Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | Royal Holloway, University of London | Module Title | MN5817 Cloud Computing for Business |
1The Assignment
1.1Assignment Checklist
1.2Selecting a Real-world scenario
1.3Evidence of Analysis
1.4Cloud Visualisations
1.5Development Diary
1.6Risk of Relying on AI Tools
2Writing The Report
2.1Length, File Name and Text Format
2.2Report Structure
2.3Presentation and Captions
2.4Referencing and Citing
2.4.1Referenceable Material Types
2.4.2Credible Sources
2.5Important Restrictions
2.6Writing Style
2.7Report Presentation
3Assignment Rubric
Declaration of AI Tool Usage
Glossary
This assignment is a cloud computing project requiring you to design and build an Extract, Transform and Learn (ETL) process on cloud. In addition, you are required to compose a business report of approximately 2,000 words. This report must communicate and justify the thought processes and assumptions behind the development of your ETL process as well as discuss the insights and recommendations they produce. In this, you will create a dummy database. Use any cloud platform’s data factory to extract data from the SQL Server and load it into storage. Perform minor transformations using Python or, alternatively, utilise Alteryx Designer. Discuss identity and security management throughout the project.
The final submissions must be:
You are also required to maintain a Project Development Diary (see Section 1.4), which must be included as an appendix of your report.
The checklist below should be used to ensure that your assignment is within the remit.
Complete a full draft of the report, including insights.
Do You Need MN5817 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentChoose any product/service real-world scenario and create dummy or use primary datasets chosen for your project are subject to your tutor’s approval. All data sources used and outputs created must comply with ethical standards. It is expected that all real-world scenario and data source combinations will be unique to each student.
This checklist can be used to methodically evaluate the feasibility and applicability of your chosen real- world scenario . This process will help you critically assess your proposed project, ensuring that it is fully aligned with the goals of the assignment and the broader MSc Digital Business programme.
1.Relevance to Business Analytics
2.Feasibility
3.Intellectual Challenge
4.Sustained Engagement
5.Balance of Theory and Practice
6.Accessibility of Information
7.Skill and Knowledge Requirements
8.Uniqueness
Your final report must provide comprehensive evidence of your design and building ETL journey. This evidence demonstrates your proficiency in applying the skills and knowledge acquired during your course to a commissioned or self-selected business or societal issue. Below is a detailed breakdown of the essential activities and tasks that must be completed and documented:
1.Dataset Selection and Preparation
2.Analysis and Interpretation
3.Insights and Recommendations
4.Proficiency and Compliance
5.Documentation of Process
Visualising your cloud business is an essential aspect of your report, playing a crucial role in clarifying, supporting, and highlighting your analysis of your work. Rather than serving as mere additions, visual elements should be integrated throughout your report as key narrative tools. They turn complex data into clear, engaging insights. Thoughtfully placed visualisations within your report enhance comprehension and effectively engage the reader. Consider the following suggestions for strategically embedding data visualisations in various sections of your report:
1.Introduction:
2.Trends and Theoretical Perspectives:
3.Analytical Framework and Method:
4.The Data:
5.The Analysis – This section is the heart of the paper portfolio and diagrams in your report:
6.Conclusion:
The Development Diary is an essential element of this project, functioning as a personal chronicle of your journey. It is designed to capture pivotal moments, critical decisions, fundamental assumptions, and any challenges encountered along the way. This diary is your space to meticulously record every assumption you make, every decision and choice along with their justifications and reasoning, every obstacle faced, and how you navigated or circumvented it.
What to include:
Below is a table outlining the types of entries you might make, with clear explanations and relevant examples to guide you in chronicling your project experience.
Remember that the more detailed and consistent your entries are, the more valuable the Development Diary will be as a resource for understanding and improving your project approach. Your diary entries are likely to be simple notes written in the first person. These entries are only for your own use, and should not be repeated verbatim when writing your report.
A template for the Development Diary will be available via Moodle.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can aid in productivity and creativity; however, they are not without risks. The most obvious risk is the potential breach of academic integrity standards (see the Generative AI page on the College’s website).
In addition to these concerns, using AI to generate academic or business content comes with significant risks, notably the phenomenon known as "hallucination" where the AI fabricates information or presents false data. This can be particularly problematic in academic and business contexts where accuracy and credibility are paramount. AI systems, although sophisticated, do not discern truth from fiction; they generate responses based on patterns in the data on which they have been trained. This means that AI can confidently present incorrect or misleading information as factual. The likelihood of this occurrence is not trivial, particularly when the real-world scenario s are obscure, complex, or outside the AI training range.
In academic settings, reliance on AI-generated content can lead to the submission of work that contains inaccuracies, potentially undermining the integrity and credibility of your work. In the business world, decisions based on incorrect information can have severe financial and reputational consequences.
Furthermore, the uncritical use of AI content can lead to the homogenisation of thought, as diverse perspectives and critical thinking are sidelined in favour of AI's often predictable outputs.
Therefore, while AI can be a powerful tool to generate ideas and help with narrative flow, it is crucial for users to critically evaluate and verify information, understand inherent risks, and take responsibility for the final content. This approach ensures that the final output is not only original, but also accurate and reliable, maintaining the integrity of academic or business endeavours.
If you have ethically employed any AI tool for your analysis, you must declare which tool you used (name and version), why and how it was used, and the specific content in your report that was developed with the aid of AI tools. You must provide this information by completing the declaration of AI usage form in this document and including this it as an appendix in your final submission.
Order Custom Answers for MN5817 Assignment
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment2.1 Length, File Name and Text Format
Your final report should be structured to facilitate a comprehensive and coherent presentation of your work, ensuring that every relevant aspect is articulated effectively. Your Development Diary, a meticulous record of the evolution of your project, will be instrumental in providing the depth and detail required for each section. Below is a detailed breakdown1 of the sections2 expected in the report, with pointers on how your diary entries can enrich your narrative.
1.Introduction, this section covers the following aspects:
2.Trends and Theoretical Perspectives, this section should cover:
1 The bullets under each sections provide a checklist of what should be covered, and do NOT suggest subsections that should be included.
2 A report of this length will have sections, NOT chapters.
3.Analytical Framework and Method, this section should cover:
4.The Data, this section should cover:
5.The Analysis, this section should cover:
6.Findings and Recommendations, this section should cover:
7.Conclusion, this section should cover:
This table outlines the types of content that typically require citations and references along with definitions and general examples.
Referenceable Material Types |
Definition |
Example |
Data and Statistics |
Quantitative information used to support arguments. |
In an essay on climate change, citing the percentage of sea level rise over the past decade. |
Direct Quotes |
Verbatim excerpts from another person's work. |
In a study on leadership, quoting a famous leader's statement on effective leadership. |
Paraphrased Ideas |
Ideas from another source, rewritten in the writer's own words. |
Discussing a psychologist's theory on human motivation, rephrased in the essay. |
Theories and Models |
Established theories or models developed by others. |
Referencing Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in an essay about employee motivation. |
Historical Facts |
Specific events, dates, or figures from history. |
Citing the date of a significant historical event, like the signing of a peace treaty. |
Legal or Official Documents |
Content from laws, regulations, or official reports. |
Referring to a clause in a human rights legislation in a law essay. |
Research Findings |
Results or conclusions from scientific or academic studies. |
Mentioning the findings of a recent study on diet and health in a nutritional science essay. |
Artistic and Literary Works |
References to books, artworks, music, and other creative works. |
Discussing themes from a classic novel in a literature essay. |
Factual Assertions |
Claims or statements that present specific, verifiable information. |
Stating the boiling point of water in a scientific essay. |
In academic writing, particularly in UK universities, credible sources offer reliability, accuracy, and authority in their information. These sources typically include the following.
1.Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles: Articles published in peer-reviewed journals have been evaluated and critiqued by experts in the field. This process ensures the research is of high quality and the findings are credible.
2.Books Published by Academic Presses: Books published by university presses or recognised academic publishers are generally considered credible, as they undergo rigorous editorial processes.
3.Official Publications and Reports: Documents released by government agencies, international organisations (such as the UN or WHO), or major research institutions are usually reliable. These include policy documents, white papers, and statistical reports.
4.Academic Conference Papers: Papers presented at academic conferences are often peer-reviewed and are considered a good source of up-to-date research.
5.Theses and Dissertations: These are detailed studies conducted by students at the master's or doctoral level and can be good sources of specialised information.
6.Authoritative Databases and Online Journals: Databases, such as JSTOR, PubMed, and Google Scholar, provide access to a wide range of peer-reviewed journal articles and academic publications.
7.Educational and Government Websites (.edu, .gov, .ac.uk): Websites ending in .edu, .gov, or .ac.uk often contain reliable information, especially if they are linked to known educational institutions or government bodies.
8.Reputable News Outlets: While not as authoritative as academic journals or books, reputable news sources like the BBC, The Guardian, or The Times can provide current information and are often used to support arguments or provide context.
9.Research Institute Publications: Research institutes often publish reports and papers that are credible and detailed, contributing significantly to their field of study.
It is important to critically evaluate each source by considering the author's credentials, publication date, publisher reputation, and objectivity of the content. The source should be relevant to the real-world scenario and offer depth to the academic work.
For postgraduate students, the presentation of a report is not just about providing information; it is a critical aspect of their academic and professional development. An effectively presented report can significantly enhance the impact and credibility of your research, demonstrating your ability to synthesise complex information and communicate it clearly and persuasively.
The following are some reasons why the presentation is so important.
1.Clarity of Communication: Postgraduate studies often deal with complex and nuanced real-world scenario s. Thus, the ability to present these intricacies in an accessible manner is crucial. A well- presented report helps ensure that your audience, whether academic peers, supervisors, or industry professionals, can easily understand and engage with your findings.
2.Professionalism: The standard of your report presentation reflects your professional image. Attention to detail, coherent structures, and clear visuals indicate a high level of professionalism and dedication to your work. This is particularly important for postgraduate students preparing to enter or advance their professional career.
3.Persuasive Argumentation: A key goal of any report is to persuade the reader of the validity of your argument. The presentation of your report plays a vital role in this process. A logically structured report with well-presented evidence and clear narrative is much more likely to convince the reader of your conclusions.
4.Impact and Engagement: The way you present your report can significantly affect how engaging it is. Reports that are visually appealing and easy to navigate are more likely to hold the reader's attention, making them more impactful.
5.Demonstrating Skills: As a postgraduate student, you are expected to develop certain skills, including critical thinking, research, and communication. How you present your report provides an opportunity to demonstrate these skills. A well-crafted presentation shows that you can not only conduct high- quality research, but also effectively communicate your findings.
6.Academic Rigour: Good presentation goes hand in hand with academic rigour. Properly citing sources, presenting data accurately, and following academic conventions contribute to the credibility and reliability of your work.
In essence, the presentation is integral to the success of the report. It enhances readability, strengthens arguments, and demonstrates your capabilities as a postgraduate student. Therefore, investing time and effort in how you present your work is just as important as the research itself.
MN5817 100% Assignment SPRING 2023-2024 |
Distinction |
First |
Second |
Pass |
FAIL |
FAIL |
FAIL |
FAIL |
FAIL |
|
Criteria |
Marks |
≥ 82 |
72, 75, 78 |
62, 65, 68 |
52, 55, 58 |
42, 45, 48 |
35 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
Critical Discussion of Data |
15 |
Exceptional critical discussion with profound insights and application of published sources. Demonstrates deep understanding and analysis. |
Strong critical discussion, thoroughly understanding the challenges of data interpretation. |
Good level of critical discussion, adequately addressing the challenges in data interpretation. |
Satisfactory discussion with basic |
Limited discussion, with a superficial understanding of data interpretation challenges. Below pass level. |
Minimal engagement with critical |
Poor understanding and discussion of data interpretation challenges. Significantly below pass level. |
Very poor understanding with almost no relevant discussion. Far below pass level. |
No engagement with the critical aspects of data interpretation. Complete lack of understanding. |
Data Interpretation (Learning Outcome 2) |
15 |
Exemplary demonstration of data interpretation skills, applying them innovatively to a realistic business/societal problem. |
Strong and effective application of data interpretation skills to a business/societal problem. |
Good demonstration of skills with relevant application to a realistic problem. |
Adequate application of skills, meeting |
Basic application of skills, with limited relevance to a business/societal problem. Below pass level. |
Minimal demonstration of data |
Inadequate application of skills to a business/societal problem. Significantly below pass level. |
Very limited skill demonstration, lacking relevance. Far below pass level. |
No evidence of data interpretation skills applied in context. Complete lack of application. |
Critique and Evaluation of Solutions (Learning Outcome 3) |
15 |
Exceptional critique and evaluation of solutions, showing deep understanding and analysis of data interpretation impacts. |
Strong critique and evaluation skills, demonstrating good understanding of data interpretation effects on solutions. |
Good level of critique and evaluation, with a fair understanding of data interpretations' impact. |
Adequate critique and evaluation, meeting |
Basic critique and evaluation with limited insight into data interpretation effects. Below pass level. |
Minimal engagement in critiquing Well below pass level.. |
Inadequate critique and evaluation, showing significant gaps in understanding. Significantly below pass level. |
Poor understanding of how data interpretations affect solutions. Far below pass level. |
No evidence of critiquing and evaluating solutions in relation to data interpretations. Complete lack of understanding. |
Communication of Data Analysis (Learning Outcome 4) |
15 |
Exceptional design and communication skills, making data analysis outcomes highly accessible to a lay audience. |
Strong communication, effectively presenting outcomes in an accessible manner. |
Good communication, with outcomes mostly accessible to a lay audience. |
Adequate communication, meeting the |
Basic communication skills, with limited accessibility of outcomes. Below pass level. |
Minimal effort in communicating outcomes in an accessible manner. Well below pass level. |
Poor communication, with outcomes largely inaccessible. Significantly below pass level. |
Very limited communication, with little to no accessibility of outcomes. Far below pass level. |
No evidence of communication of data analysis outcomes. Complete lack of communication. |
Structure and Style |
15 |
Exceptionally well- structured and lucid report tailored to a business analytics context. Outstanding grammatical precision and readability, reflecting a high academic style. |
Very well-organised report with clear, logical flow, suitable for business analytics. Very good grammatical precision enhancing readability. |
Good structure and clear presentation appropriate for a business analytics report. Good grammatical accuracy, ensuring readability. |
Adequate structure and clarity, appropriate for an academic report in business analytics. Satisfactory grammatical accuracy and readability. |
Basic structure and some clarity, but with issues in style appropriate for a business analytics context. Some grammatical errors, slightly affecting readability |
Poorly structured and unclear, with Numerous grammatical errors, |
Very poor structure and clarity, largely inappropriate for a business analytics academic style. Frequent grammatical errors, making the text hard to understand. |
Almost no coherent structure or clarity, highly inappropriate for a business analytics context. Extensive grammatical errors, rendering the text almost unreadable. |
No coherent structure or academic style, pervasive grammatical errors. |
Reading |
15 |
Exceptional breadth and appropriateness of literature, excellently integrated and highly relevant to business analytics. |
Very good range of appropriate literature, strongly integrated and relevant to business analytics. |
Good breadth of relevant literature, adequately integrated into the business analytics context. |
Satisfactory range of literature, with basic integration and relevance to business analytics. |
Limited breadth of appropriate literature, |
Poor selection of literature with little relevance to business analytics. Inadequate integration into analysis. |
Very poor selection of largely inappropriate literature for business analytics. Little integration and relevance. |
Almost no appropriate literature used for business analytics. Negligible integration and relevance. |
No appropriate literature used, no integration or relevance to business analytics. |
Referencing |
10 |
Exceptional accuracy and consistency in Harvard referencing, with sources demonstrating high academic integrity, crucial for business analytics. |
Very accurate and consistent Harvard referencing, sources showing clear academic integrity in a business analytics context. |
Good accuracy and consistency in referencing, with sources appropriate for business analytics. |
Adequate referencing with minor inaccuracies, |
Basic referencing with noticeable errors, |
Poor referencing with significant inaccuracies. Sources often lack academic integrity or relevance to business analytics. |
Very poor referencing, largely inaccurate or inconsistent, with sources generally inappropriate for business analytics. |
Almost no accurate referencing, sources mostly irrelevant or lacking academic integrity in a business analytics context. |
No adherence to referencing norms, sources, if used, are irrelevant to business analytics and lack academic integrity. |
Hire Experts to solve your MN5817 Assignment before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentIf you are falling short of time left and searching for expert help for your MN5817 Cloud Computing for Business Assignment? Our team of professional writers provides top-quality Business Management Assignment Help. Just write my assignment, and your assignment will be completed on time. We are ensuring you get the best results on our affordable UK Dissertation Help. Contact us today for a plagiarism-free assignment solutions. This will help you stand out from the rest with better grades!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content