ethical consent form

11. Author’s Declaration of Originality for Projection

12. Student Meeting Record

Table of Contents Page

Executive Summary

This section summarizes the whole thing in as few pages as possible. You’ll give your readers a rough idea of what to expect and emphasize what the report is about. The summary provides a concise explanation of all the important information in the report and highlights analysis, problems, solutions, recommendations, and conclusions. An executive summary is the brief overview section included in a long report or document. This part of the report primarily focuses on the key topics and the most important data within it. It can include an overall business goal of the company or short-term strategic objectives. The length of the summary depends on the type of report, but it is typically one or two pages long.

Introduction and Context

The introduction will contain the background to your choice of topic and introduce the following sections of the project. In addition to setting the tone, this section addresses the main issues and problems that require your expertise. Provide brief details about the problems and mention the approaches and methods you will use to analyze and solve them. Businesses hire consultants for specific jobs or to solve problems. It also introduces the report to readers and clearly describes the purpose of the report. Highlight only the key facts and important bits of information, and refrain from being too descriptive.

Client Profile

This section covers information about your client in this section. This includes the basics like business address, industry, specializations, size, past and current efforts, and other relevant information.

Research aim(s) and Objectives

Your client has a problem they need solved. This is the basic purpose of the report and your engagement with the client and should be reflected in the Aim(s). Objectives in order to achieve the aim(s) should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-Bound).

Methodology

Detail and justify exactly HOW you will go about the research

What research methodology will you adopt? Which precise methods will derive from that? How will these choices help you achieve your aim(s) and objectives?

Observations (analysis): Including Proposed solutions

This will probably be the biggest part of your consulting report. As a part of your job as a consultant, you have to gather information by observing and collecting data about the client’s field and performance. This section comprises the consultant's findings and how they propose to solve the problem or how they have already done so. You need information about individual employees, the management model, and even the entire decision making process. As the individuals reading these reports are high-level business professionals, it's important to transmit the information clearly and concisely. An effective way to do this is through visualisation tools, such as charts and graphs. Finally, this section should propose solutions for the client including the feasibility of those solutions in relation to the limitations of the client.

Conclusion

In the final section of the report, you must draw from the results, for each of the research objectives, the implications that the findings have for the organization. Explain, in detail, why your recommendations are warranted.

References

Please provide a full list of all works cited in the proposal. Ensure your referencing system is clear, consistent and thorough using the GCU Harvard Referencing System.

Appendix

See section 10 for an outline the marking criteria (also Appendix D).

MADMACC Students only: Multimedia Submission (4,000-6,000 Words)

Title Page/Front Cover

See Appendix E for a delineation of the title page

Inside Front Cover

See Appendix G for an example of the inside front cover for the dissertation

Abstract

Acknowledgements

This section gives the student the opportunity to express thanks due to the individuals or employer who have given assistance or advice during the process.

Author’s Declaration

See Appendix I for information contained in Declaration page

Table of Contents Page

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Appendices

Chapter I Introduction

Introduction for this type of project should include:

Your product’s genre, format and objective.
Description of the target audience.
The product’s concept and USP (unique selling point).
A brief overview of the theoretical framework.
Map of the dissertation which includes brief descriptions of each chapter.
Ethical considerations.

Your supervisor will help determine the exact structure and content of this chapter.

Recommended word count for this chapter: 500 words.

