Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Oxford Brookes University (OBU) | Module Title | HWSC 5006 Mental Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Course |
| Word Count | 3,000 |
|---|
|
Module code and title: |
HWSC 5006 |
Module leader:
|
Neil Howie |
|
Assignment type and word count: |
Academic poster and written commentary – Equivalent to 3,000 combined submission words. |
Assessment weighting: |
100% |
|
Submission time and date: |
23:59 on Monday |
Target feedback time and date: |
23:59 on Sunday |
This assignment requires the creation of a poster and a written commentary focused on a selected mental health disorder. The written commentary is a required component of the assessment and must be submitted alongside the poster.
The poster should demonstrate an understanding of the disorder's diagnosis, available treatment options, the legal and policy frameworks that shape mental health care, and the relevance of a behaviour change approach to supporting improved outcomes.
The written commentary enables expansion of the points made on the poster and also will include a comparison of treatments for different disorders, considering the challenges and reasons for different treatment approaches and critically discuss the strength and limitations of current legislation and policy for an individual living with the mental disorder.
|
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: |
|
|
LO1 |
Explain different treatment modalities for improved outcomes in mental health. |
|
LO2 |
Appraise a range of mental health disorders and approaches to treatment |
|
LO3 |
Critique current legislation and policy relevant to mental health services. |
For this assignment, you are required to produce an individual academic poster and a written commentary. Together, these components will demonstrate your ability to analyse and communicate key aspects of a specific mental health disorder from both clinical and socio-legal perspectives.
The academic poster should provide a clear, evidence-based visual summary of your chosen disorder. It must outline the diagnostic features, describe current treatment approaches, and introduce relevant legislation and policy frameworks that shape care delivery. This will address Learning Outcomes 1 and 2, which focus on explaining treatment modalities that support improved mental health outcomes and appraising a range of disorders and treatment approaches.
The written commentary should expand on the content of the poster, offering a more detailed and critical discussion. Drawing on academic sources and policy documents, you should critique the current state of care, assess the appropriateness of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions (LO2), and evaluate how legislation and national policy influence mental health service delivery. In doing so, you will demonstrate achievement of Learning Outcome 3, which requires the critique of relevant mental health legislation and policy.
Your commentary should also include a reflective section, considering how your understanding of mental ill-health and treatment frameworks informs your professional responsibilities within health and social care. This reflective element supports the development of academic literacy, research literacy, and critical self-awareness - core graduate attributes underpinning this module.
Do You Need Help with HWSC 5006 Mental Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Course Assignment?
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentYou will choose one mental health disorder. This could be one of the following, or another not mentioned here.:
The poster and written commentary should be submitted to Moodle as one word doc. The poster can be on a power point slide, then pasted onto the word document, with your written commentary following.
REMEMBER: The poster should only contain key points and be visually appealing, keep the amount of text to key points only. You can include graphs, pictures etc as appropriate. You will be expanding on these key points in your written commentary
Sections of your poster should include
This section could include some of the following topics
Question how reliable and valid the diagnostic criteria are (for example, is there a risk of people being mis- or under-diagnosed?)
Treatment approaches for the selected mental health condition
This section could include some of the following topics
Legislation and policy frameworks shaping care delivery
Written Commentary:
Use 12pt font (Arial or Calibri recommended), with 1.5 line spacing. Each section should be clearly titled and written in paragraphs.
Comparing treatments for different disorders.
Prompts to guide your analysis:
Reflection (This section can be written in the first person)
This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module lecturers will discuss this process with you during class time).
This assessment should be submitted as a word document
oUse Arial font.
oSet the font size to 12pt for the main text.
oApply 1.5 or double spacing throughout the document.
oClearly indicate each part of the assessment, following the template structure
oOBU Harvard referencing should be applied throughout the assessment.
|
Criteria |
Pass |
Fail |
|||||
|
100-85% |
84-70% |
69-60% |
59-50% |
49-40% |
39-30% |
29-0% |
|
|
Poster presentation and content (LO1, LO2, LO3) (30%) |
Summarises key points with clarity and originality, showing strong insight into how sources interconnect with each other and with the topic. Communicates findings with exceptional clarity and precision, using a professional style and format perfectly suited to the audience |
Summarises the main ideas in own words, showing clear understanding of how sources connect with each other and the topic. Communicates findings clearly and precisely, adapting style and format appropriately for the intended audience |
Provides accurate summaries in own words, showing clear links between different sources and their relevance to the topic. Communicates findings with precision and clarity, adapting style and tone effectively to suit the target audience |
Summarises the main points in own words with general accuracy, beginning to show how sources link to one another and to the topic. Communicates findings clearly in most places, though style or format may not always be fully adapted for the audience |
Summarises key points in own words with reasonable accuracy and begins to show how sources connect with each other. Communicates findings in a mostly clear style, though precision or adaptation for audience may be inconsistent |
Summarises information ineffectively, often relying on copying or paraphrasing with limited understanding, but with occasional signs of basic comprehension. Communicates findings in a very basic and unclear way, with style and format poorly suited to an academic audience, though some information may still be conveyed. |
Does not summarise information effectively, relying on copying or showing no understanding of the material. Does not communicate findings clearly; style and format are unsuitable for any academic audience, preventing meaningful communication. |
|
Understanding of the Mental Health Disorder (Poster and written Commentary) (20%) |
Demonstrates a highly developed and critically informed understanding of the chosen mental health disorder. Commentary shows strong critical insight, strong critical evaluation, and synthesis of high-quality academic sources. Critically evaluates contemporary data, integrating information to inform practice.
