OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook 2025-26 | University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 15 Apr, 2026
Category Dissertation Subject Education
University University of Strathclyde Module Title L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook
Word Count 15,000 Words
Academic Year 2025-26

L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook

L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook

Dissertation Outline

The draft dissertation schedule (subject to minor changes) is set out below. Part-time students should get in touch with Emma to discuss alternative timetabling options:

Dissertation schedule

Dates, Times and Locations

Workshop 1: Introduction to the Dissertation

 

Thursday 19th March, 13.00-15.00

GH617

Workshop 2: Dissertation tips for planning & design

 

Thursday 26th March, 13.00-15.00

GH617

Workshop 3: Student presentations

Tuesday 28th April, Presentation slots to be confirmed

GH617

Workshop 4: Student presentations

Wednesday 29th April, Presentation slots to be confirmed

GH617

Workshop 5: Student presentations

Thursday 30th April, Presentation slots to be confirmed

GH617

 

Students upload dissertation plans to MyPlace

 

 

8th May

Exam Boards ratify marks – formal progression to dissertations (or other outcome, e.g. resits) confirmed**

Early June

Dissertation supervision 1 (feedback on dissertation plan)

Late May

Dissertation supervision 2

Late June

Dissertation supervision 3

Late July 

Dissertation submission

5th August

For those students who start the programme in September, 120 credits must have been accumulated from the programme curriculum and have submitted a satisfactory proposal for a dissertation, to progress to the degree of Master's.  For those students who start the programme in January, 60 credits must have been accumulated from the programme curriculum and have submitted a satisfactory proposal for a dissertation, to progress to the degree of Master's.

All four MSc programmes outlined above place a strong emphasis on the dissertation, which is an extended piece of writing of up to 15,000 words, based on independent study, assessed at SCQF Level 11. The dissertation is your chance to undertake an extended piece of scholarship. It allows you to pursue in-depth a topic that is of interest to you. You are expected to demonstrate your ability to engage critically and analytically with the literature in the field, building upon relevant concepts and theory covered in the taught element of your MSc degree and, where appropriate, apply this to empirical situations.

The subject will be determined based on your own interests, its relevance to your MSc programme policy, and what is feasible in terms of the literature, data and time available. You are expected to develop your own argument and conduct your own analysis on a specific and limited research problem, though it is not required that you collect new data (some students, for example, undertake extended literature reviews for their dissertation projects - many others analyse data that are already available, such as policy documents and secondary data sets).
 
Whilst demonstrating knowledge from other modules is not explicitly part of the marking criteria, the dissertation module is designed to draw on the skills and knowledge you have gained in your MSc studies so far. The result should be a piece of academic research relevant to your programme (e.g. criminology/social policy/international social welfare), demonstrating, to a level appropriate for an MSc qualification, knowledge of: the topic chosen; relevant academic and other literature; and social scientific method.

As you start planning, it is also worth having in mind what a dissertation is not. A dissertation is not a review or discussion of everything you have learned about your chosen topic – it must address a defined aim or set of research questions. The dissertation is also not a collaborative effort between you and your supervisor. This is your own piece of research. Supervisors will not tell you what to read or do, nor will they take responsibility for the dissertation. Staff provide initial guidance, via the three workshops and feedback on the dissertation plan, to get you started, and your supervisor then advises you at certain strategic points to ensure you are on track and to alert you to any problems. Additionally, if you are finding the process challenging or encountering difficulties or uncertainties, you can approach your supervisor for advice. Your supervisor will act as a safety net, providing academic and practical guidance.

Indicative Dissertation Outline

Below is an indicative chapter outline, contents and word length. It is intended as a general guide to the structure of the dissertation. Individual dissertations may have a slightly different structure, contents and employ different chapter lengths, as the topic and approach require. If you would like more specific guidance, please discuss your proposed outline with your assigned supervisor, noting any concerns or uncertainties you have.

