OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

NS0629 Critically Examining an Aspect of Nursing Practice to Improve Patient Care Dissertation Sample

Published: 13 Mar, 2026
Category Subject Nursing
University Northumbria University Newcastle Module Title NS0629 Pressure Ulcer Prevention Nursing Interventions
Word Count 7000
Assessment Type Dissertation
Assessment Title Critically Examining an Aspect of Nursing Practice to Improve Patient Care
Academic Year 2025-26

Introduction and Rationale

Introduction and Rationale The practice of nursing has a pivotal role in enhancing patient safety and health outcome in healthcare organizations. The nurses have been identified as the key caregivers that deal with patients regularly and thus they are at the center of administering evidence based intervention that encourages quality care. Prevention of pressure ulcers among hospitalised patients is one of the important nursing practices that should be paid continuous attention to.

Pressure ulcers or bedsores or pressure injuries are localised injuries to the skin and the underlying tissue that develops as a result of sustained pressure especially in the case of patients who have low mobility. These injuries may cause major complications including infections, prolonged recovery, high healthcare prices, and poor quality of life to the patients. The prevention of pressure ulcers is one of the significant issues of the contemporary healthcare systems. Even with improved technology in medical care and nursing services, pressure ulcers still prevail in long time care and hospitals.

Patients who are unable to move, older adults, and those with long-lasting illnesses stand a high risk of getting these injuries. Since nurses are the ones who ensure that the states of patients are observed and that the preventative measures like repositioning, skin examination, and pressure-relieving devices are taken, their contribution to the prevention of pressure ulcers is critical. Thus, the effectiveness of the existing nursing practices should be explored and the possible improvements could be realized to optimise the outcomes of work with patients and provide high-quality care.

The service users may also experience effects of pressure ulcers to the extent of influencing the level of physical comfort, emotional state, and general recovery. Patients with pressure ulcers resort to pain, increase in stay, and other medical care. In others, the pressure ulcers may cause severe infections or complications that may pose a risk to the lives of patients. This means that it is not just a clinical duty but a moral obligation to avoid these injuries by healthcare workers. Patients demand safe and caring treatment and avoiding unnecessary injuries is one of the major tenets of nursing practice.

 In the UK, a number of professional and government agencies have emphasised on the need to prevent pressure ulcers in healthcare facilities. To illustrate, the National Health Service (NHS) has a focus on the patient safety and quality improvement programs in order to minimise avoidable harm in hospitals. On the same note, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) also offers evidence-based clinical guidelines that include systematic risk evaluation, frequent skin examination, and correct utilization of pressure-relieving equipment to prevent pressure ulcers.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) professional standards also highlight the fact that nurses should provide safe, effective, and evidence-based care in putting the well-being and dignity of the patient first. Even though these guidelines and standards are available, studies have shown that pressure ulcers still prevail in healthcare facilities because of poor staffing, inadequate training and knowledge, and lack of uniformity in applying the preventive methods. This indicates that the differences between prescribed guidelines and the real clinical practice might be present.

Consequently, one should study the literature available critically to determine the determinants of preventing pressure ulcers, as well as effective measures that can be implemented by nurses to enhance patient care. This dissertation is aimed at performing a literature review that will critically look into evidence concerning the application of nursing interventions in preventing pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients.

This dissertation will conduct a study of the major themes and measure the efficacy of the present practices by reviewing the available research studies and clinical guidelines. In addition, the paper will investigate how the evidence-based practices can be used to assist nurses in enhancing preventive care and lowering the prevalence of pressure ulcers.

Altogether, pressure ulcer prevention is the area that should be improved to promote the safety of patients, their quality healthcare, and professional responsibilities of nurses. Through a critical analysis of the available evidence and improvement points, this dissertation will help to continue shaping the best practices in nursing care and eventually make a positive patient outcome in clinical settings

Literature Review

Pressure ulcers (or pressure injuries or bedsores) is a serious health issue that has remained a problem to patients in long-term care centers and hospitals across the globe. These are injuries where permanence has been exerted on the skin and tissues under the skin usually on the bony areas, like on the heels, hips, sacrum, and on the elbows. In case of the decrease in blood flow to these regions, tissue damage might be occurred and the pressure ulcers are developed. These injuries are especially dangerous to patients that suffer limited mobility, chronic illness, advanced age, or are subjected to long-term hospitalisation. Since pressure ulcers can be prevented (to a significant extent) by proper nursing treatment and early treatment, their prevalence has become one of the measures of the quality of healthcare provision.

Pressure ulcer prevention is a significant issue in the current healthcare settings due to the potential severe effects of the specified injuries on the overall well-being and health of the patients. Preventing pressure ulcers leads patients to complain of pain, loss of mobility, heightened risk of infection, and prolonged hospitalization. In extreme situations, the complications associated with pressure ulcers include sepsis, which is fatal. Moreover, the management of pressure ulcers may have a significant negative impact on healthcare expenditures because of specialised wound care, prolonged hospitalisation and other medical procedures. Thus, properly developed preventive measures are crucial to enhance patient outcome and healthcare spending.

The key role in preventing pressure ulcers is played by nurses as they offer continuous patient care and follow the conditions of patients during the hospital stay. They are supposed to evaluate the risk factors present to the patients, carry out preventative measures, observe the skin status, and provide the patients and caregivers with information on preventive measures. Since nurses have more time with patients, it is the nurses who are best suited to recognize the initial indicators of pressure damage and apply promptive interventions to avoid pressure ulcer development.

Pressure ulcers are an intractable issue in health care institutions, regardless of the presence of clinical guidelines and evidence-based prevention measures. The literature indicates that the pressure ulcers are now sustained because of various issues such as poor staffing, training, variations in the application of preventative measures, and insufficient resources in the health facilities. These issues underscore the importance of continual review of nursing practices and coming up with mechanisms that can ensure successful prevention of pressure ulcers.

