Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Coursework | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | De Montfort University | Module Title | CSIP5402 Project Proposal, Planning & Project Management |
| Word Count | 1500 Words |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | Summative |
| Assessment Title | Report |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |

The intended Learning Outcomes (LOs) that are assessed by this coursework are:
When completed, you are required to submit your summative coursework:
1. As a Word or PDF file via the Turnitin link set up within the CSIP5402 module’s shell.
If, for any reason, the links are not working on the submission deadline date/time, please provide them as an attachment to an email to the module leader by the specified deadline date/time, and a subsequent submission can be completed as soon as the facility is available again.
Coursework Report
The report must not exceed 1,500 words, with a tolerance of plus or minus 10%. Content beyond this limit will be disregarded during marking. This word count excludes figures, tables, the bibliography, and Appendix A, which contains the scoping literature table.
Make sure the similarity report of your work is ideally under 15%. The similarity report is just a guide. If you are suspected of committing an academic offence, you will be called to a meeting with an Academic Practice Officer (APO).
The submission of work generated by AI tools, including but not limited to GPT, is strictly forbidden. Any instance of suspected AI-generated content will be subject to investigation and could result in referral to the Academic Practice Officer (APO)
What to submit
We encourage you to create the report using the Overleaf Latex template provided in the lab sheet or from the link below.
https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/ikim-ph-dot-d-proposal-template/gbcgmkmngczk
Please submit the .pdf file via the Turnitin link set up within the CSIP5402 module’s shell.
Alternatively, you can submit a Word document (.doc or docx) or the PDF version of it. Your report should be written using a clear font (e.g., Arial, Times New Roman, or Calibri) with a minimum font size of 11 points.
The rest of this section highlights the elements to be included in the report structure.
The project should have a meaningful title that describes the proposed project, followed by the Author's name and surname, student ID, and module name.
Assessment Checklist and Declaration
After the title page, add a page that includes the following declaration
By submitting this assessment, I confirm that:
Abstract:
The abstract should:
The Abstract should be no longer than 200 words.
Introduction:
This section aims to introduce the topic to the reader, leading to the research gap.
The introduction should:
Literature review:
The Research Gap:
In this section, you should discuss what is missing in the known literature. You can refer again to some of the literature to explain the gap.
This section should have a subsection explaining the research questions and/or hypotheses.
Methodology:
Describe here the methods (qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods) you will use to investigate the research gap and answer the research questions posed.
Clearly outline the statistical methods you intend to use in your research and explain why it's appropriate for your research.
You need to demonstrate your understanding of how you will evaluate the outputs from the analysis.
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications: In this section, you will discuss the research's ethical, legal, and social implications and possible mitigations.
Workplan: You should report the main tasks of the workplan for a 12-week project. You should also report and illustrate it with an appropriate project management approach (e.g., Gannt chart, PERT chart)
Conclusion: In this section, you should summarise the report content.
Reference: This is your reference list, and it is not counted in the word count.
Appendix A: This should contain the table compiled for scoping the literature, and it is not counted in the word count.
| Task | 0-39 (fail) | 40-49 (Marginal fail) | 50-59 (Pass) | 60-69 (Merit) | 70-79 (Excellent) | 80+ (Exceptional) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Research Proposal Structure and Coherence (20%) Relevant Sections: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion, and Workplan. |
Structure is unclear or missing key sections; poor logical flow; objectives unclear or missing. | Incomplete structure; objectives present but vague; sections may not follow a logical sequence. | Adequate structure with most sections present; objectives and questions are stated but may lack clarity or precision. | Well-structured and coherent proposal; clear research aim and objectives that align with the methodology. | Strong logical flow; all sections well-articulated; clear, insightful connection between research questions and methodology. | Flawless structure and coherence; exceptional clarity and logical alignment across all elements of the proposal. |
|
Literature Review and Identification of Research Gap (30%) Relevant Sections: Literature Review, Research Gap, Appendix A |
Very limited or no engagement with relevant literature; no clear research gap identified. | Minimal or poorly selected sources; the gap is mentioned but not substantiated by literature. | Sufficient engagement with literature; research gap is present, but may be general or loosely supported. | Good critical engagement with relevant literature; well-articulated research gap supported by evidence. | Excellent synthesis of literature; clear, well-evidenced and insightful articulation of the research gap. | Exceptional engagement with literature; the research gap is nuanced, original, and expertly justified. |
|
Critical Evaluation and Application of Research Methodology (30%) Relevant Sections: Methodology |
Methodological choices are absent or inappropriate; lack justification; no understanding of statistical approaches or their application. | Methodology is weak or poorly matched to the research questions; limited justification; little understanding of statistical evaluation. | Adequate method selected; some justification provided; basic understanding of statistical methods, but with limited depth. | Appropriate method with good justification; clear explanation of statistical tools and evaluation methods. | Method is well-justified and clearly aligned with research questions; good critical insight into statistical application and interpretation. | Innovative or highly appropriate method with exceptional justification; sophisticated understanding of statistical methods and critical evaluation. |
|
Consideration of Ethical, Legal, and Professional Issues (20%) Relevant Sections: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications |
Ethical, legal, and professional issues are not addressed or are misunderstood. | Limited discussion of issues; major elements are missing or inaccurately described. | Basic identification of relevant issues; general awareness shown but lacking depth or mitigation strategies. | Good identification and discussion of key ethical/legal/professional issues; some mitigation strategies provided. | Comprehensive and thoughtful discussion; clear and practical mitigation strategies provided. | Outstanding depth and insight; anticipates complex challenges and offers robust, innovative mitigation strategies. |
Buy Custom Answer Of CSIP5402 Project Proposal, Planning & Project Management Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentDo you need support with your CSIP5402 Project Proposal, Planning & Project Management Assignment? Our easy and friendly Project Management Assignment Help is here to guide you through every topic. You can use our clear assignment examples and Samples to understand how to structure your work and improve your learning. With reliable Assignment Help UK, you get simple explanations, helpful tips, and study guidance to boost your confidence. Make your assignment journey stress-free—learn better, understand more, and move forward with success!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content