Chapter Words

Abstract

  • Summarise all major aspects of the research, including: Topic; Research Aim and Questions; Methodology; Findings; Conclusions; Policy/Practice recommendations.
150-200 words [excluded from word limit]

Introduction

  • Outline of topic: What is the topic of the study?
  • Significance of study: Why is this research important (e.g. recent policy change/research debate, or growing evidence of a particular problem)? What does it add to our knowledge of the topic and/or methods?
  • Purpose/Research Question: What is the research seeking to do? If there is a specific research question(s), state here. Students often find it helpful to have one overarching aim and then 2-3 more specific research questions or objectives.
  • Context for study: Outline any context the reader needs to know, such as the policy context.
2000

Critical Academic Reflection: Part 1

This section should draw on learning and feedback from your taught modules to reflect on:

  • Evaluation of skills and learning so far, and their impact on the research. This should include consideration of the following questions: 
  • What academic learning from my taught modules have I brought into my dissertation?
  • How has this shaped topic choice?
  • How has feedback from my work on other modules informed my work in my dissertation?
  • What feedback has been particularly useful for the dissertation?
  • How will I develop it for the format of an MSc dissertation?
1000

Literature Review

Purpose: Explain what the Literature Review is setting out to do. This is likely to include:

  • Identifying key themes that will be explored or added to by your research 
  • Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of current literature, to inform what your research can add.
  • Identifying relevant theories and concepts that you may be relevant to the research.
  • Establishing what methods have been used in similar studies, to inform your own approach.

LR method: Explain how the review was conducted, giving a sense of how you identified, critically assessed and then synthesised relevant literature. Also, explain how your literature review chapter is structured (it is usually more effective to present the LR by thematic sections, rather than source-by-source).

2500

Methodology

  • Explanation of Research Strategy and Methods: Explain in detail your overall research strategy and the specific methods employed, detailing the decisions involved in choosing a method/set of methods over alternatives.
  • Justification of methods: The research’s strategy and methods should be rigorously justified. For example, you might use one or more of the following: The likelihood the method(s) will generate the data required to meet the project’s aim/answer the research questions; Your epistemological and ontological positions; Other methods used in the same field/by similar studies (i.e. making a case for more methodological diversity for this topic); Ethical considerations (e.g. methods which give voice to marginalised communities); Practical considerations (e.g. time and resources).
  • Research Ethics: How did you approach research ethics? Were there any ethical issues posed by your choice of topic and/or methods? How were these managed? (See section below for more information on
  • Data Collection: Tell the story of how the data was collected and any issues faced, e.g. if multiple methods were used, the order in which they were used and why; e.g. if insufficient respondents were recruited initially, how this was dealt with.
  • Validity, reliability and limitations: It may be helpful to conclude this section with a summary of why you think the method will produce valid and reliable findings, whilst acknowledging any significant limitations to the methodology.

This section should also highlight where any previous learning from taught modules has been used, and how it has been further developed.

2500

Findings

  • Present your findings in a clear, logical way. There are many ways to do this, the most common being by research question or by theme. 
  • Present quotes in indented paragraphs, with the speaker/source clearly identified
  • Graphs, figures and charts must be clearly labelled (Figure 1, etc.), presented with all information needed to interpret them (e.g. axis titles, series labels, etc).
2,500

Analysis

  • Analytical strategy and framework: Explain how the results were analysed and the conceptual/theoretical framework used.
  • Analysis: Present the analysis, in most cases this will be done using the same format as the findings, e.g. the same key themes or by research questions.
  • Link to Literature: It may be useful to cross-reference to/contrast with existing literature. NB Some dissertations combine the findings and analysis into a single, larger section – this is something you should discuss with your dissertation supervisor.
3000

Conclusion

  • Summarise findings: Provide a summary of the findings and their significance to our understanding of the core issue, acknowledging limitations.
  • Reflection/limitations: Reflect on the success of the study, highlighting aspects that could have been conducted more effectively and/or acknowledging some of the limitations of your dissertation project.
  • Policy/Practice Implications: Are there any policy/practice/advocacy implications that stem from your study? Do you have recommendations as a result of your findings?
  • Further Research: Do you have any recommendations for further research arising from your study?
1000

Critical Academic Reflection: Part 2.

 This section should link to the Critical Academic Reflection: Part 1, and should discuss how the work you have completed in your dissertation has developed your skills and academic knowledge. This section should provide specific examples of development, drawn from the dissertation process. It should also include a reflection on what these mean for your future development, beyond the dissertation.

500
References  

Appendix

should contain: 

  • ALL three Supervision Record documents, signed off by your supervisor. 
  • Completed Academic Skills Certificates
 

Focus of Dissertation & Pathway Specific Learning Objectives

The following aspects may help think through potential topics:

  • Draw on your research training: Whilst we do not specifically assess this aspect of dissertations, it is usually helpful for students to draw on the knowledge and skills they have developed during their research modules.
  • Ensure your proposed questions are researchable in the time available:  Students will hand in their last piece of taught module work at the end of April or early-mid May, depending on the modules chosen, which means the time available is 3-4 months. Therefore, the project should be executable within that period, allowing for any annual leave plans you may have in the Summer months.
  • Be scholarly in nature, aiming to advance the discipline: Whilst it is not expected that the dissertation should constitute an original contribution to knowledge in the manner of a PhD, the project should be designed as a serious piece of scholarship aiming to advance knowledge in some way and being capable, with further development, of making such a contribution. The highest marks require some demonstration of such work.

In addition, the topic must be relevant to your specific dissertation pathway. The following sections provide some pathway-specific guidance on choosing a relevant topic.

L5986: Dissertation in Criminology

Postgraduate taught students in the MSc Criminology and Social Policy must complete a Dissertation in Criminology of 15,000 words to gain the MSc qualification.

This should be a piece of academic research relevant to Criminology, showing, to a level appropriate for an MSc qualification, knowledge of the topic chosen; of relevant academic and other literature, and of social scientific methods.

Whilst demonstrating knowledge from other modules is not explicitly marked against, the dissertation module is designed to draw on the skills and knowledge students have gained in the degree course so far. For instance, students can apply concepts and theories from all the modules taught in Semester 1, utilising the research methods training from the core methods class L2909 Qualitative Methods. 

Each student will be assigned a supervisor. All our Criminology and Social Policy staff have extensive academic research experience, and can advise on more general issues around research design, methods and organisation and, where appropriate, on topic-specific issues. An effort will be made to assign each student to the most appropriate supervisor based on the degree of match between their topic and the academics available to supervise, and students are also invited to make a choice of supervisor, which will be accommodated as far as possible.

The module is offered at SCQF Level 11 and has the following learning objectives:

  • Learning Objective 1: To improve students' capacity to identify a research question and develop an appropriate research strategy
  • Learning Objective 2: To improve students' capacity to assemble a body of relevant evidence
  • Learning Objective 3: To improve students' analytical skills
  • Learning Objective 4: To improve students' ability to communicate research findings in a clear and coherent way
  • Learning Objective 5: To improve students' knowledge and understanding of a specific topic or subject area 

L5980: Dissertation in Social Policy

This dissertation pathway intends that students should pursue their own interests within Social Policy. The topic covered must have clear relevance to Social Policy as an academic subject, though this is interpreted broadly. The Social Policy Association provides a good overview of Social Policy as an academic discipline: http://www.social-policy.org.uk/what-is-social-policy/ 

To help you think about potential topics, you might want to apply concepts and theories from, or of the type taught in, the L8924 and L8927, L5976: Welfare Concepts and Ideas module; knowledge of welfare models and contemporary policy change covered in the L8925 Comparative Social Welfare module; different philosophies of research from the L5981: Perspectives on Social Research module, research methods from the Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods modules, and a range of ideas from the optional modules studied.

The Dissertation in Social Policy has the following Learning Objectives:

  • Learning Objective 1: To improve students' capacity to identify a research question and develop an appropriate research strategy
  • Learning Objective 2: To improve students' capacity to assemble a body of relevant evidence
  • Learning Objective 3: To improve students' analytical skills
  • Learning Objective 4: To improve students' ability to communicate research findings in a clear and coherent way
  • Learning Objective 5: To improve students' knowledge and understanding of a specific topic or subject area 

It is usual for dissertations on this pathway to build on the conclusions to develop some policy recommendations (or similar, e.g. recommendations for advocacy work / further research to help achieve policy change).

L5944: Dissertation in Social Work

This dissertation pathway intends that students should pursue their own interests within Social Work. The aims of the Dissertation in Social Work are:

  • To encourage students to be ‘research-minded’.
  • To promote an increased understanding of the relationship between practice and research in social work.
  • To encourage an appreciation of how social research is relevant to and can inform social work practice, policy and knowledge bases.
  • To develop students’ conceptual abilities and research skills.

The Dissertation in Social Work has the following Learning Objectives:

  • Learning Objective 1:  Demonstrate conceptual and planning skills through the formulation of a valid and manageable research proposal, taking into consideration the limited scale of the project investigation.
  • Learning Objective 2: Critically appraise theory and research findings relating to their particular area of inquiry.
  • Learning Objective 3: Design, conduct and analyse an investigation into some aspect of social work practice, in a way that incorporates effective strategies to deal with the associated ethical issues, dilemmas and conflicts.
  • Learning Objective 4: Produce a dissertation that documents the central features and findings of their research experience.
  • Learning Objective 5: Plan and conduct an investigation, process data and evaluate findings beyond the level of individual case practice.

It is usual for dissertations on this pathway to build on the conclusions to develop some practice-focused recommendations (or similar, e.g. recommendations for policy that will impact on social work concerns/practices).

Useful Resources

The first two dissertation workshops and the MyPlace page will both be used to signpost relevant resources. In addition, the following resources may be helpful:

Biggam, J. (2021/2014) Succeeding with your master’s dissertation: a step-by-step handbook. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University. (Strathclyde University Library holds copies of both the 2014 and the 2021 versions of this book. 

Chamberlain,. J. M. (2013). Understanding Criminological Research: A Guide to Data Analysis. London: Sage (the library offers online access)

Davies, P., Francis, P. and Jupp, V. (2018, 3rd edition). Doing Criminological Research. London: Sage (Strathclyde University holds copies of this version and previous ones)

Gadd, D., Karstedt, S. and Messner, S. F. (2011) The Sage Handbook of Criminological Methods. London: Sage (the library offers online access)

Hart, C. (2018) (2nd Ed.) Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. London: SAGE (Strathclyde University Library holds copies of this version and an earlier, 1998, version)
 
Hart, C. (2005). Doing your master's dissertation: realising your potential as a social scientist. London: Sage. (Strathclyde University Library holds multiple copies)
 
Rudestam, Kjell Erik (2015). Surviving your dissertation: a comprehensive guide to content and process. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. (Strathclyde University Library holds multiple copies)
 
Swetnam, D. (2007). Writing your dissertation: how to plan, prepare and present your work successfully. Oxford: How to Books (available online via University Library). 

Wincup, E. (2017, 2nd edition). Criminological Research: Understanding Qualitative Methods. London: Sage (the library offers online access)

Strathclyde University Library also has access to the SAGE Methods database, which includes loads of resources to support you in developing your methodological and analytic approach, including videos and podcasts as well as books and articles.

Assessment

Assessment is by a 15,000-word dissertation, which counts for 100% of the mark.
This must be uploaded to the relevant link on MyPlace by the deadline of 12 noon on 5th August, unless an extension has been provided.

The final dissertation must be:

  • Referenced using a standard social science referencing style which uses the Author-Date format (e.g. Harvard), with a full list of works cited in a Bibliography/Reference List at the end of the dissertation.
  • Written to a word limit of 15,000 words. The word limit applies to the main text, including citations, but excludes the title page, abstract, other front matter (e.g. lists of key terms and acknowledgements), footnotes, reference list/bibliography, any appendices, and page numbers. This limit is subject to a +/-5% leeway. 
  • There are no requirements around font, text size and margins, but the dissertation must be readable (so 1.5 line spacing and size 12+ font are recommended).

Marking Guide

The following provides an indicative outline of the criteria used to award a particular grade/classification at the PGT level. 

Class Marking range Grades awarded in this range Descriptor
PG: Distinction 90 – 100 100 92

Exceptional demonstration of the learning outcomes

Exceptional in most or every respect, the work demonstrates all of the characteristics noted for First class in the Outstanding range below and is also well beyond the level expected of a highly competent student at their level of study, and could not be bettered for the level of study.

  70 – 79 84

Outstanding demonstration of the learning outcomes

Outstanding in most respects, the work is what might be expected of a highly competent student at their level of study. The work demonstrates most of the following attributes:

  • A breadth of appropriate and focused knowledge, and a deep and critical understanding of the subject matter 
  • An outstanding standard of synthesis and evaluation, and a critical and insightful analysis
  • Complexity of thought, creativity, insight and/or originality
  • Evidence of comprehensive reading and thought of significant complexity and well beyond, but still relevant to, course/assignment materials 
  • Outstanding use of references and exemplars, well beyond, but still relevant to, course/assignment materials
  • An outstanding standard of writing and communication and/or presentation, that is clearly and logically structured
  70 - 79 78 75 72

Excellent demonstration of the learning outcomes.

 Excellent in most respects, the work is what might be expected of a very competent student at their level of study. The work demonstrates:

  • Wide, appropriate and focused knowledge and critical understanding of the subject matter
  • An excellent standard of synthesis and evaluation, and/or shows critical and insightful analysis
  • Some complexity of thought, insight and/or originality
  • Evidence of comprehensive reading and thought beyond course/assignment materials
  • Excellent use of references and exemplars
  • An excellent standard of writing and communication and/or presentation, that is clearly and logically structured
PG: Merit 60 – 69 68 65 62

Comprehensive demonstration of the learning outcomes

Very good or good in most respects for the level of study in displaying attainment of the learning outcomes, with marks at the higher end of this scale reflecting stronger and more consistent attainment of the learning outcomes. This work demonstrates:

  • A very good or good level of appropriate knowledge and critical understanding of the subject matter, with only occasional lapses in detail
  • Very good or good synthesis, analysis, reflection, understanding and/or critical evaluation
  • Evidence of reading and thought beyond course/assignment materials 
  • Appropriate use of references and exemplars
  • A good standard of writing and communication and/or presentation, that is clearly and logically structured
PG: Pass 50 – 59 58 55 52

Satisfactory demonstration of the learning outcomes:

The work is satisfactory for the level of study and clearly meets the requirements for demonstrating the relevant learning outcomes. Marks at the higher end of this scale reflect stronger and more consistent attainment of the learning outcomes for this standard of work. This work demonstrates:

  • Satisfactory knowledge and a reasonable understanding of the essential material
  • Weaknesses in the synthesis and/or analysis, reflection, understanding and critical evaluation of material, resulting in parts of the work being overly descriptive in nature
  • General accuracy with occasional mistakes and/or reduced focus on the main issue or lapses in detail
  •  Limited evidence of reading and thought beyond course/assignment materials
  • A satisfactory standard of writing and communication and/or presentation, where there may be weaknesses in the clarity and/or structure of the work
  • Appropriate use of references and exemplars, though there may be minor flaws in the referencing technique
PG: Fail 40 – 49 48 45 42

Marginal fail: Limited demonstration of the learning outcomes.

The work meets the minimum requirements for demonstrating the relevant learning outcomes for the level of study in years 1 to 4, but not at the year 5 and PGT level. Marks at the higher end of this scale reflect stronger and more consistent attainment of the learning outcomes for this standard of work, although ultimately insufficient at year 5 and PGT level. This work demonstrates:

  • Basic knowledge and understanding 
  • A weak argument that is not logically structured lacks clarity or is based on unsubstantiated statements
  • No relevant critical analysis
  • Insufficient evidence of reading and thought beyond course/assignment materials - Poor organisation and/or presentation
PG: Fail 30 – 39 38 35 32

Inadequate demonstration of the learning outcomes.

 The work fails to meet the minimum requirements for demonstrating the relevant learning outcomes for the level of study. Marks at the higher end of this scale reflect stronger and more consistent attainment of the learning outcomes within this range of marks. This work demonstrates:

  • An insufficient level of knowledge and understanding
  • A poorly structured, poorly developed, or incoherent argument, or no argument at all
  • An awkward writing style or poor expression of concepts
  • A lack of familiarity with the subject and/or assessment method
  • Insufficient evidence of reading and thought beyond course/assignment materials
  • A lack of references and exemplars
  20 – 29 20

Clear fail: Weak demonstration of the learning outcomes.

The work is very weak or shows a decided lack of effort. This work demonstrates:

  • Very poor or confused knowledge and understanding, with reference to only a few key words, phrases or key ideas 
  • No argument or one based on irrelevant and erroneous content
  • Irrelevant content and extensive omissions
  • Weaknesses of presentation and/or logic and/or evidence
  • Inadequate evidence of learning
  • Incomplete or inadequately presented references, if any
  1 - 19 10

Minimal demonstration of the learning outcomes

The work is very weak or shows a decided lack of effort. The work demonstrates:

  • No knowledge or understanding of the area in question
  • Incomplete, muddled, and/or irrelevant material
  • Irrelevant or little content, extensive omissions
  • Weaknesses of presentation and/or logic and/or evidence
  • Deficient evidence of learning
  • Incomplete or inadequately presented references, if any
  0 0 No relevant work submitted for assessment

 

Achieve Higher Grades of L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook & Raise Your Grades

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Need expert help with your L5986\L5980\L5944 MSc Dissertation Handbook? We provide AI-free and plagiarism-free Assignment Help. Our team of professional writers delivers top-quality assignments that are original and crafted without AI tools, ensuring the highest academic standards. We also offer a free list of assignment samples and answers, written by experts, to guide your work. Get your assignment checked with an AI and plagiarism report for complete peace of mind. Contact us today for reliable, expert assignment help in the UK and boost your grades!

If you want to see the solution to this brief, then click here: MSc Dissertation

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

NS0629 Critically Examining an Aspect of Nursing Practice to Improve Patient Care Dissertation Sample

Category:

Subject: Nursing

University: Northumbria University Newcastle

Module Title: NS0629 Pressure Ulcer Prevention Nursing Interventions

View Free Samples

ECON480 Economics Dissertation Solution Samples PDF | University of Otago

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Economics

University: University of Otago

Module Title: ECON480 Dissertation

View Free Samples

BUAD917 Dissertation Samples | Auckland Institute of Studies

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Education

University: Auckland Institute of Studies (AIS)

Module Title: BUAD917 Dissertation

View Free Samples

OSCOLA Referencing Bibliography Examples 2026 Complete Guide

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Law

University: ___

Module Title: OSCOLA bibliography

View Free Samples

MG5642 - PG dissertation (M.Sc. International Business) Sample PDF |

Category: Dissertation

Subject: Management

University: Brunel University London

Module Title: MG5642 PG Dissertation

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK