Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Healthcrae |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of the West of England | Module Title | USPJVV-30-M Biopsychosocial Perspectives on Health |
| Word Count | 2000 |
|---|
| Module title | Biopsychosocial Perspectives on Health |
| Module code | USPJVV-30-M |
| Assessment title | Assignment 1: Essay 2,000 words |
| Assessment type | Written assessment |
| Assessment weighting | 30% of total module mark |
| Size or length of assessment | 2,000 (no +/- 10% to be used) see New Assessment Content Limit Policy for the University (sharepoint.com) |
Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:
Generative Artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools should not be used
The purpose and format of this assessment make it inappropriate and/or impractical for GenAI tools to be used to successfully demonstrate the appropriate skills and knowledge.
You are permitted to use technology to assist with:
Please note that the aim of referencing is to demonstrate you have read and understood a range of sources to evidence your key points. You need to list the references consistently and in such a way as to ensure the reader can follow up on the sources for themselves.
Your referencing should be accurate and using UWE Cite Them Right Harvard style:
Referencing - Study skills | UWE Bristol
Submission and feedback dates
Submission format: Word document
Marks and Feedback due on: 10th December 2026
N.B. all times are 24-hour clock, current local time (at time of submission) in the UK
Marks and Feedback will be provided via:
Feedback will be provided through Blackboard, using a feedback sheet and embedded comments.
Critically evaluate our understanding of how our health needs change over the lifespan with reference to (a particular long term health condition of your choice)
Please read the information related to this module on Blackboard, including the BPS Module Handbook and lectures, suggested readings and all the information about the assessments on the BPS Blackboard pages.
1. Choose one physical long term health condition and define it. If you are unsure if the chosen condition meets the brief for the essay, ask the module leader.
2. Define what ‘health needs’ are in the context of the essay
3. Draw on developmental/lifespan theory (e.g. Piaget, Erikson, Kohlberg) to understand health needs across the lifespan change over time for your chosen physical health condition (see lectures)
4. Draw on health psychology literature/research/policy relevant to the chosen condition
5. Critique- take alternative perspectives and critique methods of included studies to come to overall conclusions
6. Ensure you answer the question, summarizing the key essay points in the conclusion
1) Please clearly introduce the essay with a statement and explanation of the chosen long term condition.
2) Ensure your essay is well structured and includes an introduction, main body and conclusion to your essay.
3) Ensure you follow guidance on referencing (UWE Cite Them Right Harvard)
4) Excellent spelling, grammar and presentation (including 11 or 12 font, Arial, 1.5 spacing)
5) Proof read your work to ensure that there are no typos.
6) Clear title, student number (not name) and submit through myUWE Blackboard
Please read this assessment brief and read the module pages on Blackboard, including the BPS Module Handbook and lectures, suggested readings and all the information about the assessments.
Please refer to UWE marking criteria which is under the Assessments section on the BPS module Blackboard pages.
Marks over 70% will be achieved where the submission is a very good and competent piece of work, demonstrating very good critical awareness and analysis of the subject. Comprehensive understanding of knowledge, with the ability to develop critiques at an advanced level.
There will be evidence of originality; negligible errors or omissions. There will be notably good presentation/communication of ideas and comprehension.
All lecture content so far on the module is closely related to the assessment.
It is recommended that you review all of the relevant materials on Blackboard. You can also speak to your module leader for advice and guidance.
UWE Bristol offer a range of Assessment Support Options that you can explore through this link, and both Academic Support and Wellbeing Support are available.
For further information, please see the Student study essentials.
Use the support above if you feel unable to submit your own work for this module.
-Ensure you put your work through SafeAssign (in plenty of time so that you can make any changes if required). SafeAssign is a student submissions originality checker provided by Blackboard which helps identify plagiarism by detecting unoriginal content in student submissions.
- Read the academic conduct policy: academic-conduct-policy-and-academic-misconduct-procedures (1).pdf
Your assessment will be marked according to the following marking criteria.
You can use these to evaluate your own work before you submit.
| Level M/FHEQ Level 7 | Indicative Qualities | |
| 100 - 90% | Outstanding | An exceptional and outstanding piece of academic work; showing advanced and critical awareness at the forefront of the discipline or professional practice. Exceptional use of appropriate texts, research and other learning materials, well beyond the taught content, displaying new insights and advanced scholarship; mastery of clarity in argument and communication. Exemplary. |
| 89 - 80% | Excellent | An excellent piece of academic work clearly demonstrating critical awareness of the discipline, current research or professional practice. Evidence of originality and advanced scholarship. Excellent analysis in most areas; use of new sources and approaches evident; balanced in analysis and argument. Clarity of argument and comprehensive knowledge. |
| 79 - 70% | Very Good | A very good and competent piece of work, demonstrating very good critical awareness and analysis of the subject. Comprehensive understanding of knowledge, with the ability to develop critiques at an advanced level. Evidence of originality; negligible errors or omissions. Notably good presentation/communication of ideas and comprehension. |
| 69 - 60% | Good | A good piece of academic work demonstrating the ability to critically evaluate. Good knowledge and understanding of the discipline or professional practice. Some ability to develop critiques at an advanced level and some evidence of originality. Good understanding of main concepts/current issues/developments, but could be further developed and strengthened with greater focus and more in-depth analysis. Good evidence of appropriate reading. Accurately and appropriately referenced. |
| 59 - 50% | Pass | Meets the relevant learning outcomes. Some basic critical awareness and review of existing literature/policy and/or concepts/current issues/developments is present. Analysis is evident but could be strengthened in originality and/or scope. Some evidence of appropriate focussed reading. Synthesis and evaluation limited but evident. Communication of ideas is mostly clear/coherent but presentation/structure could be improved. |
| 49 - 40% | Marginal Fail | Little evidence of understanding and overall not reaching the minimum pass standard due to some key omissions in presentation, argument or structure. Limited critique and evaluation, and argument needs further development. Content not always relevant. Limited evidence of reading. |
| 39 - 30% | Limited | Some evidence of effort but missing essential aspects. May be lacking in evidence of understanding, focus and structure. Likely to have no analysis or discussion and material may lack of relevance. Presentation may need to be improved. Likely to show insufficient evidence of reading. |
QAA descriptor for a higher education qualification at Level M
conceptual understanding that enables the student:
-to evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline
-to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and, where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses.
UWE information:
1. In line with UWE Bristol’s Assessment Content Limit Policy (formerly the Word Count Policy), word count includes all text, including (but not limited to): the main body of text (including headings), all citations (both in and out of brackets), text boxes, tables and graphs, figures and diagrams, quotes, lists.
2. UWE Bristol’s UWE’s Assessment Offences Policy requires that you submit work that is entirely your own and reflects your own learning, so it is important to:
When submitting your work, you will be required to confirm that the work is your own, and text-matching software and other methods are routinely used to check submissions against other submissions to the university and internet sources. Details of what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it can be found on UWE’s Study Skills pages about avoiding plagiarism.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
ahdhjs