There are different initiatives that have been implemented by healthcare organisations in order to deal with the issue of pressure ulcers and enhance patient safety. Healthcare policies and professional guidelines in the United Kingdom are focused on the significance of the use of evidence-based nursing practice and patient-centred care. Clinical guidelines offer recommendations on risk evaluation, skin examination, repositioning, and application of pressure-relieving equipment on a patient. Nonetheless, the achievement of the guidelines implementation relies on the knowledge, skills, and clinical judgement of nursing staff to a great extent. Although well-established guidelines might not be used effectively, they will not be unless there is proper training and organisational support.

Over the past few years, there has been an increasing amount of research that has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different nursing interventions that can be used to prevent pressure ulcers. Such research has investigated the issue of risk assessment tools, patient reposition, specialised support surfaces and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in prevention of pressure ulcers. Although most of the studies demonstrate effectiveness of these interventions, there are other studies that also point out difficulties involved in the implementation of these strategies in the busy clinical settings. As an example, time and high workloads can make nurses unable to regularly assess patients or reposition them at the necessary frequency.

The second thing that is significant in the field of pressure ulcer prevention is the knowledge of the experiences of patients and their views. Pressure ulcers are able to influence the quality of life, emotional well-being, and even comfort of the patient to a great extent. Patients with pressure ulcers are likely to suffer and be in pain and this can adversely affect their healing process. Hence, the prevention strategies must not be limited to clinical interventions, but the needs and experiences of the patients receiving care are to be taken into consideration.

This literature review will critically analyse available literature pertaining to the topic of nursing interventions in preventing pressure ulcers in patients who are hospitalised. Through the evidence presented, this chapter intends to target the obstruction of themes that have been of essence in the prevention strategies and the effectiveness of various preventative measures. The literature review is also aimed at defining the obstacles that can be hindering the application of the evidence-based interventions and discussing the chances of enhancing nursing practice.

In order to meet these goals, the literature review will investigate research studies on the topics of the risk assessment of pressure ulcers, nursing prevention measures, and organisational influences on care delivery. The chapter will examine also works to test the results of the pressure ulcer prevention programmes and determine their effectiveness in patient safety and quality of health care.

On the whole, this chapter represents an extensive literature review of the current studies on the topic of pressure ulcer prevention in nursing practice. The literature review will help to add to the existing knowledge of the application of nursing interventions in minimizing the prevalence of pressure ulcers and enhancing patient outcomes by reviewing strengths and weaknesses of existing studies on the subject. The results of this chapter will be the foundation of the discussion provided in Chapter 3 that will discuss the implication of the literature on nursing practice, education, and future research.

Research Question

A well formulated research question is needed to follow the review of literature as well as make the study focused on a particular nursing practice. The research question defines the extent of literature search and assists in discovering the relevant literature that could be used to understand the issue under investigation.

According to the purpose of this dissertation and the necessity to enhance patient outcomes in healthcare facilities, the research question that should be formulated in the context of this study is the following one:

What nursing interventions could be used to enhance pressure ulcer prevention among hospitalised patients?

The given research question is specifically devoted to the influence of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention and discusses the efficacy of different interventions which can be used to decrease the probability of skin damage in susceptible patients. Answering this question, the literature review is expected to examine the evidence of various preventative measures and determine the factors that can determine the success of these interventions in the clinical practice.

The research question also implies the overall purpose of enhancing patient safety and evidence-based nursing practice. It is well known that pressure ulcers are preventable injuries in case of proper care strategies. Thus, it is necessary to comprehend the efficiency of a nursing intervention and where the improvement can be achieved to promote a better quality of patient care.

Literature Search Strategy

An appropriate search strategy was designed to find the applicable research studies that can be applied to pressure ulcer prevention in nursing practice. A systematic literature search is to guarantee the presence of high-quality evidence presented in the review based on the credible academic sources.

The literature search was done on various electronic databases that focus on healthcare and nursing research. The choice of these databases was due to the fact that they have access to peer-reviewed journal articles, systematic review, and clinical research that is applicable to nursing practice.

The databases that were searched consisted of:

  • CINAHL Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
  • PubMed
  • MEDLINE
  • Cochrane Library
  • Google Scholar

The selection of these databases was based on having a substantial amount of academic papers on the topic of nursing, health management and clinical research. Multiple databases are used and this implies that more studies that are relevant will be found.

The literature search was concerned with finding the articles that discussed pressure ulcer prevention strategies, nursing interventions, risk assessment of patients, and pressure injury health outcomes.

Keywords and Search Terms

In order to make sure that the of interest studies were found, a list of keywords and search terms was created with references to the research question and the central concepts associated with the prevention of pressure ulcers.

The keywords that were employed in the search were mainly:

  • pressure ulcer prevention
  • pressure injury prevention
  • nursing interventions
  • hospitalised patients
  • risk assessment of pressure ulcers.
  • nursing care strategies
  • patient repositioning
  • skin assessment

These keywords were joined with the help of such Boolean operators as AND, OR, and NOT to narrow down the search results and guarantee the selection of the relevant studies.

Such search combinations were:

  • pressure ulcer prevention AND nursing interventions.
  • pressure injury prevention and hospitalised patients.
  • nursing care AND pressure ulcer risk assessment.

The search narrowed down to studies specifically addressing the nursing roles in pressure ulcer prevention through the application of Boolean operators excluding those studies that were not relevant to the subject.

Besides the search with key words, the reference lists on the articles concerning the relevant research were also examined to find other studies that might be included into the literature review. The practice is commonly known as hand searching and usually assists in ensuring that significant researches are not missed in the process of database searching.

Inclusion Criteria

To make sure that the literature review was focused and relevant towards the research question, inclusion criteria were used in the selection of the studies to be analysed. These criteria were used to point out the studies that had a direct relationship with the prevention of pressure ulcers in nursing practice.

