Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Lincoln (UOL) | Module Title | BUS9036M Business & Management Dissertation |
Module Details
Contact Details
Introduction
Learning Outcomes
Employability Skills / Skills for your Future
Principles of Responsible Management Education
Academic Support (for those students working in action learning sets and with facilitators).
ALS facilitator responsibilities
Research Ethics - LEAS
Securing Ethical Approval and using the Approved Templates
Teaching & Learning Methods
Contact Time
Directed Study
Independent Study
Module Delivery & Teaching Sessions
Feedback Strategy
Assessment Rationale
Assessment and other Submission Details
Recording your research meetings
KEY ASSESSMENT DATES and ACTIVITIES
Formative and Summative Assessments
Information about your weighted assessments
Dishonesty and Plagiarism
Learning Resources
The Library (www.library.lincoln.ac.uk )
Digital Learning Resources (https://digitaleducation.lincoln.ac.uk/resources-hub/ )
Appendix 1: Final Dissertation Assessment Brief
Welcome to your dissertation - the capstone project of the Masters programme. It allows you to explore your focus and interests in an independent manner. It provides the opportunity for you to apply, integrate, and deepen the knowledge, insights, and skills that you have learned during your programme of study. You can explore in this project a real-world issue or a research topic, which you execute in a manner consistent with the core philosophy and values of Lincoln International Business School (LIBS).
In keeping with the spirit of LIBS Masters programmes, this module seeks to enable and facilitate independence, innovation and creativity in terms of project foci, form and output. This module also differs in how you engage with it. With the aim of creating independent and critical learners, you are required to not only undertake an in-depth study of a topic related to the title of your named degree but also to take responsibility for your own learning and negotiate the form and output of the final work. So, this work is led by you.
You should enjoy the experience because this really is a module you can own and direct.
You will decide on a proposal approach to your research, so as to provide a clear path to follow, goals to achieve and generate a final dissertation thesis / output. Although the foci and form of the dissertation are to be negotiated, you might produce one of the following:
Please note that this module is an independent learning project so which ever form of dissertation you chose, every one will get the same support through lectures, seminars and drop ins.
These are reviewed in turn shortly in this book and available on the Blackboard site.
On completion of the module you should be able to:
LO1Communicate the aims, objectives and relevance of your chosen research project.
LO2 Develop achievable and logical plans to guide the implementation of your chosen research project.
LO3 Select, collect, analyse and interpret evidence from multiple sources in accordance with sound principles of research and investigation.
LO4 Synthesise and critically evaluate different sources of knowledge in order to articulate logical and cogent argumentation.
LO5 Evaluate critically and apply theoretical and methodological approaches in ways which augment understanding
of the topic
LO6 Reflect critically on your own research practice and intellectual argument particularly in the context of contemporary debates in management or business.
LO7 Propose practical resolutions via conclusions and recommendations when appropriate .
LO8 Demonstrate depth of knowledge, expertise and critical understanding of your chosen topic area.
The dissertation represents the final independent study of your Masters.
It is important to note that it must reflect your chosen degree in terms of subject matter. This is a requirement of your degree programme.
The module enhances your employability by developing the following transferable Work Ready skills:
The Lincoln International Business School is committed to the Principles of Responsible Management Education (PRME) to develop future leaders that are socially responsible who will create sustainable environmental and economic value.
To that end, students are encouraged to integrate these principles into their research practice and reflect on the implications of PRME for their own work. All human activity impacts upon our environment (natural, social, political) and should be a consideration in your work.
Academic Support (for those students working in seminar groups with facilitators).
What you need to understand about your academic support
Your facilitators are staff who are able to support you through the research process. It is not a requirement for your facilitator to be an expert in your disciplinary area.
You meet with your other seminar group members and your facilitators as timetabled during June and July (for the October intakes) and will be offered engagement opportunities during August and September (again for the October intakes).
Meeting your facilitator and your seminar groups should allow you to develop a wider understanding of your topic and research design.
