OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values Assignment 2 Brief 2025-26, Semester 1 & 2

Request Plagiarism Free Answer Published: 08 Jan, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Business
University University Of Worcester Module Title BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values
Word Count 1500 words
Assessment Type Individual Report
Assessment Title Assignment 2
Academic Year 2025/26

Assignment Brief: BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values 2025-26, Semester 1 & 2 

Assignment 02 Individual Report
Word Limit or equivalent (e.g. time) 1500 words
Weighting 30%

Learning Outcomes Assessed

Learning Outcomes:

LO1: Apply and critically analyse current ethical and responsible management concepts and different forms of sustainability along with their impact on organisations.

LO4: Demonstrate the ability to analyse, synthesise and present qualitative and quantitative data, both in an individual and group environment, by the application of methodological techniques.

Submission date 3pm on Friday 9 January 2026
Feedback date All assignment feedback will be issued on the 20th working day following the submission deadline. Feedback will be released on: Friday 6 February

What do I need to do to make a success of this assignment?

Assignment task(s):

Apply appropriate frameworks and models* reviewed on the course as necessary to complete the following 3 assignment components:

1. Using appropriate frameworks identify up to 3 key issues relevant to the case study business, justify their importance and discuss the complexities involved in resolving them (30%).

2. Apply frameworks, refer to expert opinion, and use evidence from the case to explore potential options to address the key issues (40%).

3. Present recommendations to the Board in terms of a balanced improvement strategy to take the business forward (30%).  

Your work will be graded against 5 criteria which are shown on the grading matrix. Your success in each criterion will determine your final grade.

1. The objective identification of the key issues, the rationale for selecting them and the demonstration of understanding the complexities involved in resolving them

2. Application of frameworks and the use of relevant and credible research to support work, and the filtering of potential options to identify recommendations to address issues.

3. The quality of recommendations to take the business forward, credibility of recommendations, likelihood of success, relevance, and detail of the implementation plan presented and the use of relevant and credible research to support work.

4. The academic skills demonstrated including the presentation of the report, use of English language, spelling, grammar, punctuation, quality of expression.

5. Credibility and relevance of references used, and the accuracy of the presentation.

*The frameworks/models reviewed on the course are tools for analysis so must be used to add value to your work. ‘Used’ means you must apply information to the framework/model to generate new information. The findings of the framework/model (i.e., what it tells you) must be discussed in the text and considered in relation to relevant, credible academic research to draw credible judgements which are required in your assignment.

Need Expert Help for Your BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values Assignment 2?

Request to Buy Answer

How should I present my work?

 

 

You are required to submit your work as a business report. This means it is written in the third person and should be fully referenced using the University Harvard referencing system, support is available through the library University of Worcester Referencing.

 Please note: No grading matrix is to be attached to this assignment

 Use this format to present your work as professional as you can:

On the title page, list the following:

Module name and code

Student number

Submission date

Assignment Number/Title

GenAI Declaration

Executive Summary

Table of Contents

Introduction

Body

Conclusion

References (use the University Harvard referencing system, support is available through the library Referencing)

Appendices

How can I obtain guidance on my assignment?

Assignment support will be provided will take place during taught sessions across both semesters. Please check the Module Outline for the dates of Assignment Briefs, Assignment Support Sessions and Tutorials.

During the Assignment Briefs, students will receive detailed information about the assessment criteria, expectations, and guidelines and during the Assignment Support Sessions, feed-forwards support will be available. In tutorials students will receive personal feedback on their work. Tutorials must be booked, and work provided to the Tutor before the review. It is crucial for all students to attend the briefings, support sessions and tutorials to ensure they understand the requirements and can ask any questions they may have.

You can submit an assessment plan of your work in progress or a short piece of text (no longer than one side of A4) to enable you to obtain guidance on the overall structure and direction of your assignment. You should submit this at least 3 days before your Tutorial enable you to review and address feedback provided to develop your work.

In addition, you may ask questions about the assignments and your work in class each week.

Participation is highly recommended in some or all of these opportunities to obtain help with your work as it offers valuable insights and guidance from the tutors. Students who used the help available got significantly higher grades in 2023-24 and 2024-25.

How and when do I hand my assignment in?

 

 

Your work must be word-processed/typed and should clearly show your student number.  You should submit your work by the 3pm deadline on Friday 9 January 2026. You should submit your work to Blackboard which is available via MyDay. You are required to keep a copy of work handed in.

See the separate Assignment Support Information document on Blackboard for help on how to submit or what to do if you are having trouble submitting your assignment.

How will my assignment be marked?

Specific marking criteria for your assignment is provided in the Grading Matrix within this document.

You are strongly advised to check your completed work against the Grading Matrix to ensure have completed all areas required before you submit it.

You should also ensure you adhere to the word limit / word count stated in your assessment brief document, details of which can be found in the University’s Assessment Policy

Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

(Gen AI)

We are aware of the benefits that the responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools can bring, however, where it is deemed that there has been inappropriate or unethical use of GenAI to generate assignments either wholly or in part, this is classed as Academic Misconduct and will result in Academic Misconduct proceedings being brought.

Within BMGT3221 Ass 03 you can use GenAI* to

1) Suggest a structure for your work. However, using a standard Powerpoint presentation following the assignment requirements will save you time and effort.

2) Edit less than 40% of your group’s presentation to improve your language. If you use GenAI to edit your text, please ensure you read your work carefully before you submit it so that it makes sense. GenAI frequently uses words that have unclear meanings and/or do not go together in correct sentences.

It is recommended that you use Word Editor to check spelling, grammar etc as they do not overwrite your work or change its meaning as Gen AI does. 

IN BMGT3221 GenAI may not be used to,

3) Generate ideas - presenting your views are the key to obtaining a good grade on this assignment. GenAI cannot replace your personal views so must not be used.

4) Create content – no written work, images, graphs, or data can be created artificially, the tutors want to know what you can do. GenAI frequently provides you with misinformation which will result in a failed assignment. Using it will have wasted your time.

5) Create a reference list – you must only use articles and journals to support your work that,

a. are real**

b. you have read all the way through

c. are available via the Library search facility

d. contain the information you say they do

e. are cited in the text with a correct reference in the reference list.  

These BMGT3221 rules for the use of GenAI must be followed. They are not replaced by the advice provided by the University. This Artificial Intelligence webpage only gives information about Gen AI. It does not tell you how you are allowed to use AI on BMGT3221.

* All reports submitted must include a Gen AI declaration:

· If you use GenAI to create a structure for your work you must declare it under the title on the first page of your report. The suggested declaration is “I have used GenAI (+ name the platform used) to………. This has changed my work by… (add how Gen AI has changed the report you have submitted)”.

· If you have not used Gen AI, the suggested declaration is “I have not used Gen AI in the creation of my work, in the editing of my work or to check my spelling, grammar, etc.

** Remember you have been given a reading list which contains credible, peer reviewed academic sources. Using them rather than searching for sources using AI or Google will save you time and effort and you will now they have not been made up.

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT WE WILL BE HOLDING WORK REVIEWS AND YOU MAY BE ASKED TO DEFEND YOUR WORK.

If you’re unsure and want some advice, please contact your module tutor, module leader or personal academic tutor for guidance.

BMGT3221 Assessment Criteria

GRADE

Criteria 1:

Objective identification of key issues, the rationale selecting them and understanding of the complexities involved in resolving them

 

Criteria 2: Application of frameworks, use of relevant and credible research to support work, and filtering of potential options to identify recommendations to address issues.

Criteria 3:

Quality of recommendations to take the business forward, credibility of recommendations, likelihood of success, relevance, and detail of implementation plan.

Criteria 4:

Academic skills demonstrated: presentation of report, use of English language, spelling, grammar, punctuation, quality of expression.

Criteria 5:

Accuracy, credibility, and relevance of references used.

Gen AI Declaration.

A

Key issues are selected and expertly described with evidence

Inherent complexities concerning the issues are discussed.

Reflective and balanced discussion on associated interacting skilfully with expert opinion where appropriate.  

Draw from a full range of sources to identify potential options that may address the selected issues.  

Critical engagement supported by further analysis where required to form a credible personal judgement which is clearly and persuasively argued.    

Recommend a well-reasoned, credible & balanced strategy as a natural progression from previous discussion and findings.  Discuss potential complexities, implications, and limitations of adopting the strategy. Propose an approach to monitor successful implementation and mitigation of associated risks.  

Excellent format with content presented articulately and persuasively.  Logical, reflective, and creative development of argument.  

Effectively and efficiently conveys understanding and meaning through accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Referencing drawn from a wide variety of quality sources and accurately presented using Harvard method.   

A Gen AI declaration has been clearly made and is honest.

B

Key issues are described clearly and accurately with supporting rationale. Associated challenges are discussed reflectively with appropriate reference to expert opinion.

Sensible potential options identified drawing from a range of sources.

Review options using appropriate techniques and synthesising relevant evidence and opinion.  Develop personal view on appropriate way forward.