20- 18 marks |
Demonstrates a deep and critical understanding of the chosen mental health disorder. Explains diagnostic features and criteria with accuracy and sophistication, drawing on current classifications (e.g. DSM/ICD). Integrates up-to-date epidemiological data and interprets its significance clearly. Shows insight into how diagnosis and prevalence data inform approaches to treatment and service delivery.
17 - 15 marks |
Shows a very good level of understanding of the chosen disorder. Accurately describes diagnostic features and criteria with only minor omissions. Makes very effective use of relevant and current statistics, with interpretation of their meaning. Very good consideration of how diagnosis and prevalence data link to treatment or service implications.
14 - 12 marks |
Provides a good explanation of the disorder and its diagnostic features. Demonstrates general accuracy but may include some errors or lack detail in places. Uses some relevant statistics and, shows some good awareness of links between diagnosis, prevalence, and treatment.
11 - 9 marks
|
Provides a satisfactory description of the disorder,. Some information on diagnostic features is included but lacks precision. There is some good use of statistics and some attempt to connect diagnosis and prevalence with treatment or services.
8 - 6 marks |
Shows minimal or incorrect understanding of the disorder. Little or no accurate information about diagnostic features or criteria. Statistics are missing, inaccurate, or irrelevant. No meaningful consideration of how diagnosis relates to treatment or services.
5 - 3 marks
|
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the disorder, information is incorrect, missing or unrelated
2 - 0 marks |
|
Analysis of Policy and Legislation (Poster and Written Commentary) (20%)
|
Synthesises specialist and inter-disciplinary information about mental health legislation and policy with exceptional depth, producing highly original and innovative proposals about policy changes needed. |
Synthesises specialist and related information about mental health legislation and policy effectively, developing proposals about policy changes that are coherent and well-structured |
Draws together specialist and inter-related knowledge about mental health legislation and policy to construct proposals about policy change that are both innovative and contextually relevant |
Synthesises relevant specialist information about mental health legislation and policy with reasonable effectiveness, producing proposals about policy change that are mostly coherent |
Combines information from a limited range of sources, with proposals about policy change that are basic but relevant |
Synthesises information or ideas about mental health legislation and policy only minimally, with attempts that are unclear, incomplete, or weakly connected to the topic. |
Does not synthesise information or ideas about mental health legislation and policy in any meaningful way; responses may be disconnected, irrelevant, or absent.
|
|
Comparison of treatment options (15%) |
Evaluates the significance of evidence about different treatment options with sophistication, integrating multiple perspectives seamlessly |
Evaluates credibility, validity, and significance with strong reasoning and clear justification of different treatment options |
Examines the significance of evidence in complex contexts with clear justification and logical reasoning about different treatment options |
Evaluates credibility and validity of findings with some critical insight of different treatment options |
Partial evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of evidence about different treatment options |
Provides minimal or superficial evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of the evidence of different treatment options often with weak or partially incorrect reasoning. |
Provides no evaluation of credibility, validity, or significance of the evidence of different treatment options. |
|
Written Commentary Structure and Argument (15%) |
Structures ideas into a seamless, logical flow that strengthens the argument and demonstrates sophisticated organisation. Critically evaluates the credibility and usefulness of sources with exceptional accuracy, explaining in detail how this affects conclusions |
Organises ideas in a logical structure that supports arguments clearly and makes them easy to follow. Evaluates sources for credibility and usefulness, providing clear reasons why some are more trustworthy than others |
Develops a logical structure where ideas build on each other smoothly, making the argument clear and persuasive Assesses the strengths and weaknesses of sources with sound reasoning, showing why certain ones carry more weight in conclusions |
Presents ideas in a mostly logical order, with clear organisation though some parts could flow more smoothly. Identifies aspects of source credibility and usefulness |
Organises ideas in a clear structure with mostly logical flow, though minor lapses may occur. Makes some evaluation of credibility and usefulness, though explanations may be general or lack depth |
Ideas are poorly organised, with unclear or inconsistent flow, though not entirely incoherent. Shows minimal evaluation of sources, with weak or incomplete awareness of credibility or usefulness.
|
Ideas are unorganised, illogical, or incoherent, with no clear flow. Does not evaluate sources, showing no awareness of credibility or usefulness. |
Buy Custom Answer Of HWSC5006 Mental Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Course Assessment
Get A Free QuoteAre you looking to understand mental health and wellbeing across the life course in HWSC 5006 at Oxford Brookes University? This subject helps students explore how mental health is shaped by social, biological, and environmental factors at different life stages. Using academic resources like Assignment Help UK and Healthcare Assignment Help can support better understanding of complex topics. Referring to a List of Free Assignment Samples Solutions pdf also helps students learn proper structure, improve writing skills, and develop strong, well-organized assignments for academic success.
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content