Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
---|---|---|---|
University | Swansea University | Module Title | MN- D019 MSC Business Project |
This module offers students the opportunity to apply knowledge and skills developed in MN-M595 Business Project Foundations. Specifically, students will be tasked with a real-world problem from industry partners and will have to apply the concepts learnt in Business Projects Foundations to complete the task. In groups, students will investigate these problems and project recommendations and solutions, based on a robust exercise in evidence gathering and critical analysis. The focus on this module is developing understanding of the workplace research process and how best this can be done.
Students will continue to work in their pre-assigned groups from MN-M595 (unless specific issues were raised) to complete the project brief they were allocated in MN-M595.
The business problem/opportunity will allow you to CONTINUE to apply the knowledge from your specialist modules to a specific business-related issue. This is a practical module and employers will look favourably on knowing you can apply theoretical knowledge to a practical real world business issue
All communications on the module including workshop lecture slides, support materials and announcements will be via CANVAS.
This booklet contains:
You would have been working in your allocated groups since the start of term 2. You will be continuing on in the same groups for term 3 for various reasons:
What to do if you are having irreconcilable differences within your group. Email the module coordinator as a matter of urgency ONLY in the circumstance where it has developed into a non-functional team. Disagreements within the team are part of the education and development process and you are expected to develop those skills during this process. However, do contact the module coordinator in the case where differences are irriconcilable.
MN-D019 over 800+ students enrolled
MN-D019 over 800+ students enrolled |
||||||
Date |
Date & Time In person |
Timetable room Booking |
Date & Time Online |
Zoom Link |
Overview |
Delivered by |
In your own time (IYOT) |
Online prerecorded introduction training session: Introduction to Business Projects |
Online - prerecorded |
||||
W/c 17th June |
17/06/24 11-12pm |
GH 043 (382) |
20/06/24 12-1pm |
Join Zoom Meeting https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/93794046944?pwd=RXBENTBOQldGSEh5RnUyYmlvOUJ0UT09 |
Time management techniques for writing such a big project |
CAS- Nicole Chartier Steven / Chris |
In your own time (IYOT) |
Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 1 |
Online pre-recorded |
||||
w/c 1st July |
01/07/24 11-12pm |
Y Twyni 002 (350) |
04/07/24 1-2pm |
https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/93153896226?pwd=QWM3RldhMWc0ZllyT2ZGQmdwUndRZz09 |
Literature search/Referencing software |
Allison Jones |
w/c 8th July |
08/07/24 11-12pm |
Y Twyni 002 (350) |
|
This was offered as a recording due to dates not lining up. |
Writing a literature review presentation skills |
CAS ANA/ANA |
In your own time (IYOT) |
Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 2 |
Online pre-recorded |
||||
w/c 15th July |
15/07/24 11-12pm |
Y Twyni 002 (350) |
19/07/24 12-1pm
|
https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/94808500397?pwd=cmF3Ky9hd3Z0M2FOT2JUR1pXQ2M5UT09 |
Searching for secondary data |
Library – Giles Lloyd Brown |
In your own time (IYOT)
|
Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 3 |
Online pre-recorded |
||||
w/c 29th July |
29/07/24 11-12pm |
GH 043 (382) |
01/08/24 10-11am
|
https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/95863192417?pwd=WXNxb092dlMrY2pkRlFkR0Zmbk9mUT09 Meeting ID: 958 6319 2417 Passcode: 368423 |
Avoiding plagiarism |
CAS Ana Brennan - 22/08 |
w/c 29th July
|
30/07/24 |
Y Twyni 002 (350) |
01/08/24
|
https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/99809812327?pwd=dysraDJmNXBkWWRYL1orYzcyYlQ5QT09 Meeting ID: 998 0981 2327 Passcode: 157585 |
Report Writing |
CAS Ana Brennan |
In your own time (IYOT) |
Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 4 |
Online pre-recorded |
||||
w/c 19th August |
19/08/24 11-12pm |
GH043 |
22/08/24 1-2pm
|
https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/99809812327?pwd=dysraDJmNXBkWWRYL1orYzcyYlQ5QT09 Meeting ID: 998 0981 2327 Passcode: 157585 |
Reflective writing (Gibbs) |
CAS Ana Brennan - |
You will have four online prerecorded training sessions for this module which are available for you to watch on canvas when released.
Additional support sessions. You may choose to attend these in-person or online. Please see the online timetable for zoom links for the session indicated below
Students are required to be available for supervision IN-PERSON during the business project.
Each group will be allocated a supervisor, this will be confirmed via an email by the 31st May 2024. Students are required to arrange four engagements with supervisors. These meetings will take place IN-PERSON. Supervision meetings will typically take place BETWEEN workshops 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Supervision meetings normally last around 45 minutes – 1 hour.
