Preparing for University Success Portfolio Assessment Brief | AU

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 28 May, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Education
University Arden University Module Title FDY3001 Preparing for University Success

FDY3001 Assessment Brief

As part of the formal assessment for the module Preparing for University Success, you are required to submit the assessment that is described in this assessment brief.

FDY3001 Learning Outcomes:

After completing the module, you should be able to:

  • Reflect upon the transition to university and the strengths that they bring to university study
  • Demonstrate an increased ability to locate, evaluate and read academic sources required for university study and assessment
  • Present information to demonstrate increased confidence in communicating in a range of scenarios for the university context (including academic and personal preparedness)
  • Graduate Attribute: Digitally Literate Identify appropriate digital resources/tools required for a restricted range of given purposes and tasks, with guidance.

All learning outcomes must be met to pass the module

Guidance

Your assignment should include a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline, the exact word count of your submitted document, the appendices, if relevant, and a reference list (see referencing section for more information). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria below to assess your work.

You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.

Maximum word count: 2000 words

Please refer to the full word count policy, which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework.

Please note the following: Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.

The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in-text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. All other printed words ARE included in the word count.

Students who exceed the word count by up to a 10% margin will not be penalised. Students should note that no marks will be assigned to work exceeding the specified limit once the maximum assessment size limit has been reached.

Get 100% Original FDY3001 Portfolio Assessment Brief Answers

Get Expert writers help

Task A: Reflective Writing (1000 words) (Module Learning Outcomes 1 and 3) 

Reflect on your experiences of university life and your progress as a student.

A reflective piece of writing is personal and informative. It is similar to writing a diary - it is an opportunity for you to express your emotions and thoughts. However, a reflective piece of writing goes further than simply describing your experiences. When you reflect, you discuss what you have learned from your experiences and the changes you make in the future based on your prior experiences.

Your reflection should address the following:

Reflect on your personal experience starting at Arden University.

  • This could include aspects of university life you have found enjoyable and your motivations/goals for starting a university degree.

Reflect on your personal growth, assessing your strengths and areas for development.

  • Include what you have learned about your academic strengths from your iLearn materials.
  • Refer to your iLearn lessons to help you discuss your academic strengths, such as your growth mindset, self-efficacy, and sense of belonging.

Discuss two academic skills you have acquired in this module.

  • Select two from the following list: academic reading, digital skills, analysing and evaluating sources, critical thinking, and referencing.
  • Refer to specific iLearn lessons explaining what you have learned and why these academic skills are essential for university success.

Discuss your next steps.

  • Based on your reflection, choose a specific academic challenge you experienced during this module. Explain what was difficult, how you overcame this challenge and the steps you will take to continue developing your academic skills at university.

Writing requirements:

  • As this is a reflective piece of writing, you can use first-person pronouns (I, me, my) to write from your perspective.
  •  Reflective writing is a continuous piece of writing. Paragraphs should be used, and subheadings are not required.
  • Give specific details in your reflection. Your reflection should explain your experience of this module, including your iLearn lessons. In-depth personal reflections will gain higher marks. General reflections will limit high marks.

Task B: Locating, reading and evaluating sources (1000 words) (Module Learning Outcomes 2 and 4)

Task B assesses your digital skills. As you have learned in this module, it is important that you can find and evaluate good-quality academic sources when researching and writing assessments. Good quality academic sources include books and journal articles.

For this task, you are going to search for and evaluate sources that would help you answer the following research question:

What factors motivate cyberbullying on social media platforms?

There are three parts to this task:

Part 1 (300 words): Use the Arden University Library Portal to locate TWO academic sources

Being able to use the Arden University Library Portal to locate relevant academic sources is a key academic skill.

To demonstrate this skill, you will search the library (specifically the A-Z Database function) to locate TWO sources that might be useful when answering the question above. You will explain how you carried out your search (so that someone else could follow your steps and end up with the same search results). To help with this, you will take screenshots (a maximum of 6) showing your search in action. Note that your screenshots MUST show you using the Arden University Library.

Include the following:

Screenshot Your explanation/description
Show you can access the Arden University Library Portal Explain how you navigated there – what did you click on to get to that page?
Show you can access the A-Z Databases Explain how you navigated there – what did you click on to get to that page?
Show the database you have chosen to search Explain why you chose that particular database.
Show the keywords you searched

What keywords did you search for? Why did you choose those particular words? If you searched for more than one keyword, why? Which keywords gave the best search results? Why do you think this was?

Show how you used the filter function to refine your search results in different ways

What did you notice when you used the filter function? Note

how the number of search results changes as you use the different filter options.

Search results Identify the TWO sources shown in the search results list that you think would be suitable to help you answer the question.

Part 2 (450 words): Show you can evaluate academic sources of information

You have now searched for and selected two academic sources that you could use to answer the research question: What factors motivate cyberbullying on social media platforms?

You are now going to evaluate both sources. Are they good sources for you to use for academic purposes? You will need to read both sources carefully so you have a good understanding of their content.

Using the CRAAP evaluation criteria (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy and Purpose), explain each source’s quality and usefulness for academic purposes.

In your answer, you must explain all elements of CRAAP. Ensure you discuss the specific details of your sources to support your analysis. You should include a full reference for each source and use in-text citations throughout your analysis to highlight specific examples from the sources. Please follow the Arden University Harvard Referencing Style.

Part 3 (250 words): Show you can evaluate non-academic sources of information

Below is a ChatGPT-generated text about the research question. Using the CRAAP criteria, explain why this text is a poor choice when writing for academic purposes.

What factors motivate cyberbullying on social media platforms? (Generated by ChatGPT)

Factors Motivating Cyberbullying on Social Media Platforms

Cyberbullying on social media is a pervasive issue driven by multiple factors. Understanding these motivations is crucial for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies. Here are the primary factors that motivate cyberbullying on social media platforms:

1. Anonymity and Perceived Impunity

One of the most significant motivators for cyberbullying is the anonymity that social media platforms can provide. When individuals believe their identity is hidden, they may feel emboldened to engage in aggressive behaviours without fear of immediate repercussions. This perceived impunity can lead to a sense of power and control over the victim, which is a driving force behind many instances of cyberbullying.

2. Social Influence and Peer Pressure

Social dynamics play a crucial role in cyberbullying. Peer pressure and the desire to fit in with a particular group can push individuals to bully others online. In some cases, cyberbullying is seen as a way to gain popularity or status within a social group. Adolescents, in particular, may bully others to avoid being ostracised by their peers or to gain approval from influential group members.

3. Retaliation and Revenge

Another motivation for cyberbullying is retaliation or revenge. Individuals who feel wronged or mistreated by others may resort to cyberbullying as a means of getting back at their perceived offenders. This can create a cycle of bullying where the victim becomes the aggressor in an attempt to regain a sense of justice or balance.

4. Boredom and Lack of Empathy

For some individuals, cyberbullying is a way to alleviate boredom. The ease of accessing social media and the instant gratification it provides can make bullying an enticing activity for those seeking entertainment. Additionally, the lack of face-to-face interaction can lead to a diminished sense of empathy. When bullies cannot see the immediate emotional impact of their actions, they may be less likely to understand or care about the harm they are causing.

5. Psychological Factors

Certain psychological traits and conditions can also contribute to cyberbullying behaviour. Individuals with low self-esteem, poor impulse control, or a need for dominance may be more prone to engage in cyberbullying. Additionally, underlying issues such as stress, anxiety, or previous experiences of being bullied can influence someone to bully others online as a coping mechanism or defence strategy.

Buy Answer to This Assignment & Raise Your Grades

Get Expert writers help

6. The Culture of the Platform

The nature and culture of specific social media platforms can either discourage or facilitate cyberbullying. Platforms with minimal moderation, unclear community guidelines, or a toxic user base can create environments where bullying behaviour is normalised or overlooked. Conversely, platforms that actively promote positive interactions and swiftly address abusive behaviour can reduce the incidence of cyberbullying.

7. Lack of Consequences

A perceived lack of serious consequences for online bullying can also motivate individuals to engage in such behaviour. If bullies believe that their actions will go unpunished or that the repercussions will be minimal, they may be more likely to continue bullying. This highlights the importance of clear policies and strict enforcement by social media platforms to deter such behaviour.

Conclusion

Cyberbullying on social media is motivated by a complex interplay of factors, including anonymity, social influence, retaliation, boredom, psychological traits, platform culture, and lack of consequences. Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach that includes educating users, enforcing strict policies, promoting empathy, and creating supportive online communities. By understanding and targeting the underlying motivations for cyberbullying, we can work towards creating safer and more inclusive social media environments.

Assignment Checklist

Use the checklist below to help you complete your assignment and prepare to submit your work.

Task A: Reflective Writing (1000 words) (LOs 1 and 3) Yes No
Have I included an introduction, main body paragraphs and a conclusion?

 

 

Have I reflected on my personal experience starting university, referring to motivations and goals?

 

 

Have I reflected on my personal growth, assessing my strengths and areas for development? Have I referred to my iLearn lessons to discuss my academic strengths?

 

 

Have I discussed two academic skills that I have acquired in this module? Have I referred to my iLearn lessons to discuss these new skills?

 

 

Have I discussed my next steps by explaining a challenge? Have I explained how I overcame this challenge and the steps I will take to continue my academic development?

 

 

Task B: Locating, reading and evaluating sources (1000 words)

(LOs 2 and 4)

Yes No
Part 1: Have I found two academic sources from the Arden Library about factors that motivate cyberbullying on social media platforms?

 

 

Part 1: Have I included six screenshots with a written explanation for each, as guided by the table in Part 1?

 

 

Part 2: Have I written two clear CRAAP paragraphs evaluating my two chosen academic sources?

 

 

Part 2: Have I clearly written the titles of my two chosen academic sources with the correct in-text citation above each of my two CRAAP paragraphs?

 

 

Part 3: Have I written a clear CRAAP paragraph about why the ChatGPT-generated text is a poor source?

 

 

Final Check Yes No
Have I included a completed cover page?

 

 

Have I edited and proofread my submission for punctuation, grammar and spelling mistakes?

 

 

Have I included in-text citations where appropriate in Task A and B?

 

 

Have I included a Reference List at the end of my assignment in Arden University Harvard Referencing format?

 

 

Have I uploaded my submission as one Microsoft Word document to the correct module submission portal on iLearn?

 

 

Final portfolio submission

Assessments submitted late will not be accepted.
Please submit your portfolio as a Word document to the ‘Assignment’ submission portal available under the ‘My Assessment’ tab on iLearn. A template is provided on the module iLearn site. Please use the template, as it will make sure that you include all the evidence asked for. 

(Please ensure you DO NOT submit your final assessment to a ‘formative (draft)’ portal). 
You must ensure that the submitted assessment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assessments that show evidence of unfair academic practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.) 

If submitting multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part you are answering along with your student number, i.e. Task A STUXXXX. If you wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure that your new submission has exactly the same file name as the previous one for the system to overwrite it.  

Assessment Criteria for FDY3001 - Preparing for University Success 

Level 3 Level 3 prepares students to function effectively at Level 4. Criteria for assessment at Level 3 reflect the preparatory nature of these modules. Students are expected to demonstrate the acquisition of generic learning skills appropriate for self-managed learning in an HE context. Students are expected to demonstrate that they have acquired the underpinning discipline-specific skills, knowledge and understanding necessary to undertake a programme of higher education.

Band and Categorical

Outstanding 80+  Excellent 70 – 79 Very Good 60 –69

 

Good 50 – 59

Satisfactory 40– 49 Marginal Fail 30 –39

Fail < 29

     

 

       
Marks  (85 / 90 / 95 / 100) (72 / 75 / 78) (62 / 65 / 68) (52 / 55 / 58) (42 / 45 / 48) (32 / 35 / 38) (0 / 5 / 15 / 20 /25)

 

 

 

Task A: Reflective Writing (1000 words) (LOs 1 and 3)

 

 

 

LO1: Reflect upon the transition to university and the strengths that they bring to university study

Outstanding level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Outstanding awareness of key issues presented by the transition to university.

Excellent level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Excellent awareness of key issues presented by

the transition to university.

Very good level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Very good awareness of key issues presented by

the transition to university.

Good level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Good awareness of key issues presented by the transition to university

Satisfactory level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Satisfactory awareness of key issues presented by the transition to university.

Limited level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Limited awareness of key issues presented by

the transition to university.

Very limited or no level of reflection and insight into own strengths.

Very limited or no awareness of key issues presented by the transition to university.

LO3: Present information to demonstrate increased confidence in communicating in a range of scenarios for the university context (including academic and personal preparedness) Outstanding response to reflective writing and Task B, communicating with high levels of confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Excellent response to reflective writing and Task B, communicating with high levels of confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Very good response to reflective writing and Task B communicating with confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Good response to reflective writing and Task B, communicating with confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Satisfactory response to reflective writing and Task B, communicating with some confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Limited response to reflective writing and Task B communicating with limited confidence and clarity across all scenarios. Very limited or no attempt to response to reflective writing and Task B.

 

 

Task B: Locating, reading and evaluating sources (1000 words) (LOs 2 and 4)

 

 

LO2: Demonstrate an increased ability to locate, evaluate and read academic sources required for university study and assessment Student guide demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts.  Outstanding application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, making sustained, reasoned judgements about the quality of sources. Student guide demonstrates an excellent understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. Excellent application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, making sustained, reasoned judgements about the quality of sources Student guide demonstrates a very good understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. Very good application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, making reasoned judgements about the quality of sources.

Student guide demonstrates a good understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. 

Good application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, making reasoned judgements about the quality of sources.

Student guide demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. Satisfactory application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, making some reasoned judgements about the quality of sources. Student guide demonstrates a limited understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. Limited application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, limited judgement about the quality of sources. Student guide demonstrates a very limited or no understanding of the steps needed to navigate academic databases and locate texts. Very limited or no application of evaluation criteria to academic sources, very limited or no judgement about the quality of sources.
 

 

 

 

 

Graduate attribute LO4: Identify appropriate digital resources/tools required for a restricted range of given purposes and tasks, with guidance

Outstanding 
identification and use of a range
of digital resources
/tools for a range of given purpose and
tasks with limited guidance.

Excellent identification and use of a range of digital resources/tools for a range of given purposes and tasks with limited guidance. Very good identification and use of digital resources/tools for a range of given purposes and tasks with some guidance. Good identification and use of a range of digital resources/tools for a range of given purposes and tasks, with some guidance. Satisfactory level of understanding how to identify and use appropriate digital resources/tools for a given purpose and tasks, with guidance.

Limited awareness of being able to identify and use appropriate digital resources/tools for a range of given purposes

and tasks, with guidance.

Poor performance in being able to identify and use appropriate digital resources/tools required for a restricted range of given purposes and tasks, with guidance.

Arden University Generic Assessment Criteria 

Level 3 prepares students to function effectively at Level 4. Criteria for assessment at Level 3 reflect the preparatory nature of these modules. Students are expected to demonstrate the acquisition of generic learning skills appropriate for self-managed learning in an HE context. Students are expected to demonstrate that they have acquired the underpinning discipline-specific skills, knowledge and understanding necessary to undertake a programme of higher education. 
 Grade  Mark  Bands   Generic Assessment Criteria 

First  

(1)

80%+  Outstanding performance which demonstrates an outstanding knowledge base, supported with wider reading and the ability to begin to analyse the subject area. The work draws widely on relevant theory and shows awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows an outstanding level of competence and confidence in managing appropriate sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work is accurately and consistently referenced throughout.

 

70-79%  Excellent performance which demonstrates an excellent knowledge base the ability to begin to analyse the subject. The work draws on relevant theory whilst showing some awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows a high level of competence in managing sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work is consistently referenced throughout.

 Upper  second

(2:1)

60-69%  Very good performance which demonstrates a sound understanding of the content and some ability to analyse the issues with reference to theory. The work shows a very good level of competence in managing sources and materials and some initiative. Academic writing skills are very good, and expression remains accurate overall. Very good professional skills (where appropriate). The work is referenced throughout.

 Lower  second (2:2)

50-59%  A good performance which shows a decent understanding of the content and makes some reference to theory. The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are generally good, and expression remains accurate overall although the piece may lack structure. Good professional skills (where appropriate). There is some attempt to reference the work.

 Third

(3) 

40-49%

A satisfactory level of understanding in which there are some gaps in knowledge of the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. The work shows a basic use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are limited and there are some errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). 

Marginal

Fail 

30-39%  A limited level of knowledge in which there are clear omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory, and ethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). 

 Clear

fail

29% and 

Below

 A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak and there are numerous errors in expression. The work lacks structure overall. Professional skills (where appropriate) are not developed. The work is imitative.

 

Get expert assignment help for FDY3001 Preparing for University Success! We specialize in offering high-quality assignment help, with an option for students to pay our experts to take on their assignment challenges. Need a reference? We also provide a free list of assignment examples to help you get started. With years of experience, our writers deliver 100% plagiarism-free content and offer unlimited revisions to meet your needs. Trust us to help you excel in your studies!

60-Second Quote

Get Your Free Academic Quote

No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential

Workingment Unique Features

Latest Free Samples for University Students

FLAT 15% OFF

AVAIL FLAT 10% OFF

+ Extra 5% OFF

FREE PLAGIARISM REPORT
Applicable on all orders
ORDER NOW →
★★★★★ 4.9/5 | 5118+ Reviews
WhatsApp
Online Assignment Help in UK