Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Entrepreneurship |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Bedfordshire | Module Title | BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship |
| Assessment deadline | Marks and feedback |
| To be submitted Before 10 a.m. on: | 20 working days after deadline (L3,4, 5,6 and 7) |
|
|
15 working days after deadline (block delivery) |
| 04/12/2026 | 11/01/2027 |
| Please note, for Exams the date is arranged centrally aligned to the academic calendar. Exams timetables will be released 6 weeks before the exam period. | |
Key assignment details |
||
| Unit title & code | Innovation and Entrepreneurship | BSS079-3 | |
| Assignment number & title | 001 | New Venture Business Plan Presentation | |
| Assignment type | Practical - Oral Presentation: individual recorded presentation (not an exam) | |
| Weighting of assignment | 100% | |
| Size or length of assessment or | 15-minute recorded oral presentation (3,000-word equivalent), supported by a cited slide deck and reference list | |
| Use of generative AI |
Permitted for research support, idea exploration, search-term generation and organisation of information, subject to University policy. All use must be critically verified and transparently acknowledged. Generative AI must not replace your own critical analysis, reflective evaluation or oral delivery, and must not be used to create a synthetic presenter. UG Business Checklist for Ethical Use of AI in Assessments.docx |
|
| Use of self-plagiarism | Not permitted. The venture proposal, analysis, slides and presentation must be newly produced for this assessment. Previously submitted work may not be reused unless explicitly authorised and appropriately cited. | |
| Anonymous marking | Not marked anonymously because the recorded oral presentation identifies the presenter. | |
| Understanding the assignment brief | ||
| Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit. |
28/09/2026 Date this discussion is to take place |
|
| Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria. | Enter link on the BREO shell | |
| What am I required to do in this assignment? |
|
Assessment task Produce an individual 15-minute recorded video presentation that presents and critically justifies a business plan for a new business venture. The venture may be an independent start-up or a clearly defined new corporate venture, product or service within an existing organisation. It must represent a credible new market opportunity rather than a minor operational improvement. Your presentation must:
Submission component:
Evidence and presentation requirements
Assessment support and draft-feedback limits
Learning outcomes assessed
|
| What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade? |
|
To pass this assessment (40% or above), your work must at minimum:
To achieve a strong grade, you should:
|
| Criterion / weighting |
70%+ (1st Class) |
60-69% (2:1) |
50-59% (2:2) |
40-49% (3rd Class) Threshold Standard |
30-39% (Fail) |
0-29% (Fail) |
| 20% Opportunity, innovation and market analysis (LO1) |
A distinctive and credible opportunity is established through sophisticated critical synthesis of business trends, customer need, market and competitor evidence. Innovation is clearly justified; assumptions and limitations are explicit. | A clear, credible opportunity is supported by strong evidence and well-selected concepts. Market need, context and innovation are critically evaluated, with only minor gaps. | A relevant opportunity is supported by sound but uneven analysis and adequate evidence. Some critical evaluation is present, although assumptions or market logic need further development. | An identifiable opportunity and basic market context are presented. Analysis is mainly descriptive and evidence or framework application is limited, but a plausible need is shown. | The opportunity is vague or weakly justified. Analysis is superficial, inaccurate, or poorly evidenced, with major gaps in the market and in the logic of innovation. | No coherent venture opportunity or meaningful market analysis is provided. Evidence is absent, irrelevant or seriously unreliable. |
| 25% Business model and integrated venture plan (LO1) |
An excellent, internally consistent business model and plan integrates the value proposition, customers, resources, partners, revenue/cost logic, and market entry and growth. Strategic choices and alternatives are critically justified. | A well-integrated and convincing business model and plan is presented. Key start-up and growth choices are well-reasoned, with strong links among the main business functions. | A generally coherent business model and plan cover the main requirements. Decisions are explained, although integration, prioritisation or growth logic is uneven. | A basic business plan covers essential functions and a recognisable business model. Links between components and strategic justification are limited but sufficient. | The business model or plan is incomplete, inconsistent or largely descriptive. Important functions, relationships or growth decisions are missing or implausible. | No viable business model or structured business plan is evident. |
| 20% Entrepreneurial leadership and critical self-reflection (LO2) |
Outstanding critical evaluation of the leadership, management and team capabilities required. Theory and self-assessment evidence are synthesised to produce insightful reflection and a specific, realistic development plan. | Strong evaluation of relevant capabilities, supported by theory and self-assessment. Reflection is well developed and leads to clear, realistic development priorities. | Sound discussion of relevant skills and attributes with some critical reflection. Evidence and development actions are appropriate but not consistently developed. | Relevant skills and attributes are identified and some reflection is offered. Evaluation is limited or generic, but the minimum requirements of LO2 are met. | Leadership and entrepreneurial capabilities are treated superficially. Reflection is weak, unsupported or disconnected from the venture. | No meaningful evaluation of entrepreneurial leadership, management or personal development is provided. |
| 25% Operational, marketing and financial viability (LO1 and LO2) |
A robust and integrated viability case uses transparent, well-supported assumptions. Operations, marketing, finance, implementation, risk, regulation, ethics and sustainability are critically evaluated, including sensitivities and mitigation. | A credible, well-justified viability case integrates operations, marketing and finance. Assumptions are clear, and key risks and responsible-practice issues are evaluated effectively. | The viability case is generally sound, with appropriate operational, marketing and financial content. Some assumptions, risks or responsible-practice considerations need deeper evaluation. | Basic operational, marketing and financial information is provided, including plausible costs, pricing or cash-flow evidence. Justification and risk evaluation are limited but sufficient. | Viability is weak or unclear. Data and assumptions are incomplete, inconsistent or unsupported, and major operational, financial or risk issues are omitted. | No credible evidence of how the venture would operate, reach customers or remain financially viable. |
| 10% Research, academic integrity and professional communication (LO1 and LO2) |
Extensive, high-quality evidence is critically synthesised and referenced accurately. AI use is transparent and ethical. Delivery is authoritative, focused, accessible and persuasive, with excellent visual support and time management. | Strong academic and industry research is well integrated and accurately referenced. Delivery is clear, professional, and well-structured, with effective visuals and transparent use of AI. | Adequate research and referencing support a generally clear presentation. Synthesis, delivery or visual quality is uneven but the argument remains understandable. | Sufficient research and citations are evident. Delivery and slides communicate the main argument, despite noticeable weaknesses in structure, clarity, referencing or timing. | Research is limited or poor quality; referencing or AI acknowledgement is inadequate. Delivery is unclear, poorly structured or difficult to follow. | Little or no credible research is evidenced. Academic integrity requirements are not met, or the presentation is absent/incoherent. |
| How does this assignment relate to ‘my learning in this unit and help me develop knowledge and skills that I will need for my future? |
|
This assessment is the culmination of the scheduled sessions on the external business environment, entrepreneurial leadership, corporate innovation, innovation and technology, disruptive opportunities, entrepreneurial motivation, new ventures, small-business marketing and management, and the entrepreneurial team. You will use that learning to make and defend an integrated venture decision rather than reproduce separate weekly topics. It develops your ability to recognise opportunity, use evidence, solve complex business problems, design an innovative business model, evaluate viability and communicate a professional proposal. It also requires you to evaluate the leadership and entrepreneurial capabilities needed to move an idea from concept to implementation. These are directly relevant to graduate and professional roles involving innovation, new product development, start-ups, business development, consultancy, project leadership, and small business management. The table below identifies the graduate competencies developed and evidenced through this assessment. |
| What should I be aware of when preparing my work? How and where should I submit my work? |
|
Submission
Academic integrity and evidence
Support and accessibility
|
Need Help With BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Assignment Brief
Get Assignment Expert HelpPreparing your BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship – New Venture Business Plan Presentation? Workingment offers academic guidance on developing business ideas, analysing market opportunities, creating business models, and preparing marketing, operational and financial plans. Get guidance on entrepreneurial leadership, business growth, risk evaluation and Harvard referencing through our Entrepreneurship Assignment Help and Business Plan Assignment Help services. You can also explore Business Management Assignment Help for relevant business concepts and Assignment Help UK for wider academic guidance. Visit Workingment to learn more.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content