You then begin the work process as soon as possible. Remember, that central to the process is that this module is independent study, supported by regular contact with your facilitator and seminar group. Independent study is not like a taught class, it is up to you to lead rather than be led; you choose the direction of travel, albeit after seeking advice from available staff and resources at the start of the module to develop your intention.
This is important to say again - your dissertation and independent research project is yours. You are expected to prepare for meetings and work to agreed commitments for them.
Your facilitator are to support you - by helping you to identify areas to develop and work on and by sharing good practice and knowledge. These may include useful suggestions and offer reassurance, but they are not there to do the work for you, or tell you what to do as such. This is your dissertation and the primary initiative rests with you. Your facilitators have a working knowledge of the research process and journey- so that you can become an expert in the topic you have chosen.
Finally - your facilitators are not going to proofread your entire thesis when you have finished. You can find services to do that if you wish outside of the university.
What follows are guidelines for the relationship between you and facilitator.
Facilitator responsibilities
During the period of support from the time of the assignment of the start of the support process until the submission of the dissertation, responsibilities and obligations are as set out below.
You, in consultation with the module coordinator and/or facilitator, are responsible for choosing your dissertation topic, carrying out the research and submitting on time. The role of the facilitator is to provide guidance and advice; they are not responsible for the quality of the submitted work. Facilitators are not responsible for chasing students who fail to arrange or attend meetings.
Your responsibilities include:
Stuck Your BUS9036M Dissertation? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!The responsibilities of the School include:
Every dissertation is different and unique. The nature of your experience of it will therefore vary between you and other learners on the module. Facilitators, like you, are busy people and have other commitments other than yourself. It is not realistic to expect them to be available to respond instantly to your demands. Likewise, submitting drafts 24 hours before expecting feedback is unlikely to meet with the level of feedback you are expecting! Different disciplines have different procedures for dissertation, so don’t expect your friends to be doing exactly the same thing in other areas of the University.
If in doubt speak to your facilitator and remember it is your work.
The University requires that all those carrying out research engage with the University’s commitment to conduct research to high ethical standards; understand the reasons for, and participate fully in, the ethical review process; and fulfil their moral and legal responsibilities in respect of the rights and welfare of participants.
The Research Ethics Policy can be found here (at https://lncn.ac/re).
The conduct of students must always be overseen by the School, who takes responsibility for ensuring that the Code of Practice for Research and all relevant policies and procedures are followed.
The research code of practice can be viewed here (at https://lncn.ac./copr)
The University of Lincoln is committed to ensuring that its research activities involving human participants and personal data are conducted in a way which:
• respects the dignity, rights and welfare of all participants in research;
• minimises risk to participants, researchers and third parties;
• appropriately manages personal data;
• aims to maximise the public benefit of research.
Securing Ethical Approval and using the Approved Templates
All primary research undertaken in the Business School (staff and student (all levels)) requires ethical approval. For this research module - you will need to work with your allocated approver to secure ethical approval using the online Lincoln Ethical Approval System (LEAS).
You can find the starting point for this process here.[ethicsapply.lincoln.ac.uk] The moment you login to the LEAS system with your university ID, an account (called a Work Space) is created for you.
Primary research needs approval BEFORE you start any data collection. For PRIMARY DATA research designs, you will complete an individual (ethical) LEAS application. Remember to ask questions of your support staff when completing this application as you will then request their authorisation which is more likely to be granted. Once you are happy that you have addressed all the comments, then your request for approval will then go to your second marker for a review of your application (they are the LEAS approver). There is an option in your LEAS application when you select submission to note that you are a PGT student from LIBS to facilitate this.
The second marker will only electronically sign the form when they are happy with it, otherwise they will add comments and reject the authorisation request prompting you to reflect further upon their concerns by making and submitting an amendment to your application. [You do this by creating a SUB FORM on the Application].
It is important to understand that you cannot complete a LEAS application until you have progressed with your thinking and reading and writing in your research. This is because to COMPLETE an individual application to LEAS you will need:
There are approved university templates (see the relevant section of the BlackBoard site) to guide you through a number of these tasks that you can use and adapt. You can also find these templates here and on Blackboard.
All of this information is submitted at the same time as your LEAS application.
You cannot therefore undertake a successful LEAS application BEFORE you have considered a significant portion of your literature and your methodology.
The outcome of an application to LEAS will be either:
PLEASE NOTE - If your proposed research involves any aspect of a special human characteristic (such as working with children) then your LEAS application is reviewed by a committee in LIBS prior to a decision being taken. This will take more time to approve. Where this is the case, LIBS will allocate reviewers for projects that are vulnerable groups or sensitive topics (the second staff signature will not be available for those projects).
There are exemplar applications available on the portal here (and which are available of Blackboard -see the ‘ethics’ tab).
Once the module has started, you will be asked to think about and start to gather information about what you intend to research which will be used to support you and help you through the ethical approval process and support you in your research.
In all cases of an individual LEAS application, please ensure you allow enough time between submission of an application (and any potential amendments) and the intended start of your data collection (this may take upto 2-3 weeks if there are complications, required amendments and difficulties in the proposed work.
The first deadline for this is the 18th June. There will be a final cut off for approvals of LEAS applications is the 1st July and if you have not got approval by this date, you will have to switch to secondary research.
Remember – all LEAS applications must include ALL supporting documentation required – this includes any questionnaires, interview schedules and participant information sheets etc. The University provides a number of templates for this information here. They are available as files also on the Blackboard site.
Remember – you may ONLY use approved questionnaire services – presently this is onlinesurveys.ac.uk (where the university will create an account for you) or MS Forms. An account will be created for you that you will then need to confirm when you receive the email invitation. You can also contact surveyhelp@lincoln.ac.uk directly to set up your account.
Remember – you may NOT start any research involving humans, until your application has received a ‘favourable review’ (received by email) unless it is previously supported by the approved PRF.
FINALLY – a successful ethical application requires you to have a significantly progressed literature and methodological understanding. This is why the LEAS application seems later in the research time available to you. Again – please factor this into your time management.
Buy Answer of BUS9036M Dissertation & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy AnswerThere will be a series of lectures delivered across Semester C (depending upon your class) and up to 6 hours of support in seminar groups. Please see the Blackboard site for what this means in practice. [Teaching Sessions]
You are encouraged to reflect on the database of staff interests (see the Blackboard site) to seek to align your research with available staff so as to direct research questions you may have.
All staff in LIBS are capable of supporting you in your independent research journey.
You are expected to invest approximately 600 hours of time into your Masters dissertation. This is a significant volume of time as befits a significant part of your Masters study.
Most of this time will be used in your independent study.
The module will be delivered through a mix of lecture and seminars in the first instance. These will be recorded as part of your engagement with your research. You are expected to articulate your research focus and develop key research questions to guide your investigation. Staff can advise, but will not direct your study.
Module Delivery |
Total Hours |
Lectures |
6 |
Seminars |
6 |
Independent Study (nominal) |
588 |
Nominal Total (60 CATS) |
600 |
Delivered lecture and seminar sessions (correct at time of writing 27/03/20224) – please check and attend ONLY those sessions that refer to your seminar group allocation.