The following were the inclusion criteria of this literature review:

  1. Peer-reviewed journal articles.
  2. Articles that are not older than ten years old.
  3. Articles written in English
  4. Research that aims at preventing pressure ulcers and not treating them.
  5. A study performed in a medical institution or a hospital.
  6. Research related to nursing interventions or nursing roles connected to prevention of pressure ulcers.

All these criteria were used to ensure that the studies that were selected were relevant to the research question as well as were founded on credible academic research.

Exclusion Criteria

On top of the inclusion criteria, there were a number of exclusion criteria used to sift out studies that did not fit the objective of this dissertation.

The exclusion criteria were:

  1. The research on pressure ulcer treatment, and not prevention.
  2. Publications dated earlier than ten years.
  3. Opinion article or blog articles that are not peer-reviewed.
  4. Other studies that are not limited to nursing practice.
  5. Research outside a healthcare or clinical setting.

The use of these exclusion criteria was useful in ensuring that the literature review was restricted to only high quality research that could offer significant information on the nursing interventions in the prevention of pressure ulcers.

Study Selection Process

With the help of the database searches, initially there were many articles found. These articles were then filtered in phases to find out their relevance to the research question.

To eliminate irrelevant studies, first, the titles and abstracts of the articles were evaluated to find out the ones that seemed to relate to the prevention of pressure ulcers. Articles, which were evidently unrelated to the topic of the research, were filtered out at this point.

Second, the entire text of the rest of the articles were perused through. At this phase inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to identify the studies that would be included in the final literature review.

In this process, a range of major studies was found, which discussed nursing interventions, risk evaluation instruments, patient outcomes, and organisational influences regarding pressure ulcer prevention.

Quality of Evidence

One of the steps of a literature review is the evaluation of the quality of the chosen studies. Not any research study can give equal evidence, and it is necessary to pay attention to the reliability and validity of the presented findings in the literature.

The papers that were incorporated in this review were reviewed on the basis of a number of factors and they included:

  • the study research design.
  • the size of the study sample
  • the data collection and data analysis methods.
  • the lucidity and validity of the findings.

Research papers with rigorous research methods, e.g., systematic reviews or randomised controlled trials, were deemed as especially useful since they provide a good evidence on the effectiveness of nursing interventions.

The literature review will be conducted to ensure that the conclusion of the research has been formulated using reliable and credible sources by assessing the quality of the evidence used.

Risk Assessment of Pressure Ulcer Prevention

The issue that has been addressed most extensively in the literature on pressure ulcer prevention is the need to carry out risk assessment as early and accurately as possible. Risk assessment is regarded as one of the key elements of nursing practice as it allows healthcare providers to define patients at a high risk of developing pressure ulcers and preventive measures to undertake prior to the tissues being destroyed. A number of researches indicate that early risk factor identification is a critical step towards decreasing the risk of developing pressure ulcers among hospitalised patients.

Braden Scale and Norton Scale risk assessment instruments are quite common in healthcare facilities that are aimed at assessing the vulnerability of a patient to pressure ulcers. These are measuring tools that evaluate various factors of significance such as mobility, nutrition status, sensory perception, skin moisture, and level of activity. Through the analysis of these variables, nurses may be able to identify the risk level of each particular patient and to introduce the necessary interventions to provide certain care.

Research studies have also shown that the systematic use of risk assessment tools can help enhance the early detection of the vulnerable patients. Indicatively, research investigating hospital-based prevention programmes has indicated that regular risk assessments result in the prevention intervention taking place sooner, including patient positioning and use of pressure-relieving equipment. Consequently, clinics that include a systematic risk assessment process tend to record reduced rates of development of pressure ulcers.

Nevertheless, the following weaknesses of risk assessment tools are also presented in the literature. Other researchers posit that the tools cannot be counted on as the only way of determining patient risk. Although risk assessment scales can be helpful in giving an objective, they might not be very useful in reflecting the individual patient conditions. Clinical judgement and professional experience thus are still considered as part and parcel of effective nursing practice.

Moreover, the use of risk assessment tools can be less effective as they are not used regularly. Research has established that risk assessment is at times done at the time of admission of the patient as opposed to being conducted routinely throughout the hospitalization. Patient conditions could vary with time and thus constant surveillance is required to make sure that new risk factors are noticed early enough.

All in all, it is possible to conclude that risk assessment tools are considered useful resources in the prevention of pressure ulcers in case they are accompanied by clinical expertise and continuous monitoring of patients. To respond to changes in patient conditions promptly, nurses need to be watchful and sensitive to such changes so as to use the preventive measures in time.

Pressure Ulcer Prevention Nursing Intervention

Much of the literature is devoted to the number of nursing interventions that are applicable in preventing pressure ulcer among hospitalised patients. Such measures are meant to decrease the pressure on the vulnerable regions of the body, retain the integrity of the skin, as well as promote the overall well-being of the patient.

Regular patient repositioning is one of the most commonly talked about interventions in the literature. Patients that sit in one position throughout the time are at a greater risk of having pressure ulcers as the constant pressure limits the circulation of blood to the tissues. Frequent repositioning of patients assists in redistribution of pressure and enhancing circulation, which will minimize tissue injury.

According to research studies, the repositioning of the patients every two hours is another effective method of prevention of pressure ulcers among patients, who are immobile or bedridden. Nevertheless, other researches also show that it is not always possible to adhere to rigid repositioning schedules in a busy hospital setting when a nurse has to work with two or more patients. Due to this, healthcare organisations should make sure that adequate resources and staffing levels exist to facilitate the long-term deployment of repositioning strategies.

