Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | University of Roehampton London | Module Title | Strategic Marketing and Communications |
| Academic year and term: | July 2026 |
| Module title: | Strategic Marketing and Communications |
| For a further description of the module, see the module brief below. | |
| Assessment Deadlines: |
The summative assessment for this module is composed of one element: 1. Individual Written Report, 3,500 words; 100% of marks. Submission by 24th September 2026, 11:59 am UK time. |
To pass this module, students need an overall 50% mark independent of whether all tasks listed have been started and completed.
| Components of summative assessment | Individual or group submission? | Word count |
Weighting (%) |
Must Attempt Y/N |
Must Pass Y/N |
Sub-components |
| Individual Written Report. | Individual | 3500 words | 100% | N | N | n/a |
Individual Written Report - 100% of the module mark
A written report on the design of a marketing strategy and implementation plan for a new or improved sustainable product or a service of your choice underpinned by academic and professional literature. An existing, well-known company must market the proposed product and should benefit the environment, society, and the economy throughout its lifecycle.
Get 100% Original Strategic Marketing and Communications Assessment Brief Answers
Get Expert Writing HelpA brief description and rationale for introducing the new or improved sustainable product or service that is the focus of your report. Agree your choice with your tutor by week 3.
Explain how your proposed product or service aligns with sustainability goals and contributes to a more sustainable future.
This section should discuss issues related to implementation, such as co-ordination between different departments and the role of internal marketing, as well as resources and capabilities required to implement your chosen marketing strategy.
Consider how your chosen marketing strategy can be implemented sustainably and minimise negative environmental and social impacts.
A further 10% of your mark is allocated to presentation and referencing (10%).
Please refer to the marking grid in the Appendix for a detailed breakdown of the assessment criteria, including the weighting of each criterion and expectations for different mark bands.
You are welcome to seek oral feedback on your work in progress.
Note: we will not provide any written or marks indicative feedback on drafts for summative assessment at any time. If you perceive any formative feedback in such a way, please note that it is not binding for your marking. Markers can also always change, and you have no entitlement to be marked by the module convener or tutors.
Additional Instructions for Re-sit The re-sit is subject to a duplicate assessment task for the main assignment period; for further instructions, see below.
Re-sit deadlines will be published via Canvas. Visit the module’s Canvas site and check your Roehampton email account regularly. The school is not obliged to check whether you have noticed re-sit deadlines.
You are required to improve and resubmit your original work using the specific re-sit Turnitin link on Canvas.
The original marking criteria will still apply; please refer to the marking grid in the Appendix.
Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use either the marking criteria provided in the section “Instructions for assessment” or the Marking rubric enclosed in the Appendix, as appropriate for this module. When you access your marked work, it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.
You must use the Harvard System.
The Business School requires a digital version of all assignment submissions. These must be submitted via Turnitin on the module’s Canvas site as a Word file (not as a PDF) and must not include scanned text or text boxes.
You may use generative AI to help generate ideas and brainstorm. However, be aware that the material generated by these AI tools may be inaccurate, incomplete, or otherwise problematic.
If you include material generated by generative AI, in most cases, it should be cited in the same way you would cite other references. Your tutors will advise you on how to do this.
Any plagiarism or other cheating will be handled under the University of Roehampton academic misconduct policy.
Citing use of generative AI: (If this generative AI material is available online, you can cite it as an electronic version of a source (such as an artwork or article).
Citation order:
If the AI’s end product (for example, use of ChatGPT in conversation) is only available to you, cite this as a personal communication and include a description of the AI-generated material in your in-text citation. Consult your tutor if they require you to provide a copy of the AI work as an appendix.
Citation order:
Name of AI
Year of communication (in round brackets)
Medium of communication
Receiver of communication
Day/month of communication
What do you do if you cannot submit a work or attend your presentation?
The University Mitigating Circumstances Policy can be found on the University website using this link.
Marking and Feedback Process
Between handing in your work and receiving your feedback and provisional marks within 30 working days, we go through several quality assurance processes to ensure that students receive marks that reflect their work. A summary is provided below:
1. Step One – The module marking team meet to agree on standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided.
2. Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.
