Category | Dissertation | Subject | Education |
---|---|---|---|
University | University of Reading | Module Title | REMDISS30: Spatial Planning Dissertation |
Word Count | 8000 Words |
---|---|
Assessment Title | Module Handbook |
Academic Year | 2024-25 |
01 – Introduction
02 – Learning outcomes
03 – Required outputs
05 – Key facts about the dissertation: An overview
06 – Choosing a topic
07 – How to develop your topic into a proposal
08 – Structuring your research and dissertation
09 – Compilation and editing: Detail matters!
10 – Problems and solutions
11 – Supervision
The dissertation is the most substantial item of work that you complete during your course of study. It is designed to serve several purposes:
Students have to prepare a dissertation of 8,000 words (not including illustrations, tables and appendices) on a subject complementary to their programme and supervised by a Real Estate and Planning member of staff. The Programme Handbook indicates that research topics will normally be on an aspect of the student's choice. Depending on the research question, secondary data sources will be a useful source of data. However, for some topics, primary sources may be required.
The dissertation is seen as the culmination of your postgraduate studies. The end product should:
It is the visible end product and the object of assessment. However, the whole process of producing the dissertation is an important part of the whole learning exercise; supervisors will therefore be allocated to students at the end of the autumn term. In contrast to other modules, where coursework requirements will be more tightly specified and shorter, the dissertation is a much more challenging exercise. Individual skills can thus be enhanced and the process of designing and executing the dissertation will encourage you to:
Because the dissertation represents the biggest exercise in independent learning, it also means that you develop a greater sense of personal awareness. In particular, you will learn more about your own strengths and weaknesses, gain a sense of autonomy and freedom in learning, and gain self-confidence through your personal achievement.
The aims of the Real Estate and Planning dissertation are as follows:
Students will develop an understanding of the research process and the main challenges encountered in undertaking a research project. Their skills with regard to organising and executing such a project will be enhanced. Skills regarding the collection and analysis of data, the surveying and synthesis of existing literature on a topic, the application of theoretical models to practical questions, and the preparation and production of a substantial piece of academic coursework will also be improved. They will develop the skills to conduct research and write up their results independently.
The Real Estate and Planning dissertation is specifically intended to develop an independent practice-relevant research topic. Assessment criteria are grouped into five categories; each category is attributed a share of the overall grade. As such, the dissertation should demonstrate:
Acquaintance with relevant literature and context, and its integration with proposed research objectives and questions - 40%
Appropriateness of data and collection method for undertaking research – 20%
Analysis and discussion of findings – 30%
Clarity of writing and quality of presentation – 10%
Refer to Appendix 1 for the relevant dissertation assessment criteria.
Some basic information about the dissertation and how to survive it:
What’s it worth? – The dissertation has a credit value of 30.
When is it undertaken? – It is expected that the majority of the work on your dissertation will begin to take place in the summer term and then be completed over the summer holidays.
How big should it be? – The word guide is 8,000 words.
What do I need to bear in mind in selecting a topic? –
Do I have to do the dissertation entirely independently? – Not entirely, you will have a supervisor who will give advice, initially in group sessions and later on an individual basis, and comment on draft work as the project progresses. But it is substantially a piece of independent work.
How much supervision can I expect? – Excluding the time the supervisor will spend reading your drafts, producing written comments and assessing the final product, it would be reasonable to expect a total of 8 hours of actual contact with your supervisor, roughly half of which would be accounted for by supervisory meetings, the rest individual contact (including email and telephone contact).
Will my supervisor keep me on schedule and take the initiative in getting me to produce drafts? – No, you have to do that.
Will my supervisor copy-edit and proofread the report? – No.
Will my supervisor be available throughout the summer to read and comment on my drafts at short notice? – Absolutely not. You will need to make specific arrangements as to when your supervisor will be available and how much time s/he will need to read drafts. Supervisor availability is likely to be limited in the July/August period.
What other support is available? – Please do make use of help outside the School. The University’s In-Sessional English Support Programme (ISLC), Skills Opportunities at Reading (SOAR) and Study Advice services can give general non-subject-specific support on matters such as research planning and writing and more specific advice, such as support in identifying appropriate statistical methods for your analysis.
When does the dissertation have to be submitted? – Refer to section 3 of this handbook. Sometimes students need to extend for various reasons, and in those circumstances, you must immediately discuss the matter with your supervisor regarding your potential case for Extenuating Circumstances.
What happens if I miss the deadline? – There are penalties for late submission by University policy. Refer to your Programme Handbook for details.
What happens if something goes wrong that disrupts the whole of my research schedule? – The normal option here is to pursue an extension, something which will need to be formally agreed by the dissertation module convener following a written application that states the reasons an extension is required. Depending on the circumstances, this will normally require the payment of a continuation fee, calculated on a term basis. This entitles you to continue to use University facilities, but expect only very limited supervisory support.
But what if I’m ill for a long period or suffer a major personal problem? – Exemption from such fees is only permissible for medical or personal reasons for which appropriate documentary evidence is received. Depending on the exact circumstances, you may be able to suspend your registration for the course. This would need to be agreed by the senior tutor.
What happens when my dissertation is submitted? – It is read by your supervisor and a second assessor, who then agree on a mark. Any failure to agree on a mark will require a third marker to be involved.
Will I have to attend a viva voce examination with an External Examiner? – No. The External Examiner’s role is to oversee the processes and general standards of the course, not to determine the marks of individual research reports. However, the External will read a selection of dissertations and talk to the submitting group.
You are required to choose a topic of relevance to the field of study. This could, for example, be an evaluation of a specific policy, consideration of an emerging issue or trend, or an evaluation of specific real estate and planning processes and/or outcomes. You need to demonstrate an understanding of the broader social and economic context within which particular policy and/or practice issues emerge.
Before starting work on your dissertation, you must develop your initial idea into a viable proposal. In a formal sense, the procedures outlined in section 8 are designed to help you do this. However, before you get to this stage, you will need to carry out some preliminary investigations. Specifically, you are required:
The following are a series of preliminary, specific questions you need to ask yourself when you are choosing your topic:
There are no clear prescriptions to be found in the answers to these questions, but when put together, they might help you in determining the strengths, weaknesses and risks of each notional proposal you may have.
While there will be much that is specific to each research project, the work and the final dissertation itself should be able to show evidence of the following elements, which will often be reflected in actual chapter or section titles.
At an early stage, you will need clarity in your mind about the research problem being addressed. Without this, it will be difficult to put limits on your dissertation or to assess the relevance of any particular data. A research question that is framed solely in terms of ‘finding out’ or ‘uncovering’ is likely to be less focused and difficult to put boundaries on. This may variously be framed as:
The research problem will also need to be communicated in a clear fashion and at an early stage in the dissertation itself. Few things are more irritating for readers (and assessors) than having to wade through a lot of introductory description and having to struggle to find what precisely the author is trying to do. The dissertation should not take the form of a detective story, which only gradually unfolds and reveals its nature. It is a good idea to ‘signpost’ the route of your dissertation at the beginning, with a clear explanation of its structure.
Once the problem is firmly established, you have to research the literature that is available on your topic and the light shed on it by other authors. You may well have to start assembling newspaper cuttings, websites, journal articles, book chapters and other literature, etc., which are relevant. This may entail visiting other libraries, academic departments, professional offices and actual sites. Keeping a clear, organised index of references from the start will ensure an accurate, comprehensive bibliography in your dissertation and save much time. As soon as you have decided on a subject, you should start to compile a reference list.
Methodology implies the selection and application of methods of gathering and analysing information appropriate to the research being undertaken. You will therefore need to think carefully and in a critical fashion about the methods you are going to use to answer your initial problem or questions. Do you have to assemble new data, or can your dissertation succeed by bringing together existing literature, data sources, etc.? Remember that all research has its methodological problems. Methods of collecting data may be skewed or biased in various ways.
Also, bear in mind specific data gathering. What specific data do you need, and how are you going to collect it? If you hope to interrogate data provided by other organisations or individuals (secondary data), will they be willing to release the information to you, and will it reach you in time? If you are going to undertake your surveys, do you have adequate time and resources to undertake them? How do you test your survey before becoming dependent on it? You should bear in mind the sensitivity of information from some public sources to inclusion in academic work. Again, all this will need to be written up.
With all the data you are dealing with, how do you analyse it? Remind yourself (and the reader) of the focus of your investigation. Keep the analysis sharp and to the point: presenting masses of data or lengthy quotations is no substitute for a clear and logical argument. Also, be mindful of the alternatives. It is unlikely that there is only one response or answer to your problem: various alternatives will probably need to be presented and their implications explored. State the reasons for selecting a particular conclusion or set of conclusions and identify their key characteristics. Otherwise, it could easily appear as something you wanted to say from the outset, rather than being evidence-based.
The discussion is tasked specifically with “referring back to the concepts in your literature review to help generalise your results and provide potential reasons to explain what you have found. What are the implications for further work, more research, etc? Though remember that, first and foremost, a discussion is neither a proposal, nor a recommendation, nor a design: it is a process of academic reasoning of your research findings through substantiated logical deduction. In other words, no assertions, no new evidence, bring together what you have found in your research in terms of the original question. Done well, discussions can really give greater coherence and meaning to the whole dissertation. Done badly, they can sound assertive, preachy and unconvincing.
If your discussion includes specific recommendations for action, you will need time and space to discuss how they might be brought about. However, you should remember that a dissertation should not be prescriptive. Also, remember that recommendations are no substitute for a good discussion.
The conclusion will remind the reader of your research problem and will briefly summarise the main stages in the development of the research. Specifying the outcome of the dissertation clearly in terms of the initial proposition will be the most important feature. The discussion also should identify any errors or limitations in your approach or shortcomings in your analysis, rather than leaving it to the reader.
Producing a dissertation is, amongst other things, an exercise in managing paperwork in both hard and electronic forms. This includes notes, drafts, drawing, typing, binding, etc. It is, therefore, essential to be methodical and tidy, with careful procedures for filing and storing material to encourage a speedy write-up. This also includes regular backups of all your work!
Dissertations are exercises in methodological thinking, and both the style of writing and method of expression should reinforce this objective. They should be evidence-based, objective and dispassionate. Also, remember that the reader needs to follow the detailed unfolding of your argument and analysis clearly. There are some clear things that you should avoid. You should not:
A dissertation consists of sound scholarship that is based on your research and a thorough knowledge of the work of others. Therefore, the author's knowledge of such work must be made clear in the text. To reinforce a sense of orderly thought, some authors organise their text into numbered paragraphs and sections, in the manner of an official report. This is not acceptable. It sometimes leads authors to move too abruptly from one aspect to another without making the links in the argument explicit in the reader’s mind. Complex paragraph numbering systems may also be distracting (they never conceal gaps in research or analysis). All studies must be fully edited, that is to say, prepared as if for publication. If it is of sufficient calibre and interest, a student may indeed be encouraged to publish their dissertation as an article.
The importance of careful attention to detail in these matters of detail cannot be overemphasised. In this, the rule is: check – and check again. Skimming reading your work on the screen is not sufficient because you will know what you are trying to say and will therefore too readily assume that that is what it says on the page. You have to go through line by line on the page in a highly disciplined way, forcing yourself to look at every single word and punctuation mark. If you can, get someone else to read it as well – non-authorial readers can often notice any slips very quickly. If these slips get through to the submitted version, they convey an impression of overall sloppiness that quickly undermines the credibility of the substance of your topic. Assessors have no sympathy with authors on this and will reduce marks accordingly.
Especially watch for the following. Misspellings and the associated lack of care in using the spell check that often produces inappropriate (sometimes hilariously so) words are particularly damaging to the overall impact of your dissertation. Another problem is associated with minor misuses of words or punctuation that are all too frequent in integrated studies. Also, beware of the following very common confusions:
Its = ‘belonging to it’ / it’s = ‘it is’
Principal = ‘the leading or main…’/ principle = ‘overarching or organising theme, ethic…’
Complementary = ‘complementary to (i.e. completing) each other.’ / complimentary = ‘as a gift or an act of praise…’
Submit your dissertation electronically via Turnitin.
Title Page. The first page of the dissertation should have the following headings:
These should add value to the dissertation and attention should be given to their appropriate format and presentation. In particular, care should be taken to ensure all maps, diagrams etc. are fully titled and numbered, and cross-referenced appropriately to the relevant part of the text. It is inadvisable to overburden the text with an undue weight of illustrative material, which often can more appropriately be located in appendices at the end of the text. However, see note below on overburdening the appendices.
Please follow these notes on house styles:
Subheading numbered 1, 2, 3, etc.
Sub sub-heading numbered 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, etc.
Sub sub sub-heading numbered a, b, c, etc.
NB. Please avoid using more than three weights or levels of subheading.
Many students suffer from all or some of the three problems:
Considering the first two problems, the most significant preparation you can make to secure the production of a good dissertation is by thoroughly the preparation of the research proposal. (The skills necessary to do this will be covered in this module.)
In devising an overall timetable, allow time for your supervisor to read and comment on drafts of select chapters. It is in your interest to submit a significant part of your draft text to your supervisor at an appropriate time for formal comment. Though please remember that supervisors are not expected to read full drafts in detail. The overall timetable (at the end) gives details of when it is sensible to do this. Allow time also for careful reading to check punctuation, spelling errors, etc. Also, allow time for producing the final copy and for getting it bound. Illustrations can take a lot of time, whether you are inserting them manually or electronically. You should also leave time to check the final version before it is actually handed in.
Refer to section 5 for web links to University support services in these problem areas.
Each student will have a supervisor. The supervisor's role is largely:
However, the dissertation is an independent piece of work written by a student judged capable of achieving a MSc degree. You should not expect the supervisor
Therefore, do not expect the supervisor to sign off your proposal and ethics application and read long drafts of your dissertation at short notice, especially if you have previously made little contact with the supervisor. This is another way of saying; do not leave everything until the last minute!
Grade/ Criteria |
Distinction |
Merit |
Pass |
Below Threshold |
Unsatisfactory |
|
(80+) |
(70-79) |
(60-69) |
(50-59) |
(40-49) |
(0-39) |
|
Acquaintance with relevant literature and context, and its integration with proposed research objectives and questions (40%)
[Ability to apply the knowledge and skills acquired in the rest of the course to proposed research design] |
Outlines objectives that are measurable and achievable, and contain some original material.
Evidence of very wide reading on the general subject matter, context and on appropriate theory. Connects areas of knowledge in innovative ways or reviews theories not commonly applied in this subject area. Excellent critical analysis of the literature, identifying areas of agreement and contention and clearly identifies knowledge gaps, leading to a logical conclusion, which presents a clear rationale for this project. |
Defines objectives clearly.
Evidence of very wide reading on the general subject matter, context and on appropriate theory. Clear explanation of theory and analysis of its relevance to this research. Sound, critical analysis, identifying areas of agreement and contention and clearly identifies knowledge gaps, leading to a logical conclusion. Presents a clear rationale for this project. |
Defines objectives clearly.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of relevant research material and can place this research within it. |
Either the principal aim has a clear focus, but the research objectives are descriptive, vague and/or are task driven OR the principal aim lacks focus in itself.
Reviews key standard literature in the subject area, but with a fairly narrow focus. Some of the literature reviewed might be dated. Does not properly analyse relevant theories and apply them to the topic at hand. Identifies research gaps and places the research within an appropriate context. |
The principal aim lacks focus and the research objectives are poorly defined, vague, descriptive and/or task driven.
Confines its review to a narrow band of literature, which might not be fully up to date and/or broad enough in its scope. Presents simple theoretical approaches but in a non-critical fashion. Little review of refereed journal articles and reports and too much reliance on non-peer reviewed material and web based sources. |
No clear principal aim is stated and the research objectives are very poorly defined on non-existent or irrelevant.
Includes a very narrow definition of the subject area reviewed. Data is out dated and/or from un-validated and non-peer-reviewed sources. Poorly structured with no coherent argument and insufficient conclusion. Does not explicitly identify research gaps in conventional knowledge or wisdom. Fails to present a convincing rationale for project. |
Appropriate-ness of data and collection method for undertaking research (20%)
[Ability to identify relevant data/method for undertaking research (primary and/or secondary data] |
Explores a wide range of appropriate research approaches and methodologies and selects practical and systematic arrangements for collecting evidence that is relevant to the research question or hypothesis.
Presents data systematically in a sophisticated and innovative format. |
Provides a clear justification of the research approach and critically analyses various design methodologies in an authoritative way, assessing their relevance against the stated objectives of this research.
Systematically presents data in a readable and appropriate format. |
Provides justification of the research approach but justification is weakened by its narrow exploration of alternatives.
Presents data in a readable format but some improvements could be made to presentation. |
Provides justification of the research approach, but it is weak in its selection of specific methods.
Unforeseen obstacles have not been adequately addressed, if at all. Improvements could be made to data presentation. |
Student demonstrates a lack of appreciation of the need to design an appropriate method of data collection.
Data presentation is poor, and confusing. |
Poor or no justification of the research approach. No convincing argument for the selection of particular methods of data collection.
Presentation of data is poor, and confusing and no linkages have been made. No appreciation of the data’s limitations is presented. |
Analysis and discussion of findings (30%)
[Ability to bring the research findings to reflect on previous analysis of literature and research questions]
|
Extremely thorough critical analysis and evaluation of the data, with clear and detailed cross-reference to the reviewed literature, appropriate theories and explanations. Analysis and interpretation of data is guided by a consistent logic. Novel relationships are identified.
Provides a clear demonstration of the relevance and practicality of findings in relation to the problem(s) being studied. Shows remarkable insight into the topic and offers original argument. Forms a sound judgement on the relevance of findings to new situations. |
Critical analysis of the results is presented and their relevance is explained, with excellent cross reference to the literature reviewed, theories and explanations.
There is clear and justified reflection upon the contribution of the dissertation and its limitations. Identifies the wider relevance of the findings in a convincing manner, and offers original insights into the topic. |
Analysis of key results is presented, but some data might be left unused. Good cross reference to the literature reviewed, theories and explanations.
The discussion makes an effort to link rather than stack ideas and presents a clear, logical argument, identifying some of the key critical issues and their relevance to the original research objectives. |
Analysis of key results is presented, but some data might be left unused and some analysis is not backed up by evidence. Some cross reference to the literature reviewed, theories and explanations.
Some useful observations about the research are presented, but elements of the discussion seem to lack a clear relationship to the data presented and its analysis. Explanation of the relevance of the research to the topic or overall subject area is incomplete. Offers only limited new insight into the topic. |
Partial development of argument, lacking in any critical analysis. Ideas are not fully developed or supported and many generalisations are made. There is little cross reference to the literature reviewed, theories and explanations.
In general, the discussion lacks any critical reflection It presents only a vague argument. There is little attempt to explain the relevance of the research to the topic or overall subject area. Offers little insight into the topic. |
Description with little or no analysis. There is little coherence in the development of ideas and no cross reference to the literature reviewed, theories and explanations.
Discussion provides only a summary of the work. No new insights on the topic are offered and/or conclusions that are clearly not backed-up by sound analysis are presented. |
Clarity of writing and quality of presentation (10%)
[Ability to write clearly and communicate to an overall high standard of presentation] |
Excellent presentation of a publishable standard and appropriate to the discipline. Complex issues are explained clearly and concisely. Excellent structure of report and chapters. Effective use of English, with appropriate choice of vocabulary, correct & comprehensive referencing, no grammatical or presentational problems, clearly defined paragraphs, with good topic sentences/headings. Absolutely no typographic errors. |
Excellent presentation, appropriate to the discipline. Structure of the report and each chapter is excellent. Effective use of English, with appropriate choice of vocabulary, correct and comprehensive referencing, no grammatical or presentation problems, clearly defined paragraphs, with good topic sentences/headings. The report is of professional quality, so there are very few, ideally no, typographic errors. |
Very good presentation and logical structure. Use of English is sound, but choice of vocabulary is sometimes inappropriate. Mostly correct and comprehensive referencing, but with a few errors. Some grammatical or presentation problems and use of sentences/headings not always effective. Some typographic errors. |
Good presentation but with some grammatical or stylistic problems. A few presentation errors. Correct but not comprehensive referencing. Weakly defined paragraphs, comprising too many points. Writing not always concise and to the point, containing some unclear or awkward sentences. Imprecise use of words and some grammatical errors. |
Paragraphs poorly defined and an illogical arrangement of ideas. Some major grammatical or proof-reading errors. Use of clichés, colloquialisms, repeated or inexact word choices. Inadequate and/or inappropriate referencing. |
Very poor presentation, with numerous grammatical and other presentational problems. Incomplete and/or incorrect referencing. |
Achieve Higher Grades with REMDISS30 Dissertation Solutions
Order Non-Plagiarized DissertationAre you looking for your dissertation writing service in UK for REMDISS30: Spatial Planning Dissertation from University of Reading? You are at the right place. Our online assignment writing help service provides professional guidance for specialization for UK students. Now you can be stress free. We provide all types of assignments, such as dissertations, reports, coursework, etc. We also provide AI and plagiarism free content and free assignment samples written by PhD experts. Contact us today and boost your academic grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content