OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

HSO4008 Introduction to evidence-based research Research Report Assessment 1 Brief 2026 | RCL

Request Plagiarism Free Answer Published: 08 Jan, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Science
University Regent College London ( RCL) Module Title HSO4008 Introduction to evidence-based research
Word Count 3000 Words
Assessment Type Written Report
Assessment Title Assessment 1
Academic Year 2026

HSO4008 Assignment Brief

Module Number:  HSO4008

Module Name:  Introduction to evidence-based research

Module Tutor/s: Eric Elong Ebolo , Dominique Porter-Whitaker ,  Ngozi Ibeawuchi , Zenzele Mazibuko.

ASSESSMENT

Assessment Number 001
Assessment Type (and weighting) Written Report (100%)
Assessment Name 3000 words report that examines an area of evidence-based practice directly relevant to an area / aspect of health and social care practice.
Assessment Submission Date Submission of Assignment 001 Research Report:
23/01/2026 (Before 23:59 UK Time)

 Learning Outcomes Assessed

Module Learning Outcomes Assessment No. and Type
LO1:  Identify characteristics of Quantitative and Qualitative research methods Research Report Assessment 1
LO2:  Consider research evidence appropriate to health and social care practice, considering reliability and validity Research Report Assessment 1
LO3:  Demonstrate knowledge of the relationship between research theory and health and social practice Research Report Assessment 1
LO4: Gather evidence from a variety of research sources, including charts, graphs, and tables, from text and online sources Research Report Assessment 1

Use Of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Applications In This Assessment – A

AI Status Application Notes
Category A No GAI tool is permitted. While grammar and/or spell checkers may be used to correct individual words and sentences, the use of GAI is not allowed. This is because the learning outcomes require you to produce original assessment work without any GAI assistance

Any GAI generated content which is presented as your own original work and is not acknowledged will be assessed for academic misconduct.

Declaration: At the end of the assessment you should also include a declaration of any software tools including Generative AI (GAI) applications that you used in developing and completing the assessment.

Assessment Task:

Your report will be expected to address the following:

Investigate one area of health and social care by examining two academic journal articles

  • Introduce/ justify your chosen topic by considering current research/ statistics in that subject area/ reference what others say about it – NHS/ NICE/ other authors etc.
  • Introduce what research is/ the importance of research in health/ social care/ evidence-based practice etc.
  • Explain qualitative/ quantitative research– what are the characteristics of each?
  • Introduce your two articles– title/ author/ summary of each
  • Using the two journal articles compare and contrast the primary research methods/approaches used by the authors.
  • Discuss the validity and reliability of each article- How could the research be improved next time?
  • How do the findings/ conclusion/ recommendations highlight a need for change/ improvements to practice.
  • Make reference to a wide variety of text and online sources

*Please note- the LO’s do not have to be addressed in order and it is sometimes better if they are not.

Hire Experts to solve your HSO4008 Introduction to Evidence-based Research before Deadline

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Report Format

1.Introduction & Background

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Why is the research important in Health and Social care

1.3 Characteristics of quantitative and qualitative research

2. Research Article Comparison

2.1 Research article 1

2.2 Research article 2

2.3 How do the articles highlight improvement in practice

3. Conclusion

References (Harvard Referencing Style)

Appendix (if applicable)

Minimum Secondary Research Source Requirements:

Level HE4 – It is expected that the Reference List will contain between five and ten sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include one refereed academic journal and three academic books. Please also use 2-3 references from core reading.

Specific Assessment Criteria:

(Please note that the General Assessment Criteria will also apply. Please see section 2)

First Class (70% And Above):

This piece of work shows evidence of wider research with reference to several differing academic viewpoints. exceptional depth and comprehensive understanding of the topic. The report has recognised relevantly and discussed in detail, all the required factors.  Several reasoned and logical arguments have been developed well and supported by a wide range of appropriately researched literature. Presentation is of a high standard, and in the appropriate report style.  The high number of appropriate sources has been referenced accurately and to a high standard. Exceptional coherence and organisation of ideas, showcasing a high level of academic writing and use of a wide range of resources.  Academic style and referencing will be excellent.

Upper Second Class 2(1) (60-69%):

A clear and informative piece of work with evidence of wider research and discussion. The research report has correctly recognised and discussed, all the required factors.  Some reasoned arguments have been developed and supported by a good number of sources.  A good number of appropriate sources have been referenced well, with most complying with the Harvard style.  The report will be well-structured, with a coherent presentation of ideas, displaying very good academic writing skills. Academic style and referencing will be very good.