If you wish to have shorter but more regular meetings, you can negotiate this with your supervisor.
Supervisors will then complete a supervision record on e-vision to provide comment as to what extent the student has met milestones for each engagement point. The expected outcomes and topics for discussion at each engagement are outlined in Appendix A.
We recommend your first meeting to take place after the 10th June 2024
You should be assigned to your supervisors by the 31st May 2024, it is your responsibility as a group to arrange meetings with your supervisor.
You would have an opportunity to discuss the projects with the project providers in the form of a webinar. We hope that you attended these and found the information valuable. Do feedback to your supervisors what your experience of the engagement was.
Do You Need MN- D019 Assignment of This Question
Request to Buy Answer10th June 2024 – 16th September 2024
One supervision meeting is to be held during the months of June, July, August and September.
This is a critical aspect of engagement and is compulsory for Tier 4 visa allocation and monitoring.
Please refer to the ‘Module Overview’ lecture slides on Canvas for detailed information on the role of your supervisor.
Swansea University has a policy on the supervision of Postgraduate Taught Masters students, which is available on the university website at:
http://www.swansea.ac.uk/academic-services/academic-guide/assessment-and-progress/supervision-policy/
Meetings can be arranged as soon as supervisors have been allocated. Supervisors need to register each meeting using e-vision and the following link:
https://evision-swanseauniversity.msappproxy.net/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn
For more details on supervision meetings and milestones see Appendix A.
Full-time students are required to be actively engaged and available for supervision during the business project.
The University will continue to monitor students’ engagement during the business project and will take relevant action involving those students whose engagement is deemed to be unsatisfactory. Supervisors will complete a monthly meeting record on e-vision to provide comment as to what extent the student has met milestones for each engagement point. The expected outcomes and topics for discussion at each engagement are outlined in Appendix A.
Students are expected to REMAIN in Swansea for the summer. If you would like to clarify this pertaining to your specific circumstances, then please contact tier4attendance@swansea.ac.uk
Please remember if you miss an engagement without giving more than 24 hours’ notice, it is at the supervisor’s discretion as to whether they rearrange it. Please take into consideration that this may not be immediately following the previous meeting.
The University cannot be held responsible for withdrawing a student for non-attendance where the student may have extenuating circumstances if these circumstances have not been made known to the School or the University.
On completion of this module students should be able to:
1.Critique the role of knowledge and information in the workplace.
2.Demonstrate a critical awareness of issues relating to undertaking a business project
3.Critically evaluate, choose, and implement methodologies to appropriate business projects.
4.Explain the value and contribution of reflective practice
5.Extrapolate recommendations from research findings and demonstrate an ability to report findings to business partners.
Every effort has been made to provide the books and journals featured in the reading list for this module in digital and hard copy format via the library. For more details of the resources available to support your studies, both on-line and in person, please consult the library services guide or watch this short recording by Subject Librarian, Naomi Prady.
https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/management
The full reading list for this module is available via Canvas
The core textbooks for the module are:
Doing Research in Business Management: an essential guide to planning your project (2nd Edition).by Mark Saunders and Philip Lewis. Pearson (2018).
Business Research Methods (4th Edition) by Alan Bryman and Emma Bell. Oxford University Press (2015)
Moon, J. (1999) Reflection in learning & professional development: theory & practice. Kogan Page London.
Jasper, M., Rosser, M., & Mooney, G. (2013). Professional development, reflection and decision-making in nursing and health care. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
https://efs.weblogs.anu.edu.au/files/2018/01/Moon-on-Reflective-Writing.pdf
Bassot, B. (2020). The Reflective Journal. Red Globe Press/Macmillan Education Limited.
Costley, C., Elliott, G. and Gibbs, P. (2013). Doing Work-Based Research. SAGE: London.
Gray, D.E. (2020). Doing Research in the Business World (2nd Edition). SAGE: London
The following are also helpful books that cover the main areas in the module:
Easterby-Smith et al. (2018). Management and Business Research. SAGE: London.
Wilson NG and Elayne Coakes (2014). Business Research. Kogan Page London.
Kloppenborg, T. J., Anantatmula, V. S., and Wells, K. N. (2019). Contemporary project management. 4th edition. Cengage Learning, Boston
Gido, J., Clements, J., and Baker, R. (2018) Successful Project Management. 7th edition. Cengage Learning, Boston
Journal articles will also be available in a folder on Canvas
A core textbook is only a starting point and provides introductory and background information only. Supplemental reading will be identified at each lecture. To achieve high marks in this module students will need to do the background and supplemental reading as well as conduct their own independent research for instance through the reading of academic journals, into the topics identified.
The assessment for the module is structured as follows:
Step 1: 30% Pre-recorded Group Presentation via Turnitin on Canvas - Deadline at 2:00pm on July 19th .
Group Ethics form via Turnitin on Canvas - Deadline at 2:00pm on July19th (to be confirmed if Programme Director can submit this on students behalf) .
Step 2: 40% Group business project of no more than 7,500 words - Deadline at 2:00pm on September 30th
Step 3: 30% Individual Reflective Research Practice Portfolio of no more than 2,000 words - Deadline at 2:00pm on September 30th
Any written work submitted as part of any assessment or examination may be submitted in Welsh, and that work submitted in Welsh will be treated no less favourably than written work submitted by you in English as part of an assessment or examination.
The expectation is that students will submit their Business project within the time-limit laid down by the regulation.
For postgraduate students, the School operates a late penalty system of awarding zero marks for any late and/or incomplete submissions.
PLEASE NOTE: Students must ensure that their research can be completed in 3 months and should take note of public holidays both in the UK and overseas when drawing up their work plan.
A candidate's time-limit may be extended by Swansea University in exceptional cases. It is the responsibility of the student to bring to the attention of their supervisor any foreseeable events which may interfere with their work and result in a possible extension request.
Extensions may be granted on compassionate grounds, in cases of illness, serious domestic difficulties, or inordinate professional commitments (part-time students only) which can be demonstrated to have adversely affected a candidate's ability to complete within the stipulated period. A full and reasoned case, supported by appropriate medical or other independent evidence, must be made by the School for the consideration of Swansea University.
Students who request an extension on such grounds must complete the official Extension Request Form in Appendix C. A clear statement must be supplied, showing that the School concerned has evaluated the situation in which the candidate finds him/herself as a result of the illness or other circumstance (including covid-19 related issues) and that it considers the requested extension to be appropriate. Such a statement will, wherever possible, follow contact between the candidate and the School.
The first assignment of this module is a pre-recorded group presentation and ethics form worth 30% of the module mark.
This assignment is split into two key components:
Part 1: Pre-recorded group presentation and associated slides
Part 2: Group ethics form
Part 1: Pre-recorded group presentation and slides brief
This group assignment will allow you to demonstrate the progress you have made in planning what you have done for the project so far and your approach to delivering the outcomes that were outlined in your project brief.
This interim presentation can draw upon the content from your proposal for MN-M595 and the new work you should have done since.
The assignment will be a 15-minute pre-recorded presentation and upload it to canvas with a separate session for Q and A.
The Q and A session should be arranged IN-PERSON with your supervisor no later than 2 weeks post submission (19th July – 02nd August).
All students MUST appear in the presentation recording and MUST attend the group Q & A in person.
Your presentation should contain information on the following:
A more comprehensive structure will be available on Canvas.
Part 2: Group ethics form ( this is not needed for your submission)
The School of Management and wider University have a Research Ethics Policy that applies to all research undertaken to make sure it complies with ethical guidelines. The policy is intended to cover work completed by undergraduates, postgraduates (taught and research), research staff and academic staff.
What is research integrity: ethics and governance?
For a more comprehensive overview of the ethical guidelines please see:
Ethical Review Process
1.Using the video provided on Canvas to help complete the online research ethics form.
2.The Research Ethics Form is accessed through your apps under the name ‘Research Ethics Applicant’. Go to My Applications
3.Only ONE group member needs to complete this. There is the option to ADD all group members names/student numbers/e-mails within the application.
4.The icon will look like this:
You MUST include the ethics approval document in your dissertation.
Ethical Considerations
Students should note that Swansea University is not responsible for any processing by them of personal data for which Swansea University is not the data controller, even if the processing is carried out using Swansea University's equipment and facilities. Students are personally responsible for complying with the GDPR in regard to data for which they are the data controller.
You may be required to provide your supervisor and the assessment team with a copy of your data should they request.
Submission – for more information see section 8
One group member should submit the following documents. Please remember to clearly include GROUP NUMBER IN SUBMISSION TITLE.
Key Marking criteria will include (please see the following marking rubric for more details):
MN-D019 Presentation |
% |
0-9 Missing Fail |
10-19 Inadequate Fail |
20-29 Very Poor Fail |
30 – 39 Poor Fail |
40-44 Tolerable Fail |
45-49 Basic Fail |
50-54 Satisfactory Pass |
55-59 Fair Pass |
60-64 Favourable Merit |
65-69 Good Merit |
70-74 Very Good Distinction |
75-79 Great Distinction |
80-89 Excellent |
90-99 Outstanding Distinction |
100 Impeccable Distinction |
Initiative: Originality and Innovativeness of Solution |
20 |
This section is completely missing |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Inadequate |
The potential approach and solution to the project is very poor |
The potential approach and solution to the project is poor |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Tolerable |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Basic |
The potential approach and solution to the project is satisfactory |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Fair |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Favourable |
The potential approach and solution to the project is good |
The potential approach and solution to the project is very good |
The potential approach and solution to the project is Great |
The potential approach and solution to the project is excellent |
The potential approach and solution to the project is outstanding |
The potential approach and solution to the project is impeccable |
Presentation Content: Relevance of information provided |
20 |
This section is completely missing |
The content of the presentation is Inadequate and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is very poor and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is poor and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is Tolerable and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is Basic and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is satisfactory and is partially relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is Fair and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is Favourable and does not relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is good and has some relevance to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is very good and is relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is Great and is relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is excellent and is very relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is outstanding and is very relevant to the project brief |
The content of the presentation is impeccable and is very relevant to the project brief |
Presentation structure |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate presentation structure |
Very poor presentation structure |
Poor presentation structure |
Tolerable presentation structure |
Basic presentation structure |
Satisfactory presentation structure |
Fair presentation structure |
Favourable presentation structure |
Good presentation structure |
Very good presentation structure |
Great presentation structure |
Excellent presentation structure |
Outstanding presentation structure |
Impeccable presentation structure |
References: Use of suitable sources to support the report |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate use of appropriate sources |
Very poor use of appropriate sources |
Poor use of appropriate sources |
Tolerable use of appropriate sources |
Basic use of appropriate sources |
Satisfactory use of appropriate sources |
Fair use of appropriate sources |
Favourable use of appropriate sources |
Good use of appropriate sources |
Very good use of appropriate sources |
Great use of appropriate sources |
Excellent use of appropriate sources |
Outstanding use of appropriate sources |
Impeccable use of appropriate sources |
Quality of Research: Evidence to support project |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate supporting evidence |
Very poor supporting evidence |
Poor supporting evidence |
Tolerable supporting evidence |
Basic supporting evidence |
Satisfactory supporting evidence |
Fair supporting evidence |
Favourable supporting evidence |
Good supporting evidence |
Very good supporting evidence |
Great supporting evidence |
Excellent supporting evidence |
Outstanding supporting evidence |
Impeccable supporting evidence |
Purpose: Rationale behind presentation delivery |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate rationale provided |
Very poor rationale provided |
Poor rationale provided |
Tolerable rationale provided |
Basic rationale provided |
Satisfactory rationale provided |
Fair rationale provided |
Favourable rationale provided |
Good rationale provided |
Very good rationale provided |
Great rationale provided |
Excellent rationale provided |
Outstanding rationale provided |
Impeccable rationale provided |
Professionalism in terms of delivery |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate professionalism in delivery |
Very Poor professionalism in delivery |
Poor professionalism in delivery |
Tolerable professionalism in delivery |
Basic professionalism in delivery |
Satisfactory professionalism in delivery |
Fair professionalism in delivery |
Favourable professionalism in delivery |
Good professionalism in delivery |
Very Good professionalism in delivery |
Great professionalism in delivery |
Excellent professionalism in delivery |
Outstanding professionalism in delivery |
Impeccable professionalism in delivery |
Response to questioning |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Very Poor responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Poor responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Tolerable responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Basic responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Satisfactory responses showing a basic understanding of the project aims |
Fair responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Favourable responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims |
Good responses showing an acceptable understanding of the project aims |
Very Good responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims |
Great responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims |
Excellent responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims |
Outstanding responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims |
Impeccable responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims |
Submission of ethics form |
5 |
0% awarded if the ethics form is not submitted |
5% awarded if group submits ethics form |
The second coursework assignment for this module is a group assignment worth 40% of the overall module mark.
COURSEWORK BRIEF
The Group Project Report should follow the structure below and will be based on the project brief your group have been provided.
The word limit is 7,500 words so it needs to provide a concise overview of how you have planned, executed and delivered the project. There should be a clear indication of what has been achieved in relation to the objectives set in the project brief. There should also be clear recommendations on how the company can implement the proposed ideas and any shortcomings from your project and how it could be improved with more time.
An outline structure is indicated on the next page. Bullet points can be used appropriately and you can cross reference to a table, spreadsheet, Gant chart or other planning tool. Your planning tool will not be included in the word count.
PLEASE NOTE:
You would have completed a PROPOSAL for this work in term 2. It is not the report but a proposal to suggest how you could achieve the objectives of your project. The content should NOT be identical to that submitted for MN-M595. You are now doing the work that you proposed to do in term 2. It is perfectly fine to make changes to the proposal with your supervisors guidance where required.
It is poor academic practice to copy and paste therefore please do not do that here – it will result in a lower grade.
Top Tips for Successful Report Writing
You are required to submit your GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT via Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by Friday 30th September at 2 pm. Use the filename MND019-GROUPNUMBER-STUDENTNUMBER
For more information on submission guidelines please see section 8. Submission
7,500 (not including tables, figures, appendices – please see section 9 for more detailed information
business Project report Structure
By following this outline, you can create a comprehensive and well-organised postgraduate-level business project report.
Title Page (which should be a Professional Business Project Report Cover page)
Declarations and Statements
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Table of Figures and Tables
1.Introduction
1.1.Background: Provide context and background on the business problem or opportunity
1.2.Aim and Objectives: Clearly outline the goals of the project including the main project aim and objectives
1.3.Scope: Define the scope (what is included and excluded from the project) and limitations of the project.
1.4.Project research Approach: The approach used to achieve the objectives.
2.Business Problem/Opportunity Analysis
2.1Problem Statement: Define the business problem or opportunity.
2.2Impact: Discuss the potential impact on the organization.
2.3 Goals: Outline the desired outcomes and success criteria.
3.Background Research
3.1.Situational Analysis - start with a PESTEL analysis to understand the macro-environment. Conduct a SWOT analysis to summarise internal and external factors. Perform an internal analysis to evaluate the companies capabilities. Integrate a market analysis to understand specific market dynamics.
3.2.Relevant academic sources researched A brief summary of key findings from previous research in relevant and credible academic journals, case studies, books, market reports and relevant publications from accredited agencies and organisations.
4.Approach and process (Desk-based research)
4.1 Project Approach: Describe the approach taken to address the problem or opportunity.
4.2 Analysis Techniques and approaches: Outline the techniques used to analyze the data.
4.3 Work Plan: Provide an overview of the project work plan and timelines.
4.4 Ethical concerns and ethical procedures at the School of Management, Swansea University.
5.Findings
5.1.Introduction Reiterate the aims and objectives. Provide a very brief overview of the approach used to achieve the objectives.
5.2.Analysis: Present your analysis, including themes, trends. Use charts, graphs, and tables to illustrate key points.
5.3.Discussion – interpret your findings in the context of your objectives
5.4.Key Findings: Summarize the main findings relevant to the project objectives
6.Recommendations
Strategic Recommendations: Provide actionable recommendations based on the findings.
7.Implementation
7.1.Action Plan: Provide a detailed action plan for implementing the recommendations.
7.2.Timeline: Include a timeline with milestones and deadlines.
7.3.Resources: Identify the resources required for implementation (e.g., personnel, budget, technology).
7.4.Risk Management: Discuss potential risks and mitigation strategies.
8.Evaluation and Monitoring
8.1.Success Metrics: Define the metrics and KPIs to measure the success of the implementation.
8.2.Monitoring Plan: Outline a plan for ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
9.Conclusion
9.1.Summary: Recap the key findings and recommendations.
9.2.Impact: Discuss the potential impact of the project on the organization.
9.References
Use APA style to list of all the sources cited in the report.
APPENDIX SECTION
10.Appendices
Marking Criteria
MN-D019 Report |
% |
0-9 Missing (Fail) |
10-19 Inadequate (Fail) |
20-29 Very Poor (fail) |
30 – 39 Poor - Fail |
40-44 Tolerable Fail |
45-49 Basic fail |
50-54 satisfactory (pass) |
55-59 Fair - Pass |
60-64 favourable (merit) |
65-69 good Merit |
70-74 very good |
75-79 great |
80-89 Excellent |
90-99 Outstanding - Distinction |
100 Impeccable Distinction |
Executive Summary |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Very poor identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Poor identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Tolerable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Basic identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Satisfactory identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Fair identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Favourable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Good identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Very good identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Great identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Excellent identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Outstanding identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Impeccable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered |
Introduction and Business Problem |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Very poor identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Poor identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Tolerable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Basic identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Satisfactory identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Fair identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Favourable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Good identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Very good identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Great identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Excellent identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Outstanding identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Impeccable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives |
Background Research |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Very poor application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Poor application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Tolerable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Basic application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Satisfactory application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Fair application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Favourable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Good application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Very good application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Great application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Excellent application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Outstanding application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Impeccable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates |
Approach and Process (desk Based research) |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Very poor Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Poor Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Tolerable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Basic Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Satisfactory Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Fair Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Favourable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Good Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Very good Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Great Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Excellent Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Outstanding Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Impeccable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods |
Findings and analysis |
15 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Very poor explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Poor explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Tolerable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Basic explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Satisfactory explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Fair explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Favourable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Good explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Very good explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Great explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Excellent explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Outstanding explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Impeccable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief
|
Recommendations |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Very poor identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Poor identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Tolerable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Basic identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Satisfactory identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Fair identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Favourable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Good identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Very good identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Great identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Excellent identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Outstanding identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Impeccable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors |
Conclusions |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Inadequate recommendations |
Very poor demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and very poor recommendations |
Poor demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and poor recommendations |
Tolerable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Tolerable recommendations |
Basic demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Basic recommendations |
Satisfactory demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Satisfactory recommendations |
Fair demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Fair recommendations |
Favourable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Favourable recommendations |
Good demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Good recommendations |
Very good demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Very good recommendations |
Great demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Great recommendations |
Excellent demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and excellent recommendations |
Outstanding demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and outstanding recommendations |
Impeccable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Impeccable recommendations |
References |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate APA 7 referencing |
Very poor APA 7 referencing |
Poor APA 7 referencing |
Tolerable APA 7 referencing |
Basic APA 7 referencing |
Satisfactory APA 7 referencing |
Fair APA 7 referencing |
Favourable APA 7 referencing |
Good APA 7 referencing |
Very good APA 7 referencing |
Great APA 7 referencing |
Excellent APA 7 referencing |
Outstanding APA 7 referencing |
Impeccable APA 7 referencing |
Appendices |
10 |
Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Inadequate Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Very Poor Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Poor Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Tolerable Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Basic Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Satisfactory Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Fair Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Favourable Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Good Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Very good Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Great Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Excellent Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Outstanding Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Impeccable Missing ethics form and group planning documents |
Quality of Writing |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Very poor Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Poor Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Tolerable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Basic Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Satisfactory Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Fair Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Favourable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Good Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Very good Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Great Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Excellent Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Outstanding Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Impeccable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section |
Quality of Presentation |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequately structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant. |
Very poorly structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant. |
Poorly structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant. |
Tolerable structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant. |
Basic structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant. |
Satisfactory structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Fair structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Favourable structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Good structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Very good structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Great structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Excellent structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Outstanding structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Impeccable structured report that is easy for the reader to follow. Headings are used to set out the sections. |
Group work and project documentation |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work |
Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work |
Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work |
Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work |
Most documents included, some missing evidence of group work |
Most documents included, some good evidence of group work |
Most documents included, some good evidence of group work |
All documents included, some good evidence of group work |
All documents included, good evidence of group work |
All documents included, very good evidence of group work |
All documents included, very good evidence of group work |
All documents included, very good evidence of group work |
All documents included, excellent evidence of group work |
All documents included, excellent evidence of group work |
The third coursework assignment for this module is an individual assignment worth 30% of the overall module mark.
Coursework Brief
Using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle (1988) as shown and supported by Reflective Writing by J Moon) you are expected to develop a reflection of your positive and negative experiences associated with completing the Business Project.
Please FOCUS your reflection on the following elements:
The individual reflection provides an opportunity for you to look back on the business project and consider the progress made over the course of the module.
As part of the reflection, you need to consider what actions could have been taken and would need to be taken if you experienced a similar situation in the future.
Word count = 2,000
You are required to submit your INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 3pm
For more information on submission guidelines please see section 8. Submission.
Key Marking criteria will include:
MN-D019 Individual Reflection |
Weighting (100%) |
0-9 Missing (Fail) |
10-19 Inadequate (Fail) |
20-29 Very Poor (fail) |
30 – 39 Poor - Fail |
40-44 Tolerable Fail |
45-49 Basic fail |
50-54 satisfactory (pass) |
55-59 Fair - Pass |
60-64 favourable (merit) |
65-69 good Merit |
70-74 very good |
75-79 great |
80-89 Excellent |
90-99 Outstanding - Distinction |
100 Impeccable Distinction |
Description |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Very Poor description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Poor description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Tolerable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Basic description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Satisfactory description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Fair description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
|
Favourable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
|
Good description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Very Good description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Great description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
|
Excellent description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on. |
Outstanding description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
|
Impeccable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
|
Feelings |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Very Poor explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Poor explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Tolerable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Basic explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Satisfactory explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Fair explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Favourable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Good explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Very Good explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Great explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Excellent explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Outstanding explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Impeccable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience |
Evaluation |
15 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Very Poor evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Poor evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Tolerable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Basic evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Satisfactory evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Fair evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Favourable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Good evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Very Good evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Great evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Excellent evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Outstanding evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Impeccable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience |
Analysis |
15 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Very Poor Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Poor Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Tolerable Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Basic Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Satisfactory Analysis that identifies some honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, with minimal relation to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Fair Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Favourable Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Good Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Very Good Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Great Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Excellent A Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Outstanding Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Impeccable Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice. |
Conclusion |
15 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Very Poor conclusions which do not identify any options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Poor conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Tolerable conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Basic conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Satisfactory conclusions which identify minimal options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Fair conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Favourable conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Good conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Very Good conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Great conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Excellent conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Outstanding conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Impeccable conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward |
Action Plan |
15 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Very Poor and missing action plan and missing time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Poor and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Tolerable and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Basic and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Satisfactory and includes only a basic action plan and minimal feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Fair and detailed action plan and Fair feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Favourable and detailed action plan and Favourable feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Good action and detailed action plan and good feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Very Good and detailed action plan and very good feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Great and detailed action plan and Great feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Excellent and detailed action plan and excellent feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Outstanding and detailed action plan and outstanding feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Impeccable and detailed action plan and Impeccable feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe |
Quality and Scope of the literature and structure of references |
10 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Inadequate analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Inadequate identification of options for improvement. |
Very Poor use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and very poor analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as very poor identification of options for improvement. |
Poor use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and poor analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as poor identification of options for improvement. |
Tolerable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Tolerable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Tolerable identification of options for improvement. |
Basic use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Basic analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Basic identification of options for improvement. |
Satisfactory use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and satisfactory analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as satisfactory identification of options for improvement. |
Fair use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Fair analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Fair identification of options for improvement |
Favourable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Favourable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Favourable identification of options for improvement |
Good use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and good analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as good identification of options for improvement |
Very Good use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and very good analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as very good identification of options for improvement |
Great use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Great analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Great identification of options for improvement |
Excellent use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and excellent analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as excellent identification of options for improvement. |
Outstanding use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and outstanding analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as outstanding identification of options for improvement |
Impeccable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Impeccable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Impeccable identification of options for improvement |
Understanding |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Very Poor demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Poor demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Tolerable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Basic demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Satisfactory demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Fair demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Favourable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Good demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Very Good demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Great demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Excellent demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Outstanding demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Impeccable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice |
Readability |
5 |
This section is completely missing |
Inadequate ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Very poor ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Poor ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Tolerable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Basic ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Satisfactory ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Fair ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Favourable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Good ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Very good ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Great ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Excellent ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Outstanding ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Impeccable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above |
Stuck MN- D019 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?
Hire Assignment Helper Now!There are different submission deadlines for the different assignments of the Business Projects Module. These can be seen above in relation to the different assignments.
Overall, the following items should be submitted for fulfilment of the MN-D019 Business Projects Module
The following requirements must be adhered to:
1.One electronic copy of your GROUP CODE OF CONDUCT must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 21st June at 2 pm – this will only be reviewed in the event of group issues.
2.One electronic copy of your GROUP PRESENTATION SLIDES must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th July at 2 pm
3.One electronic copy of your PRE-RECORDED GROUP PRESENTATION must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th July at 2 pm
4.One electronic copy of your GROUP ETHICS FORM must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th July at 2 pm (to be confirmed if Programme Director can submit this on the students behalf)
5.One electronic copy of your GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm
6.One electronic copy of your INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm
7.ONLY IN THE EVENT OF ISSUES: One electronic copy of your INDIVIDUAL PEER REVIEW FORM must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm.
8.Students must ensure that their Group Business Project and Individual Reflection includes the required signed Declarations and Statements form (Appendix B).
Failure to meet the submission requirements set out in points 2-6 above will result in a mark of 0 and work classified as an incomplete submission. No further re-submission opportunities will be available to submissions that are deemed to be incomplete.
7.When your submission has been successful you will be given a submission receipt. You must keep a note of this, either by saving it or taking a screenshot. If there are any problems with your submission, we will need this before we can resolve them.
8.Students may be required to submit a copy of their data upon request by their supervisors or the assessment team.
Plagiarism detection software will be used to check your report, and any unfair practices will be dealt with strictly. Information about unfair practice can be found in the University’s Academic Guide available at:
9.www.swan.ac.uk/registry/academicguide/assessmentandprogress/unfairpracticeprocedure/1definitionofunfairpractice/
10.For postgraduate students, the School operates a late penalty system of awarding zero marks for any late submissions.
11.Business projects which are of particular relevance to Wales or Celtic Studies may be deposited in the University Library (copies retained by Swansea University may be decommissioned after one year).
If you have any queries regarding your submission, please contact the assessments team within the School of Management Reception or e-mail at the assessment team
You will then see a message saying “Submission Complete”
Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University. Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:
Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University. Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:
The maximum word limit for the main assignment (excluding tables, contents page, footnotes, charts, graphs, figures but including in-text references) is 2000 words. The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet.
Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work.
Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.
The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:
APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing
To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University).
Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.
For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.
Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.
Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University. Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:
The word limit is 7,500 words; this is a maximum limit and is for the main text.
The word limit does NOT include:
The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet.
Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work.
Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.
The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:
APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing
To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University).
Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.
For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.
Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.
Character or Print Height
Text-size would be equivalent to 12pt Times New Roman. (The size of text used in this sentence.)
Margins
Margins should be 4cm (1½ inches) wide on the left-hand side and 2cm (¾ inch) on the right-hand side.
Line Spacing
Double or one-and-a-half line spacing should be used in the main text. However, single spacing should be used in the abstract and in any indented quotations and footnotes.
Page Numbering
Pages in the Business project should be numbered sequentially. Page numbers should be placed top-right or bottom centre.
Individual Reflection
Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University. Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:
The word limit is 2000 words; this is a maximum limit and is for the main text.
The word limit does NOT include:
The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet.
Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work.
Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.
The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:
APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing
To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University).
Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.
For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.
https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/Student-Data-Protection-Statement-18-19.pdf
Character or Print Height
Text-size would be equivalent to 12pt Times New Roman. (The size of text used in this sentence.)
Margins
Margins should be 4cm (1½ inches) wide on the left-hand side and 2cm (¾ inch) on the right-hand side.
Line Spacing
Double or one-and-a-half line spacing should be used in the main text. However, single spacing should be used in the abstract and in any indented quotations and footnotes.
Page Numbering
Pages in the Business project should be numbered sequentially. Page numbers should be placed top-right or bottom centre.
Proof Reading
Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.
Extenuating Circumstances are defined as serious and acute problems or events which are beyond your control or ability to foresee which may have affected your performance and/or may have impeded your ability to complete or submit an assessment on time.
If you feel you are dealing with extenuating circumstances please contact your supervisor, the assessments team (assessment-management@swansea.ac.uk) who will be able to discuss the extenuating circumstances process with you.
If you require an extension to your business project please complete the form in Appendix C.
Any students who fail the Directed Independent Learning element, will automatically be eligible for one attempt to resubmit (capped) in line with current academic regulations and time limits set out below. Any additional University fees incurred will be waived.
If a student chooses not to submit a 1st attempt then they will not be eligible to resubmit.
Please see the following link for the Flexible Postgraduate Taught Masters Safety Net Regulations.
Mode of Study |
|
Full-time |
3 months |
Part-time |
6 months |
oStep 1: A review of the feedback on their own project compared against another project that has passed. What are the similarities, differences, what is better in their project and vice versa? Students should also make sure they focus on the reasons where both projects could be improved. They need to clearly focus on the feedback provided by the marker.
oStep 2: Reflect and discuss what they learnt when completing each of the assignments in relation to:
oStep 3: Develop an updated proposal considering the comparisons conducted in step 1 and the feedback from step 2. The structure of the proposal should be as follows:
You will NOT be eligible to graduate until you have passed the resubmission of this module and there is option to resubmit early
Academic integrity is fundamental to the values promoted by Swansea University. It is important that all students are judged on their ability, and that no student is allowed unfairly to take an advantage over others, to affect the security and integrity of the assessment process, or to diminish the reliability and quality of the qualification awarded.
Academic misconduct is to commit any act where a student may obtain an unpermitted advantage for themselves or another. This can relate to any form of assessed work including:
Academic misconduct can be committed on an individual or group basis.
There are different types of academic misconduct including:
The University takes academic misconduct very seriously and it can have a detrimental effect on your results as where academic misconduct is found to have taken place penalties will be applied.
Students should note that a claim of ignorance of the University’s expectations on good academic practice is not an acceptable defence to an allegation of academic misconduct.
Self-plagiarism is the copying of work that was originally completed and submitted by the student and resubmitted for another purpose, without acknowledgement. While self-plagiarism is not considered as academic misconduct by the University it is treated as poor academic practice by the School and this is reflected in the marks awarded.
How can students learn about good academic practice?
At the start of term the library offers induction sessions for new and continuing students. These include a complete guide to academic referencing and details of further training such as EndNote.
You can also access information on good academic practice through the Academic Success Programme at http://www.swansea.ac.uk/asp/
A short course on good academic practice can be found on a Canvas site called ‘Academic Integrity’ found under ‘My Studies’, listed under the ‘My Organisations’ section. Following completion of the self-directed learning, there is an online quiz (takes about 5 minutes), which assess your level of understanding of the learning material. You can revisit the training material and retake the quiz as many times as you wish.
Full information on Academic Misconduct can be found at http://www.swansea.ac.uk/academic-services/academic-guide/assessment-and-progress/academic-misconduct-procedure/
DOES YOUR GROUP PROJECT PRESENTATION INCLUDE THESE THINGS?
Please complete this checklist:
DOES YOUR GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT INCLUDE THESE THINGS?
Please complete this checklist:
DOES YOUR INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE RESEARCH PORTFOLIO INCLUDE THESE THINGS?
Please complete this checklist:
Buy Answer of your MN- D019 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentDo you need last-minute online assignment help with your MN- D019 MSC Business Project Assignment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Business Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment example and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
See the solution of this document click here: MN- D019 MSC Business Project Assignment Sample
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content