BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Assignment Brief 2026/27 | UoB

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 04 Nov, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Entrepreneurship
University University of Bedfordshire Module Title BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Assignment Brief 

Assessment deadline Marks and feedback
To be submitted Before 10 a.m. on: 20 working days after deadline (L3,4, 5,6 and 7)

 

15 working days after deadline (block delivery)
04/12/2026 11/01/2027
Please note, for Exams the date is arranged centrally aligned to the academic calendar. Exams timetables will be released 6 weeks before the exam period.

 

Key assignment details

Unit title & code Innovation and Entrepreneurship | BSS079-3
Assignment number & title 001 | New Venture Business Plan Presentation
Assignment type Practical - Oral Presentation: individual recorded presentation (not an exam)
Weighting of assignment 100%
Size or length of assessment or 15-minute recorded oral presentation (3,000-word equivalent), supported by a cited slide deck and reference list
Use of generative AI

Permitted for research support, idea exploration, search-term generation and organisation of information, subject to University policy. All use must be critically verified and transparently acknowledged. Generative AI must not replace your own critical analysis, reflective evaluation or oral delivery, and must not be used to create a synthetic presenter. UG Business Checklist for Ethical Use of AI in Assessments.docx

Use of self-plagiarism Not permitted. The venture proposal, analysis, slides and presentation must be newly produced for this assessment. Previously submitted work may not be reused unless explicitly authorised and appropriately cited.
Anonymous marking Not marked anonymously because the recorded oral presentation identifies the presenter.
Understanding the assignment brief
Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit.

28/09/2026

Date this discussion is to take place

Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria. Enter link on the BREO shell

Completing your assignment

What am I required to do in this assignment?

Assessment task

Produce an individual 15-minute recorded video presentation that presents and critically justifies a business plan for a new business venture. The venture may be an independent start-up or a clearly defined new corporate venture, product or service within an existing organisation. It must represent a credible new market opportunity rather than a minor operational improvement.

Your presentation must:

  • Define the customer problem or unmet need and explain the venture’s innovative value proposition;
  • Critically analyse the external environment, target market, customers and competitors using current and credible evidence and appropriate frameworks;
  • Explain and justify the proposed business model and start-up or growth strategy;
  • Present an integrated marketing, operational and financial plan, including realistic assumptions about costs, pricing, revenue and viability;
  • Explain how the venture will operate, including delivery processes, technology/AI tools and key implementation milestones.
  • Critically evaluate the entrepreneurial leadership, management and team capabilities required to establish and operate the venture;
  • Evaluate relevant risks, ethical considerations, sustainability implications and legal or regulatory requirements; and
  • Conclude with a clear, evidence-based recommendation on whether and how the venture should proceed.

Submission component:

  • One recorded video presentation in the file format specified on BREO.
  • The presentation slide deck, containing in-text citations and a complete Harvard-style reference list.
  • Only essential supporting appendices, such as financial calculations or research tables. Appendices support the oral presentation; they are not a substitute for presenting and evaluating the key evidence.

Evidence and presentation requirements

  • Use a balanced range of relevant academic and credible practitioner, industry and official sources. Clearly distinguish sourced facts from your own assumptions or estimates.
  • Apply concepts and frameworks critically. Do not present models as descriptive lists; use them to reach and justify decisions.
  • All sources, data, images and permitted use of generative AI must be acknowledged in accordance with university requirements.
  • The video recorded delivery must be your own voice and must be clear, professional and accessible. Slides should be readable and the recording should remain focused on the assessed business plan.
  • This is an individual assessment. Discussion and peer learning are encouraged during teaching, but the assessed venture, analysis and presentation must be your own work.

Assessment support and draft-feedback limits

  • Assessment support sessions will be provided before the end of Week 7 and again in Week 11, before the submission deadline.
  • Tutors will clarify the task, discuss your venture concept, proposed frameworks and give feedback to improve.
  • Use Student Support Hours, the library, Academic Skills support and Studiosity early enough to act on the guidance received.

Learning outcomes assessed

  • LO1 - Demonstrate critical understanding of the role of corporate innovation and the entrepreneurial character, start-up and growth strategies, and business planning.
  • LO2 - Critically evaluate the skills and attributes required in the leadership, operation and management of an entrepreneurial organisation.
What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade?

To pass this assessment (40% or above), your work must at minimum:

  • present a clear new business venture and a basic evidence-based explanation of the opportunity;
  • apply relevant innovation, entrepreneurship and business-planning concepts covering the essential market, operational, and leadership viability;
  • identify and evaluate relevant entrepreneurial leadership and management skills and attributes; and
  • demonstrate research through appropriate citations and a Harvard-style reference list;

To achieve a strong grade, you should:

  • synthesise academic and industry evidence rather than relying on description or unsupported opinion;
  • make explicit, justified choices and evaluate alternatives, limitations, assumptions and risks;
  • integrate the market, business model, operations, leadership, marketing and finance into one internally consistent plan;
  • show critical self-awareness and a realistic plan for developing the entrepreneurial and leadership capabilities required; and
  • deliver a focused, professional and persuasive presentation with accurate referencing and transparent academic practice.
Criterion /
weighting

 70%+

(1st Class)

60-69%

(2:1)

50-59%

(2:2)

40-49%

(3rd Class)

Threshold Standard

30-39%

(Fail)

0-29%

(Fail)

20%
Opportunity, innovation and market analysis (LO1)
A distinctive and credible opportunity is established through sophisticated critical synthesis of business trends, customer need, market and competitor evidence. Innovation is clearly justified; assumptions and limitations are explicit. A clear, credible opportunity is supported by strong evidence and well-selected concepts. Market need, context and innovation are critically evaluated, with only minor gaps. A relevant opportunity is supported by sound but uneven analysis and adequate evidence. Some critical evaluation is present, although assumptions or market logic need further development. An identifiable opportunity and basic market context are presented. Analysis is mainly descriptive and evidence or framework application is limited, but a plausible need is shown. The opportunity is vague or weakly justified. Analysis is superficial, inaccurate, or poorly evidenced, with major gaps in the market and in the logic of innovation. No coherent venture opportunity or meaningful market analysis is provided. Evidence is absent, irrelevant or seriously unreliable.
25%
Business model and integrated venture plan (LO1)
An excellent, internally consistent business model and plan integrates the value proposition, customers, resources, partners, revenue/cost logic, and market entry and growth. Strategic choices and alternatives are critically justified. A well-integrated and convincing business model and plan is presented. Key start-up and growth choices are well-reasoned, with strong links among the main business functions. A generally coherent business model and plan cover the main requirements. Decisions are explained, although integration, prioritisation or growth logic is uneven. A basic business plan covers essential functions and a recognisable business model. Links between components and strategic justification are limited but sufficient. The business model or plan is incomplete, inconsistent or largely descriptive. Important functions, relationships or growth decisions are missing or implausible. No viable business model or structured business plan is evident.
20%
Entrepreneurial leadership and critical self-reflection (LO2)
Outstanding critical evaluation of the leadership, management and team capabilities required. Theory and self-assessment evidence are synthesised to produce insightful reflection and a specific, realistic development plan. Strong evaluation of relevant capabilities, supported by theory and self-assessment. Reflection is well developed and leads to clear, realistic development priorities. Sound discussion of relevant skills and attributes with some critical reflection. Evidence and development actions are appropriate but not consistently developed. Relevant skills and attributes are identified and some reflection is offered. Evaluation is limited or generic, but the minimum requirements of LO2 are met. Leadership and entrepreneurial capabilities are treated superficially. Reflection is weak, unsupported or disconnected from the venture. No meaningful evaluation of entrepreneurial leadership, management or personal development is provided.
25%
Operational, marketing and financial viability (LO1 and LO2)
A robust and integrated viability case uses transparent, well-supported assumptions. Operations, marketing, finance, implementation, risk, regulation, ethics and sustainability are critically evaluated, including sensitivities and mitigation. A credible, well-justified viability case integrates operations, marketing and finance. Assumptions are clear, and key risks and responsible-practice issues are evaluated effectively. The viability case is generally sound, with appropriate operational, marketing and financial content. Some assumptions, risks or responsible-practice considerations need deeper evaluation. Basic operational, marketing and financial information is provided, including plausible costs, pricing or cash-flow evidence. Justification and risk evaluation are limited but sufficient. Viability is weak or unclear. Data and assumptions are incomplete, inconsistent or unsupported, and major operational, financial or risk issues are omitted. No credible evidence of how the venture would operate, reach customers or remain financially viable.
10%
Research, academic integrity and professional communication (LO1 and LO2)
Extensive, high-quality evidence is critically synthesised and referenced accurately. AI use is transparent and ethical. Delivery is authoritative, focused, accessible and persuasive, with excellent visual support and time management. Strong academic and industry research is well integrated and accurately referenced. Delivery is clear, professional, and well-structured, with effective visuals and transparent use of AI. Adequate research and referencing support a generally clear presentation. Synthesis, delivery or visual quality is uneven but the argument remains understandable. Sufficient research and citations are evident. Delivery and slides communicate the main argument, despite noticeable weaknesses in structure, clarity, referencing or timing. Research is limited or poor quality; referencing or AI acknowledgement is inadequate. Delivery is unclear, poorly structured or difficult to follow. Little or no credible research is evidenced. Academic integrity requirements are not met, or the presentation is absent/incoherent.

Additional information

How does this assignment relate to ‘my learning in this unit and help me develop knowledge and skills that I will need for my future?

This assessment is the culmination of the scheduled sessions on the external business environment, entrepreneurial leadership, corporate innovation, innovation and technology, disruptive opportunities, entrepreneurial motivation, new ventures, small-business marketing and management, and the entrepreneurial team. You will use that learning to make and defend an integrated venture decision rather than reproduce separate weekly topics.

It develops your ability to recognise opportunity, use evidence, solve complex business problems, design an innovative business model, evaluate viability and communicate a professional proposal. It also requires you to evaluate the leadership and entrepreneurial capabilities needed to move an idea from concept to implementation.

These are directly relevant to graduate and professional roles involving innovation, new product development, start-ups, business development, consultancy, project leadership, and small business management.

The table below identifies the graduate competencies developed and evidenced through this assessment.

What should I be aware of when preparing my work? How and where should I submit my work?

Submission

  • Submit through the BSS079-3 assessment submission point in BREO before 10 a.m. on the confirmed Week 11 deadline.
  • Upload the recorded presentation, the final slide deck and only the permitted supporting appendices. Follow the file-format and naming instructions published in BREO.
  • Before submitting, verify that the recording opens, the audio is clear, all slides are legible and every required file is attached. Retain your submission receipt.

Academic integrity and evidence

  • The analysis, reflective evaluation and oral delivery must be your own. Cite all sources, datasets, images, frameworks and externally produced material using the required Harvard style.
  • Any permitted generative-AI use must be critically checked and transparently acknowledged. Do not submit fabricated sources, unverifiable data, AI-generated analysis presented as your own, or a synthetic voice/avatar.
  • Do not use confidential or personal data without authority. Anonymise sensitive information and use reliable public or appropriately authorised evidence.
  • Appendices are not a place for undeveloped arguments. The key analysis and conclusions must be communicated within the assessed presentation.

Support and accessibility

  • Use the assessment explanation, rubric, BREO materials, library resources, Student Support Hours, Academic Skills support, Studiosity and the two planned assessment-support sessions.
  • Create readable slides, use clear spoken delivery and add captions or a transcript where the submission guidance requires this. Contact the University support services promptly if you need an agreed reasonable adjustment.
  • The exact AY26-27 deadline, feedback date, recording method and upload formats must be confirmed in BREO before submission.

Need Help With BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Assignment Brief

Get Assignment Expert Help

Preparing your BSS079-3 Innovation and Entrepreneurship – New Venture Business Plan Presentation? Workingment offers academic guidance on developing business ideas, analysing market opportunities, creating business models, and preparing marketing, operational and financial plans. Get guidance on entrepreneurial leadership, business growth, risk evaluation and Harvard referencing through our Entrepreneurship Assignment Help and Business Plan Assignment Help services. You can also explore Business Management Assignment Help for relevant business concepts and Assignment Help UK for wider academic guidance. Visit Workingment to learn more.

60-Second Quote

Get Your Free Academic Quote

No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential

Workingment Unique Features

Latest Free Samples for University Students

FLAT 15% OFF

AVAIL FLAT 10% OFF

+ Extra 5% OFF

FREE PLAGIARISM REPORT
Applicable on all orders
ORDER NOW →
★★★★★ 4.9/5 | 5118+ Reviews
WhatsApp
Online Assignment Help in UK