Lower Second Class 2(2) (50-59%):

Students will demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of the topic and adequate explanation. The report needs to discuss the importance of reliability and validity in research. The report should have adequate comparison between the selected research articles, focussing on the LO’s. The report will be generally organised, with a good presentation of ideas, displaying good academic writing skills. Adequate references, indicating substantial research and engagement with relevant literature.

Third Class (40-49%):

A reasonable attempt has been made at researching the research report, but greater in-depth discussion and academic debate is required.  The research report has recognised some factors, however mostly the discussion is superficial and lacking in any depth.  Presentation of the essay is limited, and only the minimum of 5 sources has been provided, with at least one academic text and two academic journals included.

Fail (39% And Below)

Limited analysis indicating a lack of depth in understanding of the topic. Poor organisation of ideas and lack of coherence, demonstrating weaknesses in academic writing. Insufficient or irrelevant references, indicating insufficient research and engagement with relevant literature. Students who do not meet the requirements of a third-class grade will not successfully complete the assessment activity.

Grades

Please note that grades awarded, and summative feedback provided will be provisional until the Assessment Board has met and may therefore be subject to change.

General Assessment Criteria For Written Assessments

GENERAL ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES – LEVEL HE4

  Relevance

Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass

Knowledge and Understanding Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/

Referencing

Written English Presentation and Structure

 

 

Class I
(Exceptional Quality)85% – 100%
Work is directly relevant and expertly addresses the requirements of the brief.

Learning outcomes are met.

Demonstrates breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice beyond the threshold expectation for the level.

Demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts in different contexts.

Presents an excellent and cohesive appraisal of findings through the critical analysis of information.

Draws clear, justified and thoughtful conclusions.

Demonstrates creative flair, originality and initiative.

Demonstrates a critical understanding of problem-solving approaches and applies strong problem-solving skills.

Provides insightful reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. A wide range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.

Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography.

 

Writing style is clear and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An exceptionally well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used.

A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used.

The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.

Evidence of planning and logically structured.

Where relevant, there is effective placement of, and reference to, figures, tables and images.

Class I
(Excellent Quality)70% – 84%
Work is relevant and comprehensively addresses the requirements of the brief.

Learning outcomes are met.

Demonstrates an excellent breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.

Demonstrates in-depth understanding of key concepts.

Presents an excellent and cohesive discussion of findings through the interpretation and evaluation of information sources.

Draws clear, justified and thoughtful conclusions.

Demonstrates clearly creativity and initiative.

Applies excellent problem-solving skills.

Provides excellent reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility. A range of contemporary and relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.

Sources cited accurately in both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography.

Writing style is clear and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. An excellently well written answer with competent, spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used.

A wide range of appropriate vocabulary is used.

The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.

Evidence of planning and logically structured.

Where relevant, there is effective placement of and reference to, figures, tables and images.

Class II/i
(Very Good Quality)60% – 69%
Work is relevant and addresses most of the requirements of the brief well.

Learning outcomes are met.

Demonstrates a thorough breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.

Demonstrates very good understanding of key concepts.

Presents a perceptive and cohesive discussion of findings through the interpretation and evaluation of information sources.

Draws clear and justified conclusions.

Demonstrates creativity and initiative.

Applies strong problem-solving skills.

Provides justified reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. A range of appropriate reference sources selected and drawn upon.

Sources cited accurately in the main in the text and in the Reference List/ Bibliography.

Writing style is clear and appropriate to the requirements of the assessment. A very well written answer with competent spelling, grammar and punctuation. For example, paragraphs are well structured and include linking and signposting. Sentences are complete and different types are used.

A range of appropriate vocabulary is used.

The presentational style and layout are correct for the type of assignment.

Evidence of planning and logically structured in the main.

Where relevant, there is effective placement of figures, tables and images.

  Relevance

 

Learning outcomes must be met for an overall pass

Knowledge and Understanding Analysis, Creativity and Problem-Solving Self-awareness and Reflection Research/

 

Referencing

Written English Presentation and Structure

 

 

Class II/ii
(Good Quality)50% – 59%
Work addresses key requirements of the brief. Some irrelevant content.

Learning outcomes are met.

Demonstrates a sound breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.

Demonstrates sound understanding of key concepts.

Presents a logical discussion of findings through the interpretation and evaluation of information sources.

Draws clear and justified conclusions.

Demonstrates some creativity and initiative.

Applies sound problem-solving skills.

 

Provides valid reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. Relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.

Some sources accurately cited in both the body of text and in the Reference List/Bibliography.

Writing style is mostly appropriate to the requirements of the assessment   Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent and minor lapses do not pose difficulty for the reader. Paragraphs are structured and include some linking and signposting. Sentences are complete.

A range of appropriate vocabulary is used.

The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.

 

Logically structured in the most part.

Where relevant, effective placement of some figures, tables and images.

Class III
(Satisfactory Quality)40% – 49%
Work addresses the requirements of the brief, although superficially in places. Some irrelevant content.

Learning outcomes are met.

Demonstrates a sufficient breadth of knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.

Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of key concepts.

Presents a valid discussion of findings through the interpretation and evaluation of information sources.

Draws justified conclusions.

Demonstrates creativity and initiative in places.

Applies sufficient problem-solving skills.

Provides some reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, as required by the assessment. Some relevant reference sources selected and drawn upon.

Some weaknesses in referencing technique.

Writing style is occasionally not appropriate for the assessment. Grammar, spelling and punctuation are generally competent, but may pose minor difficulties for the reader. Some paragraphs may lack structure, and there is limited linking and signposting.

Some appropriate vocabulary is used

The presentational style and layout are largely correct for the type of assignment.

Adequately structured.

Inclusion of some figures, tables and images but not always relevant and/or clear.

Borderline

Fail
35% – 39%

Work addresses only some of the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.

One or more learning outcomes have not been met.

Demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of key concepts. Presents a limited discussion of findings through the interpretation of information sources.

Draws some irrelevant conclusions.

Creativity and initiative are lacking.

Problem-solving skills are lacking.

 

Provides limited reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. Sources selected are limited and lack relevance.

Poor referencing technique employed.

Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question.

Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear in places. Paragraphs are poorly structured.

For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.

Figures, tables and images included when required but these lack clarity and relevance.

Fail

 

<34%

Work does not address the requirements of the brief. Irrelevant and superficial content.

One or more learning outcomes have not been met.

Demonstrates inadequate knowledge and understanding of theory and practice for this level.

Demonstrates insufficient understanding of key concepts.

Presents a limited discussion of findings with little consideration of the quality of information drawn upon.

Draws irrelevant conclusions.

Creativity, initiative and problem-solving skills are absent.

Provides inadequate reflection and self-awareness in relation to the outcomes of own work and personal responsibility, when required. There is an absence of relevant sources.

Poor referencing technique employed.

Writing style is unclear and does not match the requirements of the assessment in question.

Deficiencies in spelling, grammar and punctuation makes reading difficult and arguments unclear. Unstructured paragraphs.

For the type of assignment the presentational style, layout and/or structure are lacking.

Figures, tables and images are absent when required or lack relevance/clarity.

Buy Custom Answer Of This HSO4008 Assignment 01 Research Report & Raise Your Grades

Get A Free Quote

Are you a Regent College London student looking for expert guidance on your HSO4008 Introduction to evidence-based research report assignment 1? Don't worry, there's no need! We're here to help you with your assignments. Whether you need Healthcare Assignment Help or well-designed solutions, we'll provide you with everything. You'll find free assignment examples that will strengthen your study materials. With our expert team providing all assignment services, you'll receive accurate, clear, and original content. Stop worrying about your marks and complete your assignments hassle-free with expert support. So what are you waiting for? Join us now and make your study journey easier!

Click here to view the list of Regent College London assignment samples.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

QUALIFI Level 5 Unit 1: Theories, Principles and Models in Education and Training Assessment Example

Category: Assignment (Qualifi Level 5)

Subject: Management

University: __________

Module Title: QUALIFI Level 5 Unit 1: Theories, Principles and Models in Education and Training

View Free Samples

IS6138 Digital Governance and Compliance Assessment Answer PDF  | UCC

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: University College Cork (UCC)

Module Title: IS6138 Digital Governance and Compliance

View Free Samples

BSNS5001 Organisations in an Aotearoa New Zealand Context Assessment Answer Solution PDF | Open Polytechnic

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Open Polytechnic (OP)

Module Title: BSNS5001 Organisations in an Aotearoa New Zealand Context

View Free Samples

BSRV4602 – Law for Real Estate Licensees Assessment 1 Answer Sample PDF | Open Polytechnic

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: Open Polytechnic (OP)

Module Title: BSRV4602 – Law for Real Estate Licensees

View Free Samples

ABKA638 Certificate in MYOB Business Essentials Payroll Assessment Answer Solution| The Career Academy

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: The Career Academy NZ

Module Title: ABKA638 Certificate in MYOB Business Essentials Payroll

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK