Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
---|---|---|---|
University | BPP University | Module Title | Management Personal |
Word Count | 2500 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Type | Coursework |
Assessment Title | Personal Effectiveness Report |
Academic Year | 2025 |
The required submission for this assignment is a 2500 words “Personal Effectiveness Report”. Your report will include reflection on skills for a chosen career, comparison of own skill set/habits to choice of career, and analysis of methods for enhancing personal effectiveness.
Students are required to complete Three tasks:
1. Reflect on your own skill set in relation to a career goal.
2. Assess your habits/behaviours and how they may impact your career.
3. Analyse methods of enhancing personal effectiveness and improving personal branding. The Learning Outcomes to successfully pass this assessment are:
(LO1) Critically evaluate how people learn for professional development.
(LO2) Appraise the key skills and behaviours required to be effective in a professional context.
(LO3) Demonstrate understanding of a range of methods of supporting personal effectiveness in a professional environment.
Are You Looking for Answer of This Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentIntroduction
You should begin with an introduction to the concept of personal effectiveness. You should also give a brief overview of tasks 1, 2 and 3.
a) Using a model of reflective practice, reflect on a task that you completed at work or university to identify your own skill set. Identify both your strengths and weaknesses.
b) Analyse the skills you identified concerning your choice of career or job.
N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles on wider leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library.
(This task meets LO2)
a) Using the Covey self-assessment questionnaire, identify your strengths and weaknesses. Explain these with examples from your own life. (Include a screenshot of the results from the questionnaire in the appendix).
b) Discuss how your weaknesses can impact your chosen career.
N.B. You should support your analysis with references to additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library.
Choose a maximum of two areas for improvement (weaknesses) from Tasks 1 and 2. Develop a concise short-term plan using the SMART model or the Agile model to improve these areas. Explain how these plans will enhance your brand.
N.B. You should support your answer with references to additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library.
(This task meets LO3)
You will need to summarise the key points of the assessment tasks.
You should end with a concluding statement on the main topic of the report.
Your Personal Effectiveness report should contain the following:
Numerical Grade |
30-39% |
40-49% |
50-59% |
60-69% |
70-79% |
80-100% |
Final Grade |
Fail |
Low Fail |
Pass |
Merit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
LOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LO1 (Critically |
Inadequate or |
Limited |
Satisfactory |
Good identification and |
Excellent |
Outstanding identification |
evaluate how |
weak idenfication |
identification and |
identification |
discussion of own |
identification and |
and discussion of own |
people learn for |
and discussion of |
discussion of own |
and discussion |
weaknesses/poor habits |
discussion of own |
weaknesses/poor habits |
professional |
own |
weaknesses/poor |
of own |
with clear personal |
weaknesses/poor |
with explicit personal |
development.) |
weaknesses/poor |
habits. Limited |
weaknesses/po |
examples included |
habits with explicit |
examples used to illustrate |
|
habits. No clarity in |
clarity in the link |
or habits with |
illustrating their list of |
personal examples |
identified skills/habits. |
|
the link to personal |
to personal |
some examples |
habits. Results of |
included. Results of |
Results of questionnaire |
|
development and |
development and |
included. Link to |
questionnaire included |
questionnaire |
included and explicitly |
|
chosen career. |
chosen career. |
personal |
and clearly referred to |
included and |
referred to throughout the |
|
Does not include |
Questionnaire |
development |
throughout the task |
explicitly referred to |
task with exceptional depth |
|
questionnaire |
results are |
and chosen |
with satisfactory depth |
throughout the task |
in analysis. Explicit links to |
|
results Provides a |
missing or |
career is |
in analysis. Clear links to |
with good level |
personal development and |
|
weak explanation |
incomplete. |
evident. Results |
personal development |
depth in analysis. |
chosen career with a clear |
|
of personal |
Provides limited |
of questionnaire |
and chosen career. |
Explicit links to |
understanding of the links |
|
strengths and |
explanation |
included but |
|
personal |
between personal |
|
weaknesses |
without |
lacks depth in |
|
development and |
development and career |
|
without examples. |
examples. |
analysis. |
|
chosen career. |
growth. |
LO2 (Appraise |
Weak reflection |
Limited reflection |
Satisfactory |
Good reflection with |
Excellent reflection |
Outstanding reflection with |
the key skills and |
and limited clarity |
with some clarity |
reflection with |
clear identification of |
with a deep and |
an exceptional and |
behaviours |
in appraising key |
in identifying |
explicit |
personal skill set and |
balanced |
comprehensive |
required to be |
skills and |
personal skill set. |
identification of |
personalisation. Applies |
understanding of |
understanding of personal |
effective in a |
behaviours |
Applies Schon or |
personal skill |
the reflective model |
personal skill set |
skill set with clear |
professional |
required in a |
Gibbs reflective |
set. Applies a |
effectively. Identifies |
showcased through |
personalisation and |
context.) |
professional |
model effectively |
reflective model |
both strengths and |
personalisation and |
examples. Applies the |
|
context. Doesn't |
to some extent. |
effectively. |
weaknesses with depth |
examples. Applies |
reflective model with |
|
apply any reflection |
Identifies both |
Identifies both |
and clarity in analysis |
the reflective model |
excellent depth and |
|
or applies a model |
strengths and |
strengths and |
with explicit reference |
exceptionally well. |
coherence. Identifies both |
but lacks depth. |
weaknesses but |
weaknesses |
to a chosen career. |
Identifies both |
strengths and weaknesses |
|
|
lacks depth in |
with a |
|
strengths and |
with exceptional clarity and |
|
|
analysis. |
satisfactory |
|
weaknesses |
coherence. Analyses skill set |
|
|
|
level of depth |
|
comprehensively. |
with explicit reference to a |
|
|
|
and analyses |
|
Analyses skill set |
chosen career, including |
|
|
|
with reference |
|
with explicit |
exceptional depth and |
|
|
|
to a chosen |
|
reference to a |
precision. |
|
|
|
career. |
|
chosen career which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
includes exceptional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
depth and precision. |
|
|
LO3 |
Inadequate or |
Limited |
Satisfactory |
Good identification of |
Excellent |
Outstanding identification |
(Demonstrate |
weak identification |
identification of |
identification of |
two areas of |
identification of |
of areas of development |
understanding of |
of areas of |
areas of |
two areas of |
development with clear |
areas of |
with an exceptional and |
a range of |
development with |
development |
development |
and coherent relevance |
development with a |
comprehensive |
methods of |
limited relevance |
with relevance to |
with explicit |
to the previous tasks. |
thorough |
understanding of their |
supporting |
to the previous |
the previous |
relevance to the |
Creates a short-term |
understanding of |
direct application to the |
personal |
tasks. Creates a |
tasks. Creates a |
previous tasks. |
plan with depth and |
their relevance to |
previous tasks. Creates a |
effectiveness in a |
short-term plan |
short-term plan |
Creates a short- |
clarity in objectives and |
the previous tasks. |
short-term plan with |
professional |
with some gaps |
with some |
term plan with a |
actions. Identifies and |
Creates a |
exceptional clarity, |
environment.) |
and limitations. |
elements but |
satisfactory |
analyses methods with |
comprehensive |
coherence, feasibility, and |
|
Identifies and |
lacks depth and |
level of depth |
good depth and clarity |
short-term plan with |
innovation. Identifies and |
|
analyses some |
specificity. |
and specificity. |
in analysis. Clearly links |
exceptional depth, |
analyses methods with |
|
methods but lacks |
Identifies and |
Identifies and |
personal development |
precision, and |
Outstanding clarity, |
|
depth and |
analyses some |
analyses |
to personal branding. |
feasibility. |
coherence, feasibility, and |
|
relevance. Doesn’t |
methods but has |
methods with a |
|
Comprehensively |
innovation. Links personal |
|
link to personal |
limited depth and |
satisfactory |
|
identifies and |
development to personal |
|
branding. |
relevance. |
level of depth |
|
analyses methods |
branding with exceptional |
|
|
Limited link to |
and relevance. |
|
with Excellent depth |
clarity, coherence, |
|
|
personal |
Links personal |
|
and precision. |
feasibility, and innovation. |
|
|
branding. |
development to |
|
Explicitly links and |
|
|
|
|
personal |
|
explains personal |
|
|
|
|
branding |
|
development to |
|
|
|
|
satisfactorily. |
|
personal branding. |
|
Academic skills |
Inadequate or weak academic/intellect ual skills with few difficulties. Largely original work with some evidence of reflection and critique. Structure and accuracy in expression beginning to emerge. |
Limited academic/intellec tual skills. Original work with personal reflection and broad evidence- based critique. Solid structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/professi onal skills evident. |
Satisfactory academic/intell ectual skills. Wholly original work with good reflection and solid, well- reasoned judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Consistent structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/profes sional skills established. |
Good academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination |
Excellent academic/intellectua l skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence and imagination. |
Outstanding academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence, creativity and imagination working consistently in the higher cognitive domains to a professional standard. |
Referencing |
Inadequate or weak references and notes with minor or insignificant errors or omissions. |
Limited and full and appropriate references and notes with minor or insignificant errors |
Satisfactory with precise, full and appropriate references and notes. |
Good with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at a high standard. |
Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at near-publishing standard. |
Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references and notes at publishing standard. |
Hire Experts to solve this assignment Before your Deadline
Buy Today Contact UsPersonal Effectiveness Personal Effectiveness Coursework Report Assignment. Are you looking for personal effectiveness assignment solutions? Leave the stress of assignment writing to us as we are providing top assignment help services at affordable rates. Our team of expert writers will provide you high-quality assistance with report writing at pocket-friendly prices that will meet all your requirements and boost your academic performance. Get a personal effectiveness report sample by connecting with our experts. Don’t waste time! get registered today by following sign up process.
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content