Category | Assignment | Subject | Accounting |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of the West of England Bristol (UWE Bristol) | Module Title | UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance |
Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:
MO1 Critically evaluate and analyse a range of accounting and finance issues.
MO2 Critically engage with an appropriate cross section of significant accounting and finance research writings, demonstrating an understanding of their assumptions, methodology, methods, and significance.
MO3 Present cogent reviews of complex and sophisticated accounting and finance research work in both written and oral forms
MO4 Make discriminating use of a range of information resources in order to identify appropriate source material, compile bibliographies, inform research and enhance presentations.
The assignment for this module is to write a critical review of the literature in the area of your dissertation. Your work should be no longer than 2,500 words. It is worth 60% of the marks on this module. This coursework should be based on a relevant topic in accounting and finance. You are expected to provide a critique of the relevant literature on this topic. The review should show the relevant body of literature and research on this topic in such a way that allows you to highlight the importance of your topic and how your research will contribute to knowledge in the research area.
Carefully read the entire assignment brief, including its requirements, and attend the lectures throughout the academic semester and the lecture dedicated to the assignment – please refer to the teaching plan for the lecture date.
Please refer to the marking criteria below and the requirements of the assignments. You need to achieve a score of 50% or more to pass this assignment.
The assessment criteria below will be used to mark your submission. It should help you to structure your work and to present an appropriate level of work that is indicative of a clear understanding of the core issues relevant to the topic of your research.
Student name:
Student number:
Mark:
CONTENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
An informative introduction which identifies scope of the review |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Appropriate brief coverage of relationship with dissertation |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Identification of broad scope (or categories of) academic literature to be addressed and the specific publications which are the principal focus of the review |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Demonstration of knowledge of debates through citing of authors and their arguments |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Examination of reliability through discussion of research methodologies of publications reviewed & evidence provided (e.g., statistical surveys, case studies). |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Critical engagement with important publications |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Critical analysis of the centrally important issues that have been identified; if possible, through discussion of at least two differing views on each |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Locating of issues within a wider context of academic debate or business concerns |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Synthesis of different strands reviewed |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Breadth of reading |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Depth of coverage |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Evidence of understanding of publications reviewed |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Structure of argument |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Evidence of originality of thought/creativity |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
A clear conclusion based on the case made in the review |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
PRESENTATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
Use of subheadings |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Correct format of referencing* |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Writing style (coherence and fluency) |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Spelling and grammar |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
Do You Need UMACTU-15-M Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentPlease refer to the marking criteria above and the characteristics of work that achieves a 2:1 or 1st.
All lectures are equally important to understand the principles and concepts relevant to the contemporary issues in accounting and finance.
What additional resources may help me complete this assessment?
UWE Bristol offer a range of Assessment Support Options that you can explore through this link, and both Academic Support and Wellbeing Support are available.
For further information, please see the Academic Survival Guide.
Use the support above if you feel unable to submit your own work for this module.
Avoid plagiarism (taking sentences, arguments, and chunks from somebody else’s work - for instance from the Internet) and collusion withother students (that is working together on the same piece of work) and other types of assessment offences. Make every effort to write your own sentences with originality (not copied). Avoid contract cheating as having the work done by someone else is a serious offence and is punished very heavily. Please refer to the UWE webpages for further information at Assessment offences - Assessments | UWE Bristol.
Your assessment will be marked according to the following marking criteria.
Issue |
Grade A |
Grade B+ |
Grade B |
Grade C |
Refer / Fail |
Relevance to assignment brief |
Assignment’s aims and themes are integral to the assignment. |
Clear focus on the themes of the assignment. |
Mainly focused on the themes of the assignment. |
Some of the writing is focused on the themes of the assignment. |
Makes no attempt to address the themes of the assignment. |
Extent of evaluation |
Evaluation within assignment rigorous and appropriate. |
Good clear evidence of evaluation carried out within assignment. |
Evaluation reasonably well carried out. |
Some attempt at evaluation within assignment. |
No attempt at evaluation within assignment. |
Quality of reasoning |
Analytical and clear conclusions well-grounded in theory and literature, showing development of new concepts. |
Good development as shown in summary of arguments based on theory/literature and beginnings of synthesis. |
Evidence of findings and conclusions grounded in theory / literature. |
Limited evidence of findings and conclusions supported by the literature and theory. |
Unsubstantiated / invalid conclusion, based on anecdotes and generalisations only. |
Skill at facilitating discussion |
Excellent enabling pacing and summarising of discussion. |
Clear evidence of ability to stimulate, facilitate and summarise discussion. |
Some ability to stimulate and facilitate discussion or be directive. |
Some ability to facilitate discussion but tendency to miss opportunities. |
Inability to stimulate/ facilitate discussion. |
Clarity and quality of written expression |
Clarity of expression excellent. Consistently accurate use of grammar and spelling professional / academic writing style. |
Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed. Grammar and spelling accurate and language fluent. |
Language mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate. |
Meaning apparent but language not always fluent, grammar and spelling still poor. |
Purpose and meaning of assignment unclear. Language, grammar and spelling poor. |
Understanding of subject |
Work shows a well-co-ordinated, grounded, and reasoned understanding of topic and its relevance to practice. |
Consistent understanding demonstrated in a logical, coherent, and lucid manner. |
Demonstrates understanding in a style which is logical, coherent, and flowing. |
Attempts a logical and coherent understanding of the subject area. |
Fails to demonstrate understanding of the subject/topic area. |
Referencing |
Referencing clear, relevant and consistently accurate using the Harvard system. |
Referencing relevant and mostly accurate using the Harvard system. |
Minor inconsistencies and inaccuracies in referencing using the Harvard system. |
Referencing present but had inconsistencies and inaccuracies. |
Referencing inaccurate or absent. |
Use of literature |
Has developed own ideas and justified using a wide range of sources of theories and literature which has been thoroughly analysed, applied, and tested. |
Ability to appraise critically the theory and literature from a variety of courses, developing own ideas in the process. |
Clear evidence and application of readings relevant to the subject within the text. |
Evidence of some limited reading around the subject. |
Little or no evidence of reading around the subject. |
You can use these to evaluate your own work before you submit.
1.In line with UWE Bristol’s Assessment Content Limit Policy (formerly the Word Count Policy), word count includes all text, including (but not limited to): the main body of text (including headings), all citations (both in and out of brackets), text boxes, tables and graphs, figures and diagrams, quotes, lists.
2.UWE Bristol’s UWE’s Assessment Offences Policy requires that you submit work that is entirely your own and reflects your own learning, so it is important to:
Buy Answer of UMACTU-15-M Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentAre you worried about the UMACTU-15-M Contemporary issues in Accounting and Finance Assignment? then no need to worry anymore! Our experts provide Accounting Assignment Help that has been designed for the students. You will get expert guidance and help on assignments that will strengthen your concepts. We also provide you with UWE Bristol assignment samples that will help you understand. And the best part? All the content is 100% original, written by PhD expert writers, and well-researched, so that you get the best quality. So don’t delay now; boost your grades with our help!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content