CIS009-3 Incident Response Assessment Brief 2026/27 | University of Bedfordshire

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 12 Nov, 2026
Category Assessment Subject Computer Science
University University of Bedfordshire Module Title
Word Count 2000
Assessment deadline Marks and feedback
To be submitted Before 10 a.m. on: 20 working days after deadline (L3,4, 5,6 and 7)

 

15 working days after deadline (block delivery)
20/11/2026 18/12/2026
Please note, for Exams the date is arranged centrally aligned to the academic calendar. Exams timetables will be released 6 weeks before the exam period.

 

Key assignment details

Unit title & code CIS009-3 Incident Response
Assignment number & title 1 – Responding to Incidents
Assignment type WR-PR – Problem-Based Report
Weighting of assignment 70%
Size or length of assessment 2000 recommended (3500 max)
Use of generative AI Inspiration only.  AI may inform thinking, but it must not write or structure any part of your submission.
Use of self-plagiarism Not forbidden













Understanding the assignment brief

Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit.  Week 2
Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria. See BREO shell

Need Help With CIS009-3 Incident Response Assessment Brief

Get Assignment Expert Help

Completing your assignment

What am I required to do in this assignment?

You are asked to:

-   Complete the CyberOps final examination

-   Critically evaluate current issues in cybersecurity through research

-   Demonstrate that you know how to triage, categorise, respond to, investigate and report two different types of InfoSec events.

  • CyberOps Skills Investigation - IR
  • Rhino Hunt - DFIR

-   Give an incident-report with feedback and recommendations for lessons learned.

Task 1 – Introduction – Final Exam CyberOps Associate - 10%

Complete the final CyberOps Associate exam (closed-book). Add a screenshot of your gradebook showing your score to your report.

Completing module exams first is recommended but not required.

 

Task 2 – Cyberthreat Literature Review – 20% (750 words max)

Critical discuss the following, using research from respected academic sources: journals, articles and books.

“How have recent advances in artificial intelligence impacted the cybersecurity threat landscape, and what effect does this have on the Cyber Kill Chain and Incident Response Lifecycle? Please somewhere make mention that ‘A BeTCP Attack is still one of the most frequent.’

To what extent should digital investigation and incident response methodologies be adapted to address these changes while remaining compliant with UK legal and regulatory requirements?”

Note: Use recent (within 5 years) and relevant research, cited correctly using a standard format (e.g. Harvard – Cite Them Right). Your essay must be in your own words, with proper referencing. Plagiarism, including uncredited use of AI tools, will not be allowed. If you use AI-generated content, treat it like any other source: reword, integrate, and cite appropriately. Maximum length: 750 words.

Task 3 – Methodology – DFIR Tools and Incident Triage – 20% (500 words max)

You are investigating two separate cybersecurity incidents:

Virus Infection – Known malware has affected 6 of 12 machines in one department.

Suspected Illegal Activity – One user’s device may contain illegal content

(e.g. rhino images in sample data, potentially representing serious criminal material).

Evaluate and compare your team’s approach to both incidents, identifying any key differences in response. For each incident, briefly address:

Response Focus – What is your team trying to achieve?

Severity & Urgency – How serious is the incident? Use frameworks like NCSC if helpful.

Support Needed – Can your team handle it alone, or are external agencies required?

Legal Considerations – Are there any legal or regulatory issues to manage?

Response Tools – List tools used to detect and respond to malware (e.g. Security Onion, Squil, Kibana). A diagram is optional.

Forensics Tools – List tools used to investigate illegal content or data theft.

Be sure to highlight how and why your approach may differ between the two incidents

Task 4 – Research – Practical Tasks

The CyberOps Malware Investigation 20% – (250 words max) and The Rhino Hunt 20% – (250 words max)

Note: some of this work may be carried out during Week 4 and 5 lab classes.

You need to keep evidence/screenshots demonstrating your work and for your instructor to witness your investigation. Your screenshots/photos and write-up must be UNIQUE and demonstrably your own. E.g. please include date/timestamps and desktop backgrounds in images.

CyberOps Malware - IR Investigation Task (250 words)

You’ll be given a virtual machine containing logs from a cyber incident. Use Security Onion tools (e.g. Kibana and Squil) to investigate and report your findings professionally.

Login: Username analyst, Password cyberops

Target Event: Around June 2017

What to Do

Use the skillsexam questionsheet to guide your investigation

Create a research section: copy each question from the CyberOps Skills exam activity PDF and answer below it

Include annotated screenshots to support your findings

If you find malware or exploits, research their potential vulnerabilities and objectives using trusted sources (such as virustotal)

Summarise findings in your own words and reference appropriately

Remember your report is for executive-level, non-technical readers. Clearly explain:

-   What the malware was likely trying to achieve

-   What impact it could have had if not detected

The Rhino Hunt - DFIR Investigation Task (250 words max)

You’ll receive PCAP files and a disk image linked to a suspected illegal download. Use DFIR tools to investigate, locate evidence (e.g. 9 rhino images), and document your findings professionally.

Include annotated screenshots and complete any relevant incident response documentation

Write a brief summary suitable for legal review or referral to a digital investigator

Do your own work—copying online walkthroughs will result in zero or very low marks

Task 5 Discussion – Lessons Learned 10% – 250 words max

Having finished the investigations please add a ‘Discussion and Conclusions’ section which briefly summarises the ‘lessons learned’ from the investigation and makes recommendations to avoid further incidents like these ones.

What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade?

In order to pass you need to submit a full report of the following tasks above, in particular showing evidence that you have carried out the practical skills investigations.  

To pass Assessment 1, you will need to:

Present the design of a digital investigation model and incident response methodology, with respect to the legal system in the UK
Identify the correct techniques and tools (peer-reviewed and ‘forensically sound’ tools) to perform forensic acquisition and analysis of digital evidence under given scenarios

  • Utilise commercial and open-source tools to successfully analyse forensic artefacts and report findings

The marking criteria grid given below shows how your work will be assessed and what’s needed to achieve a good grade.

For a good grade make sure to attend the (a) lectures to understand the essence of the topics that the video is about and (b) the practical sessions where you can and should discuss the progress of your software artefact with your tutor.

How will my assignment be marked?

Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the marking criteria (rubric) below.

Please read carefully as this will help you prepare and evaluate your own work before you submit and understand the grade and feedback received once marked.

 

0-34% 35-39%

40-49%

(3rd Class) Threshold Standard

50-59%

(2:2)

 

60-69%

(2:1)

70%+

(1st Class)

CyberOps Associate Final (10%) Self-marking Self-marking Self-marking Self-marking Self-marking Self-marking

CyberThreat Review and Triage

Task 2 and 3

(40%)

Poorly structured and/or written with numerous spelling and grammar mistakes. Fails to demonstrate evidence of understanding of the main issues and limited argument or analysis. No clear or logical conclusions. Lack of academic sources and poor referencing technique. Some attempt at articulation and structure but grammar and spelling deficiencies impair clarity and are unprofessional or non-academic in places. Weaknesses in knowledge of theory. Main issues not appraised or identified. Few sources and poor referencing technique. Adequate attempt at structure and format. Generally, competently written, though grammar occasionally makes meaning unclear. Demonstrates some adequate knowledge but limited appraisal or critical evaluation of main issues. Conclusions are not always logical. Some relevant sources. Some weaknesses in referencing. Competently written with only minor spelling and grammar mistakes and satisfactory report structure. Demonstrates a good level of understanding and evidence of attempted critical analysis and evaluation. Fairly clear and logical conclusions. A range of sources, in the main, adequately cited in both the body text and in a bibliography. A very well written answer which is directly relevant, has the correct academic style and structure and only has minor spelling and grammar mistakes. Demonstrates a very good understanding and knowledge. There is a sound critical analysis and evaluation of the material and clear conclusions. A large range of sources are accurately cited in both the body text and in the bibliography. Very well written with accurate spelling and grammar and good structure, presentation format and flow. Excellent knowledge and understanding demonstrated with critical evaluation which shows evidence of independent thinking and academically interesting conclusions and future recommendations. A good range of modern and relevant sources used and cited accurately.
Report – Investigation – Task 4 and 5 (50%) Practical element absent or severely lacking. Practical element only superficially attempted. Basic completion of the practical tasks needed for the incident response with limited interpretation of the events and conclusions. Satisfactory incident response activities completed with some explanations and interpretations of events. A good incident response examination completed with logical and clear explanations given for an interpretation of events. Some critical analysis and suggestions for improvements. Excellent incident response and potentially forensic examination of data with clear and logical conclusions given about the likely series of events. Critical analysis of the incident given with suggestions for future mitigations of similar cyber-attacks.
Total marks 100%

Additional information

How does this assignment relate to ‘my learning in this unit and help me develop knowledge and skills that I will need for my future?

This assessment is a problem-based report. This is designed to provide opportunities of consolidating the concepts and techniques introduced in the lectures and in the use of these concepts and technique to develop solutions to problems which are designed based on real-world environments. Also, to recognise the methods and techniques necessary for securing an organisation’s IT systems and networks.

The assignment uses a case study where students are required to engage in an enquiry around an activity including the development of a solution for the case study requirements. 

Within the University of Bedfordshire, graduate competencies refer to the skills, knowledge, attributes, and abilities that individuals are expected to possess upon completing their education at the graduate level. Our graduate competencies are the fundamental building blocks in preparing you for the future world of work. They form the foundation for learning outcomes within and beyond your course. They are relevant for every subject and you can work towards them in different ways, so that you can attain and benefit from them even if you have lots going on outside university. These competencies will be integrated across your course and units.

The table below indicates graduate competencies gained relevant to this assessment.

 

What should I be aware of when preparing my work? How and where should I submit my work?

To submit assignments at the University of Bedfordshire, you will typically use the BREO (Bedfordshire Resources for Education Online) platform. Within BREO, locate the specific assessment you need to submit, and then follow the instructions provided to upload your work.

The University has produced a guide that is designed to help you understand the processes we use to deliver and manage assessment-related processes, what support is available to you and how we agree and approve your results. It also provides you with an explanation of the codes we use when we issue results and transcripts.

When submitting work for assessment, you must ensure that it is all your own work. Failure to do this could result in sanctions, including removal from your course. The Academic Integrity Resource (AIR) has been designed to introduce you to academic integrity and how to demonstrate this during your studies. Remember to use the self-help resources to support your skills in academic writing. You could also Improve your assignment grades by accessing free university support to develop a wide range of relevant and valuable academic skills.

The University provides access to Studiosity that connects students with a team of writing specialists who are here to help you with writing and core skills - anytime, anywhere. Studiosity provides you with two online services: Writing Feedback and Connect Live.  Their Writing Feedback gives feedback on referencing, choice of language, structure and spelling/grammar within 24 hours. If you are not sure how to use the feedback to enhance your work before making a final submission, you can arrange to discuss this with a member of the Study Hub team. Connect Live also offers live support in areas such as basic English, maths and stats, science and generic study skills. Both services are available 24/7, 365 days of the year, and you can access them for FREE via BREO.

The CIS009-3 Incident Response assignment at the University of Bedfordshire focuses on practical cybersecurity investigations and incident reporting. Workingment Academy Writing Services provides academic guidance to help you understand topics such as AI-related cyberthreats, incident response methods, digital forensics and UK legal requirements. Get guidance on malware analysis using Security Onion, Kibana and Squil, investigating digital evidence, incident triage and preparing lessons-learned reports. Our Cyber Security Assignment Help covers key topics in the assessment, while IT Assignment Help provides guidance on technical concepts and investigation methods. You can also access Assignment Help UK for guidance across different academic subjects.

60-Second Quote

Get Your Free Academic Quote

No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential

Workingment Unique Features

Latest Free Samples for University Students

FLAT 15% OFF

AVAIL FLAT 10% OFF

+ Extra 5% OFF

FREE PLAGIARISM REPORT
Applicable on all orders
ORDER NOW →
★★★★★ 4.9/5 | 5118+ Reviews
WhatsApp
Online Assignment Help in UK