3. Step Three – A moderation takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback
4. Step Four – Work then goes to the University for moderation and external examination who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair
5. Step Five – Your provisional mark and feedback are processed by the Office and made available to you.
|
Grade Category (range) Assigned mark ________________ Marking criteria (weight out of 100) |
Outstanding 100 |
Excellent (80-89) 85 |
Very Good (70-79) 75 |
Good (60-69) 65 |
Adequate (50-59) 55 |
Marginal Fail (40-49) 45 |
Fail (30-39) 35 |
Fail (20-29) 25 |
Not done 0 |
|
Introduction 10% Introduction and Product/ Service Description
|
10 It cannot be improved on |
(8 – 8.9) 8.5 Excellent Introduction and Product Service Description |
(7- 7.9) 7.5 Very Good Introduction and Product Service Description |
(6- 6.9) 6.5 Good Introduction and Product Service Description |
(5-5.9) 5.5 Satisfactory Introduction and Product Service Description |
(4 – 4.9) 4.5 Underdeveloped rationale for introduction of product and Product/Service Description |
(3- 3.9)3.5 The introduction and Product Service Description are below the necessary standard |
(2-2.9)2.5 Introduction and Product Service Description are substantially below the necessary standard |
0 Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
|
Market Context 20% A Critical Analysis of the Market Context
|
20 It cannot be improved on |
(16-17.8) 17 Excellent Critical Analysis of the Market Context |
(14-15.8) 15 Very Good Critical Analysis of the Market Context |
(12-13.8) 13 Good Critical Analysis of the Market Context |
(10-11.8) 11 Satisfactory Critical Analysis of the Market Context |
(8-9.8) 9 Generic/ underdeveloped/ descriptive Analysis of the Market Context |
(6-7.8) 7 Critical Analysis of the Market Context is below the necessary standard |
(4-5.8) 5 Critical Analysis of the Market Context is substantially below the necessary standard |
0 Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
|
STP 20% Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning |
It cannot be improved on |
Excellent Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning |
Very Good Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning issues |
Good Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning issues |
Satisfactory Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning issues |
Generic or underdeveloped Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning |
Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning are below the necessary standard |
Critical Analysis of the Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning are substantially below the necessary standard |
Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
| Ext Marketing Mix 30% |
30 It cannot be improved on |
(24-26.7) 25.5 Excellent Recommended Extended Marketing Mix |
(21-23.7) 22.5 Very Good Recommended Extended Marketing Mix |
(18-20.7)19.5 Good Recommended Extended Marketing Mix |
(15-17.7)16.5 Satisfactory |
(12-14.7)13.5 Generic or underdeveloped Recommended Extended Marketing Mix |
(9-11.7)10.5 Recommended Extended Marketing Mix is below the necessary standard |
(6-8.7)7.5 Recommended Extended Marketing Mix is substantially below the necessary standard |
0 Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
|
Implementation issues - 10%
A discussion of Implementation Issues |
It cannot improved on |
Excellent Discussion of Implementation Issues |
Very Good Discussion of Implementation Issues |
Good Discussion of Implementation Issue |
Satisfactory Discussion of Implementation Issue |
Generic or underdeveloped discussion of implementation issues |
Discussion of Implementation Issues are below the necessary standard |
Discussion of Implementation Issues are substantially below the necessary standard |
Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
| Presentation 10% | It cannot be improved on | Excellent presentation and referencing | Very Good presentation and referencing |
Good presentation and referencing |
Satisfactory presentation and referencing | Inadequately structured, errors in referencing practices and presentation of tables and figures | Presentation and referencing are below the necessary standard | Presentation and referencing are substantially below the necessary standard |
Missing or wrong. Doesn’t meet the basic assessment criteria |
Get expert help with Strategic Marketing and Communications (RBP020L047A, RBP020L047N, RBP020L047S, RBP020L047H) at the University of Roehampton London through Workingment. The RBP020L047A assessment requires a 3,500-word report covering sustainable marketing, market analysis, STP, the extended marketing mix and implementation planning. Our expert writers can help you understand the brief and prepare your report according to the given assessment requirements. If you need strategic marketing assignment help or marketing communication assignment help, Workingment provides original, plagiarism-free academic work prepared by experienced writers.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content