Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | The University Of Law | Module Title | L7 SUCCESS THROUGH BUSINESS SCHOOL |
By sitting this assessment, I am confirming:
Assessment details: Individual written report, 100% (2,500 words)
Referencing: Students are expected to use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required. Please follow the ULaw Harvard (APA 7th) for all your assignments at the ULBS.
Submission Method: Turnitin - Your work will be put through Turnitin. All submissions will be electronically checked for plagiarism.
You have the option to upload your work ahead of the deadline, more than once. ULBS will be reviewing your last submission only. You can only upload one file. For example, if your work contains a word document and power point slides/Excel spreadsheet you will need to copy your slides/spreadsheet into the word document.
ULBS Assessment Office Contact Details
The ULBS Assessment Office are here to help should you have any non-academic questions related to your assessments. You can contact them at AssessmentOffice@law.ac.uk
Note: Keep in mind that self-plagiarism (when you reuse your own specific wording and ideas from work that you have previously submitted without referencing yourself) is also a form of plagiarism and is not allowed.
Please refer to the marking criteria (below) for a breakdown of how the tasks will be marked.
ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
|
Assessment Method |
LO’s Met |
|
Weighting |
|
Individual written report of 2,500 words |
All Los of the module are met |
100% |
|
Students are required to choose a FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) brand that fulfils the below criteria:
- The brand has been involved in unethical practices between 2000 – 2023.
- The brand can originate or operate anywhere in the world.
- The brand can still be operating or have ceased to operate.
- The brand is chosen after the student has verified that enough information from the prospective company and their external environment is available.
| MARKING CRITERIA | MARK WEIGHT | FAIL (0–49%) | PASS (50–59%) | COMMENDATION (60–69%) | DISTINCTION (70–100%) |
|
Introductory section including business ethics, unethical business practices and referencing
|
15 | Exhibits an unsatisfactory grasp of the issues. Primarily descriptive and lacking in independent critical thought. Weak or no attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Little evidence of ability to tackle the issues. Poor structure/grammar. | Satisfactory grasp of the issues, with limited independent critical thought appropriate to the tasks. Material is largely relevant to the tasks. Some evidence of analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Work is presented in acceptable manner, with some minor errors. | Good/very good understanding of the issue with some independent critical thought and approach to the tasks. Good attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical reflection, with evidence of some ability to tackle issues. Work is clearly presented in a fairly well-organised manner. | Excellent level of understanding. All requirements are dealt with to a high standard. Excellent analysis, synthesis and critical reflection. Evidence of independent and original judgement in relation to resolution of problems. Excellently presented. |
|
Analysis 1: Moral Philosophical Bases Choose three of the moral philosophical bases and critically evaluate how the company followed (or not) the three bases you have chosen, that led to the identified unethical behaviours/scandal. (Around 900 words, LO1 and LO5). |
30 | ||||
|
Analysis 2: Ethical Decision-Making or Social Accounting Explain the theoretical aspect of the ethical decision making or social accounting. Then critically apply the ethical decision making or social accounting theories on the chosen brand’s unethical practices. (Around 500 words, LO1 and LO5). |
20 | ||||
|
Analysis 3: Leadership • Critically evaluate the leadership style of the company. |
15 | ||||
|
Recommendations and Conclusions • Identify three recommendations that are concrete and derived from the unethical practices that have been analysed in the report. (Around 300 words). |
20 |
Struggling with Level 7 Success Through Business School Assessment? Get Expert Help Before Your Deadline
Get Assignment Help on WhatsAppAre you struggling with your L7 Success Through Business School assessment at The University of Law? This assessment requires students to examine an FMCG brand involved in unethical business practices and critically analyse the moral philosophical bases, ethical decision-making approaches, corporate social responsibility, and leadership responses connected to the identified scandal. If you need support with analysing business ethics theories, evaluating corporate responsibility, or developing a structured approach to your report, WorkingMent offers expert University Assignment Help and Business Ethics Assignment Help. You can also get guidance with Management Assignment Help when examining leadership decisions and organisational responses to ethical issues.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
