Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Sociology |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of York | Module Title | SPY00157M Exploring Policy Research |
| University | University of York, School for Business and Society |
| Module | SPY00157M Exploring Policy Research |
| Assessment | Summative assignment: critical comparative review |
| Word Limit | 2,500 words |
| Weighting | 100% |
| Deadline | Monday following week 8, 13:00 UK time (check the Canvas submission point) |
| Referencing | Harvard |
This postgraduate SPY00157M assessment asks you to choose two public or social policy research papers on the same policy problem, one a review study and one a case study, and write a 2,500-word critical comparative review. You explain the policy problem and research strategies, critique the methods, reflect on ethics, propose an alternative design and evaluate the policy recommendations.
Select two public or social policy research papers that address the same policy issues or problems. One must be a review study (this can be the same as your formative) and the other must be a case study. Write a 2,500-word critical comparative review of your chosen policy papers: explain the policy problem(s) and the research strategies used to address them, critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the research method(s) in the context of the policy problems, reflect on potential ethical implications, propose a suitable alternative research design and/or method, and briefly evaluate the quality of the policy recommendations or make your own suggestions based on the findings. You can build on the formative written piece completed in week 5.
Need Help with SPY00157M Exploring Policy Research Summative Assessment? Get Expert Guidance for Your Coursework
Get Assignment Help on WhatsAppGive the assessment a title that reflects the topic of your chosen policy research papers (for example, “A comparative review of two selected housing policy research papers”). Do not include your name, as work is marked anonymously.
Explain the purpose of the assignment, give full references for the two chosen papers and set out how the review is structured.
Part 1 (400 words): Policy problems, research questions and the role of research
Describe the policy problems or issues in both papers, compare how each identifies and phrases its research questions, explain the nature of those questions and discuss the role of research in policy making (Units 1 to 3).
Part 2 (700 words): Research designs and methods
Explain and compare the research designs, methods and sources of evidence in each paper, and evaluate their merits, strengths and weaknesses using relevant quality criteria in the context of the policy issue (Units 4 and 5).
Part 3 (300 words): Ethical implications
Reflexively discuss the potential ethical implications of the two studies and whether ethical reflexivity is adequately addressed (Unit 6).
Part 4 (300 words): Alternative research design
Propose and justify a suitable alternative research design and/or method for the same policy problems (Units 3 to 5).
Part 5 (400 words): Policy recommendations
Briefly evaluate and compare the quality of the policy recommendations, or suggest your own based on the findings if none are given (Unit 7).
Draw a clear conclusion on the overall quality of the two research papers.
Use the Harvard referencing system and provide a full reference list.
Preparing your University of York SPY00157M Exploring Policy Research Summative Assessment? Workingment offers assignment help UK to guide you in comparing policy research papers, evaluating research methods, discussing ethical issues, and assessing policy recommendations. With Workingment Academic Writing Services, you can get guidance on structuring your 2,500-word critical review and applying Harvard referencing correctly.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
