| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Teesside University | Module Title | ACC4043-N Contemporary Management in Operations and Finance |
| Word Count | 4500 |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | End Course Assessment (ECA) |
| Assessment Title | Part A - Financial Analysis and Part B - Managing Operations |
| Academic Year | 2026 |
Teesside University International Business School
Contemporary Management in Operations and Finance (ACC4043-N)
The deadline for Submission is Friday, 09 January 2026 at 4pm
Word Count for this ECA Assignment is 4500 (Part A: 2000 words and Part B: 2500 words which should not exceed or fall short of +/-10% of the required words)
Produce an informal report not exceeding or falling short (+/- 10%) of 2000 words (excluding cover page, table of contents, references and appendices) which:
Select a company (not a financial institution) and evaluate their performance using at least the most recent two years’ financial statements.
(Data from the LSEG/Fame database or other information sources for comparative data can be used provided a formula of how each ratio was calculated necessary to be demonstrated in your work).
An informal report style should be used, and the following areas should be addressed:
You can calculate ratios for your selected company from the annual reports, and or from the LSEG/FAME database. The source of the figures used must be clearly and explicitly shown and referenced. Ensure the annual report of your chosen company, and that of your competitor company has a minimum of two years period to facilitate trend analysis and comparative analysis. (Financial Institutions such as banks, insurance companies etc CANNOT be used for this assignment).
Select a company from LSEG/FAME database, who has published their 2023/24 annual report/financial statements and MUST be used as the basis of the evaluation of your chosen company’s performance. Extracts from the Annual Report which you used MUST be submitted (only the used components) with the report within the appendices. FAME database or a similar site can be used to obtain comparable data BUT must be referenced and extracts shown in the appendix section. As this is an academic writeup, we expect a minimum of 20 references (use the Harvard Style for referencing) for this section
TEES VALLEY PARKERS (TVP) is a large conglomerate and manufacturing company, with great potential and operating in large scale in textiles, pharmaceuticals, ceramics, marine food, information and communication technologies, financial services, and energy. The company has already undertaken some policies to enhance including modifications of 5-years corporate strategies and conducted a survey to measure the pulse of the customer regarding the satisfaction in terms of product and services and scored 3.0 out of 5.0 of satisfaction measure. Now, it is currently not sure about its reported performances and is wondering what areas of its operations require improvement, what proposals to be chosen and if necessary, how performance can be improved and controlled the inventories. You are required to develop your own ideas and recommendations for the effective operation of the organisation. You are required to produce a 2,500-word report that evaluates the role of operational, financial and performance management in the case study organisation.
Students are required to employ a range of analytical techniques, communicate effectively and demonstrate a both theoretical and practical understanding of the key issues addressed by the module.
Do You Need This ACC4043-N CMOF ECA Assignment?
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentThe detailed format can be found in the support outline in your learning material section. It includes sections such as:
Title Page
This should contain the following information:
This should be presented as follows:
The Reference List This should:
These should be clearly numbered and appropriately referred to in your assignment and should not include information that is essential for the main body of the assignment. Appendices should not be used as a device for getting around the word limit.
You are to submit your ECA assignment in the prescribed format to the Blackboard Ultra on or before Friday, 4 pm (UK Time), on January 09, 2026, as highlighted in the assessment section of the CMOF Ultra blackboard VLE. No extensions are planned. The submission link will be made available by week 12.
The ECA assessment will be graded using the module ACC4043-N rubrics already uploaded to your blackboard in conjunction with the Generic University Level 7 Criteria included below.
Submission date: Submit electronically to the Blackboard by Wednesday, 09th of January 2026, 4 pm UK Time. Please do not plan for an extension.
Feedback would be provided within 20 working days from the submission date.
| Band | Generic Criteria |
| 90-100% | An excellent critical and complete demonstration of understanding in all key areas of knowledge relevant to the work and demonstrating an innovative and creative approach. Evidence throughout the work of a sustained ability to synthesise and interpret complex concepts, to make inferences and to provide an original and/or compelling argument and discussion. Excellent structure and immaculate presentation, with cogent use of academic language and grounded in a pertinent and substantial selection of source materials. Excellent use of appropriate analytical and research methods and addresses ethical considerations in an informed and perceptive manner. Exceptional ability to link and critically analyse theory and practice where appropriate. |
| 80-89% | An excellent, critical and systematic demonstration of understanding in all key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Evidence throughout of the ability to synthesise and interpret complex concepts to provide a compelling argument and discussion. Very good structure and presentation, with confident use of academic language and grounded in a relevant and extensive selection of source materials. Excellent use of appropriate analytical and research methods and fully addresses ethical considerations. Excellent ability to link and critically analyse theory and practice where appropriate. |
| 70-79% | An excellent, critical and organised demonstration of understanding in all key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Evidence throughout of the ability to synthesise and interpret diverse concepts to provide a sound argument and discussion. Good structure and presentation, with fluent use of academic language and grounded in an appropriate and comprehensive selection of source materials. Very effective use of appropriate analytical and research methods and consideration of ethical implications. Very good ability to link and critically analyse theory and practice where appropriate. |
| 60-69% | A proficient, clearly stated and analytical demonstration of understanding in all key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Evidence of the ability to integrate and analyse diverse concepts in a rational and logical argument and discussion. Well structured and clearly presented work, with fluent use of academic language and utilising a relevant and extensive range of source materials. Effective use of appropriate analytical and research methods and consideration of ethical issues. Good ability to link and critically analyse theory and practice where appropriate. |
| 50-59% | An acceptable and substantiated demonstration of understanding in all key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Evidence of the ability to integrate and analyse diverse concepts in a reasoned and valid argument and discussion. Adequately structured and presented work, with clear use of academic language and reference to a sufficient range of relevant source materials. Adequate use of appropriate analytical and research methods and does address ethical considerations. Effective linking of theory and practice where appropriate. |
| 40-49% | A limited, insufficient and/or inaccurate understanding in key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Insufficient evidence of ability to integrate and analyse concepts to provide a valid discussion. Unacceptably structured and presented work, with insufficient use of academic language and conventions. A limited range of source materials is used. Limited or ineffective use of analytical and research methods and limited coverage of ethical considerations. Inadequate linking of theory and practice where applicable. |
| 30-39% | A descriptive and/or narrative account, with little critical and/or flawed understanding of key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Insufficient evidence of ability to discuss fundamental concepts. Unclear and and/or unevidenced argument and discussion. Poorly structured and presented work, with little use of academic language and conventions. A narrow and/or inappropriate range of source materials and analytical and research methods is used. Failure to identify ethical considerations and to link theory and practice where applicable. |
| 0-29% | A weakly descriptive and/or narrative account, with no analytical content and/or significant inaccuracies in understanding of key areas of knowledge relevant to the work. Little or no evidence of research and the ability to discuss fundamental concepts. No awareness of ethical issues. Unclear and unsourced arguments and discussion. Flawed structure and presentation, with negligible attention to academic language or conventions. Some or all source materials are unreferenced and/or irrelevant. Failure to link theory and practice where applicable. |
Buy Custom Answer Of This ACC4043-N CMOF ECA Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteThe ACC4043-N Contemporary Management in Operations and Finance ECA Assignment requires strong analytical skills and a clear understanding of modern financial and operational strategies. Students often seek professional Management Assignment Help to meet academic expectations and tight deadlines. With trusted Assignment Help UK, learners can access expert-written solutions tailored to university standards. Additionally, a Free list of Assignment Samples examples allows students to understand structure, referencing, and critical evaluation, ensuring high-quality submissions and improved academic performance.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content