No. |
Who |
When |
Where |
Time |
Week |
DAY |
TOPIC |
Core Reading |
1 |
L.McQuade |
31/5/2024 |
INB0114 |
3-4pm |
36 |
Friday |
Module Introduction |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 1,2 Biggam (2018) chapter 4 |
1 |
L.Natukuna |
28/5/2024 |
INB0114 |
11am-12 noon |
36 |
Tuesday |
Module Introduction |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 1,2 Biggam (2018) chapter 4 |
2 |
L.McQuade |
3/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
3-4pm |
37 |
Monday |
Finding a focus & LEAS |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 2 Biggam (2018) chapter 4 |
2 |
L.Natukuna |
4/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
11am-12 noon |
37 |
Tuesday |
Finding a focus & LEAS |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 2 Biggam (2018) chapter 4 |
3 |
L.McQuade |
10/6/2024 |
ONLINE |
3-4pm |
38 |
Monday |
Structure and writing style |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 3,4 Biggam (2018) chapter 5 |
3 |
L.Natukuna |
11/6/2024 |
ONLINE |
11am-12 noon |
38 |
Tuesday |
Structure and writing style |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 3,4 Biggam (2018) chapter 5 |
4 |
L.McQuade |
17/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
3-4pm |
39 |
Monday |
Literature and reading |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 8
|
4 |
L.Natukuna |
18/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
11am-12 noon |
39 |
Tuesday |
Literature and reading |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 8
|
5 |
L.McQuade |
24/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
3-4pm |
40 |
Monday |
Methodology and Critical Thinking |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 5, 9, 10, 11, 12,13
|
5 |
L.Natukuna |
25/6/2024 |
INB0114 |
11am-12 noon |
40 |
Tuesday |
Methodology and Critical Thinking |
Saunders et al (2019) chapter 5, 9, 10, 11, 12,13
|
6 |
L.McQuade |
1/7/2024 |
INB0114 |
3-4pm |
41 |
Monday |
Support
|
NA |
6 |
L.Natukuna |
2/7/2024 |
INB0114 |
11am-12 noon |
41 |
Tuesday |
Support
|
NA |
Please check your timetable for your seminar group schedule.
Receiving formative feedback during your learning is essential to ensure you are prepared for your final assessment. To support your learning throughout the module the following formative feedback strategies are used:
Assessment Method |
Weighting(%) |
Due |
LO’s Assessed
|
|||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
||
Final Dissertation |
100 |
Noon - Friday 27th September 2024 |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
This module will be assessed through ONE is graded dissertation
DATE to be completed by |
ACTIVITY |
What you need to do |
Who does this? |
Support |
Meetings (group and individual) between June - July & September – to be agreed (TBC) |
Submit your LEAS Ethical Application Form Submission + supporting materials [this submission is made via LEAS and NOT via a link on Blackboard] |
Work with your seminar tutor to complete your LEAS application. |
ALL who are applying for primary research approval |
|
27th September 2024 |
Assessment Submission [on Blackboard] |
Submit your Research Dissertation |
ALL |
|
Method Selected, collected, analysed and interpreted evidence from multiple sources in accordance with sound principles of research and investigation. (LO3) 15% |
The execution is virtually flawless and demonstrates competence beyond the level of study. |
The work draws upon an extensive and authoritative range of sources and uses these effectively following sound principles of research and investigation |
The work draws upon an extensive range of sources and uses these effectively following sound principles of research and investigation |
The work draws upon a wide range of sources and uses these appropriately following the main principles of research and investigation. There will be minor omissions or insufficient triangulation or cross-referencing. |
The work draws upon sufficient source material to substantiate argument. However, further data could have been collected and/or analysed to provide a fuller and more balanced investigation. The work has followed the basic principles of investigation. |
Although the work has collected and analysed evidence the sources need enhancing and the interpretation is deficient in some ways. The work has not consistently followed the key principles of research design. |
There is insufficient evidence and the analysis lacks sophistication with virtually no interpretation. Key principles of investigation have not been followed. |
Synthesis Synthesised and critically evaluated different sources of knowledge in order to articulate logical and cogent argumentation (LO4) 12% |
The work is exceptional and the powers of criticality and synthesis go well beyond the standards expected at this level. |
The work demonstrates criticality and developed powers of syntheses. The argumentation is logical and coherent. There are strong arguments of advocacy as well as discovery, |
The work demonstrates criticality and powers of syntheses. The argumentation is logical and coherent. There are strong arguments of advocacy as well as discovery, |
The work does synthesise to a large extent and critically evaluate key sources of knowledge. This is robust but not fully developed. The argument is coherent and evidenced, but with a stronger emphasis on discovery than advocacy. |
The work tends to summarise quite extensively what is known about the topic rather than integrating the various sources into a more coherent and logical argument. The evidence base is sufficient but needed to be better deployed. Argumentation is emergent rather than developed. |
The work tends to present a summary of a somewhat constrained knowledge set. There maybe some critical comments but these are not evaluative. Arguments are under-developed |
The work is a summary of a limited knowledge base. There is a limited basis from which to develop either synthesis or evaluation. No argumentation is evidenced |
Evaluation Critically evaluated and applied appropriate theoretical and methodological approaches in ways which augmented understanding of the topic (LO5) 12% |
The work is exceptional and extends our knowledge in a manner which goes well beyond expectation at this level. |
The work is professionally situated, critically evaluates & applies existing frameworks and knowledge domains in a manner that demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and capacity to augment current knowledge. |
The work is appropriately situated, critically evaluates & applies existing frameworks and knowledge domains in a manner that demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and capacity to augment current knowledge |
The key conceptual, theoretical and methodological frameworks are reviewed and applied to the specific topic/project. There is some critical evaluation of these frameworks |
The work identifies and outlines appropriate approaches but, does not assess their relative merits nor build an evaluation of their utility to the aims of the project. |
Although the work identifies and reviews key approaches, there are significant gaps. The focus is on accessible material rather than that which challenges convention. |
There is limited engagement with conceptual, methodological or theoretical approaches that could inform the work. There is insufficient engagement with contemporary approaches, controversy or debate. |
Reflection Critically reflected on the research practice and intellectual arguments underpinning the work, particularly in the context of contemporary debates in management or business. (LO6) 8% |
The work is exceptional and exceeds the level of reflexivity normally expected at this level. |
The work is reflective and evaluates its contribution within the context of wider debates, whether academic or in terms of entrepreneurial, business and management praxis. The work demonstrates justifiable self- confidence with clear contributions for developent |
The work is reflective and evaluates its contribution within the context of wider debates, whether academic or in terms of entrepreneurial, business and management praxis. The work demonstrates justifiable self- confidence. |
The work is confident and demonstrates a sound understanding of the limitations of the research conducted and can position the findings within the contexts of wider debates. Positionality may not be fully analysed. |
The work focuses on outlining strengths and limitations without necessarily engaging in critical reflection. Some reflection is applied to the work undertaken; there maybe a lack of confidence or over confidence in the project. The work doesn't explore all the lessons learnt. |
There is no critical reflection, rather there is a focus on some strengths and limitations. The reflection tends to be broad rather than applied to the specificities of the individual project. |
The work identifies some issues but these represent a partial reflection on research practice. There is very little engagement with wider debates around business and management practice. |
Conclusions Proposed practical and appropriate resolutions via conclusions and recommendation, so as to demonstrate the benefit of the work undertaken. . (LO7) 12% |
The work is exceptionally insightful in terms of how the implications and relevancy of the work are understood and articulated. |
The work proposes fully appropriate and practical resolutions via conclusions and recommendations, so as to demonstrate the benefit of the work undertaken. |
|
The work reaches valid conclusions and makes relevant recommendations. The full implications of the work may not be articulated completely but what is proposed is evidence based. |
The work reaches an overall conclusion but lacks specific and/or considered recommendations or practical resolutions. Not all recommendations follow from the evidence. |
The conclusions are weakly articulated and limited. Where recommendations are made they may not reflect evidence or be practical. The work does provide sufficient basis for more robust conclusions. |
The conclusion tends to be summative rather than integrative. The nature of the findings are not fully appreciated or understood in the context of existing debates or business and management practice. |
Knowledge Demonstrated a depth of knowledge, expertise and critical understanding of their chosen topic area. (LO8) 12% |
The work demonstrates exceptional knowledge and critical understanding such that it goes well beyond the standards expected at this level |
The work demonstrates professional in-depth knowledge, expertise and critical understanding of chosen topic. The work is authoritative and contains original insights. |
The work demonstrates in-depth knowledge, expertise and critical understanding of chosen topic. The work is authoritative and contains original insights. |
The work demonstrates a sound knowledge and developing level of expertise in the field. There is evidence of some critical understanding of key areas but this could be further developed. There are no significant gaps in the knowledge base, but originality is limited. |
The work demonstrates a sufficient knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of the topic or domain. The work tends to lack critical insight and expertise is emergent rather than developed |
The level of knowledge and understanding is not quite at the level expected. Expertise is limited and derivative rather than original. |
There is evidence that some knowledge has been accumulated but this is very limited and there are significant gaps and fundamental weaknesses or misunderstandings. |
Presentation Presentation and organization of the dissertation 5% |
The work is exceptionally well presented and the organisation exceeds that expected at this level. |
The work fully complies with presentation guidelines and conventions. |
The work fully complies with presentation guidelines and conventions. |
Overall the presentation is of a high standard but with a few minor amendments required to bring it up to full compliance. |
The presentation meets the pass standard but contains a number of errors and deviation from the guidelines and conventions |
The work is not quite up to the standard expected. There are numerous errors- whilst these detract from the text they could have been easily rectified by re-working or editing the work |
There are significant weaknesses in presentation and the work does not really meet expectations and falls short of convention in several important respects. These errors would require significant reworking of the text. |
AACSB/ APL – AoL criteria (not grade contributing) |
|
Exceeded Threshold |
|
Proficient |
Borderline Proficient |
Not proficient |
|
CC8 Synthesis: Synthesise information to contribute original insight to contemporary challenges and domains |
Integrates relevant and sufficient information to address the challenge or domain, gathered from multiple and varied sources In addition to typical sources, finds unusual ways or places to get information. Promotes divergent or creative perspectives. |
Integrates relevant and sufficient information to address the challenge or domain Finds one or two sources that are not typical Offers new ideas but stays within narrow perspectives |
Does not integrate information to address the challenge or domain Gathers too little, too much, or irrelevant information, or from too few sources Does not offer any new ideas |
Insufficient information, weakly organised and descriptive |
|||
CC11 Reflection: Reflect on own knowledge and understanding, prioritising self-development in new high level skills. |
Strong analysis and critical reflection on current personal skill set and professional development. Evidences experiential learning and mindfulness. |
Good self analysis of recent experience, reflection of current personal skill set and established priorities for professional development. Draws conclusions and makes connections to future plans for developing higher order skills. |
Limited analysis and reflection on current personal skill set and requirements of professional development. Does not make a connection to future plans. |
Unable to identify own capabilities or prioritise areas for development |
|||
CC12 Adaptability: Appraise trends and their potential impacts on own agency and effectiveness in the context of sustainability |
Trends are clearly identified and have been analysed. These are related to the impacts on agency and effectiveness. Sustainability is embedded within the analysis. |
Have identified and discussed the trends. May not have fully engaged with all elements and potential impacts. Has analysed own agency and effectiveness although this may be limited. Sustainability context is reflected in the content however may not be completely embedded. |
Have not engaged with one of the key elements such as sustainability. May have limited analysis of the trends or may not have demonstrated how the impacts relate to own agency and effectiveness. |
Trends are not analysed but only identified. Have not engaged with the potential impacts and effectiveness. May not relate to sustainability. |
Buy Answer of BUS9036M Dissertation & Raise Your Grades
Request to Buy AnswerAre you stuck on BUS9036M Dissertation At University of Lincoln? So now you can be stress free as you have reached the right place and here our expert team is providing you Dissertation writing services. Look no further, we are available 24/7 to help you, so now be stress free and focus on studies. If you want solutions then we also provide free assignment samples that will help you clear your concepts. Contact us today and increase your academic grades with online assignment help!
See the Solution of this Document Click here: BUS9036M Dissertation Example
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content