| Category | Assignment | Subject | Computer Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Northampton | Module Title | CSYM017 Databases |
| Word Count | 4000 words |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2026 |
| Submission date: | 26/01/2026 |
| Feedback date: | 26/02/2026 |
| Resit date: | 24/03/2026 (3pm) |
Title (Question): Individual assignment work
Setting the scene:
The assignment is designed to prepare students for designing relational and graph models based on a given dataset, implementing them into working databases, performing transactional queries for decision-making, etc. The students are also required to compare and reflect on the data models for the choice of future application scenarios.
This assignment requires students to complete all assignment tasks to achieve the learning outcomes.
The assignment includes two key parts:
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
Students are expected to log their learning activities (e.g., lab exercises and extra work) in the portfolio. There is no standard format, however, the portfolio should be structured well for easy reading (e.g., including a Table of Contents with week numbers). The work each week in the portfolio should include two sections: 1) the learning activities (i.e.,
| Assessment Criteria & Weight | Learning Outcomes addressed through this Assessment | No submission / no evidence | Fail 1–49% | Pass 50–59% | Merit 60–69% | Distinction 70–100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio – learning activities (20%) | a, b, c, d, e | No submission | The effort is lacking – there is only limited amount of work in the portfolio. | There is evidence of some effort; most of the activities have been attempted. | Very good effort has been made to attempt all the exercises; there is evidence of extra work. | Tremendous effort has been made in doing the assigned tasks, there is evidence of attempting extra challenging activities. |
| Portfolio – Reflection (20%) | j, k | No submission | There are not enough reflective comments. | The reflective comments are broadly satisfactory. | Good reflective comments, which show in-depth understanding of topics. | The reflective submission is of high standard in terms of both quantity and quality. |
| Quality of Assignment Work (30%) | f, g, h, i | No submission | There is insufficient work – from model design, implementation, database queries. Overall, it is lacking. | The work is broadly satisfactory in terms of model design, database implementation and queries. | The work is good, the models are carefully designed, the databases are implemented properly; the queries are carefully designed and most of them return correct results. | The quality of the work is exceptional – the models are carefully designed. There is a clear evidence of proper database implementation; the quality of the queries is excellent in terms of correctness and novelty. |
| Explanation of the Assignment Work (30%) | j, k | No submission | Little or poor explanation of the assignment work. | The justification/explanation of the assignment work are broad |
Achieve Higher Grades of CSYM017 AS1 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentIf you need help on assignments CSYM017 Databases Assignment? to now stress-free and get Computer Science Assignment Help from our expert team. We also provide free assignment samples that have been written by PhD expert writers. We are available 24/7 to assist you. Now, be tension-free and focus on studying and give your assignment to our expert team. We will deliver your assignment before the deadline with well-researched results. Contact us today and boost your academic grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content