Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY | Module Title | R7005HF Advanced Research Methods |
a) Research and evaluate divergent research philosophies with reference to their appropriateness to different research contexts and problems.
b) Select and evaluate research methodologies and methods that are appropriate to the research problem, and which are aligned to the underpinning theoretical position
c) Critically reflect on different perspectives in social science and draw conclusions for future research
|
Submission Deadline: 15.00 on Thursday 20th August 2026 Please ensure that your student number is included at the beginning of your submission title when uploading your work |
AI usage is permitted in-line with our University Guidance.
AI use must be acknowledged alongside your reference list.
Resources to support the appropriate use of AI can be found on The Learning Hub. The university encourages ethical, responsible use of AI.
As you use AI, remember that it has limitations and your writing and ideas will often be better.
You remain responsible for ensuring your work is original, meets the expected standards of academic integrity, and that AI is used only as a supportive tool.
In submitting this reassessment:
I/we declare that the work is my/our own work and that it meets the standards of academic integrity expected at all times as set out in university academic integrity policy. I/we also confirm that this work conforms to the stated Artificial Intelligence guidance for this assignment brief and has not previously been submitted for assessment for an academic award, unless otherwise indicated.
The assignment is designed to help you consider and evaluate the potential philosophical position and methodology you could take to deliver your research project. With this in mind the assignment is designed to enable to rework your original submission to this assignment. The work requires you to critically evaluate two philosophical approaches and must be related to your area of study. You will identify a specified research problem and consider how the nature of the emergent research question differs in line with the Research philosophy.
For your specific research problem, formulate a research question, design, and methodology based on a selected research philosophy. Discuss how this philosophy influences your research question, methodology, data collection, and analysis: (35%)
For your particular research problem, you are required to revise the research question, design, and methods according to a different research philosophy. Within this context, examine how the chosen research philosophy influences your research question, methodology, data collection strategies, and techniques for analysing data. (35%)
Consider the two research strategies identified in plan 1 and 2. Consider which of the two research strategies best meets your understanding of the research problem and contributes most to the furthering of knowledge, reflecting your vision of the nature of the research problem. You are required to critically evaluate, reflect and appraise the two approaches and select the approach most suitable to resolving the research problem with justification of your choice. (30%).
The work should be presented as one Word Document and submitted via Turnitin. The work should be no longer the 4000 words, not including title page and references.
Font size should be no smaller than 11 point.
| Criteria | Weighting % |
| Research Plan 1 |
35% |
|
Research Plan 2 |
35% |
|
Reflective Piece |
30% |
Any part of your assignment that goes over the word count, page limit, or presentation time will not be marked. This is to make sure all students are assessed fairly and equally. It also helps you develop important skills in clear and focused communication.
Your feedback will be returned through GradeMark. To view feedback, please return to the drop-in box on your module. Instructions on how to access feedback through GradeMark can be found under the “Student Information” tab on the front page of The Learning Hub. As well as the grade/mark, you should also receive feedback (which may be typed or spoken) on your assignment. If the written feedback provided is unclear you are advised to contact the module leader/module tutor to provide clarification.
Your marked assignment should be returned by the date stated on the brief. If this will not be possible, the module leader/module tutor will advise students of the expected return date. If you do not receive your mark and feedback by this date, please ask your Course Tutor to contact the relevant Head of Department to advise them of this delay.
Work submitted after the published deadline will be subject to a mark penalty unless there are approved, documented, mitigating circumstances. The penalties for late or non-submission can be viewed here:
Please be aware that module tutors may be away from the University during the July/August period. If you have a query about the reassessment task, please attempt to contact the module tutor in the first instance. Please note that if you email your tutor, you may receive an out of office reply that directs you to contact another member of staff with your query. If you are unable to contact your tutor or nominated alternate contact, please send your request for assistance to assignments@harper-adams.ac.uk who will forward your request to an appropriate member of academic staff.
Date of assignment launch to students: 14th July 2026
Feedback and grades will be returned by: 14th September 2026
Assignment brief moderated by (print name): HABS Moderation Panel 8/7/26
| Weighted mark range | Research Plan 1 35% | Research Plan 2 35% | Reflective Piece 30% |
| 90-100 |
Outstanding explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with no further editing Outstanding use of a wide variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation |
Outstanding explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with no further editing Outstanding use of a wide variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation |
An outstandingly well-articulated reflection on the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and “validity” |
| 80-89 |
Exceptional explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics and displays a strong degree of originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with no further editing Exceptional use of a wide variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation including peer reviewed articles. |
Exceptional explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics and displays a strong degree of originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with no further editing Exceptional use of a wide variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation including peer reviewed articles. |
An exceptionally well-articulated reflection on the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and “validity” |
| 70-79 |
Excellent explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays a degree of originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with limited editing Excellent use of a good variety of reliable, appropriate sources including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation |
Excellent explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays a degree of originality, creativity, flair and imagination in both the structure and style of expression Of publishable quality with limited editing Excellent use of a good variety of reliable, appropriate sources including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic conventions Data trends visualisation |
Strong and well-articulated reflection on the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and” “validity” |
| 60-69 |
A very good explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays some originality, creativity, flair and imagination in the style of expression
Could be publishable with further edition Good variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic convention Data trends visualisation |
A very good explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics
and displays some originality, creativity, flair and imagination in the style of expression
Could be publishable with further edition Good variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic convention Data trends visualisation |
well-articulated reflection on the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and “validity” |
| 50-59 |
A good explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics and displays some originality, some variety of reliable, appropriate sources including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic convention |
A good explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics and displays some originality, some variety of reliable, appropriate sources including peer reviewed articles. Accurate use of academic convention |
A sound attempt to articulate their understanding of the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and “validity” |
| 40-49 |
Work offers an explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics some variety of reliable, appropriate sources – including peer reviewed articles. Data trends visualisation |
Work offers an explanation, evaluation and exploration of a chosen philosophical approach and the implications for research design, research question, methodology, methods of analysis and ethics some variety of reliable, appropriate sources including peer reviewed articles. Data trends visualisation |
An attempt to articulate their understanding of the factors influencing their choice of approach with clear consideration of the implications of one approach over the other as to the nature of the research design, its value and “validity” |
| 30-39 |
Poorly examines the relationship between philosophy, design question and methodology Some use of relevant sources. References are complete and partially comply with the Guide to Referencing, - occasional omissions or minor omissions |
Poorly examines the relationship between philosophy, design question and methodology Some use of relevant sources. References are complete and partially comply with the Guide to Referencing, - occasional omissions or minor omissions |
No clear demonstration of impact on the development of their ideas and argument. · Lacks the articulation into their decision-making |
| 20-29 |
Presentation doesn’t conform to guidelines. Accuracy. structure and/or style. Little use of relevant sources but indiscriminately selected or largely unreliable or irrelevant. Work mainly descriptive, but superficial argument based on limited analysis and evaluation of knowledge |
Presentation doesn’t conform to guidelines. Accuracy and clarity of expression severely compromised by poor structure and/or style. Little use of relevant sources but indiscriminately selected or largely unreliable or irrelevant. Work mainly descriptive, but superficial argument based on limited analysis and knowledge |
Very limited demonstration of impact on the development of their ideas and argument. · Lacks the articulation into their decision-making process |
| 10-19 |
Lacks structure of style Accuracy structure and/or style. Very limited use of relevant sources, largely unreliable or irrelevant. Work highly descriptive, but superficial argument Limited evidence of scholarly activity. |
Lacks structure of style Accuracy structure and/or style. Very limited use of relevant sources, largely unreliable or irrelevant. Work highly descriptive, but superficial argument ·  Limited evidence of scholarly activity. |
Lacks real evidence of reflection |
| 0-9 | No evidence of scholarly activity. | No evidence of scholarly activity. | Fails to articulate their decision-making process |
Get Expert Help with Your Harper Adams Advanced Research Methods Assignment
Get Instant Assignment HelpNeed support with the Harper Adams Advanced Research Methods (R7005HF) Assignment? Get expert Assignment Help UK for developing and evaluating research plans based on different research philosophies, methodologies, data collection strategies, and analysis techniques. Our academic support can help you understand the relationship between research philosophy, research design, research questions, and methodology while preparing a well-structured reflective piece that critically compares both approaches. Whether you need guidance with Research Plan 1, Research Plan 2, or the final reflective evaluation, you can access clear, original, and plagiarism-free academic assistance aligned with the assignment requirements. Students seeking broader academic guidance can also access Management Assignment Help and Dissertation Assignment Help from experienced university writers for reliable support with research-based assignments and academic projects.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
