Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Greenwich (UOG) | Module Title | INDU1130 International Human Resource Management |
Welcome to the ‘International Human Resources Management’ module (INDU 1130) at the University of Greenwich Faculty of Business. International Human Resources Management is an optional 30-credit module for students on the BA Business Management programme and other programmes. It assumes no detailed prior knowledge of the field of human resources management.
In this globalised world, whether it is the larger multinational corporations or smaller domestic enterprises who are seeking to take first steps in internationalisation, human resources management plays pivotal role in achieving competitive advantage. This module introduces relevant concepts and theories in the field of International Human Resource Management (IHRM) and provides students with the knowledge of HR professionals and all People Managers.
This module is designed for those on a generalist Business Management degree without prior exposure to any specialist HR modules. The module covers both fundamental human resources concepts, as well as contemporary issues facing companies operating in an international context.
This module is structured into three topics. The first topic covers the theoretical aspects of IHRM, which forms the basis for comprehending the second topic that addresses the functions in IHRM. Finally, the third topic examines the broader contemporary issues and challenges in IHRM.
This is a rigorous, conceptually informed module which is designed to provide you with comprehensive understanding of the theory and practice of IHRM. This knowledge will be developed through three learning activities:
Core reading. Each week you will be expected to complete a small amount of reading prior to participation in the tutorials. This is often a single journal paper or a book
1.chapter. However, additional readings will be available each week should you wish to further expand your knowledge in specific aspects of IHRM theory and practice.
2.Lectures. Each week there will be a lecture on a specific topic. The lectures will draw on readings and illustrate academic concepts with real-life examples.
3.Tutorials. Each week there is a tutorial which incorporates interactive activities, class discussion. These sessions often require preparation prior to the workshop. Please do ensure you do this to get the maximum out of these sessions.
This handbook provides essential information about this module including the aims and learning outcomes, the schedule of teaching and learning activities, assessment tasks, resource recommendations and, if applicable, any additional resources that you will need. Please read it at the start of term so you are aware of key details and important dates.
I hope you will find this module enjoyable, and I eagerly anticipate working with you. Should you have any inquiries or concerns during the term, please feel free to reach out to me without hesitation.
Host faculty: Faculty of Business
Host school: Greenwich Business School
Number of credits: 30-credits
Term(s) of delivery: Term 1 & 2
Site(s) of delivery: Greenwich
The course focuses on contemporary HRM topics within a cross-cultural, comparative, and international context, such as HRM in multi-nationals, global mobility, and global talent management. This course aims to outline the background and the main theoretical frameworks for the study of IHRM; and introduce the broad functional areas of HRM, and how they interact through strategy.
On successful completion of this course a student will be able to:
Glossary:
This module is intended to develop students’ knowledge on the important topic of international human resource management by giving students opportunities to develop both topic-specific and general employability skills. The underlying approach is one which seeks to consolidate academic practice at level 6 study by encouraging both collaborative and independent study / research skills needed for job readiness and sustained professional development. The module also aims to impart generic study skills and knowledge of sectoral issues within a global context.
The module focuses on developing cognitive skills by providing multiple opportunities for independent problem-solving. You will be engaging with real-life organisational cases, making sensible assumption based on course readings and applying that knowledge to practical solutions. You will develop critical thinking skills which is a core component of the module. The module will encourage to you analyse complex issues, evaluate different perspectives, and construct logical arguments relevant to IHRM. The process of preparing for assessments will enhance your research skills, ability to assess source credibility, and capacity to draw evidence-based conclusions.
The module will also expose you to generic competencies that will be fostered through various activities throughout the course. Group work, including debates and presentations in seminars will allow you to develop teamwork, collaboration, and communication skills. Technical ability will be cultivated by providing you with opportunities to apply IHRM knowledge to specific organizational challenges and contexts. This goes beyond mere problem-solving, extending to problem analysis of the constantly changing nature and contexts of IHRM. Your learning of these skills will prove fruitful in professional settings, particularly in the field of IHRM.
