Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Healthcare |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | New Zealand School Of Education | Module Title | HLTH7001: Professional Practice and Legislation |
| Course Code & Title: | HLTH7001: Professional Practice and Legislation |
| Credits/Level: | 15/7 |
| Assignment 1: | Public Health Report |
| Version: | V4.2 |
| Term & Cohort: |
|
| Due date: |
|
| Overall Weighting: | 60% |
| Total marks available | 100 |
| Tutor: |
|
| 1 |
Apply knowledge relevant to health issues to assist in the enhancement of the health of the individuals and whanau/families, organisations and communities. |
| 2 |
Evaluate how well the holistic health needs of individuals, whanau/families, organisations and communities are met through the provision of and access to health services. |
| 3 |
Analyse concepts of health caregivers’ role including: Legislation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi and health ethics. |
This assessment relates to the following learning outcomes:
LO 1 Articulate the essence of Public Health Legislation and services and explain the importance of ethical practice in healthcare.
LO2 Differentiate the roles and responsibilities of Public Health care.
LO3 Compare and Contrast the scope of the practice of Public Health care.
To pass the assessment, you must meet all the stated learning outcomes (LOs) and must achieve 50% marks in tasks addressing the LOs.
Assessment
Learning outcomes: 1, 2 & 3
Task: Public Health Report Word count: 2500 words +/- 20% Due date:
Write a report including the following:
1. Introduction (approximately 200 words)
2. Identify, compare, and contrast any NZ Public Health Intervention/initiative in relation to the three core areas of Public Health. (Approximately 700-850 words) (LO3)
3. Identify, explain, and critique the role of Public Health services in NZ. (Approximately 700-850 words) (LO1)
4. Differentiate the roles and responsibilities of Public Healthcare in New Zealand/Aotearoa. (Approximately 700-850 words) (LO2) Your discussion will focus on:
5. Conclusion (approximately 200 words)
6. References APA (7th edition) format
Marking criteria
HLTH7001: Professional Practice and Legislation
Assessment 1: Public Health Report
| Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark |
|
Part 1 Introduction, including the following:
|
An excellent introduction for all sections. Excellent clarity. | The introduction has a good outline and includes all sections. | An acceptable outline with some shortfalls. Some details are missing or incomplete. | The introduction is either incomplete, not addressed clearly or irrelevant to the topic. | No attempt to include an introduction. |
|
|
|
6 | 5-4 | 3 | 2-1 | 0 | /Part 2 LO 3 |
| Part 2 LO 3 | Excellent | Good | Adequate | Limited/Inadequate | Very Limited/No Attempt |
|
|
Identify, compare, and contrast any NZ Public Health Intervention/initiative in relation to the three core areas of Public Health.
Compare and contrast this intervention/initiative with |
An excellent level of analysis and critique of Health Intervention has been demonstrated. A wide range of literature reviews has been conducted to identify, compare, and contrast Public |
Good analysis and reasonable critique of Public Health Intervention have been demonstrated. A reasonable range of literature reviews has been conducted to identify, compare, |
Adequate analysis and some critique of Public Health Intervention have been demonstrated. An acceptable range of literature reviews has been conducted to identify, compare, and contrast Public Health Intervention |
Limited/Inadequate analysis and critique of Public Health Intervention. An inadequate range of literature reviews has been conducted to identify, compare, and contrast Public Health Intervention against three key |
Very limited or no attempt to analyse and critique Public Health Intervention.
No literature review has been attempted to identify, compare, and contrast |
|
|
the three key principles of Public Health - Health Promotion - Health Protection - Health Prevention |
Health Intervention against three key principles in NZ/Aotearoa. An excellent degree of critical thinking has been demonstrated. |
and contrast Public Health Intervention against three key principles in NZ/Aotearoa. A reasonably good degree of critical thinking has been demonstrated. |
against three key principles in NZ/Aotearoa. An acceptable level of critical thinking has been demonstrated. |
principles in NZ/Aotearoa. A very limited degree of critical thinking. |
Public Health Intervention against three key principles in NZ/Aotearoa. No evidence of critical thinking. |
|
|
|
24 - 21 | 20- 16 | 15 -12 | 11 - 6 | 5 - 0 | /24 |
| Part 3 LO 1 | Excellent | Good | Adequate | Limited/Inadequate | Very Limited/No Attempt |
|
|
Identify, explain, and critique the role of Public Health services in NZ/Aotearoa. • Identify and critique two legislations that govern, regulate, and/or influence the provision of public health services in New Zealand/ . |
TWO relevant legislation and TWO ethical principles that influence govern, regulate, and/or influence the provision of public health services have been identified, explained, and critique extensively. An excellent degree of critical thinking has been demonstrated. |
TWO relevant legislation and TWO ethical principles that influence govern, regulate, and/or influence the provision of public health services have been identified, explained, and analysed constructively. A reasonably good degree of critical |
TWO relevant legislation and TWO ethical principles that influence govern, regulate, and/or influence the provision of public health services have been identified, explained, and analysed, but somewhat limited. Adequate analysis and a limited degree of critical thinking have been demonstrated. |
Suggested New Zealand legislation and/or ethical principles are either not addressed adequately or/and not relevant and/or not contextualised. Very limited critical thinking or analysis. Most examples are irrelevant. |
Limited or no attempt to identify, critique and/or explain the New Zealand legislation and relevant ethical principles that affect the provision of Public Health Services. No critical thinking or analysis. Irrelevant examples. |
|
|
Provide a relevant example(s) to back up your explanation/support your discussion. Identify and critique two ethical principles that govern, regulate and/or influence the provision and decision-making when it comes to public health services in the context of New Zealand/Aotearoa. Provide a relevant example(s) to back up your explanation/support your discussion. |
All examples are clear, well-justified, and comprehensive. |
thinking has been demonstrated. Most examples are clear, justified, and comprehensive. |
Most examples are relevant but not well explained. |
|
|
|
|
|
24 - 21 | 20 - 16 | 15 - 12 | 11 - 6 | 5 - 0 | /24 |
| Part 4 LO2 | Excellent | Good | Adequate | Limited/Inadequate | Very Limited/No Attempt |
|
|
Differentiate the roles and responsibilities of Public Healthcare in New Zealand/Aotearoa. • Clearly describe, differentiate, and compare the five roles and responsibilities of Public Health care in New Zealand/Aotearoa. |
5 roles and responsibilities are identified, compared, and differentiate in depth with relevant supporting literature. The significance of Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi in relation to the roles of Public Healthcare in New Zealand/Aotearoa has been analysed in-depth, |
4 roles and responsibilities are identified, compared, and contrasted indepth with relevant supporting literature. Or 5 roles and responsibilities are identified, compared, and contrasted with relevant supporting literature but need more clarity and detail. |
3 or 2 roles and responsibilities are identified, compared, and contrasted in-depth with relevant supporting literature. Or 4 roles and responsibilities are identified, compared, and contrasted with relevant supporting literature but need more detail and clarity. An attempt has been made to analyse the impact of Te Tiriti |
Just 1 role and responsibility is identified, compared, and contrasted with relevant supporting literature. Or roles and responsibilities of Public Health Care in New Zealand are identified but not compared. They are either addressed inadequately, vaguely, or irrelevantly. |
Limited or no attempt to Identify, compare and contrast roles and responsibilities of Public Health Care in New Zealand. Limited or no attempt to address the impact of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi on the roles and responsibilities of Public Health Care. |
|
|
• Discuss the significance of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi in relation to the roles of Public Healthcare in New Zealand/Aotearoa. |
with relevant supporting literature. |
The impact of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi on the roles and responsibilities of Public Health care is analysed briefly, with some relevant supporting literature |
Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi on the roles and responsibilities of Public Health but need more detail and clarity. Supporting literature has limited relevance. |
The impact of Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi is either not addressed adequately or not relevant to the context. |
|
|
|
|
24 - 21 | 20 - 16 | 15 - 12 | 11 - 6 | 5 - 0 | /24 |
|
Conclusion Summarise the main points of the report in a logical and concise manner. |
All main points of the report are concisely and logically summarised. No new information/facts were provided. | Most of the main points of the report are summarised well. No new information/facts were provided. | A few points of the report are mostly summarised, but clarity is missing. | The main points of the report are vaguely summarised. Not well connected to the main body of the report. |
Limited or no attempt to summarise the report. No connection to the main body of the report. |
|
|
|
10 - 9 | 8 - 7 | 6 - 5 | 4-1 | 0 | /10 |
| Referencing | APA (7th) referencing, and intext citations are consistently accurate. | APA(7th) referencing, and in-text citations are mainly accurate.
A couple of errors in quotes, in-text citations & reference formatting are noted. |
APA(7th) referencing, and intext citations are followed but several errors for quotes, intext citations & reference formatting are noted. | Referencing and intext citations contain multiple fundamental errors that do not accurately acknowledge the literature. | No attempt was made to reference. |
|
|
|
6 | 5-4 | 3 | 2-1 | 0 | /6 |
| Language Standards | Fluent language and writing style appropriate to the assignment with accurate grammar and spelling. Thoughts and ideas are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. |
Language and writing style is mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling are mainly accurate. Thoughts and ideas are expressed in a coherent manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors. |
Meaning is apparent but language and writing are not always fluent. Meaning is apparent but language and writing are not always fluent. Thoughts and ideas are expressed in a manner that needs better coherence. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors. | The level of language and writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical and coherent manner. There are frequent grammar and/or spelling mistakes making the meaning unclear | The meaning is not apparent because of the low level of language and serious grammar and/or spelling mistakes. |
|
|
|
6 | 5-4 | 3 | 2 | 1-0 | /6 |
1. A minimum mark of 50% must be achieved to pass this assessment.
2. You are required to keep a soft copy of the submitted assessment.
3. You are required to hand in your assessment on or before the due date.
4. Your assessment is to be submitted through Turnitin via Canvas.
5. All students are required to attach the signed assessment coversheet with their final submission (the end page of this document).
Get Help with HLTH7001: Professional Practice and Legislation Assessment 1 Answers Before Deadline
Chat with Assignment WriterWorkingment provides reliable academic help for students working on the HLTH7001 Professional Practice and Legislation Assignment 1 and its Public Health Report requirements. Get assistance with analysing New Zealand public health interventions, health promotion, health protection and health prevention, along with the roles and responsibilities of public health services in Aotearoa. Our experienced academic writers can also help with discussions on NZ public health legislation, ethical principles and the significance of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. If you need broader assignment help NewZealand, specialist nursing assignment help, or individual essay writing services, Workingment can assist with clear, original and properly referenced academic work. You can also review our free samples to understand our writing quality and approach.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
