Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Cardiff Metropolitan University (CMU) | Module Title | BSP6000 Strategic Management |
| Academic Year | 2026/27 |
|---|

You must select one company from the list below and complete an analysis and evaluation of the chosen company’s competitive environment using and applying Porter’s Five Forces from the understanding the business environment concept covered in the module. You must also provide a critical evaluation of theories, models, concepts and literature. The analysis and evaluation must be supported with the use and application of academic and industry (grey) literature.
Companies
Select one company from those listed below which will form the basis of your work for the PRES1 assessment.
| · Aldi | · Amazon | · Apple |
| · Uber | · Ryanair | · Tesla |
| · Tesco | · Marks and Spencer | · Microsoft |
| · Burberry | · Boeing | · Jaguar Land Rover |
You must produce a poster in a suitable academic format summarising your analysis and evaluation of the chosen company’s competitive environment using Porter’s Five Forces model, and critical evaluation of theories, models, concepts and literature. The poster must be produced to an academic standard using an appropriate format. The poster must be produced using Microsoft PowerPoint and accompanied by a 5 minutes recorded oral synopsis of the poster.
Guidance on producing an academic poster can be found at the following link on the university’s academic skills webpages and further details will be provided during the semester.
https://study.cardiffmet.ac.uk/Help/training/Pages/Resources.aspx
Your aim in completing this assessment is to provide in a poster format an analysis and critical evaluation of the chosen company’s competitive environment and critical evaluation of theories, models, concepts and critique of literature through the application of Porter’s Five Forces model.
Notes
Academic literature: academic textbooks and journal articles. These can be sourced from MetSearch and Google Scholar for example.
Industry literature: Sometimes referred to as grey literature, i.e. non-academic sources e.g. credible sources such as websites, government/company reports, policy/strategy documents, marketing data, financial accounts etc.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (adapted from Petty, 2009 and Fry et al., 2015).
Knowledge (recall) is just the ability to recall something
Comprehension (understand) means you understand knowledge. In practice this means you can explain the knowledge in terms of your existing learning and experience.
Application (use) means doing after being shown how or ability to apply abstract principles to particular known or novel situations
Analysis (breaking down) is breaking complex whole into parts, and then looking at the parts in some detail and identifying relationship or patterns
Synthesis (combine) is to combine facts or ideas to create new patterns or structures derived from the original data
Evaluation (judge) is to give the value of something, to state its strengths and weaknesses
An illustrated example…

This includes elements of the Cardiff Met EDGE (Ethical, Digital, Global and Entrepreneurial skills) and other attributes developed in students through the completion of the module and assessment. These will also be highlighted in the module guidance, which should be read by all students completing the module. Assessments are not just a way of auditing student knowledge. They are a process which provides additional learning and development through the preparation for and completion of the assessment.
|
CRITERIA |
70+ |
60-69 |
50-59 |
40-49 |
0-39 |
|
Analysis 30% Correct use and application of relevant strategic management models, theories and concepts, evidencing depth in understanding, knowledge and analysis. |
Excellent detailed analysis with significant depth. |
Very good analysis but further depth needed in some places and/or with further opportunities to explore in more detail |
Good analysis but with further depth to the analysis needed in many places and/or lacks detail in many places and with many opportunities to explore in more detail |
Satisfactory analysis, but very limited in its scope and depth. |
Unsatisfactory. No analysis offered or extremely limited in scope and depth. |
|
Evaluation 10% Ability to critically evaluate theories, models, concepts and their application, and critique literature |
Excellent evaluation of models, theories and concepts, and critique of literature |
Very good evaluation of models, theories and concepts but with further opportunities to explore in more detail |
Good evaluation of models, theories and concepts but lacks detail in many places and/or with many opportunities to explore in more detail |
Satisfactory work but very limited evaluation of concepts, theories & models, |
Unsatisfactory work. No evaluation offered or extremely limited. |
|
Literature 20% Evidence of use and application of a wide range of credible academic and industry literature supported by correct Harvard Referencing, both in-text citations and reference list entries |
Excellent use of supporting academic and industry literature with excellent formatting of references |
Very good use of supporting academic and industry literature. Generally correct formatting of references but with minor corrections needed |
Good use of supporting academic and industry literature but with further opportunities to include additional sources. More substantive corrections needed with referencing |
Satisfactory use of supporting academic and industry literature but with significant opportunities to use additional sources. Significant corrections needed with references. |
Unsatisfactory. No or very limited use of supporting literature. No references and/or extremely poorly formatted references. |
|
Poster Design 20% · Quality of academic poster, design, layout, proofing and overall presentation |
Excellent poster design, content, and presentation |
Very good poster design and content but with some minor opportunities for improvements in content, design and/or layout |
Good poster design and content but with more substantive opportunities for improvement in content, design and/or layout |
Satisfactory poster design with significant improvement needed in content, design and/or layout |
Extremely poor poster, content, design and/or layout |
|
Oral Synopsis 20% · Quality, timing and coherence of oral synopsis (i.e. 5 minutes) which enhances poster content |
Excellent coherent delivery, which augments and enhances the poster. Within 30 seconds of allowed time. |
Very good delivery but with some minor opportunities for improvement. Within 1 minute of allowed time |
Good delivery but with further opportunities for improvement. Within 1½ minutes of allowed time |
Satisfactory delivery but with significant improvement needed. Within 2 minutes of allowed time |
Extremely poor oral delivery. Significantly under or over allowed time, i.e. under 3 minutes or over 7 minutes |
Are you a Cardiff Metropolitan University (CMU) student and need last-minute online assignment help for your BSP6000 Strategic Management Assignment? We're here for you! Our experienced writers provide high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable prices. We understand how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and comprehensive academic support. You can rest assured that our Strategic Management Assignment Help will boost your productivity and help you achieve excellent grades in your academic year. We've got you covered. Check out our Cardiff Metropolitan University Assignment Samples and see the quality for yourself. We are available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better without any stress!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content