UK's No.1 Assignment Help, Trusted Since 2018
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Huddersfield | Module Title | BIT2027 Applied Project Management |
| Assessment Type | Project Work |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2026-27 |
Software
Students will use the following software to complete the assessment. All required tools are free and accessible through a web browser:
You are required to produce an individual academic poster with an accompanying 1,500-word analytical and reflective commentary, based on a selected or simulated project case scenario. The poster should visually present key project management components, including: scope definition, stakeholder and team analysis, risk assessment, data interpretation (e.g., time, cost, quality, or performance metrics), and lessons learned.
As part of the assessment, you must use Google Gemini and Google AI Studio (Build Function) to create a small AI-powered tool that supports one or more project management tasks (e.g., a risk analysis generator, stakeholder mapping engine, scheduling calculator, EVM interpreter, or scope assessment tool). You will integrate the outputs of this AI tool into your poster and critically evaluate its usefulness in the accompanying text.
This assessment requires the application of project management principles, tools, and techniques to analyse a project scenario and communicate findings through both visual and written formats. The following expectations apply:
1. Core Knowledge Requirements (Level 5)
To achieve a pass, you must demonstrate understanding of:
2. Supporting Evidence and Sources
Your work should draw upon:
You are encouraged to integrate appropriate tables, visuals, and data summaries where relevant.
3. Core Intellectual and Cognitive Skills (Level 5)
Your assessment must demonstrate:
4. Writing Style, Structure, and Presentation
Poster:
Accompanying Text (1,500 words):
5. Other Assessed Skills
This assessment also evaluates:
6. Word Count Guidance
Included in the word count (1,500 words):
Not included in the word count:
You will be penalised for exceeding the word limit by ±10%.
This is a template only. Schools are required to add to the criteria with subject-specific language in accordance with the assessment and assessment type. Schools must ensure that they include the full criteria they will use to provide clear indications of how achievement of module learning outcomes may be demonstrated, thereby promoting the reliability of assessment. The marking criteria should be kept in the Module Handbook.
Once completed, this guidance (in red text) should be deleted.
| General / Knowledge | Grade Range | Description |
1. Presentation and Structure 2. Understanding / Skills 3. Selection of cited material |
|---|---|---|---|
| General / Knowledge | 80 and above | Outstanding work, demonstrating comprehensive mastery of knowledge, understanding and extensive critical appreciation of the subject area. |
1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. Some degree of originality. 2. Evidence of highly significant and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Very significant evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Sources used selectively and skilfully to support the argument. Referencing is extensive, accurate and relevant |
| General / Knowledge | 70-79 | Excellent work, demonstrating mastery of knowledge, understanding and critical appreciation of the subject area |
1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of highly significant and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Significant evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Sources used selectively and skilfully to support the argument. Referencing is extensive, accurate and relevant |
| General / Knowledge | 60-69 | Very good work, demonstrating very good knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area |
1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of very good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is appropriate, accurate and relevant. |
| General / Knowledge | 50-59 | Good work, demonstrating good knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area |
1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of some reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is adequate, accurate and relevant. |
| General / Knowledge | 40-49 | Satisfactory work, demonstrating sufficient knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area. |
1. Work is structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. Some evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of some limited reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is limited. |
| General / Knowledge | 30-39 | Unsatisfactory work: Demonstrating very limited knowledge or understanding of the subject area |
1. Work is not structured well or academically presented with a lack of attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. Minimal evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Some evidence of some limited reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is minimal. |
| General / Knowledge | 0-29 | Poor / very poor work Demonstrating inadequate, limited knowledge and fragmentary understanding of the subject area. |
1. Work is not structured well or academically presented with a lack of attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. No or very limited evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. No or very limited evidence of further reading and referencing |
Hire Experts To Solve BIT2027 Applied Project Management Assignment Before the Deadline
Order Non-Plagiarised AssignmentDo you need support with your BIT2027 Applied Project Management Assignment? Our easy and friendly Project Management Assignment Help is here to guide you through every topic. You can use our clear assignment examples and Samples to understand how to structure your work and improve your learning. With reliable Assignment Help UK, you get simple explanations, helpful tips, and study guidance to boost your confidence. Make your assignment journey stress-free—learn better, understand more, and move forward with success!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