The use of pressure-relieving equipment is another action that has been of significance in terms of intervention discussed in the literature. Specialised mattresses, cushions and support surfaces help to evenly distribute body weight and lower pressure on a certain part of the body. It has been found out that these devices can greatly minimize the occurrence of pressure ulcers when combined with other preventive measures.

It has also been studied how skin assessment and monitoring are crucial in pressure ulcer prevention measures. Frequent skin checks enable nurses to detect skin damage at the initial stage i.e. redness, swelling, or irritation. The timely identification of the problem allows medical workers to act in time and avoid the development of pressure injuries.

Skin hygiene and moisture control is also an essential part of nursing care. Perspiration, incontinence or drainage of a wound can lead to excess moisture that can result in unstable skin and predisposition to breakdown. Nurses should therefore make sure that the skin of the patients is kept clean and dry to support the integrity of the skin and minimize the risk of pressure injuries.

Although such interventions are highly advised in clinical guidelines, the literature indicates that such measures can be largely effective with regular implementation and support by the healthcare organisations.

Elevated expenses and challenging market penetration issues might further deter the effective adoption of the new system.

Obstacles to successful Implementation 

Even high costs and difficult market penetration factors may further discourage the successful implementation of the new system.

Even though evidence-based recommendations on pressure ulcer prevention are general, some of the studies have established obstacles that could hinder the effective implementation of these strategies in clinical practice.

Staffing shortages in healthcare facilities are considered one of the most frequently reported barriers. In cases where nurses have many patients under their care, it is hard to conduct frequent patient assessments, repositioning, and skin checks. Excessive workloads may result in omission of preventative interventions, thus exposing the patients to the risk of developing pressure ulcers.

Poor education and training of the healthcare professionals is another significant obstacle found in the literature. According to some researches, nurses might not be adequately trained on pressure ulcer prevention measures in their professional education or programmes in continuing professional development. The nurses might not be knowledgeable or even confident enough to employ the evidence-based interventions without proper training.

To improve patient care, staffing and training problems are not the only reasons that can compromise the communication issue within the healthcare groups. This is because prevention of pressure ulcers may need the cooperation of nurses, physicians, physiotherapists and other health care experts to be effective. Unless there is proper communication among the members of the team, vital information regarding the risk factors or the care plans of the patients might not be exchanged.

The healthcare organisations should thus work on these obstacles by ensuring that they are properly staffed, enhanced training opportunities are provided, and that they support and encourage team work in healthcare setups.

Impact on Patient Outcomes

The literature has invariably shown that efficient pressure ulcer prevention methods can be used to a large extent to enhance patient outcomes. The prevention of pressure ulcers is preventing physical injuries among patients and also improving the overall healthcare experience of patients.

The patients with pressure ulcers usually have serious pain, discomfort, and diminished mobility. These injuries can postpone the healing and increase the hospitalization. In other instances, the pressure ulcers may cause infection which may need further medical care and be accompanied by major complications.

Economically also, the pressure ulcers are a huge financial liability to the health systems. Pressure ulcers are complicated to treat in terms of wound care, other medical resources, and the length of hospitalisation. Investment into preventative strategies, therefore, can be used to promote cost savings in healthcare and enhance patient safety.

Based on research studies, hospitals that have developed full pressure ulcer prevention programmes tend to record reduced incidences and better patient outcomes. The programmes usually include frequent risk assessment, staff training, repositioning of patients protocols, and specialised equipments use.

In general, the literature indicates that the proper prevention measures are beneficial not only to patients but also to the healthcare system in terms of its efficiency and sustainability.

A critical review of the research evidence is essential when carrying out research (Kumar, 2010).

The literature review should be critically analyzed to be familiar with the advantages and weaknesses of the research evidence on pressure ulcer prevention in nursing practice. Despite the fact that many of these studies have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of preventative strategies, the quality and reliability of these studies are highly varying based on the nature of the research design, sample size and the ways of collecting data.

A considerable number of the studies that were used in the literature review adopted observational research designs to investigate the practices of pressure ulcer prevention in the hospital settings. Observational studies can be employed as helpful tools in determining the trends in clinical practice and in comprehending the implementation of preventive interventions in real-life healthcare environments. These researches tend to give meaningful information on what determines good nursing care. Nevertheless, observational research can be also restricted due to the fact that not every intervention-patient outcome cause and effect relationship can be clearly identified.

Conversely, there are other studies that have employed the experimental research design, including randomised controlled trials, in order to determine the effectiveness of a particular intervention. Randomised controlled trials are thought to be one of the best types of research evidence since a researcher can compare the results of various interventions in controlled conditions. Indicatively, there are studies where specialised pressure-relieving mattresses were analyzed against the ordinary hospital mattresses on their effectiveness. In general, these studies state that patients with specialised support surfaces have reduced incidences of pressure ulcer development.

Although the studies have yielded some valuable findings, some limitations will be noted. Randomised controlled trials are usually carried out with controlled conditions which might not be entirely realistic of busy hospital settings. Consequently, the same interventions that seem to be very successful in a research setting might become harder to apply to clinical practice.

The other weakness that has been noticed in the literature is the difference in sample sizes adopted by various studies. Other studies have a relatively limited sample size of participants and this can reduce the external validity of the results. Studies on large sample sizes are more likely to give credible findings since they represent a broader scope of experiences of patients and clinical situations.

Moreover, the literature review has shown that numerous studies pay more attention to individual intervention compared to studying the joint impact of various preventative strategies. Practically, the prevention of pressure ulcers is usually a complex of interventions, which implies risk assessment, repositioning, skin check, and the implementation of pressure-cushioning devices. Future studies ought therefore to pay attention to the review of the holistic prevention programmes as opposed to individual interventions.

On the whole, although the current literature is helpful in understanding the concept of pressure ulcer prevention, one should exercise caution in interpreting the results and take into consideration the methodological shortcomings of various designs of studies.

