UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance Assessment Brief

Published: 28 Aug, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Accounting
University University of the West of England Bristol (UWE Bristol) Module Title UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance

UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance Assessment Brief

Module learning outcomes

Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:

MO1 Critically evaluate and analyse a range of accounting and finance issues.
MO2 Critically engage with an appropriate cross section of significant accounting and finance research writings, demonstrating an understanding of their assumptions, methodology, methods, and significance.
MO3 Present cogent reviews of complex and sophisticated accounting and finance research work in both written and oral forms
MO4 Make discriminating use of a range of information resources in order to identify appropriate source material, compile bibliographies, inform research and enhance presentations.

Completing your assessment 

What am I required to do on this assessment?

The assignment for this module is to write a critical review of the literature in the area of your dissertation. Your work should be no longer than 2,500 words. It is worth 60% of the marks on this module. This coursework should be based on a relevant topic in accounting and finance. You are expected to provide a critique of the relevant literature on this topic. The review should show the relevant body of literature and research on this topic in such a way that allows you to highlight the importance of your topic and how your research will contribute to knowledge in the research area. 

Where should I start?

Carefully read the entire assignment brief, including its requirements, and attend the lectures throughout the academic semester and the lecture dedicated to the assignment – please refer to the teaching plan for the lecture date.

What do I need to do to pass? 

Please refer to the marking criteria below and the requirements of the assignments. You need to achieve a score of 50% or more to pass this assignment. 

Assessment Criteria for the Literature Review

The assessment criteria below will be used to mark your submission. It should help you to structure your work and to present an appropriate level of work that is indicative of a clear understanding of the core issues relevant to the topic of your research. 

Student name:
Student number:

Mark:

CONTENT:

 

 

 

 

 

An informative introduction which identifies scope of the review

A

B

C

D

E

Appropriate brief coverage of relationship with dissertation

A

B

C

D

E

Identification of broad scope (or categories of) academic literature to be addressed and the specific publications which are the principal focus of the review

A

B

C

D

E

Demonstration of knowledge of debates through citing of authors and their arguments

A

B

C

D

E

Examination of reliability through discussion of research methodologies of publications reviewed & evidence provided (e.g., statistical surveys, case studies).

A

B

C

D

E

Critical engagement with important publications

A

B

C

D

E

Critical analysis of the centrally important issues that have been identified; if possible, through discussion of at least two differing views on each

A

B

C

D

E

Locating of issues within a wider context of academic debate or business concerns

A

B

C

D

E

Synthesis of different strands reviewed

A

B

C

D

E

Breadth of reading

A

B

C

D

E

Depth of coverage

A

B

C

D

E

Evidence of understanding of publications reviewed

A

B

C

D

E

Structure of argument

A

B

C

D

E

Evidence of originality of thought/creativity

A

B

C

D

E

A clear conclusion based on the case made in the review

A

B

C

D

E

PRESENTATION:

 

 

 

 

 

Use of subheadings

A

B

C

D

E

Correct format of referencing*

A

B

C

D

E

Writing style (coherence and fluency)

A

B

C

D

E

Spelling and grammar

A

B

C

D

E

Do You Need UMACTU-15-M Assignment of This Question

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

How do I achieve high marks in this assessment? 

Please refer to the marking criteria above and the characteristics of work that achieves a 2:1 or 1st.

How does the learning and teaching relate to the assessment? 

All lectures are equally important to understand the principles and concepts relevant to the contemporary issues in accounting and finance.  

What additional resources may help me complete this assessment?

  • All Blackboard materials that are relevant to your chosen topic. 
  • Support given will be limited to exploring the possible interpretations of the assignment.
  • Your independent research and time management. 
  • My office hours are on Tuesdays 11-1 pm 

What do I do if I am concerned about completing this assessment?

UWE Bristol offer a range of Assessment Support Options that you can explore through this link, and both Academic Support and Wellbeing Support are available.

For further information, please see the Academic Survival Guide.

How do I avoid an Assessment Offence on this module?

Use the support above if you feel unable to submit your own work for this module. 

Avoid plagiarism (taking sentences, arguments, and chunks from somebody else’s work - for instance from the Internet) and collusion withother students (that is working together on the same piece of work) and other types of assessment offences. Make every effort to write your own sentences with originality (not copied). Avoid contract cheating as having the work done by someone else is a serious offence and is punished very heavily. Please refer to the UWE webpages for further information at Assessment offences - Assessments | UWE Bristol.

Marks and Feedback

Your assessment will be marked according to the following marking criteria.

Issue

Grade A

Grade B+

Grade B

Grade C

Refer / Fail

Relevance to assignment brief 

Assignment’s aims and themes are integral to the assignment.

Clear focus on the themes of the assignment.

Mainly focused on the themes of the assignment.

Some of the writing is focused on the themes of the assignment.

Makes no attempt to address the themes of the assignment.

Extent of evaluation 

Evaluation within assignment rigorous and appropriate.

Good clear evidence of evaluation carried out within assignment.

Evaluation reasonably well carried out.

Some attempt at evaluation within assignment.

No attempt at evaluation within assignment.

Quality of reasoning 

Analytical and clear conclusions well-grounded in theory and literature, showing development of new concepts.

Good development as shown in summary of arguments based on theory/literature and beginnings of synthesis.

Evidence of findings and conclusions grounded in theory / literature.

Limited evidence of findings and conclusions supported by the literature and theory.

Unsubstantiated / invalid conclusion, based on anecdotes and generalisations only.

Skill at facilitating discussion 

Excellent enabling pacing and summarising of discussion.

Clear evidence of ability to stimulate, facilitate and summarise discussion.

Some ability to stimulate and facilitate discussion or be directive.

Some ability to facilitate discussion but tendency to miss opportunities.

Inability to stimulate/ facilitate discussion.

Clarity and quality of written expression 

Clarity of expression excellent. Consistently accurate use of grammar and spelling professional / academic writing style.

Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate and language fluent.

Language mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate.

Meaning apparent but language not always fluent, grammar and spelling still poor.

Purpose and meaning of assignment unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor.

Understanding of subject 

Work shows a well-co-ordinated, grounded, and reasoned understanding of topic and its relevance to practice.

Consistent understanding demonstrated in a logical, coherent, and lucid manner.

Demonstrates understanding in a style which is logical, coherent, and flowing.

Attempts a logical and coherent understanding of the subject area.

Fails to demonstrate understanding of the subject/topic area.

Referencing 

Referencing clear, relevant and consistently accurate using the Harvard system.

Referencing relevant and mostly accurate using the Harvard system.

Minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing using the Harvard system.

Referencing present but had inconsistencies and inaccuracies.

Referencing inaccurate or absent.

Use of literature 

Has developed own ideas and justified using a wide range of sources of theories and literature which has been thoroughly analysed, applied, and tested.

Ability to appraise critically the theory and literature from a variety of courses, developing own ideas in the process.

Clear evidence and application of readings relevant to the subject within the text.

Evidence of some limited reading around the subject.

Little or no evidence of reading around the subject.

You can use these to evaluate your own work before you submit.

1.In line with UWE Bristol’s Assessment Content Limit Policy (formerly the Word Count Policy), word count includes all text, including (but not limited to): the main body of text (including headings), all citations (both in and out of brackets), text boxes, tables and graphs, figures and diagrams, quotes, lists. 

2.UWE Bristol’s UWE’s Assessment Offences Policy requires that you submit work that is entirely your own and reflects your own learning, so it is important to:

  • Ensure you reference all sources used, using the UWE Harvard system and the guidance available on UWE’s Study Skills referencing pages. 
  • Avoid copying and pasting any work into this assessment, including your own previous assessments, work from other students or internet sources
  • Develop your own style, arguments and wording, so avoid copying sources and changing individual words but keeping, essentially, the same sentences and/or structures from other sources
  • Never give your work to others who may copy it
  • If an individual assessment, develop your own work and preparation, and do not allow anyone to make amends on your work (including proof-readers, who may highlight issues but not edit the work) and When submitting your work, you will be required to confirm that the work is your own, and text-matching software and other methods are routinely used to check submissions against other submissions to the university and internet sources. Details of what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it can be found on UWE’s Study Skills pages about avoiding plagiarism.

Buy Answer of UMACTU-15-M Assignment & Raise Your Grades

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Are you worried about the UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance Assignment? then no need to worry anymore! Our experts provide Accounting Assignment Help that has been designed for the students. You will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with UWE Bristol assignment samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

Customer Experience Strategy CW4 Formative Assessment Report Example | BPP

Category: Report Writing Example

Subject: Management

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: Customer Experience Strategy

View Free Samples

BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan) Assignment Sample 2024-25, Sem3 | BCU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Birmingham City University

Module Title: BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan)

View Free Samples

RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Roehampton

Module Title: RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management

View Free Samples

HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership AS2 Reflective Portfolio Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Northampton

Module Title: HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership

View Free Samples

ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: University of Greenwich (UOG)

Module Title: ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK