UK's No.1 Assignment Help, Trusted Since 2018
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of West London (UWL) | Module Title | MS70126E Global Sustainable Operations |
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
|---|
Module Aim
Global operations are critical to the success of international businesses by sustainably trading internationally. Operations cover all aspects of a business and interact across multiple functions. The insights gained from the module allow students to appreciate the need for the management of resources, optimising the supply chain, procurement, logistics, quality systems, and project management.
Learning outcomes
Expectations
Specific expectations students can have of tutors:
Specific expectations tutors will have of students:
A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment. You will be provided feedback on your formative assessments, and this will help you to better understand
What is required of you when you submit your summative assessment? Please see below guidance on your formative assessment and how to access your feedback.
A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment. You will be provided feedback on your formative assessments, and this will help you to better understand what is required of you when you submit your summative assessment. Please see below guidance on your formative assessment and how to access your feedback.
Assessment Support
| Assessment | Teaching Weeks in which Assessment Support Takes Place | Outline of Type and Form of Assessment Support to be Provided | Student Preparation Required Prior to or After the Support Session | How will the Support Session to be Delivered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Week 6 | Tutor presentation review | Students complete the presentation of the final draft to present for clearance and feedback by the tutor for final guidance. The final draft shall be prepared and ready before the class. Formative feedback will be provided for each group. | In a seminar, formative feedback |
| A2 | Week 13 | Tutor review of draft submission | Students complete an assessment for submission, and the tutor provides formative feedback on a 1-2-1 level. | In a seminar, formative feedback |
Summative Assessment 1
| Assessment title | In class Group Presentation ((AI- Amber) |
|---|---|
| Submission date and time | Weeks -7 and 8 |
| Word Count (or equivalent) | 20 minutes presentation with a maximum of 15 slides on global sustainable operations for a specific business. Including Q&A |
| Where to submit | Turnitin |
| Feedback date | 15 working days after the submission deadline |
| Assessment Weighting | 40% |
| PSRB requirements (if applicable) | NA |
Submitting feedback & grades online using Blackboard
Assessment task: Oral Assignment – 20-minute group presentation on global sustainable operations for a specific business
Submission Details: Weeks 7 and 8
The presentation should be no more than 20 PowerPoint slides, excluding table of contents, references, and appendices (appendices shall include communication with AI: Fully formulated prompts, at least two prompts with improvement shall be included. In addition, a summary of AI response shall be provided).
Each team will agree to investigate an international organisation with the tutor.
Part of the assessment shall include the use of the generative AI tool to provide a solution for sustainability project implementation challenges in the selected company. Provide step-by-step process mapping for the AI that should include prompts, a summary of the AI response and a critique of the AI suggestions. Critique shall include both strengths and weaknesses of the AI effort.
Prepare a group presentation that
1. Reviews selected and approved by the tutor business to identify key operational activities
2. Create a set of recommendations to improve the operational management activity by implementing sustainability requirements (AI tool shall be used)
3. Develop a project business case to deliver the recommendations
4. Evaluates the requirements needed to successfully deliver the project outcomes
Your presentation should consider the following topics:
This is an academic piece of work; you are expected to conduct extensive up-to-date research, critically evaluating the chosen organisation along with Harvard referencing.
Formative assessment is used to give students qualitative feedback on their work during the development process before the submission date. Marks or grades are not provided as part of the feedback at the formative stage. Formative feedback will involve one-to-one sessions with the allocated student groups.
Main Objectives of the Assessment
| No. | Learning Outcome | Marking Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| LO3 | Design appropriate recommendations for managing operational activities | See below |
| LO4 | Evaluate and reflect on the role of project management in delivering successful operations | See below |
Marking Criteria & Marking Scheme:
| Criteria | Weight | 100-70% | 69-60% | 59-50% | 49-1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Content Knowledge and Understanding | 30% | Extensive knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with the exploration and critique of information and ideas from a comprehensive range of sources. | Very wide knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with the exploration and critique of information and ideas from a suitable range of sources. | Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with exploration and critique of information and ideas from an adequate range of sources. | Failure to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of supply chain management. No Exploration and critique of information/ideas from a range of sources. |
| 2. Quality of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis | 30% | Demonstrates an exceptional level of argument with critical judgement in the analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and findings evaluated critically, rigorously, and fully discussed in context with research. | Demonstrates a suitable level of argument with critical judgement in analysis, evaluation, synthesis and findings evaluated sufficiently, rigorously, and fully discussed in context with research. | Demonstrates a satisfactory level of argument with critical judgement in analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and findings adequately evaluated clearly discussed in context with research. | Failure to present arguments with critical judgement or analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and failure to evaluate or discuss findings of the research. |
| 3. Research and Referencing | 20% | Exceptional research and excellent information collected and analysed in full. Exceptional range of background reading with excellent referencing consistently accurate to a recognised standard. | Appropriate research and complete information collected and analysed. Extensive range of background reading with excellent referencing appropriately accurate and to a recognised standard. | Satisfactory information collected but with analysis either incomplete or inaccurate. Satisfactory referencing, accurate and to a recognised standard. | Poor research, with little evidence of an effort to obtain appropriate information. Failure to reference appropriately and not to a recognised standard. |
| Recommendations and conclusion | 10% | Very clear and logical from the analysis Highly relevant and valuable for the client | Clear and logical flow of analysis Relevant and valuable for the client | Satisfactory recommendations Partially relevant or somewhat feasible for the client | Limited or superficial recommendations Irrelevant or not feasible for the client |
| Presentation and structure | 10% | Structure of report is logical, and presentation to a professional standard. Brilliant writing style, with excellent grammar and spelling. A Clear expression of ideas. | Structure and presentation of the report are very good and articulate. Few typographical errors. Language fluent and accurate grammar used. | Structure and presentation of the report are satisfactory and coherent. Some typographical errors. Language fluent and accurate grammar used. | Structure and presentation of the report are disorganised, with a significant number of typographical errors. Poor use of language and grammar. |
Employability Skills
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
Communication
Non-Verbal
Problem solving
Take the initiative and be self-motivated
Critical thinking
Can work under pressure and to a deadline
Planning and organisation skills
Team working
Ability to learn and adapt
Valuing Diversity
Negotiation Skills
Industry/commercial aware
Reflective lifelong learners
Digitally literate
Creativity/lateral thinking
Time management
Influencing
Intellectual curiosity
Flexibility
Interpersonal
Leadership
Perseverance
Confidence
Global/cultural awareness
Integrity and accountability
Decision making
Summative Assessment 2
| Assessment title | Report on Supply Chain Management (AI -Amber) |
|---|---|
| Submission date and time | Week 14, Friday 22/05/2026 23.59 pm |
| Word Count (or equivalent) | 2.500 (+- 10%) |
| Where to submit | Turnitin |
| Feedback date | 15 working days after the submission deadline |
| Assessment Weighting | 60% |
| PSRB requirements (if applicable) | N/A |
Main objectives of the Assessment
Assessment task: Written Assignment
The A2 is a 2,500-word individual written assignment. This assessment requires students to provide an audit report on Supply Chain Management for a chosen multinational corporation. Students should confirm their choice of a company with their lecturer before proceeding with their work. Students should use the library resources as part of their research activity to include recent articles on their chosen company. Students will need to appraise the operational strategy relating to sustainability and deliver recommendations on the operational sustainability changes required for the organisation. This report will need to include a detailed assessment of the company’s operational strategy and supply chain sustainability using the ISO9001 Quality Management System standard.
The report should provide a performance evaluation of each area within the business:
1. Operational strategy such as addressing sustainability goals
2. Leadership
3. Planning of project implementation (use AI to make suggestions about possible ways of sustainability project planning)
4. Support
5. Operations
| No. | Learning Outcome | Marking Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| LO1 | Critique operations strategy and resource management and propose recommendations for improvement | See below |
| LO2 | Appraise the challenges in achieving sustainability in global operations and formulate a strategic organisational framework | See below |
| LO3 | Design appropriate recommendations for managing operational activities | See below |
| LO4 | Evaluate and reflect on the role of project management in delivering successful operations | See below |
| LO5 | Plan for and justify the application of sustainability factors in determining supply chain management decisions | See below |
| LO6 | Relate the value of quality assurance to achieving sustainable global operations | See below |
Marking Criteria & Marking Scheme
| Criteria | Weight | 100-70% | 69-60% | 59-50% | 49-1%% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Content Knowledge and Understanding | 30% | Extensive knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with the exploration and critique of information and ideas from a comprehensive range of sources. | Very wide knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with the exploration and critique of information and ideas from a suitable range of sources. | Satisfactory knowledge and understanding of supply chain management presented with exploration and critique of information and ideas from an adequate range of sources. | Failure to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of supply chain management. No Exploration and critique of information/ideas from a range of sources. |
| 2. Quality of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis | 30% | Demonstrates an exceptional level of argument with critical judgement in the analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and findings evaluated critically, rigorously, and fully discussed in context with research. | Demonstrates a suitable level of argument with critical judgement in analysis, evaluation, synthesis and findings evaluated sufficiently, rigorously, and fully discussed in context with research. | Demonstrates a satisfactory level of argument with critical judgement in analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and findings adequately evaluated clearly discussed in context with research. | Failure to present arguments with critical judgement or analysis, evaluation, synthesis, and failure to evaluate or discuss findings of the research. |
| 3. Research and Referencing | 30% | Exceptional research and excellent information collected and analysed in full. Exceptional range of background reading with excellent referencing consistently accurate to a recognised standard. | Appropriate research and complete information collected and analysed. Extensive range of background reading with excellent referencing appropriately accurate and to a recognised standard. | Satisfactory information collected but with analysis either incomplete or inaccurate. Satisfactory referencing, accurate and to a recognised standard. | Poor research, with little evidence of an effort to obtain appropriate information. Failure to reference appropriately and not to a recognised standard. |
| Presentation and structure | 10% | The structure of the report is logical, and the presentation is to a professional standard. Brilliant writing style, with excellent grammar and spelling. A Clear expression of ideas. | Structure and presentation of the report are very good and articulate. A few typographical errors. Fluent in language and accurate grammar used. | Structure and presentation of the report are satisfactory and coherent. Some typographical errors. Fluent in language and accurate grammar used. | Structure and presentation of the report are disorganised, with a significant number of typographical errors. Poor use of language and grammar. |
Employability Skills
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
Communication
Problem-solving
Research skills
Leadership
Industry/commercial aware
Confidence
Global/cultural awareness
Integrity and accountability
Decision making
Ability to learn and adapt
The reading list for this module is available on Blackboard in the module area and online by searching for reading lists. This shows real-time availability of books in the library and provides direct links to digital items recommended by your lecturer.
Remember to log into Blackboard daily to receive all the latest news and support available at your module information sites!
Subject guides are also available to help you find relevant information for assignments, with contact details of the Subject Librarian for your School.
The reading list for this module is available on Blackboard in the module area and online by searching for reading lists. This shows real-time availability of books in the library and provides direct links to digital items recommended by your lecturer.
Remember to log into Blackboard daily to receive all the latest news and support available at your module sites!
Subject guides (libraryguides) are also available to help you find relevant information for assignments, with contact details of the Subject Librarian for your School.
Essential text: Operations Management, Slack N, Pearson Education (2022), 10th Edition
Recommended texts: Inventory and Production Management in Supply Chains, Silver et al, Routledge (2021), 4th Edition
Quality Management Reconsidered for the Digital Economy, Beckford J, Routledge 2022, 5th Edition
ISE Project Management: the managerial process, Larson, Erik W, McGraw-Hill, 2020, 8th Edition
Achieve Higher Grades of MS70126E Global Sustainable Operations Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentIf you are looking for MS70126E Management Assignment Help in UK for Global Sustainable Operations, then don’t worry! Our Assignment Help UK service provides you with expert guidance and well-researched content that will ensure your academic success. The best part? You can also get all assignment services in affordable prices! Skip the deadline stress and make your assignments top-quality and plagiarism-free. We also free assignment samples that are written by the phd experts. Getting better grades has become even easier. Contact us today.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