Chapter II Literature Review

This chapter contains the theoretical basis for your discussion, in Chapter IV, of your project. The aim of this chapter is:

to present and to analyse, in a critical manner, that part of the published literature which is relevant to your research topic and which acts as the basis for a fuller understanding of the context in which you are conducting your research; thus helping the reader to a more rounded appreciation of what you have completed.
to act as a backdrop against which what you have done in the remainder of the dissertation may be analysed and critically evaluated so as to give the reader the opportunity to assess the worth of your writing, analytical and research skills
to show that not only have you discovered and reported what you have found to be relevant in the literature search, but that you have understood it and that you are able to analyse it in a critical manner
to demonstrate that your knowledge of the area of interest is detailed enough that you are able to identify gaps in the coverage of the topic; thus justifying the reason(s) for your research
to illustrate that you know what the key variables, trends and “actors” are in the environment of your study, i.e. you show that you know what are the important issues are that need to be investigated.
to enable readers to be able to measure the validity of your choice(s) of research methodology, the appropriateness of the process(es) by which you analyze your results, and whether or not your findings are congruent with the accepted research which has gone before.

Recommended word count: 800-1500 words.

Chapter III Creative Methodology and Process

This chapter should contain your description of the inspiration and decision-making process behind the project, justification of the format and subject, the work on the project, and the reflection section outlining any issues and difficulties that arose during the project’s execution. The reflection section should also contain a note on limitations.

Recommended word count: 800-1500 words.

Chapter IV Analysis

In Analysis, the theoretical framework outlined in the Introduction and Literature Review is applied to the project. This should be supported with references from relevant academic literature and illustrated with examples. Lengthy quotations should be avoided, unless they are of critical importance. Theories and concepts from any part of the Programme can be used in construction of the framework (e.g., semiotics, leadership, creativity) as long as they are relevant to the project.

Recommended word count: 4000-5000 words.

Chapter V Conclusions

This chapter should synthesize the main points discussed in the dissertation, state any limitations and potential future developments.

References

Recommended word count: 500 words.

Appendices

MADMACC Students Only: Textual Analysis (12,000 Words)

Title Page/Front Cover

See Appendix H for a delineation of the title page

Abstract

Acknowledgements

This section gives the student the opportunity to express thanks due to the individuals or employer who have given assistance or advice during the process.

Author’s Declaration

See Appendix I for information contained in Declaration page

Table of Contents Page

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Appendices

Chapter I Introduction

Introduction typically includes:

A contextual overview of the project.
Research question, aim(s) and objectives.
Justification of the topic.
A brief overview of the theoretical framework.
Map of the dissertation which includes brief descriptions of each chapter.
Methodological overview/description and justification of the sample.
Ethical considerations.

Your supervisor will help determine the exact structure and content of this chapter.

Recommended word count: 1000-1500 words.

Chapter II Literature Review

The main reasons for the presence of a literature review in a Master’s dissertation are:

to present and to analyse, in a critical manner, that part of the published literature which is relevant to your research topic and which acts as the basis for a fuller understanding of the context in which you are conducting your research; thus helping the reader to a more rounded appreciation of what you have completed.
to act as a backdrop against which what you have done in the remainder of the dissertation may be analysed and critically evaluated so as to give the reader the opportunity to assess the worth of your writing, analytical and research skills
to show that not only have you discovered and reported what you have found to be relevant in the literature search, but that you have understood it and that you are able to analyse it in a critical manner
to demonstrate that your knowledge of the area of interest is detailed enough that you are able to identify gaps in the coverage of the topic; thus, justifying the reason(s) for your research
to illustrate that you know what the key variables, trends and “actors” are in the environment of your study, i.e. you show that you know what are the important issues are that need to be investigated.
to enable readers to be able to measure the validity of your choice(s) of research methodology, the appropriateness of the process(es) by which you analyse your results, and whether or not your findings are congruent with the accepted research which has gone before.

Recommended word count: 2000-3000 words.

Analysis Chapters (normally between 2 and 4)

The analysis of the media sample should be based on the research questions and issues that were explored during fieldwork or organised by themes. Each of these questions or themes should be examined in a separate chapter. This should be supported with references from relevant academic literature and illustrated with examples. Lengthy quotations should be avoided, unless they are of critical importance. You also need to ensure that your use of online material follows current ethical guidelines.

Recommended word count: 5000-7000 words.