You can find out more about the Greenwich Employability Passport at: Identify your skills | Careers | University of Greenwich
You can also use LinkedIn Learning to gain access to thousands of expert-led courses to support your ongoing personal development. More information can be found at: LinkedIn Learning | IT and Library Services | University of Greenwich
Week number |
Week Beginning |
Activity |
Core Reading |
Term 1 |
|||
Topic 1: Theorising International Human Resources Management |
|||
1 |
22/09/2025 |
Lecture: Introduction to the Module |
None |
Seminar: Module review and Icebreaker |
|||
2 |
29/09/2025 |
Lecture: Conceptual Approaches to IHRM |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), Chapter 1 |
Seminar: Assessment Briefing & Guide |
|||
3 |
06/10/2025 |
Lecture: The Cultural Approach |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), Chapters 3 and 4 |
Seminar: Conceptualising IHRM |
|||
4 |
13/10/2025 |
Lecture: The Institutional Approach (National) |
Wintersberger (2016), chapter 5 |
Seminar: Mini Case in IHRM: Cross-cultural issues at AERO |
|||
5 |
20/10/2025 |
Lecture: The Institutional Approach (International) - Convergence & Divergence Debate |
Wintersberger (2016), chapter 6 |
Seminar: Article Review - Institutions and Human Resource Management policy and practice |
|||
6 |
27/10/2025 |
Lecture: Assessment Briefing: Essay |
Recap: Assessment Briefing |
Seminar: Article Review - An investigation of global HRM practices: are practices converging or diverging in the modern day? |
|||
Topic 2: Functions of International Human Resources Management |
|||
7 |
03/11/2025 |
Lecture: Lens 3 Multinational Corporations |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 8 |
Seminar: Assessment Draft Review & Q/A |
|||
8 |
10/11/2025 |
Lecture: Resourcing the Organisation 2: Recruitment and Selection |
Wintersberger (2016), chapter 8. OR Scullion and Paauwe (2012), chapter 4. |
Seminar: Multinational Corporations - Analysis and Critical Discussion |
|||
9 |
17/11/2026 |
Lecture: Resourcing the Organisation 3: Multinationals & Expatriate Migrants |
Brewster et al (2023; 14), chapter 13; 14 AND Wintersberger (2016) pages 153-158 AND Situmoranga and Japutrab (2019) |
Seminar: Case Analysis: Resourcing in IKEA |
|||
10 |
24/11/2025 |
Lecture: Performance management 1: introduction |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 9 OR Torrington et al (2007) chapter 11 |
Seminar: Case Analysis: Multinational Resourcing – A case for Nintendo |
|||
11 |
01/12/2025 |
Lecture: Performance management 2: Appraisal |
Brewster et al, (2023; 2016) chapter 9 OR Armstrong (2015). |
Seminar: Performance Management Strategies in Deloitte |
|||
12 |
08/12/2025 |
Lecture: Conclusion to semester 1 & Essay feedback |
Article available on Moodle |
Seminar: Critical reading and analysis of article |
|||
Winter Break |
|||
Term 2 Topic 2 Continued: Functions of International Human Resources Management |
|||
13 |
12/01/2026 |
Lecture: Introduction to assessment 2 |
Read & Discuss Case Brief |
Seminar: Recapping HR functions & case reading |
|||
14 |
19/01/2026 |
Lecture: Pay and reward 1: Introduction |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 7; 10 AND Wintersberger (2016), chapter 9. |
Seminar: Assessment 2 structure, Q/A, write-up activity |
|||
15 |
26/01/2026 |
Lecture: Pay and Reward 2: Linking Performance to Pay and Rewards |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 7; 10 AND Wintersberger (2016), chapter 9. |
Seminar: Extrinsic or Intrinsic Rewards Activity |
|||
16 |
02/02/2026 |
Lecture: Training and Development 1: National Context |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 10; 11 AND Wintersberger (2016), chapter 10. |
Seminar: Performance & Pay- A case of Royal Bank of Scotland |
|||
17 |
09/02/2026 |
Lecture: Training and Development 2: Organisational Context |
Brewster et al (2023; 2016), chapter 10; 11 AND Wintersberger (2016), chapter 10. |
Seminar: Role Play Activity: Origami |
|||
18 |
16/02/2026 |
Lecture: Assessment Brief: Report Formative Assessment |
Recap: Case Study & Formative Assessment Briefing |
Seminar: Poster Presentation Guide |
|||
19 |
23/02/2026 |
Lecture: Employee Relations 1: Introduction |
Brewster et al (2023), chapter 4 AND Wintersberger (2016), chapter 11. |
Seminar: Institutions & Employees – Debate Activity |
|||
20 |
02/03/2026 |
Lecture: Employee Relations 2: Global Approaches |
Wilton (2019), chapter 4 |
Seminar: Poster Preparation & Draft Review |
|||