Synthesis of Key Findings

The synthesis of the reviewed literature will make it possible to identify some regular themes and patterns that can be found in various research studies. The available evidence on the topic of pressure ulcer prevention in nursing practice can be made into several critical conclusions.

To begin with, the early risk assessment is always mentioned as one of the essential elements of effective pressure ulcer prevention. The studies show that patients who are evaluated frequently with structured risk assessment tools have higher chances of receiving preventive measures in time. This underscores the need to integrate regular risk assessment in the regular nursing practice.

Second, the literature points to the significance of regular use of the nursing intervention like repositioning and skin monitors. Although the clinical guidelines suggest repositioning patients at regular intervals, the success of such a strategy is based on the capability of healthcare workers to conduct the repositioning activities periodically. Healthcare organisations should thus offer adequate resources and staffing assistance to empower nurses to be able to deliver preventative care.

Third, specialised equipment like pressure-relieving mattresses and cushions have also been demonstrated to prevent occurrence of pressure ulcers in patients who are at high risk. These devices are significant in redistribution of pressure and averting tissue damages especially to those patients who may not have the ability to shift independently.

The other significant discovery made in the literature is associated with the impact of education and training on enhancing the prevention of pressure ulcers. According to several studies, healthcare professionals who undergo regular training on the prevention measures of pressure ulcers are more aware of the risk factors and tend to revert to the right measures of prevention.

Lastly, the literature emphasises on the role of organisational support and interdisciplinary cooperation in enhancing patient outcomes. The collaboration between nurses, physicians, physiotherapists, and other medical practitioners is usually essential in preventing pressure ulcers. Whether it is a coordinated team or a team that cooperates, healthcare teams will increase the likelihood of offering comprehensive and coordinated care to patients.

Gaps in the Literature

Even though the literature which has been reviewed has presented some useful information about pressure ulcer prevention, there are still some gaps that need to be filled through research activities. Detecting these gaps is relevant as it shows in which areas the further research may be helpful to enhance nursing practice.

A literature gap identified is connected with the fact that there have been few studies that have evaluated the long-term outcomes of the pressure ulcer prevention programmes. Most of the researches are based on immediate results, e.g., decrease in pressure ulcer cases as in-patients. Nevertheless, it is less documented on long-term effects of prevention strategies on patient recovery and quality of life.

The other gap is the effect of organisational factors on the prevention of pressure ulcers. Although there are also studies that recognize the influence of staffing and workload levels on nursing practice, there is not a lot of literature that investigates the role of healthcare management policies and resource allocation on preventative measures implementation.

Also, the research about the patient perspectives of preventive pressure ulcers is not conducted. The experiences and perceptions of the patients may offer important information on ways on how the healthcare professionals would increase patient comfort and participation in preventive care practices.

Sealing these gaps in research may help design more effective and competent prevention strategies of pressure ulcers in the future.

Conclusion of the Literature Review

The chapter has critically reviewed available literature concerning nursing interventions as far as prevention of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients is concerned. Following the literature review, several major themes were addressed, and they were the significance of the risk assessment in the early years of a patient, the effectiveness of prevention methods used by a nurse, like patient repositioning and pressure-reducing devices, and the obstacles that can hinder the successful application of preventive measures.

Education, organisational support, and interdisciplinary collaboration were also noted to be important in enhancing patient outcomes as highlighted in the review. Although the literature contains good evidence about the effectiveness of preventative strategies, there are a number of challenges that might restrain the application of the strategies in clinics.

On the whole, the results of this literature review highlight the enormous contribution which nurses make to the prevention of pressure ulcers and enhanced patient safety. Nurses can use evidence-based interventions and continuous monitoring of patients to observe any changes in inpatients, which can help them reduce the risk of pressure ulcers development to a considerable extent.

These are the lessons learned during this literature review that can be used as the basis of the discussion in the following chapter. Chapter 3 will critically comment on how the findings relate to nursing practice, education, and future research, and will give recommendations to enhance the current research of the prevention of pressure ulcers in medical institutions

Discussion and Implication to Nursing Practice

The chapter explains the major findings that were discovered during the literature review and how they can be applied in nursing practice. The analysis is based on the efficacy of various strategies used to prevent pressure ulcers and the way the interventions may be implemented in the hospital environment. It also dwells upon the obstacles which nurses can experience in the process of taking preventative measures and discusses possible ways to enhance patient care.

The issue of pressure ulcers is still a pressing challenge in the sphere of healthcare settings due to its potential to impact patient health negatively, prompting a longer period of hospitalization, and additional financial strain on healthcare organizations. Hence, the enhancement of preventive care is a significant aspect that healthcare professionals, especially nurses, which are the main participants in patient monitoring and care provision, should focus on.

The chapter is a critical analysis of the key themes found in the literature review such as risk assessment, nursing intervention, barriers to intervention and organisational support.

Significance of Risk Assessment at the earliest stage

The literature review has emphasised the extreme significance of risk assessment in the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients during their hospital stay. Through risk assessment, nurses are able to determine weak patients and preventive measures are adopted before tissue damage is caused.

The Braden Scale and other formal evaluation instruments are very popular in clinical practice in order to assess the risks of the patient. These tools are useful in evaluation of important variables such as mobility, nutrition, skin moisture, and sensory perception by the nurses. Risk assessment tools when utilized properly aid in early intervention as well as enhance patient outcomes.

Nevertheless, the literature also suggests that risk assessment instruments cannot substitute the professional clinical judgement. Nurses are expected to integrate these tools with knowledge and experience to enable them come up with informed judgments as far as patient care is concerned. To illustrate, a patient can be rated as moderately vulnerable in a risk assessment instrument and yet have certain conditions that predispose him or her to developing pressure ulcers.

The other critical point raised in the literature is the fact that risk assessment should be conducted continuously during the stay of a patient in a hospital. The health condition of patients can fluctuate with time especially when they have increased mobility, disease progression or surgery. Hence, the risk assessment process must be done on a regular basis as opposed to the process being conducted only upon admission of a patient.

Enhancement of uniformity of the risk assessment practices can go a long way in enhancing pressure ulcer prevention strategies in the healthcare organisations.

The effectiveness of Nursing Interventions is as follows

Nursing interventions are the key focus in preventing pressure ulcers since the nurses have the direct responsibility of being on the front lines to check on the patients and enact preventive care measures.

Patient repositioning is one of the most significant interventions that are present in the literature. Repositioning assists in redistributing the pressure in the various parts of the body and upgrades blood circulation. Empirical evidence proposes that frequent repositioning of patients, especially immobile patients, is very effective in lowering the chances of pressure ulcer development.

The success of repositioning strategies however relies on the implementation consistency. Strict repositioning schedules may not be able to be enforced in busy hospitals where nurses handle a number of patients. This brings out the necessity to support organisations and adequate staffing to help in the delivery of preventative care.

The other intervention that was found in the literature is the application of pressure relieving equipment, including special mattresses and cushions. They are gadgets that are meant to spread stress throughout the body and prevent stress on sensitive regions. The results of the research show that patients who are placed on pressure relieving surfaces undergo fewer cases of pressure ulcer development as opposed to those on standard hospital mattresses.

Another important element of pressure ulcer prevention is regular skin check-up. Nurses should also regularly check the skin of patients to see the signs of tissue damage early in the form of redness, swelling or skin breakdown. Early detection also enables the health care personnel to act promptly and avoid pressure injury development.

Besides these measures proper skin hygiene and moisture control is relevant in maintaining skin integrity. Moisture caused either by perspiration or incontinence may lead to weakening of skin and exposure to pressure injuries. It is thus the responsibility of nurses to ensure the skin of patients is clean, dry and also well covered.

Hindrances to the Prevention Strategy Implementation

Although evidence-based guidelines are provided to prevent pressure ulcers, multiple obstacles may restrict the usefulness of these methods in the clinical practice.

Staffing shortages in healthcare organisations have been found to be one of the greatest barriers in the literature. In situations where the nurses have many patients under their care, it becomes hard to conduct regular risk assessment, repositioning and regularly checking the skin of patients. Preventative interventions might thus be decreased because of high workloads.

The other issue is associated with poor education and training amongst medical practitioners. Not all nurses will get adequate training on pressure ulcer prevention methods or using specialised devices. Nurses can be unable to implement evidence-based interventions properly without proper knowledge.\

Moreover, interpersonal issues in healthcare teams might influence patient care. The prevention of pressure ulcers would sometimes involve the cooperation of various healthcare professionals, such as nurses, physicians, physiotherapists and nutrition specialists. In the event that there is little communication within the team, valuable information on the risk factors of patients may not be disseminated.

To overcome these obstacles, the organisational determination to enhance healthcare resources, staff training and communication in teams is necessary.

Nursing Practice Implications

The results of this dissertation bear some significant implications on the nursing practice. To start with, prevention programmes on pressure ulcers should be implemented in structured manners by healthcare organisations. These programmes are to consist of regular risk assessment, staff training programs, and articulate clinical guidelines on preventive care.

Second, hospitals are supposed to invest in the right pressure relieving devices to assist the nurses in providing effective care to patients. The risk of pressure ulcer development in high-risk patients can be minimised through the provision of access to specialised mattresses and support surfaces to prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers.

Third, nursing knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers and skills require the implementation of continuous professional education. Nurses can be kept abreast of modern evidence-based practice and also be able to identify at an early stage the evidence of skin damage through training programmes.

Lastly, healthcare organisations ought to promote interdisciplinary cooperation of healthcare professionals. Teamwork guarantees the thoroughness of the plans of patient care and the inclusion of preventative measures that are to be pursued on a regular basis.

Future Research Recommendation

Although the literature on the topic has presented useful information on the issue of pressure ulcer prevention, additional studies are required to enhance knowledge on the ways in which the preventive measures can be utilized with a better success.

The proposed studies in the future ought to focus on the effectiveness of the pressure ulcer prevention programmes in various healthcare environments in the long-term. Also, scholars need to delve into the implications of organisational variables like the level of staffing, hospital policies and healthcare management practices on effective implementation of prevention strategies.

The other research question that can be examined in the future is the patient opinion of pressure ulcer prevention. Knowledge of the experience of patients can assist healthcare providers to develop care plans that enhance comfort, interest, and general satisfaction with care services.

Chapter Summary

In this chapter, the author has spoken about the most important findings that were discovered during the literature review and discussed their implications on nursing practice. The paper has noted the roles of early risk assessment, regular nursing interventions and well supported organisational settings in the prevention of pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients.

Even though, numerous evidence-based prevention strategies are at the point of universal access, a number of obstacles can likely hinder their effective usage in clinical practice. To overcome such challenges, it is necessary to have better staffing resources, professional education, and interdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare settings.

The following chapter would first give a conclusion of the dissertation, which will summarise the main findings and give an overall recommendations on the enhancement of pressure ulcer prevention strategies in the nursing practice.

Conclusion and Recommendations

This chapter offers the ultimate conclusion of the dissertation and summarises the main findings that have been detected in the course of the research. The major objective of this dissertation was to find out nursing interventions that have been employed to prevent pressure ulcer among hospitalised patients and to determine the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing patient outcomes.

The problem of pressure ulcers is still relevant in healthcare since they may lead to pain, infection, increasing hospitalization, and decreased quality of life among patients. Avoidance of pressure ulcers is thus a significant task to health practitioners especially nurses whose roles in the care and observation of patients are very crucial.

The chapter is a summary of the major findings in the literature review and discussion chapters as well as recommendations on how to enhance the practice of pressure ulcer prevention in healthcare facilities.

Summary of Key Findings

It was shown in the literature review that prevention of pressure ulcers should be a complex process that should be based on a combination of early-onset risk assessment, effective nursing intervention, and organisational support. The key outcome of this research is the vital role of nurses in the prevention of conditions at risk and prevention efforts, which involves the detection of vulnerable patients.

Primarily, it was found that early risk evaluation became one of the key elements of the prevention of pressure ulcers. Assessment scales like structured assessment scales can help nurses to discover patients more susceptible to pressure ulcers development. These tools can be employed regularly and the healthcare professional will be able to initiate preventive measures prior to the damage of tissues.

Nonetheless, it was also highlighted in the literature that risk assessment tools are not to be applied individually. Nurses will need to use these tools together with clinical judgement and constant monitoring of the patient to make sure that risk factors are correctly identified. The condition of patients can vary during their hospitalization, and frequent reevaluation is a necessity.

The other significant piece of information that came out of the literature review pertains to the efficacy of nursing interventions (especially patient repositioning, skin checks, and pressure-relieving devices). Frequent repositioning of the patient will aid in decreasing pressure on the flimsy parts of the body and enhancing blood flow. The intervention is specifically critical among immobile or bedridden patients.

Pressure relieving apparatuses, e.g., specialised mattresses and cushions, were also identified to greatly reduce chances of the development of the pressure ulcers. Such devices facilitate the creation of even weight distribution of the body and decrease long term pressure on certain body parts.

Another important aspect of prevention of pressure ulcers is that of regular skin assessment. Nurses can also monitor the skin of patients regularly, thereby observing the initial signs of pressure injury and implement necessary measures to avoid the further worsening of the situation.

Even though such evidence-based interventions are available, the literature revealed that there are various barriers that can hinder their application in clinical practice. The most frequently reported difficulties experienced by the healthcare professionals were the staffing shortages, high workloads, and lack of training opportunities.

Nursing Practice Implication

The results of this dissertation present some significant implications concerning the nursing practice. To begin with, prevention of pressure ulcers should be one of the main aspects of patient safety that healthcare organisations should focus on. The nurses need to be equipped with the right resources and training to facilitate them to provide efficient preventative care.

The hospitals should make sure that the risk assessment processes are undertaken periodically during the hospitalisation of patients. This is because continuous monitoring enables nurses to detect any changes in the conditions of their patients and develop preventive measures at the earliest stage possible.

Second, the healthcare organisations are expected to invest in specialised equipment and supporting technologies that help nurses to prevent pressure ulcers. The supply of pressure-relieving mattresses and any other supportive equipment can go a long way in enhancing patient outcomes.

Third, continuous learning and professional development is an important way of enhancing the knowledge of the nurses about the pressure ulcer prevention mechanisms. Nurses can also be assisted by educational programmes to keep informed of the available evidence-based practices and enhance their patient risk factor identification and management capabilities.

Lastly, the interdisciplinary collaboration between the healthcare teams can be enhanced to enhance the pressure ulcer prevention methods. Nurse-physician, physiotherapist, and other healthcare provider communication makes sure that the care plans are holistic and well-coordinated towards the patients.

Recommendations

According to the results of this dissertation, there are a number of recommendations which could be offered to enhance the situation with pressure ulcers prevention in healthcare facilities.

To start with, healthcare organisations ought to adopt organised pressure ulcer prevention programmes that involve frequent risk evaluation, positioning programs and frequent skin surveillance. Such programmes are to be incorporated in the normal nursing care processes.

Second, hospitals are expected to have the right level of staffing to assist nurses in the provision of preventative care. To enhance the uniformity of the implementation of preventative interventions, it would be beneficial to reduce the excessive workloads.

Third, healthcare organisations ought to invest in modern pressure-reducing equipment to decrease the chances of developing pressure ulcers among the high-risk patients. Availability of the right equipment will help in better patient care by the nurses.

Fourth, more attention to the training on the prevention of pressure ulcers should be paid in the nursing education programmes. Giving the nurses effective training and current clinical guidelines can enhance the general quality of care to all patients.

Lastly, the long-term effects of pressure ulcer prevention programmes need to be investigated in the future, and the effects that organisational policies have on the adoption of preventative measures.

Final Conclusion

To sum up, preventing pressure ulcers is a critical component of nursing practice due to its high morbidity and mortality rates as well as its high cost in medical care systems. The results of this dissertation show that the efficient prevention methods should be based on the combination of early risk evaluation, regular nursing interventions, and strong organisational support.

Nurses have a critical role to play in the identification of patients at risk, the prevention intervention, and the monitoring of the patient status during their hospital stay. With the necessary resources, training, and development, nurses are able to greatly decrease the number of pressure ulcers and enhance patient outcomes.

In spite of the fact that there are still a number of issues that impact the execution of the prevention strategies, the changes in the staffing, education, and interdisciplinary cooperation can empower the patient safety practices in the healthcare setting.

In general, the reinforced pressure ulcer prevention measures will not only enhance the health of patients but will also lead to the more efficient and sustainable health systems.

References (Harvard Style)

  • Beeckman, D., Defloor, T., Schoonhoven, L. and Vanderwee, K. (2011) Knowledge and attitudes of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention, 48(9) pp. 11181127, International Journal of Nursing Studies.
  • Berlowitz, D.R., and Brienza, D.M. (2007) ‘Are all pressure ulcers the result of deep tissue injury?', A review of the literature, Ostomy Wound Management, 53 (10), pp. 34-38.
  • Clark, M. (2013) Prevention and management of pressure ulcers. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Coleman, S., Nixon, J., Keen, J., Wilson, L., McGinnis, E. and Stubbs, N. (2014) ‘A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(10) pp. 22222234.
  • Defloor, T. and Grypdonck, M. (2005) Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3), pp. 373 382.
  • European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance (2019) Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: Clinical practice guideline. Accessed on: 12th June, 2020.
  • Gorecki, C., Brown, J.M., Nelson, E.A., Briggs, M., Schoonhoven, L., Dealey, C., Defloor, T. and Nixon, J. (2009) Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(7), pp. 11751183.
  • Grey, J.E., Harding, K.G. and Enoch, S. (2006) ‘Pressure ulcers’, BMJ, 332(7539), pp. 472475.
  • Halfens, R., Van Achterberg, T. and Bal, R. (2013) International prevalence measure of care problems: findings and discussion. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
  • Kottner, J., Cuddigan, J. and Carville, K. (2014) Pressure ulcer prevention: the clinical guideline development and implementation, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(4), pp. 544 546.
  • Lahmann, N.A., Halfens, R.J. and Dassen, T. (2010) ‘Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(1314), pp. 18331841.
  • Lyder, C.H. and Ayello, E.A. (2008) Pressure ulcers: a patient safety issue, Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook of Nurses, pp. 267300.
  • Moore, Z. and Cowman, S. (2012) Repositioning to treat pressure ulcers Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014) Pressure ulcers: prevention and management (CG179). London: NICE.
  • National Health Service (2023) Pressure ulcers prevention and treatment. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk
  • Pressure injury prevention and treatment clinical practice guideline (2019) by National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel. Washington: NPIAP.
  • Nixon, J., McGough, A., Brown, J., et al. (2007) Pressure relieving support surfaces a randomised controlled trial, Health Technology Assessment, 11(22) pp.1-100.
  • NPUAP, EPUAP and PPPIA (2014) Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. Cambridge Media.
  • Padula, W.V., Delarmente, B.A. and Black, J.M. (2019) Preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals, BMJ Quality and Safety, 28(4), pp. 325 327.
  • Sullivan, N. and Schoelles, K.M. (2013) ‘Preventing in-facility pressure ulcers as a patient safety measure’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(5), pp. 410416.
  • Tayyib, N., Coyer, F. and Lewis, P. (2016) Pressure ulcer prevention in critical care, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 32, p.110.
  • Vanderwee, K., Grypdonck, M. and Defloor, T. (2007) ‘Effectiveness of turning with unequal time intervals, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(1), pp. 5968.
  • Wilborn, D. and Halfens, R. (2016) Pressure ulcer prevention practice by nurses, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31(3), pp. 234241.

Do you require Nursing Assignment Help within the UK in your NS0629 Research and Evidence-Based Practice dissertation on Nursing Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalised Patients? Our professional academic authors will be in a position to help you write a properly organized dissertation that critically evaluates evidence-based nursing interventions to prevent pressure ulcers. We assist the students in discovering the major issues, including risk assessment instruments, patient repositioning, skin assessment, and the use of pressure-relieving equipment in clinical practice. Our team offers high-quality academic writing done under proper research, free of plagiarism and in accordance with AI requirements, in compliance with UK university requirements and the Harvard requirements. In case you require a good sample of dissertations on NS0629 Research and Evidence-Based Practice, our assignment samples may assist you in knowing how to critically review literature and talk about its implications on the nursing practice. Get professional advice now and get better grades in NS0629 Research and Evidence-Based Practice.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


ECON480 Economics Dissertation Solution Samples PDF | University of Otago

ECON480 Dissertation: This research paper examines the relationship between renewable energy adoption and economic growth in New Zealand during the period 1991-2024. The results indicate a statistically significant positive long-term relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth.

BUAD917 Dissertation Samples | Auckland Institute of Studies

BUAD917 This dissertation studies how New Zealand’s five major banks allocate credit to different sectors between 2020 and 2025. It focuses on lending to Mortgage, SME, and Agricultural sectors.

OSCOLA Referencing Bibliography Examples 2026 Complete Guide

OSCOLA references are written in two ways: OSCOLA references Footnotes, and the other is OSCOLA reference Bibliography. This is the only part where you are going to mention all the references that you have used in your assessment.

MG5642 - PG dissertation (M.Sc. International Business) Sample PDF |

The primary goal of this study is to assess the COVID-19 influence on ASDA employee motivation and work satisfaction. ). Motivation is crucial for a business since it underpins performance, employee attractiveness, and other organisational activities.

NBS-7099B Digital Transformation Dissertation Example 2025-26 | UEA

The importance of digital transformation is tracking the students' results, which is digital transformation monitoring student success, which is more realistic.  The KM's goal is to improve the productivity, efficiency, and competitiveness of an organisation for its employees.

5L7V0004 Research Methods Dissertation Proposal Sample

5L7V0004 Dissertation Proposal: The global economy pursues recovery from the pandemic, Russia's occupation of Ukraine, and the crisis which is the cost of living.

MKT748 Sustainability Marketing Dissertation Sample 2025-26 | UU

The achievable potential is to reach this SDG by producing a solution that eventually improves patient well-being through productive and innovative health support. The management of heart valve disease has significantly evolved as technological advancements have facilitated the transformation of the treatment process.

7053SSL Postgraduate Business Project Dissertation Example | CU

As per the report from Forbes, with the stimulation of the internal business, the brand got an opportunity to reach and serve customers with distinct cultural values and beliefs. The international business fails to identify the cross-cultural differences that are contributing to the rise in the rate of controversies.

FTI7005 Research Project Dissertation Example | CMU

This research systematically examines all of these factors and how they should or should not affect the perspectives of dental health, the costs of oral care, and the consumption of natural resources.

7000HUM Dissertation CW Sample | Coventry University

7000HUM Dissertation: The research is concentrated upon the impact that social media have over foreign diplomatic actions of western countries. Dissertation has reviewed journal papers from various authors.

Online Assignment Help in UK