Chapter V Conclusions, Limitations and Future Focus

Limitations

In the course of the research, problems may have occurred due to all or some of the following reasons:

the constraints of time which were out with your control. Remember you should identify a research design which fits within your time frame.
the degree to which the results can be applied to a larger population.
the potential effects of non-response where relevant to your work.

Future Focus

In this section you need to identify how this topic/subject area may develop in future, and how the research gaps highlighted in the Limitations section may be addressed.

Recommended word count for Conclusion: 1000 words.

References

Appendices

LLM Students Only: Law Dissertation (12,000 words)

LLM Dissertation Structure

V. Abstract

A concise summary of the entire dissertation. It typically ranges from 150 to 300 words and includes the following elements:

Objectives: States the main objectives of the research.

Methodology: Briefly describes the research methods adopted.

Key Findings: Summarises the most important findings of the research.

Conclusions: Provides a brief conclusion based on the findings.

VI. Acknowledgements

Expression of gratitude to those who supported the research. This can include:

Supervisors and Advisors: Acknowledges the guidance and support provided by academic supervisors and advisors.

Colleagues and Peers: Thanks fellow students, colleagues, and peers who contributed to the research process.

Family and Friends: Acknowledges the personal support received from family and friends.

VII. Table of Contents

A detailed outline of the dissertation. It includes:

Chapters: List of all chapters.

Sections and Sub-sections: Breakdown of each chapter into sections and sub-sections with corresponding page numbers.

List of Figures and Tables

VIII. List of Abbreviations

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Background

Provision of context for the research. Introduction of the topic and setting the stage for the problem statement.

1.2 Problem Statement

Articulation of the specific problem or issue the dissertation addresses. Explanation of why the research is necessary and what gap it aims to fill.

1.3 Research Objectives

List of the main goals the research aims to be achieved. Objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

1.4 Research Questions

Reference to the questions the research seeks to answer. These questions guide the research and are directly related to the objectives.

1.5 Significance of the Study

Explanation of the importance and potential impact of the research.

1.6 Structure of the Dissertation

A brief account of the content of each chapter.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Overview of Relevant Legal Framework

A review of the legal framework relevant to the research topic (existing laws or policies).

2.2 Historical Context and Development (if applicable)

A demonstration of the evolution of the topic over time.

2.3 Key Legal Theories and Doctrines

Discussion on the main theories and legal doctrines that underpin the research (the theoretical foundation for the study).

2.4 Critical Analysis of Existing Literature

Examination of the strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the current body of knowledge. Identification of areas where further research is needed.

2.5 Identification of Research Gaps

Identification of the gaps in existing research that the dissertation aims to fill. Explanation of how the research will address these gaps.

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

3.1 Research Design

Description of the overall approach and strategy of the research. Explanation of how the research is structured with a view to achieving the objectives.

3.2 Legal Research Methods (Doctrinal, Empirical, Comparative, etc.)

Discussion on the legal research method utilised in the study.

3.3 Data Collection (Case Law, Statutes, Legal Documents)

Explanation of how data was collected, including sources such as case law, statutes, and legal documents.

3.4 Ethical Considerations (if any)

Reference to any ethical issues encountered and how they were addressed.

Chapter 4: Legal Analysis

4.1 Overview of the Legal Issue/Case Study

A detailed overview of the specific legal issue or case study under examination.

4.2 Examination of the Relevant Legal Framework

Discussion on the legal framework pertinent to the issue.

4.3 Analysis of Judicial Decisions (if applicable)

Discussion on judicial decisions related to the topic.

4.4 Comparative Legal Analysis (if applicable)

A comparison of the legal issue across different jurisdictions (similarities/ differences).

4.5 Discussion of Legal Principles and Their Application

Discussion on the legal principles involved and how they apply to the issue at hand.

Chapter 5 (indicative): Legal Analysis

5.1 Presentation of Findings

5.2 Interpretation of Results

Interpretation of the significance of the findings in the context of the research questions. Explanation of what the results mean.

5.3 Implications for Legal Practice

Discussion on the practical implications of the findings for legal practice and policy.

5.4 Policy Recommendations (if applicable)

If applicable, this section provides policy recommendations based on the research findings. It suggests changes to laws or practices.

Chapter 6 (indicative): Legal Analysis

6.1 Case Study 1: [Specific Legal Issue or Case]

A detailed examination of a specific legal issue or case.

6.2 Case Study 2: [Specific Legal Issue or Case]

A detailed examination of another specific legal issue or case.

6.3 Lessons Learned from Case Studies

Discussion on the lessons learned from the case studies (key insights and implications).

6.4 Broader Implications for Law and Policy

Exploration of the broader implications of the case studies for law and policy.

Chapter 7: Conclusion

7.1 Summary of Findings

7.2 Contributions to Legal Scholarship

Explanation of how the research advances knowledge in the cognitive area.

7.3 Limitations of the Study

Acknowledgement of any constraints inherent in the research.

7.4 Recommendations for Future Research

Identification of potential new routes to explore.

Bibliography

1. Primary Sources

Statutes and Legislation: List of all relevant laws, statutes, and legislative acts cited in the dissertation.

List of Cases: Includes all referenced cases, providing full Oscola compliant citations.

Regulations and Treaties: Mention of any relevant administrative regulations, international treaties, and agreements.

2. Secondary Sources

Books: List of all books used in the research. Includes the full title, author(s), edition (if applicable), publisher, and year of publication.

Journal Articles: Full citations for all journal articles, including the article title, author(s), journal name, volume, issue number, year, and page numbers.

Encyclopaedias and Dictionaries

Reports and Official Documents

Online Journals and Articles: Full citations, including URLs or DOIs.

Websites and Databases: Complete URL and the date accessed.

Theses and Dissertations

Conference Papers

Newspapers and Magazines: Full details, including the date of publication.

7.5 Submission Guidelines

One electronic copy to be submitted via Turnitin in GCU Learn. Documents MUST be MS Word.

The deadline for submission of all final work is on or before, 4pm 11th December

Format of project or dissertation:

Documents MUST be MS Word. PDF files will not be accepted and thus will not be marked. If you submit an PDF be asked to resubmit failure to do so your submission will not be marked. This is to allow through similarity an AI checks on submissions.

The dissertation/project should be typed on 1.5 line spacing on one side only of A4 white paper except for indented quotations or footnotes where single spacing may be used.

The margin at the left-hand binding edge of the page should not be less than 4cms; other margins should not be less than 2cms.

Pages should be numbered consecutively through the main text including photographs and/or figures included as whole pages at the bottom of the page.

Tables and figures should be numbered and titled and a list included in the Contents.

All ideas in the text should be referenced and references listed in full at the end of the dissertation in alphabetical order of first named author. The GCU Harvard style of referencing should be used.

Copies of the dissertation/masters research project should be presented in a permanent and legible form using one of these fonts: Arial; Times New Roman or Calibri; the size of the font should be 12 pt.

The title page/front cover for dissertations should give the following information:

the full title of the Masters Research Project
Format chosen for the work e.g. dissertation/systematic review/journal article and proposal/research report
the full name of the author
the degree that is awarded by the University
the award for which the degree is submitted in partial fulfilment of its requirements
the month and year of submission
Appendix H shows a specimen example

MMN230182 The Research Project Assessment

Developed from your Proposal from the previous trimester, you will undertake the research that will formulate your Project. The Masters Research Project should be viewed as an independent piece of work with academic supervision. Further support will be provided throughout the process via a series of 6 lectures developed and delivered in conjunction with the Learning Development Centre (LDC). In addition, there will be 6 hours of practical guidance to support data management and analysis.

The Project Subject Co-ordinators will assign individual students to a Supervisor with relevant knowledge of the student's subject area. Students will have regular one-to-one tutorials with their designated Supervisor to support them in producing the project. It is anticipated that students will meet with their supervisors six times during the module (as detailed in the syllabus).

The University's virtual learning environment, GCULearn, will be used to complement and support the face to face and independent learning elements of the module, enhancing student engagement and enriching the learning experience. GCULearn will host digital resources and key readings such as journal articles, digital book chapters, online lectures, web links and embedded video clips.

MMN230182 Project Supervision

Following submission of the Proposal, you will be allocated a Supervisor to support you during the Project stage of the module. The Project is above all your project, and its success or failure will ultimately depend on your commitment, effort and organisation. The role of the Supervisor is to offer general advice and guidance and to be an appropriate point of contact during the researching and writing of the project. Your Supervisor will help in terms of discussing ideas; assisting you with approach and structure; reading draft chapters and providing constructive feedback. You will be required to maintain regular contact with your Supervisor throughout the Project process and this should be evidenced in the Record of Supervision (Appendix A and MRP module site on GCU Learn) completed by the Supervisor that is required as part of your Project submission.

It is expected that you will have up to five meetings with your Supervisor. In order to make the most of meetings, you will need to prepare in advance of each. It is your responsibility to arrange meetings and attend regular consultations with your Supervisor. Be sure to establish at the start of the process if there are times when your Supervisor will not be available so you can take account of this in your planning. While most Supervisors are happy to accept e-mail communications from their students, you must remember that they have many other demands on their time and cannot guarantee to respond to unsolicited e-mails quickly. You should agree the nature of your communication with your Supervisor at the start of the Project.

Overwhelming evidence demonstrates that students who do not maintain regular contact with their Supervisor are less successful, and in some cases fail the Project. Lack of contact with your Supervisor will be taken into account in the assessment of your performance under the criterion Structure, Presentation, Scholarly Conduct, which is worth 15% of the final mark. See section 11 below covering Project Marking Criteria.

MMN230182 Supervisor and Student Responsibilities

The following is a summary of the responsibilities of each party, student and Supervisor.

Responsibilities of Student are to:

be independent
seek advice and feedback on their work
have regular meetings with the Supervisor
proof read and perform in-depth self-critique of draft chapters
send draft chapters to supervisors 5 working days in advance of the meeting
accurately report on progress and identify any problems to your supervisor
take ultimate responsibility for the direction and content of the Project
raise any difficulties/concerns with the supervisor process as soon as possible (see section 14.2 on Elevating Project Concerns)

Responsibilities of Supervisor are to:

approve the research topic aims and objectives
discuss the structure, literature and methods of research
review draft chapters and provide written/oral feedback within 5 days
be constructively critical
be available when necessary, and within reason, for up to six meetings
adhere to meeting guidelines
be professional, open and supportive
give the student serious attention during discussion in meetings
have knowledge of the research area and exchange ideas freely
be aware of potential pitfalls in the research topic
direct student to support services where appropriate
maintain the Record of Supervision using the form available in appendix A and on the MRP module site on GCU Learn
alert the Academic Project Co-ordinator or Module Leader with progress reports for any student experiencing issues and/or difficulties

Students will be expected to submit completed draft chapters to supervisors at least 10 working days before a scheduled meeting. Supervisors will be expected to provide feedback on one draft of each chapter of the Project as it progresses which constitutes feedback on one completed draft. A final complete draft may also be reviewed (but not detailed feedback) by the supervisor provided that submissions are made to the Supervisor at least two weeks prior to the Project submission deadline.

MMN230182 Project Draft Chapter Deadlines

Although you can submit work to your Supervisor at any mutually convenient time, interim deadlines are required so that satisfactory progress can be monitored. These interim deadlines are to be agreed upon between yourself and the supervisor. If you fail to meet these deadlines, you should expect to be contacted by the Academic Project Co-ordinator or Module Leader as part of GCU’s duty of care.

In order for the feedback to be valuable, work submitted must be full chapters, not just parts of chapters, and must represent a substantial contribution to the Project. Feedback from Supervisors will help you to develop and strengthen your work.

MMN230182 Project Marking Criteria and Content

Your Project will be marked on the following five criteria, the weighting of each chapter will vary depending on the submission type see Appendix B-F:

Use of Related Academic Literature
Methodology/Theoretical Framework
Analysis/Findings
Conclusions
Structure, Presentation, Scholarly Conduct

The Project Rubric is available in Appendix B and in the MPR module site on GCU Learn. Breakdown of these headings is based on the following guidelines.

Project Use of Related Academic Literature

A good quality Project will demonstrate a thorough grasp of relevant academic literature (books, academic journals) related to the topic chosen. The Project should evidence the student’s ability to use academic literature in a critical manner to develop the argument within the study. The academic literature should be carefully cited using Harvard conventions. There should be explicit account of the literature from which the theoretical approach of the research is drawn.

Project Methodology/Theoretical Framework

The Project should outline the theoretical framework within which the research will be carried out, and must specify which research methods, indicating clearly how these were applied, and the ways in which they related to the aims and objectives of the study. This chapter must also show awareness of ethical issues raised by the approach adopted, and how these were addressed. Limitations inherent in the approach should be recognised.

Project Analysis/Findings

Projects must include analysis of primary (and where appropriate) secondary data. ‘Analysis’ will be assessed in relation to the ways that the student has actually defined and applied critical theories within a relevant research methodology and/or in relation to the depth of engagement with an informed evaluation of ‘textual’ practices. Evidence of independent critical judgment, originality and depth of analysis will characterise Projects awarded the highest grades, in which the student’s own ‘critical voice’ has been brought to bear not only on primary source material but on existing scholarship and debates. A sense of scholarly authoritativeness and mastery over the chosen topic will distinguish the best Project work.

There is no need to include all of the primary data (e.g. transcripts, questionnaires, observations). However, where appropriate, evidence of data analysis can be presented in the appendix. For example, for qualitative research, include one interview transcript with notes/codes to show analysis was conducted. Alternatively, for quantitative analysis, tables of data analysis extracted from SPSS can be included. Seek guidance from your supervisor.

Project Conclusions

Conclusions should include some sense of outcomes which have evolved out of the discussion, i.e. what the research has tried to argue, and how this has made a contribution to knowledge. Future research recommendations based upon the output of the study should be reported and recommendations for industry should be considered where relevant.

Project Structure, Presentation, Scholarly Conduct

The Project should demonstrate an organised structure that takes the reader on a logical and easy-to-follow journey through the argument being developed. It should start with an Introduction that clearly states the aim and objectives of the project and contextualises the material to be addressed. It is largely based on whether the Project as a whole fulfils its aims and objectives as stated in the Introduction that its success or otherwise will be judged.

Appropriate use of academic conventions, writing style (grammar, spelling, and punctuation), as well as good quality drafting and proof-reading will contribute to the final mark.

Credit will be given to work where the writing possesses marked qualities of clarity, focus, structure and relevance. A well-signposted structure with clear pagination and sub-sectioning will gain marks in this category too. The markers will also take into account standards of presentation of the Project as a whole, with good or imaginative design, layout and ‘packaging’ (e.g. front cover; binding; quality of appendices and other accompanying material submitted), all gaining credit.

LLM Dissertation Marking Criteria and Content

The Dissertation will be marked on the following criteria:

Abstract, introduction and literature review
Methodology
Results, discussion, conclusion recommendations, and presentation

Abstract, introduction and literature review

When writing a master's dissertation, several key factors must be considered to ensure the work meets high academic standards and contributes meaningfully to the field of study. Formulating a clear and focused research question and well-defined objectives is crucial as they guide the research process. Conducting a thorough literature review provides context and identifies gaps the research will address. Selecting an appropriate methodology, systematically collecting and analysing data, and demonstrating the originality and contribution to knowledge are essential. The dissertation should be structured logically with clear and concise writing. Meticulous adherence to the OSCOLA referencing system to maintain academic integrity is essential.

Methodology

Research design should clearly outline the research questions, hypotheses, and overall approach to investigating the chosen topic. It is essential to articulate how the design aligns with research objectives and contributes to the existing body of legal knowledge. When defending the chosen methodology, one must explain why the selected methods are the most suitable for addressing the research questions, considering both their strengths and limitations. Finally, the data collected should be relevant, reliable, and sufficient to support the arguments presented. This may include primary sources such as case law and statutes, as well as secondary sources like academic literature and empirical data where appropriate. The quality and relevance of the data will directly impact the validity of the conclusions drawn.

Results, discussion, conclusion recommendations, and presentation

In a law dissertation, meaningful data analysis should offer insightful interpretations that contribute to answering the research questions, while conclusions must directly address the established aims and objectives, synthesising findings and demonstrating their relation to existing literature. Clear recommendations for future research should stem from the study's findings and limitations, identifying gaps in knowledge. The handling of concepts and theories should demonstrate understanding and critical engagement, showing their relevance to the legal issue under study. Finally, the presentation should be professional, adhering to academic conventions in legal writing, with clear structure, appropriate citations, and coherent argumentation.

MMN230182 Project Word Count

Please see section 7.1 Assessment Schedule & Format for precise word counts depending on the research project format. All formats will abide to a tolerance of +/- 10% to the total word count. Submitting a Project that is below the word count is self-limiting. Submitting a Project that is above the word count runs the risk that markers will only read to the upper word limit of the submission. Therefore, the penalty for too many words is that the later parts of your Project (e.g. conclusions) may not be included in the mark. The word count starts at the Introduction chapter and ends after the conclusions chapter. Preliminaries are not included in the word count.

See Appendix G Guide to Layout of Project; Appendix H for Template for Project Front Cover. Appendices are available in the MPR module site on GCU Learn.

Appendix B: Masters Research Project Rubric – Dissertation, Research Project & Media Textual Analysis

PROJECT

0-19%

Completely Unacceptable Fail

20-29%

Extremely Poor Fail

30-39%

Very Poor

Fail

40-49%

Poor

Fail

50-59%

Satisfactory Pass

60-69%

Good

Pass

70-79%

Excellent

Very Good

Pass

>80%

Outstanding

Extremely Good

Pass

Use of Related Academic Literature 25%

Discussion is

completely unacceptable

with no theoretically derived substance which lacks scope and structure.

Completely unacceptable evidence of synthesis and no exposition of core concepts.

Completely unacceptable account of expertise in the body of theory. No implications of recent developments.

evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is extremely poorly developed demonstrating extremely weak theoretically derived substance that is extremely poorly scoped and structured.

Extremely poor evidence of synthesis and extremely weak exposition of core concepts.

Extremely poor account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is extremely unclear.

Extremely poor evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is very poorly developed demonstrating very weak theoretically derived substance that is very poorly scoped and structured.

Very poor evidence of synthesis and very weak exposition of core concepts.

Very poor account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is very unclear.

Very poor evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is poorly developed demonstrating weak theoretically derived substance that is poorly scoped and structured.

Poor evidence of synthesis and weak exposition of core concepts.

Poor account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is unclear.

Poor evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is satisfactorily developed demonstrating satisfactory theoretically derived substance that is satisfactorily scoped and structured.

Satisfactory evidence of synthesis and satisfactory exposition of core concepts.

Satisfactory account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is satisfactory.

Satisfactory evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is well developed demonstrating strong theoretically derived substance that is well scoped and structured.

Good evidence of synthesis and strong exposition of core concepts.

Good account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is clear.

Good evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is very well developed demonstrating very strong theoretically derived substance that is very well scoped and structured.

Very good evidence of synthesis and very strong exposition of core concepts.

Very good account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is very clear.

Very good evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Discussion is extremely well developed demonstrating extremely strong theoretically derived substance that is extremely well scoped and structured.

Extremely good evidence of synthesis and extremely strong exposition of core concepts.

Extremely good account of expertise in the body of theory. Implications of recent developments is extremely clear.

Extremely good evidence of progressive argument/idea development.

Methodology/Theoretical Framework 25%

Completely unacceptable relevance to aim/objectives.

No theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating completely unacceptable critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Completely unacceptable account of limitations, ethical issues.

Completely unacceptable quality of execution of data collection and management.

Extremely poor relevance to aim/objectives.

Extremely poor theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating extremely poor level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Extremely poor account of limitations, ethical issues.

Extremely poor quality of execution of data collection and management.

Very poor relevance to aim/objectives.

Very poor theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating very poor level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Very poor account of limitations, ethical issues.

Very poor quality of execution of data collection and management.

Poor relevance to aim/objectives.

Poor theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating poor level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Poor account of limitations, ethical issues.

Poor quality of execution of data collection and management.

Satisfactory relevance to aim/objectives.

Satisfactory theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating poor level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Satisfactory account of limitations, ethical issues.

Satisfactory quality of execution of data collection and management.

Good relevance to aim/objectives.

Good theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating good level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Good account of limitations, ethical issues.

Good quality of execution of data collection and management.

Very good relevance to aim/objectives.

Very good theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating very good level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Very good account of limitations, ethical issues.

Very good quality of execution of data collection and management.

Extremely good relevance to aim/objectives.

Extremely good theoretically derived discussion and design choices demonstrating extremely good level of critical analysis and substantiation of decisions.

Extremely good account of limitations, ethical issues.

Extremely good quality of execution of data collection and management.

Analysis/Findings 25%

Completely unacceptable level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Completely unacceptable analysis and presentation of findings that do not relate to existing published literature.

Extremely poor level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Extremely poor analysis and presentation of findings that relate extremely poorly to existing published literature.

Very poor level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Very poor analysis and presentation of findings that relate very poorly to existing published literature.

Poor level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Poor analysis and presentation of findings that relate poorly to existing published literature.

Satisfactory level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Satisfactory analysis and presentation of findings that relate to existing published literature.

Good level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Good analysis and presentation of findings that relate well to existing published literature.

Very good level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Very good analysis and presentation of findings that relate very well to existing published literature.

Extremely good level of rigour, sophistication and appropriateness of data management.

Extremely good analysis and presentation of findings that relate extremely well to existing published literature.

Conclusions 10%

Lacks link to aim and objectives. Not supported by analysis and findings.

Completely unacceptable

evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Extremely poor link to aim and objectives that is extremely poorly supported by analysis and findings.

Extremely poor evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Very poor link to aim and objectives that is very poorly supported by analysis and findings.

Very poor evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Poor link to aim and objectives that is poorly supported by analysis and findings.

Poor evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Satisfactory link to aim and objectives that is satisfactorily supported by analysis and findings.

Satisfactory evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Good link to aim and objectives that is well supported by analysis and findings.

Good evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Very good link to aim and objectives that is very well supported by analysis and findings.

Very good evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Extremely good link to aim and objectives that is extremely well supported by analysis and findings.

Extremely good evidence of contribution to knowledge and/or practice.

Appendix C: Masters Research Project Rubric – Systematic Literature Review

0-19%

Completely Unacceptable Fail

20-29%

Extremely Poor Fail

30-39%

Very Poor

Fail

40-49%

Poor

Fail

50-59%

Satisfactory Pass

60-69%

Good

Pass

70-79%

Excellent

Very Good

Pass

<80%

Outstanding

Extremely Good

Pass

Use of Related Academic Literature 15%