Topic 3: Contemporary Issues in International Human Resources Management |
|||
21 |
09/03/2026 |
Lecture: Contemporary Issues in IHRM 1: Global mobility and implications for HR
|
Butterick and Charlwood (2021) OR Cooke et al (2021) |
Seminar: Seminar: Poster Presentations |
|||
22 |
16/03/2026 |
Lecture: Contemporary Issues in IHRM 2: ‘Green’ HRM
|
Mehta and Chugan (2015) OR Wusoff et al (2020) |
Seminar: Assessment 2 Questions, feedback & writing retreat |
|||
23 |
23/03/2026 |
Lecture: Contemporary Issues in IHRM 3: ‘Gig’ Workers
|
Wood et al (2019) OR Myhill et al (2021) |
Seminar: Assessment 2 Questions, feedback & writing retreat ECs |
|||
24 |
30/03/2026 |
Lecture: Conclusions to module & future talks |
NONE |
Seminar: General information on Employability, Future Education, Available Resources & more |
Are You Looking Solution of INDU1130 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment
First sit assessments |
Deadline
|
Weighting out of 100%* |
Maximum length |
Marking type |
Method of submission |
Is the submission anonymous? |
Learning outcomes mapped to this assessment. |
Essay |
1 December 2025
|
50% |
2000 words |
Numerical (0-100) |
Turnitin |
Yes |
1&2 |
Report |
23 March 2026
|
50% |
2500 words |
Numerical (0-100) |
Turnitin |
Yes |
3&4 |
Assessment 1: Essay
This essay counts for 50% of the overall module mark and has a 2000-word limit. The essay has two questions and focuses on the theoretical aspects of IHRM. The questions you are required to address are:
The first questions will form part first of the essay. To answer the first question, you are required to briefly outline the three approaches to IHRM: cultural, institutional, and global. You must illustrate this with critically analysing the specific theories, by means of outlining the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches to exploring HR policies and practices. This critical examination should be supported by empirical evidence from the literature.
The second question forms the second part of the essay and is a convergence-divergence debate. In this section, you will evaluate the statement “Globalisation means that eventually HR policy and practice will converge into a single ‘best practice’ everywhere in the world”. This statement should examine two views. The first view should examine and discuss that globalisation, technology, and competition will eventually force similar HR policy towards a single ‘best practice’. You should find a journal article/paper which shows the evidence for this view. The second view should consider the opposing view examining and discussing that cultural, institutional, and other national differences mean there will always remain a divergence between difference countries and companies in how they do HR. Again, this will be evidenced with a journal article/paper.
Marking Criteria for the Essay
Criteria |
Marks Assigned (/100) |
Description |
Understanding of key concepts |
30 |
Answers demonstrates an understanding of the topic in question, relevant key concepts are explained and applied in a practical way |
Critical engagement with the relevant literature |
25 |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature are used to support arguments and demonstrate awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature |
Appropriate use of examples to consider and explore problems. |
25 |
Appropriate use of empirical and case study materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop insight on the questions. Can use examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual / theoretical perspectives. |
Clarity of structure and referencing. |
20 |
The structure of the answer is presented clearly. The standard of Academic English should be high. Harvard referencing style should be used throughout. |
Assessment 2: Report
This report counts for 50% of the final module mark/grade and has a 2500-word limit
Task
You hare tasked with writing a report to the Board of Directors of the Macdonald Hotels and Resort Group Ltd. The details of the case are presented in the ‘Macdonald Hotels and Resort case study’ document on Moodle. Macdonald Hotels and Resorts is a British hotel and resort chain that plans to internationalise beyond Spain by acquiring a small hotel chain in a country of your choice. The board of directors have commissioned you, as a HR consultant, to give then advice and recommendations of their questions:
You are required to read the detailed case brief document on Moodle under the Assessment Information section.
Use of AI: AI technologies can be valuable tools to enhance your academic skills, such as refining your English language use, summarising complex materials such as journal articles, supporting critical thinking, and deepening your conceptual understanding. These resources should be used responsibly as part of your learning journey. It is important to uphold academic integrity by ensuring that all submitted work is your own original effort therefore, AI tools must not be used to generate assignments or any content that you submit for assessment. Adhering to these principles helps maintain fairness and the value of your qualification. Please view the AI guidance here.
Marking criteria for the report
Criteria |
Marks Assigned (/100) |
Description |
Understanding of key concepts. |
30 |
The report demonstrates an understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. |
Critical engagement with the relevant literature. |
25 |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support the case study analysis. |
Understanding and implementation of HR plan and procedures and formulation of evidence-based recommendations |
30 |
Appropriate case study and empirical materials means evidence most likely to come from searching using academic databases, directly from journals or from other sources suitable to academic study. It does not include descriptions of company policies drawn from the internet. These might be used in an illustrate way to support a point, but would need to be supported with relevant, quality evidence. |
Clarity of structure and referencing. |
15 |
The report is clearly and appropriately presented, with good spelling and grammar. Harvard referencing style is correctly and consistently used for referencing. |
You will be supported towards the summative assessments through weekly tutorials that includes case discussions as well as a poster presentation.
Poster Presentation:
To help prepare for your final report, you will be asked to prepare a Poster. Your teaching team and peers will act as the Board of Directors of the MacDonalds Hotels & Resorts Group. The full briefing of the case study is available on the Moodle site.
This formative assessment has three purposes:
This is not an academic presentation, so descriptive listings of academic theories are not required. Your task is to show how you can put academic theories to use to explore the issues and come up with good, well-researched options and recommendations based on the evidence. Please also remember, although MacDonald’s plans to internationalise may raise issues and concerns, it is not a ‘problem’ (otherwise they would not bother expanding!) Try to think about what a Board of Directors would expect in this kind of context from a team of consultants and frame the case study as a positive opportunity. While this is a simulation, as a group of HR consultants you would always hope that your presentations would impress a Board sufficiently so that they may contract you again in the future.
Written feedback will be provided for each assessment. There will be in-text comments as well, and this in-text commentary will provide specific feedback relative to the assessment content.
The first assessment (Essay) will be graded using the following rubric.
Criteria |
Fail (0-39%) |
Satisfactory (40-49%) |
Good (50-59%) |
Very good (60-69%) |
Excellent (70-79% |
Exceptional (80-100%) |
Concepts
|
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic in question, relevant key concepts are not explained and/or applied in a practical way. |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic in question, but with weaknesses in how relevant key concepts are explained and/or applied in a practical way. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic in question, but with limits in how relevant key concepts are explained and/or applied in a practical way. |
Demonstrates a very good understanding of the topic in question. Relevant key concepts are explained and/or applied in a practical way. |
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic in question. Relevant key concepts are explained and/or applied in a robust and practical way. |
Demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the topic in question. Relevant key concepts are explained and/or applied in an excellent and practical way. |
Critical Engagement
|
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is not used to support arguments. No awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Limited relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support arguments. Limited awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support arguments. Demonstrates some awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support arguments. Demonstrates very good awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support arguments. Demonstrates an excellent awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Relevant and appropriate academic literature is used to support arguments. Demonstrates an outstanding awareness of the types of debates and findings from the empirical literature. |
Empirical Examples
|
Does not use appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop insight on the questions. Does not use examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual / theoretical perspectives. |
Use of appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop a limited insight on the questions. Limited use of examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual / theoretical perspectives. |
Good use of appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop a limited insight on the questions. Good use of examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual / theoretical perspectives. |
Very good use of appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop a very good insight on the questions. Good use of examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual / theoretical perspectives. |
Excellent use of appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop an outstanding insight on the questions. Outstanding use of examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual perspectives. |
Outstanding use of appropriate empirical materials provided in the module and from the wider literature to support and develop an outstanding insight on the questions. Outstanding use of examples of HR functions to illustrate conceptual perspectives. |
Execution
|
The structure of the answer is poor. The standard of Academic English is not sufficiently high. Harvard referencing style is not used throughout. |
The structure of the answer is satisfactory. The standard of Academic English is satisfactory but with many flaws. Harvard referencing style is not used throughout. |
The structure of the answer is good. The standard of Academic English is good but with some flaws. Harvard referencing style has some limited errors. |
The structure of the answer is very good. The standard of Academic English is very good, with only a few flaws. Harvard referencing style has some very limited errors. |
The structure of the answer is outstanding. The standard of Academic English is outstanding. Harvard referencing style has no errors. |
The structure of the answer is outstanding. The standard of Academic English is outstanding. Harvard referencing style has no errors. Of publishable quality. |
The second assessment (Report) will be graded using the following rubric:
Criteria |
Fail (0-39%) |
Satisfactory (40-49%) |
Good (50-59%) |
Very good (60-69%) |
Excellent (70-79%) |
Exceptional (80-100%) |
Concepts |
The report does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. |
The report demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. However, this remains superficial with limited application of theories and concepts to the case study analysis. |
The report demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. Links concepts well to the case study. |
The report demonstrates a very good understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. Links concepts well to the case study. Shows evidence of critical thinking, for example shows limitations of theories, drawbacks of proposals. |
The report demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. Links concepts well to the case study. There is solid evidence of knowledge of the limitations and critiques of different theoretical frameworks. Shows insight |
The report demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the topic and relevant key concepts. Concepts are linked to the case study. There is solid evidence of knowledge of the concepts, and their limitations, as well as critiques of different theoretical frameworks. Shows remarkable insights and command of the subject matter |
Critical Engagement |
Does not show critical engagement with relevant academic literature to support the case study analysis. |
Offers a basic or superficial critical engagement with relevant academic literature. |
Offers a good analysis, with evidence of some thought and critical engagement with relevant academic literature. There is an attempt to critique the academic literature to shape the analysis. |
Offers a good analysis, with strong evidence of some thought and reflection in using, but also critiquing, relevant academic literature and shaping the analysis. |
Offers an excellent analysis, with very strong evidence of thought, reflection and insight in using and critiquing, relevant academic literature and shaping the analysis |
Offers an excellent analysis of the case study, drawing on relevant literature, but also critiquing to pull out insight. Shows a higher level of intellectual capacity in reflecting and critiquing the literature in situating the analysis. |
Empirical examples |
Does not use appropriate case study and empirical materials and/or the work includes descriptions of company HR policies/practices drawn from the internet. |
Uses appropriate case study and empirical materials. The incorporation of such material is satisfactory. |
Uses appropriate case study and empirical materials, incorporating the lessons from the empirical literature to create some convincing recommendations to the Macdonald’s Board. |
Uses appropriate case study and empirical materials, incorporating the lessons from the empirical literature to create very convincing recommendations to the Macdonald’s Board. |
Uses appropriate case study and empirical materials, incorporating the lessons from the empirical literature to create strongly convincing, evidence-based recommendations to the Macdonald’s Board. |
The work shows command of the academic and practitioner literature. The analysis is solid, using the academic literature to demonstrate real insight and intellectual clarity to the case study analysis |
Execution |
The report is not clearly and appropriately presented. There is poor spelling and grammar. Harvard referencing style is not correctly and consistently used for referencing. |
The report has a satisfactory structure, but with significant errors or incoherence. Spelling and grammar acceptable, but with errors. |
The report has a good structure, but with some considerable errors or incoherence. Spelling and grammar acceptable, but with some errors. |
The report is clearly and appropriately presented. Generally good spelling and grammar. Harvard referencing style is generally correctly and consistently used for referencing. |
The report has an excellent structure, clearly and appropriately present, with excellent spelling and grammar. Harvard referencing style is correctly and consistently used for referencing. |
The report has an outstanding structure, clearly and appropriately present, with perfect spelling and grammar. Harvard referencing style is perfect, both as in-text citation and in the reference list. |
The marking rubric can also be found on the module Moodle page under the “Assessment Information” section.
Coursework is marked on the understanding that it is the student’s own work on the module and that it has not, in whole or part, been presented elsewhere for assessment. Where material has been used from other sources, this must be properly acknowledged in accordance with the University’s regulations regarding Assessment Misconduct.
Marking, feedback and next steps
To pass this module, you must achieve an overall mark of 40+ and a mark of 40+ for all assessments.
For coursework, the marks and feedback will normally be provided to students within seventeen working days of the submission deadline. In exceptional circumstances, where there is a delay in providing feedback, you will be informed by the module leader.
If you do not pass a module at the first attempt, you will likely be eligible for a resit opportunity on the failed assessments. The Progression and Award Board (PAB) will decide whether you will be offered an opportunity to resit. Note that marks on resit assessments are capped at 40% unless extenuation has been applied for and granted.
External Examiner
The External Examiner for this module is:
Name: Christina Anderl
Institution: London South Bank University
Please note that the role of the External Examiner is to evaluate the overall standard of assessments on the module. They are unable to correspond with individual students about their work. If you need to discuss your marks or feedback, please contact the module leader.
Resit assessments |
Deadline
|
Weighting out of 100%* |
Maximum length |
Marking type |
Method of submission |
Is the submission anonymous? |
Learning outcomes mapped to this assessment. |
Essay |
TBC
|
50 %
|
2000 words |
Numerical (0-100%) |
Turnitin |
Yes |
1&2 |
Report |
TBC
|
50 % |
2500 words |
Numerical (0-100%) |
Turnitin |
Yes |
3&4 |
The re-sit for this module would require you to revise and resubmit your submission, taking on board the advice, guidance and feedback provided by the tutor. Before submitting you should seek feedback from your tutor to ensure that the new submission will pass. A support session will be arranged by the module leader which will give you the opportunity to ask any questions that you may have. Your resubmission should be prefaced with a short (200 word) commentary outlining how the resubmission has been revised.
The following are suggested readings for the module. Additional, more detailed reading recommendations will be provided for the module topics.
Author |
Title |
Publisher |
ISBN |
Brewster, C., Houldsworth, E., Sparrow, and P., Vernon, G. (2023) |
International Human Resources Management (5th Edition) |
Kogan Page Publishers |
9781398603554 |
Wintersberger, D. (2017) |
International Human Resource Management: A case study approach |
Kogan Page: London. |
9780749480998 |
Additional Reading:
Author |
Title |
Publisher |
ISBN |
Brewster, C., Sparrow, P., Vernon, G., and Houldsworth, E. (2016) |
International Human Resource Management (4th education) |
CIPD: London |
1843983753 |
Activities:
There are no additional activities involved in this module.
Resources:
There are no additional specialist resources required for this module.
Costs:
There are no additional costs associated with this module.
At the University of Greenwich, we value feedback from students as well as External Examiners and other stakeholders and we use this information to help us improve our provision. For example, due to feedback directly received from the students, the content of this module are now timely updated to reflect examples from global context and play-based activity have been included in a tutorial. Your feedback and suggestions are warmly received. Please contact the module leader if you have any recommendations.
Important note: The University of Greenwich will do all that it reasonably can to deliver the module and support your learning as specified in our handbooks and other information provided. However, under some circumstances, changes may have to be made. This may include modifications to the:
This might be because of, for example:
In these circumstances, the university will take all reasonable steps to minimise disruption by making reasonable modifications. However, to the full extent that it is possible under the general law, the university excludes liability for any loss and/or damage suffered by any applicant or student due to these circumstances.
Buy Custom Answer Of INDU1130 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteIf you are falling short of time left and searching for expert help for your INDU1130 International Human Resource Management Assignment? Our team of professional writers provides top-quality Human Resource Management Assignment Help. Just write my assignment, and your assignment will be completed on time. We are ensuring you get the best results on our affordable Assignment Help. Contact us today for a plagiarism-free Assignment Examples. This will help you stand out from the rest with better grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content