A clear & balanced strategy recommendation is derived from previous discussion and analysis.  Limitations and risks of the proposed way forward are identified and discussed.  Proposals for successful implementation provided.

Strong presentation both in form and content. Logical and mostly reflective progression of argument.  

Conveys understanding and meaning very well through accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Appropriate quality references presented using correct Harvard format.  

A Gen AI declaration has been made and is honest.

 

C

Key issues together with associated challenges to resolving them are described with appropriate rationale and with some reference to expert opinion.  

Clearly identify potential strategic options.  Apply expert opinion and techniques to review the options.

Draw reasonable intermediate conclusions.     

Evidence of argument progression as a suitable strategy is identified and clearly communicated.  Description of risks/challenges associated with implementing the strategy.  

Clearly presented paper both in form and content.  Generally coherent development of themes - more descriptive than reflective.  

Appropriately conveys understanding and meaning through mostly accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

Adequate references integrated.

Generally credible academic sources are used to support your work.

Generally correct Harvard method.

A Gen AI declaration has been made which is mostly clear and honest.

D

Some relevant issues are selected and described showing a basic understanding of the case and their relevance and complexity.  An attempt is made to involve expert opinion.

Basic and single option response to key issues.  Some discussion and attempt to apply a framework and expert opinion. Description of findings with safe or limited conclusions.

Some recommendations for future are proposed – these are basic and safe in nature with limited connection to previous analysis or evaluation. Simplistic approach to implementation.

Some misunderstanding.

Generally presented in the appropriate format with reasonable clarity.  Much unsubstantiated discussion, descriptive and safe conclusions.  

Adequately conveys understanding and meaning through generally accurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar although some errors exist.

Inadequate number of sources used to support your work.

Few credible academic sources are used to support your work. Many references are taken from generic websites and subjective online sources.

Major errors in the Harvard format.

A Gen AI declaration has been made and is honest

E-F

Description of the issues is weak/poor.  Limited evidence that complexity of issues is recognised or understood.

Poor or simplistic options provided.

Unsubstantiated, unconnected, and descriptive. Little evidence of discussion or further evaluation.

Some misunderstanding.  

Limited, and/or inappropriate, and or unsubstantiated proposals offered, if at all.  

Lack of understanding

 

Poor and inappropriate presentation format.  Lack of clarity.  

Descriptive responses.

Inadequately/very poorly conveys understanding and meaning through written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Serious/very serious errors in use of English exist.

Lack of referencing demonstrated within your work.

A Gen AI declaration has not been made where required

Information is taken from non-academic sources and subjective online sources.

References included in the reference list but not cited in the text or cited sources are not included in the reference list.

Major errors in referencing format.

Some plagiarism demonstrated*.

A Gen AI declaration has not been made.

 

G

Description of the issues is non-existent.  No complexity of issues is understood.

No potential options for improvement are presented.

Significant lack of understanding is demonstrated.

No recommendations are presented.

Significant lack of understanding is demonstrated.

Severe lack of clarity.

Understanding and meaning not conveyed due to inaccurate written English/spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Major errors exist

Almost no attempt to reference relevant works. Use of fake references*.

No references used.

Extensive plagiarism demonstrated*

Fake references detected*

A Gen AI declaration has not been made.

H / NS

Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.

Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.

Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.

Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.

Seriously inadequate or insufficient response or non-submission.

Hire Experts To Solve BMGT3221 Assignment 2 Before Deadline

Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Do you need help with your BMGT3221 Rethinking Organisational Values assignment 2 at the University of Law? Look no further! We are here to assist you. Students seeking high-quality assistance often choose Best Assignment Help UK for timely and accurate solutions. Expert business management assignment help ensure easily understandable content backed by thorough research. A free list of assignment sample examples helps students learn proper writing techniques and improve their answers. This combination of guidance and resources helps students achieve better grades and develop a strong understanding of the subject.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

MSc Management Principles of Management Assignment Sample Answer

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: Principles of Management

View Free Samples

ACC217 Accounting Information Systems Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Accounting

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences | SUSS

Module Title: Accounting Information Systems (ACC217)

View Free Samples

ACC210 Accounting for Decision Making and Control Assignment Answers SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Accounting

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS)

Module Title: ACC210 Accounting for Decision Making and Control

View Free Samples

BUS105 Statistics Assignment Sample Solution Docx | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences

Module Title: Statistics (BUS105)

View Free Samples

MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics Assignment Sample Answer

Category: Assignment

Subject: Marketing

University: Singapore University of Socical Sciences

Module Title: MKT542 Digital Marketing Analytics

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK