MN- D019 MSC Business Project Module Handbook | Swansea University

Published: 16 Aug, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Business
University Swansea University Module Title MN- D019 MSC Business Project

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Group Expectations
  3. Workshops and Additional Support Sessions
  4. Supervisory Meetings
  5. Learning Outcomes
  6. Reading Material
  7. Assessment
    Step 1: Pre-Recorded Group Presentation
    Step 2: MSc Group Business project
    Step 3: Individual Reflection
  8. Submission
  9. Notes on Style and Word Count
  10. Extenuating Circumstances
  11. Non-submission and Re-submissions
  12. Good Academic Practice
  13. Feedback
  14. Submission Checklists
  15. Appendices    45
        Appendix A: Supervision Meetings and Milestones
        Appendix B: Declaration and Statements
        Appendix C: Extension Request Form

Module Overview

1. Introduction

This module offers students the opportunity to apply knowledge and skills developed in MN-M595 Business Project Foundations. Specifically, students will be tasked with a real-world problem from industry partners and will have to apply the concepts learnt in Business Projects Foundations to complete the task. In groups, students will investigate these problems and project recommendations and solutions, based on a robust exercise in evidence gathering and critical analysis. The focus on this module is developing understanding of the workplace research process and how best this can be done. 

Students will continue to work in their pre-assigned groups from MN-M595 (unless specific issues were raised) to complete the project brief they were allocated in MN-M595. 

The business problem/opportunity will allow you to CONTINUE to apply the knowledge from your specialist modules to a specific business-related issue. This is a practical module and employers will look favourably on knowing you can apply theoretical knowledge to a practical real world business issue

All communications on the module including workshop lecture slides, support materials and announcements will be via CANVAS. 

This booklet contains: 

  • an overview of the module 
  • workshop information and supervisory information
  • details of the core textbooks via the reading list
  • information on assessment and feedback, including the business project briefs 

2.Group Expectations 

You would have been working in your allocated groups since the start of term 2. You will be continuing on in the same groups for term 3 for various reasons: 

  • The large number of students on the module
  • To make sure all students are allocated to complete the correct project
  • You would have gone through your storming and norming phases, hopefully and are now able to work at your peak performance.
  • You will remain in the group you were allocated until September 30th 2024.
  • Your supervisor for MN-D019 will be allocated by the 31st May 2024. 
  • You will be expected to please complete the following documents below in MN-D019 by the 21st June, which means you need to meet as a group before then to plan, ideally after the 10th June. 
  • Upload these documents to your canvas group space
  • Complete Belbin's team roles
  • UPDATE and sign the group code of conduct – submit by 21st June
  • If your group changes for any reason, please update the code of conduct. 
  • Check you have submitted all relevant documents per the group documents checklist including an agenda, minutes and actions meeting template for each meeting.
  • Complete presentation and ethics form – Submit by 19th   July
  • Complete the project, and reflection  – Submit by 30th September
  • Peer evaluation:  if your group have experienced severe problems during the term, or any social loafing (major lack of engagement from some students) then it is a requirement for your  group to complete the peer evaluation form (EVERY student needs to complete it).

What to do if you are having irreconcilable differences within your group. Email the module coordinator as a matter of urgency ONLY in the circumstance where it has developed into a non-functional team.  Disagreements within the team are part of the education and development process and you are expected to develop those skills during this process.  However, do contact the module coordinator in the case where differences are irriconcilable.

MN-D019 over 800+ students enrolled

MN-D019 over 800+ students enrolled

Date

Date & Time In person

Timetable room Booking

Date & Time Online

Zoom Link

Overview

Delivered by

In your own time (IYOT)

Online prerecorded introduction training session: Introduction to Business Projects

Online - prerecorded

W/c 17th June

17/06/24

11-12pm

GH 043 (382)

20/06/24

12-1pm

Join Zoom Meeting https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/93794046944?pwd=RXBENTBOQldGSEh5RnUyYmlvOUJ0UT09
Meeting ID: 937 9404 6944 Passcode: 440264

Time management techniques for writing such a big project

CAS- Nicole Chartier

Steven  / Chris

In your own time (IYOT)

Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 1

Online pre-recorded

w/c 1st July

01/07/24

11-12pm

Y Twyni 002 (350)

04/07/24

1-2pm

https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/93153896226?pwd=QWM3RldhMWc0ZllyT2ZGQmdwUndRZz09

Literature search/Referencing software

Allison Jones

w/c 8th July

08/07/24

11-12pm

Y Twyni 002 (350)

 

This was offered as a recording due to dates not lining up.

Writing a literature review presentation skills

CAS ANA/ANA

In your own time (IYOT)

Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 2

Online pre-recorded

w/c 15th July

15/07/24

11-12pm

Y Twyni 002 (350)

19/07/24

12-1pm

 

https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/94808500397?pwd=cmF3Ky9hd3Z0M2FOT2JUR1pXQ2M5UT09

Searching for secondary data

Library – Giles Lloyd Brown

In your own time (IYOT)

 

Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 3

Online pre-recorded

w/c 29th July

29/07/24

11-12pm

GH 043 (382)

01/08/24

10-11am

 

https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/95863192417?pwd=WXNxb092dlMrY2pkRlFkR0Zmbk9mUT09

Meeting ID: 958 6319 2417 Passcode: 368423

Avoiding plagiarism

CAS

Ana Brennan - 22/08

w/c 29th July

 

30/07/24
11-12pm

Y Twyni 002 (350)

01/08/24
12-1pm

 

https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/99809812327?pwd=dysraDJmNXBkWWRYL1orYzcyYlQ5QT09

Meeting ID: 998 0981 2327 Passcode: 157585

Report Writing

CAS

Ana Brennan

In your own time (IYOT)

Online prerecorded Business Projects training session 4

Online pre-recorded

w/c 19th August

19/08/24

11-12pm

GH043
(382) &
GH049
(247)

22/08/24

1-2pm

 

https://swanseauniversity.zoom.us/j/99809812327?pwd=dysraDJmNXBkWWRYL1orYzcyYlQ5QT09

Meeting ID: 998 0981 2327 Passcode: 157585

Reflective writing (Gibbs)

CAS Ana Brennan -

3.Workshops and Additional Support Sessions

You will have four online prerecorded training sessions for this module which are  available for you to watch on canvas when released. 

Additional support sessions. You may choose to attend these in-person or online. Please see the online timetable for zoom links for the session indicated below

4.Supervisory Meetings

4.1 Supervisor Meetings

Students are required to be available for supervision IN-PERSON during the business project.

Each group will be allocated a supervisor, this will be confirmed via an email by the 31st May 2024.  Students are required to arrange four engagements with supervisors. These meetings will take place IN-PERSON. Supervision meetings will typically take place BETWEEN workshops 1, 2, 3 and 4. 

Supervision meetings normally last around 45 minutes – 1 hour.  
If you wish to have shorter but more regular meetings, you can negotiate this with your supervisor. 

Supervisors will then complete a supervision record on e-vision to provide comment as to what extent the student has met milestones for each engagement point.  The expected outcomes and topics for discussion at each engagement are outlined in Appendix A.  

We recommend your first meeting to take place after the 10th June 2024

You should be assigned to your supervisors by the 31st  May 2024, it is your responsibility as a group to arrange meetings with your supervisor.  

You would have an opportunity to discuss the projects with the project providers in the form of a webinar. We hope that you attended these and found the information valuable.  Do feedback to your supervisors what your experience of the engagement was.

Do You Need MN- D019 Assignment of This Question

Request to Buy Answer

4.1.1 Specific requirements for supervision meetings are: 

10th June 2024 – 16th September 2024

One supervision meeting is to be held during the months of June, July, August and September.  

This is a critical aspect of engagement and is compulsory for Tier 4 visa allocation and monitoring.

Please refer to the ‘Module Overview’ lecture slides on Canvas for detailed information on the role of your supervisor.
    
Swansea University has a policy on the supervision of Postgraduate Taught Masters students, which is available on the university website at:

http://www.swansea.ac.uk/academic-services/academic-guide/assessment-and-progress/supervision-policy/

4.1.2 Registration of Student Meetings

Meetings can be arranged as soon as supervisors have been allocated. Supervisors need to register each meeting using e-vision and the following link:

https://evision-swanseauniversity.msappproxy.net/urd/sits.urd/run/siw_lgn

For more details on supervision meetings and milestones see Appendix A.

4.2 Attendance and Absence 

Full-time students are required to be actively engaged and available for supervision during the business project.

The University will continue to monitor students’ engagement during the business project and will take relevant action involving those students whose engagement is deemed to be unsatisfactory. Supervisors will complete a monthly meeting record on e-vision to provide comment as to what extent the student has met milestones for each engagement point.  The expected outcomes and topics for discussion at each engagement are outlined in Appendix A.  

Students are expected to REMAIN in Swansea for the summer. If you would like to clarify this pertaining to your specific circumstances, then please contact tier4attendance@swansea.ac.uk 

Please remember if you miss an engagement without giving more than 24 hours’ notice, it is at the supervisor’s discretion as to whether they rearrange it. Please take into consideration that this may not be immediately following the previous meeting. 

The University cannot be held responsible for withdrawing a student for non-attendance where the student may have extenuating circumstances if these circumstances have not been made known to the School or the University.

5.Learning Outcomes

On completion of this module students should be able to:

1.Critique the role of knowledge and information in the workplace.
2.Demonstrate a critical awareness of issues relating to undertaking a business project
3.Critically evaluate, choose, and implement methodologies to appropriate business projects.
4.Explain the value and contribution of reflective practice
5.Extrapolate recommendations from research findings and demonstrate an ability to report findings to business partners.

Transferrable Skills

  • Communication skills (written and verbal)
  • Teamwork/building
  • Problem solving
  • Identification and evaluation of sources of data/information
  • Planning and organisation
  • Time management
  • Responsibility and flexibility
  • Critical thinking
  • Reflexivity

6.Reading Material

Every effort has been made to provide the books and journals featured in the reading list for this module in digital and hard copy format via the library.  For more details of the resources available to support your studies, both on-line and in person, please consult the library services guide or watch this short recording by Subject Librarian, Naomi Prady.

https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/management

The full reading list for this module is available via Canvas

The core textbooks for the module are: 

Doing Research in Business Management: an essential guide to planning your project (2nd Edition).by Mark Saunders and Philip Lewis. Pearson (2018).

Business Research Methods (4th Edition) by Alan Bryman and Emma Bell. Oxford University Press (2015)

Moon, J. (1999) Reflection in learning & professional development: theory & practice. Kogan Page London.

Jasper, M., Rosser, M., & Mooney, G. (2013). Professional development, reflection and decision-making in nursing and health care. Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 
 
https://efs.weblogs.anu.edu.au/files/2018/01/Moon-on-Reflective-Writing.pdf 
 
Bassot, B. (2020). The Reflective Journal. Red Globe Press/Macmillan Education Limited.
 
Costley, C., Elliott, G. and Gibbs, P. (2013). Doing Work-Based Research. SAGE: London.
 
Gray, D.E. (2020). Doing Research in the Business World (2nd Edition). SAGE: London

The following are also helpful books that cover the main areas in the module:

Easterby-Smith et al. (2018). Management and Business Research. SAGE: London.

Wilson NG and Elayne Coakes (2014). Business Research. Kogan Page London. 

Kloppenborg, T. J., Anantatmula, V. S., and Wells, K. N. (2019). Contemporary project management. 4th edition. Cengage Learning, Boston

Gido, J., Clements, J., and Baker, R. (2018) Successful Project Management. 7th edition. Cengage Learning, Boston

Journal articles will also be available in a folder on Canvas

A core textbook is only a starting point and provides introductory and background information only. Supplemental reading will be identified at each lecture. To achieve high marks in this module students will need to do the background and supplemental reading as well as conduct their own independent research for instance through the reading of academic journals, into the topics identified.

7. Assessment

The assessment for the module is structured as follows: 

Formative Assessment

  • Code of Conduct: deadline  21st June by 2pm
  • Peer Review form: deadline at 2:00pm on September 30th (only those with major group conflict issues should submit this form)

Summative Assessment

Step 1: 30% Pre-recorded Group Presentation via Turnitin on Canvas  - Deadline at 2:00pm on July 19th .    
Group Ethics form via Turnitin on Canvas  - Deadline at 2:00pm on July19th  (to be confirmed if Programme Director can submit this on students behalf) .    
 
Step 2: 40% Group business project of no more than 7,500 words - Deadline at 2:00pm on September 30th  

Step 3: 30% Individual Reflective Research Practice Portfolio of no more than 2,000 words - Deadline at 2:00pm on September 30th

7.1 Submission in Welsh

Any written work submitted as part of any assessment or examination may be submitted in Welsh, and that work submitted in Welsh will be treated no less favourably than written work submitted by you in English as part of an assessment or examination. 

7.2 Time Limits and Extensions

The expectation is that students will submit their Business project within the time-limit laid down by the regulation.  

For postgraduate students, the School operates a late penalty system of awarding zero marks for any late and/or incomplete submissions.

PLEASE NOTE: Students must ensure that their research can be completed in 3 months and should take note of public holidays both in the UK and overseas when drawing up their work plan. 

A candidate's time-limit may be extended by Swansea University in exceptional cases. It is the responsibility of the student to bring to the attention of their supervisor any foreseeable events which may interfere with their work and result in a possible extension request.

Extensions may be granted on compassionate grounds, in cases of illness, serious domestic difficulties, or inordinate professional commitments (part-time students only) which can be demonstrated to have adversely affected a candidate's ability to complete within the stipulated period. A full and reasoned case, supported by appropriate medical or other independent evidence, must be made by the School for the consideration of Swansea University.
  
Students who request an extension on such grounds must complete the official Extension Request Form in Appendix C. A clear statement must be supplied, showing that the School concerned has evaluated the situation in which the candidate finds him/herself as a result of the illness or other circumstance (including covid-19 related issues) and that it considers the requested extension to be appropriate.  Such a statement will, wherever possible, follow contact between the candidate and the School.

Step 1: Pre-Recorded Group Presentation

The first assignment of this module is a pre-recorded group presentation and ethics form worth 30% of the module mark. 

This assignment is split into two key components:

Part 1: Pre-recorded group presentation and associated slides
Part 2: Group ethics form

Part 1: Pre-recorded group presentation and slides brief

This group assignment will allow you to demonstrate the progress you have made in planning what you have done for the project so far and your approach to delivering the outcomes that were outlined in your project brief. 

This interim presentation can draw upon the content from your proposal for MN-M595 and the new work you should have done since. 

The assignment will be a 15-minute pre-recorded presentation and upload it to canvas with a separate session for Q and A. 

The Q and A session should be arranged IN-PERSON with your supervisor no later than 2 weeks post submission (19th July – 02nd August). 

All students MUST appear in the presentation recording and MUST attend the group Q & A in person. 

  • If students do NOT engage with the presentation – you will lose those marks (85% of grade/95% if you also do not engage with the Q&A). 
  • If students engage in the presentation but DO NOT engage in the IN-PERSON Q & you will be allocated 10% less (as per the marking rubric below) for the presentation mark. 

Presentation Structure

Your presentation should contain information on the following:

  • Project Summary including 1 CLEAR AIM, associated objectives, tasks and activities 
  • Supporting Academic Literature
  • Current Progress
  • Obstacles to progress
  • Methodology – how do you intend to find the answers to the problem/opportunity faced by the company
  • Future Project Timeline 

A more comprehensive structure will be available on Canvas. 

Part 2: Group ethics form ( this is not needed for your submission)

The School of Management and wider University have a Research Ethics Policy that applies to all research undertaken to make sure it complies with ethical guidelines. The policy is intended to cover work completed by undergraduates, postgraduates (taught and research), research staff and academic staff.

What is research integrity: ethics and governance? 

For a more comprehensive overview of the ethical guidelines please see:   

  • Research Ethics System

Ethical Review Process

1.Using the video provided on Canvas to help complete the online research ethics form.
2.The Research Ethics Form is accessed through your apps under the name ‘Research Ethics Applicant’. Go to My Applications 
3.Only ONE group member needs to complete this. There is the option to ADD all group members names/student numbers/e-mails within the application. 
4.The icon will look like this:

You MUST include the ethics approval document in your dissertation. 

Ethical Considerations

  • You must have received research ethics clearance via the online system, or if necessary the schools ethics committee, before engaging in any research activities. 
  • Primary data collection should be carried out in accordance with the University guidelines on COVID-19 at all times and should be adapted to reflect any changes to these guidelines as they arise.
  • You are expected to behave to the highest professional standard that maintains your integrity and the school’s reputation.
  • Make sure that your respondents know that you are going to keep their identity confidential. If very sensitive data is involved, the university can establish a three-year ban on public access to your dissertation.
  • You should not record telephone or online interviews without the explicit agreement of interviewee.
  • All data should be anonymised and stored securely.

Students should note that Swansea University is not responsible for any processing by them of personal data for which Swansea University is not the data controller, even if the processing is carried out using Swansea University's equipment and facilities. Students are personally responsible for complying with the GDPR in regard to data for which they are the data controller. 

Student Handling of Personal Data

You may be required to provide your supervisor and the assessment team with a copy of your data should they request.

Submission – for more information see section 8

One group member should submit the following documents. Please remember to clearly include GROUP NUMBER IN SUBMISSION TITLE. 

  • Group Presentation slides via Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by Friday 19th July ay 2pm 
  • Group pre-recorded presentation via Speedgrader on Canvas (module MN-D019) by Monday 19th July ay 2pm
  • Group Ethics form via Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by Monday 19th July at 2pm
  • Individual reflective report by 30th September 2024, 2pm
  • Business Project report by 30th September 2024, 2pm

Key Marking criteria will include (please see the following marking rubric for more details): 

  • Initiative: Originality and Innovativeness of Solution
  • Presentation Content: Relevance of information provided
  • Presentation Structure
  • References: Use of suitable sources to support the report
  • Quality of Research: Evidence to support project 
  • Purpose: Rationale behind presentation delivery
  • Professionalism in terms of delivery 
    Response to questioning

MN-D019 Presentation

%

0-9 Missing Fail

10-19 Inadequate Fail

20-29

Very Poor

Fail

30 – 39

Poor

Fail

40-44 Tolerable Fail

45-49

Basic Fail

50-54 Satisfactory Pass

55-59 Fair Pass

60-64 Favourable Merit

65-69

Good

Merit

70-74

Very Good Distinction

75-79

 Great Distinction

80-89 Excellent

90-99 Outstanding Distinction

100 Impeccable Distinction

Initiative: Originality and Innovativeness of Solution

20

This section is completely missing

The potential approach and solution to the project is Inadequate

The potential approach and solution to the project is very poor

The potential approach and solution to the project is poor

The potential approach and solution to the project is Tolerable

The potential approach and solution to the project is Basic

The potential approach and solution to the project is satisfactory

The potential approach and solution to the project is Fair

The potential approach and solution to the project is Favourable

The potential approach and solution to the project is good

The potential approach and solution to the project is very good

The potential approach and solution to the project is Great

The potential approach and solution to the project is excellent

The potential approach and solution to the project is outstanding

The potential approach and solution to the project is impeccable

Presentation Content: Relevance of information provided

20

This section is completely missing

The content of the presentation is Inadequate and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is very poor and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is poor and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is Tolerable and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is Basic and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is satisfactory and is partially relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is Fair and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is Favourable and does not relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is good and has some relevance to the project brief

The content of the presentation is very good and is relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is Great and is relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is excellent and is very relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is outstanding and is very relevant to the project brief

The content of the presentation is impeccable and is very relevant to the project brief

Presentation structure

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate presentation structure

Very poor presentation structure

Poor presentation structure

Tolerable presentation structure

Basic presentation structure

Satisfactory presentation structure

Fair presentation structure

Favourable presentation structure

Good presentation structure

Very good presentation structure

Great presentation structure

Excellent presentation structure

Outstanding presentation structure

Impeccable presentation structure

References: Use of suitable sources to support the report

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate use of appropriate sources

Very poor use of appropriate sources

Poor use of appropriate sources

Tolerable use of appropriate sources

Basic use of appropriate sources

Satisfactory use of appropriate sources

Fair use of appropriate sources

Favourable use of appropriate sources

Good use of appropriate sources

Very good use of appropriate sources

Great use of appropriate sources

Excellent use of appropriate sources

Outstanding use of appropriate sources

Impeccable use of appropriate sources

Quality of Research: Evidence to support project

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate supporting evidence

Very poor supporting evidence

Poor supporting evidence

Tolerable supporting evidence

Basic supporting evidence

Satisfactory supporting evidence

Fair supporting evidence

Favourable supporting evidence

Good supporting evidence

Very good supporting evidence

Great supporting evidence

Excellent supporting evidence

Outstanding supporting evidence

Impeccable supporting evidence

Purpose: Rationale behind presentation delivery

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate rationale provided

Very poor rationale provided

Poor rationale provided

Tolerable rationale provided

Basic rationale provided

Satisfactory rationale provided

Fair rationale provided

Favourable rationale provided

Good rationale provided

Very good rationale provided

Great rationale provided

Excellent rationale provided

Outstanding rationale provided

Impeccable rationale provided

Professionalism in terms of delivery

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate professionalism in delivery

Very Poor professionalism in delivery

Poor professionalism in delivery

Tolerable professionalism in delivery

Basic professionalism in delivery

Satisfactory professionalism in delivery

Fair professionalism in delivery

Favourable professionalism in delivery

Good professionalism in delivery

Very Good professionalism in delivery

Great professionalism in delivery

Excellent professionalism in delivery

Outstanding professionalism in delivery

Impeccable professionalism in delivery

Response to questioning

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Very Poor responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Poor responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Tolerable responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Basic responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Satisfactory responses showing a basic understanding of the project aims

Fair responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Favourable responses showing a lack of understanding of the project aims

Good responses showing an acceptable understanding of the project aims

Very Good responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims

Great responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims

Excellent responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims

Outstanding responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims

Impeccable responses showing an appropriate understanding of the project aims

Submission of ethics form

5

0% awarded if the ethics form is not submitted

5% awarded if group submits ethics form

Step 2: MSc Group Business project

The second coursework assignment for this module is a group assignment worth 40% of the overall module mark. 

COURSEWORK BRIEF

The Group Project Report should follow the structure below and will be based on the project brief your group have been provided. 

The word limit is 7,500 words so it needs to provide a concise overview of how you have planned, executed and delivered the project. There should be a clear indication of what has been achieved in relation to the objectives set in the project brief. There should also be clear recommendations on how the company can implement the proposed ideas and any shortcomings from your project and how it could be improved with more time. 

An outline structure is indicated on the next page. Bullet points can be used appropriately and you can cross reference to a table, spreadsheet, Gant chart or other planning tool. Your planning tool will not be included in the word count.

PLEASE NOTE: 

You would have completed a PROPOSAL for this work in term 2.  It is not the report but a proposal to suggest how you could achieve the objectives of your project.  The content should NOT be identical to that submitted for MN-M595. You are now doing the work that you proposed to do in term 2. It is perfectly fine to make changes to the proposal with your supervisors guidance where required.

It is poor academic practice to copy and paste therefore please do not do that here – it will result in a lower grade. 

Top Tips for Successful Report Writing

  1. Use third person throughout
  2. Use plenty of white space – reports do not look like an essay. They should have relevant heading and sub-headings and be page numbered with an excellent executive summary that can be cross referenced to the relevant section in the report.
  3. Each new chapter /section should be given a number (1,2,3) or letter (A, B, C) and the subsequent sub-headings can be labelled 1.2, 1.2, etc
  4. Begin each new chapter on a new page.
  5. Use graphs, tables and pictures to illustrate your points.
  6. It is acceptable to use bullet points in report writing (avoid writing in essay format)

Submission

You are required to submit your GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT via Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by Friday 30th September at 2 pm.  Use the filename MND019-GROUPNUMBER-STUDENTNUMBER

For more information on submission guidelines please see section 8. Submission

Word count

7,500 (not including tables, figures, appendices – please see section 9 for more detailed information

business Project report Structure

By following this outline, you can create a comprehensive and well-organised postgraduate-level business project report.

Title Page (which should be a Professional Business Project Report Cover page)

  • Title of the project: 
  • Group Name / number 
  • Institution - Swansea University cover page
  • Degree: MSc Management (include pathway if appropriate) 
  • Student numbers of the group members
  • The date of submission

Declarations and Statements 

  • Found in the appendices of the handbook.
    Ethics Confirmation
  • You will be provided an Ethical confirmation certificate which can be found on canvas. This needs to be inserted HERE. 
    Acknowledgements
  • Saying thank you to people that have helped and supported you

Executive Summary

  • Overview: Brief summary of the project, including objectives, methodology, key findings, and recommendations.
  • Purpose: Explain the business problem or opportunity addressed.
  • Key Results: Highlight the main findings.
  • Recommendations: Summarize the key recommendations.

Table of Contents

  • Headings and Subheadings: List all main sections and sub-sections with corresponding page numbers. 

Table of Figures and Tables

  • List all the figures and tables with corresponding page numbers. 

MAIN report SECTIONS

1.Introduction
1.1.Background: Provide context and background on the business problem or opportunity 
1.2.Aim and Objectives: Clearly outline the goals of the project including the main project aim and objectives
1.3.Scope: Define the scope (what is included and excluded from the project) and limitations of the project. 
1.4.Project research Approach: The approach used to achieve the objectives.
2.Business Problem/Opportunity Analysis
2.1Problem Statement: Define the business problem or opportunity.
2.2Impact: Discuss the potential impact on the organization.
2.3    Goals: Outline the desired outcomes and success criteria.
3.Background Research
3.1.Situational Analysis - start with a PESTEL analysis to understand the macro-environment. Conduct a SWOT analysis to summarise internal and external factors.  Perform an internal analysis to evaluate the companies capabilities.  Integrate a market analysis to understand specific market dynamics. 
3.2.Relevant academic sources researched A brief summary of key findings from previous research in relevant and credible academic journals, case studies, books, market reports and relevant publications from accredited agencies and organisations.
4.Approach and process (Desk-based research)
4.1    Project Approach: Describe the approach taken to address the problem or opportunity.
4.2    Analysis Techniques and approaches: Outline the techniques used to analyze the data.
4.3    Work Plan: Provide an overview of the project work plan and timelines.
4.4    Ethical concerns and ethical procedures at the School of Management, Swansea University.
5.Findings
5.1.Introduction Reiterate the aims and objectives. Provide a very brief overview of the approach used to achieve the objectives.
5.2.Analysis: Present your analysis, including themes, trends. Use charts, graphs, and tables to illustrate key points.
5.3.Discussion – interpret your findings in the context of your objectives
5.4.Key Findings: Summarize the main findings relevant to the project objectives
6.Recommendations
Strategic Recommendations: Provide actionable recommendations based on the findings.
7.Implementation
7.1.Action Plan: Provide a detailed action plan for implementing the recommendations.
7.2.Timeline: Include a timeline with milestones and deadlines.
7.3.Resources: Identify the resources required for implementation (e.g., personnel, budget, technology).
7.4.Risk Management: Discuss potential risks and mitigation strategies.
8.Evaluation and Monitoring
8.1.Success Metrics: Define the metrics and KPIs to measure the success of the implementation.
8.2.Monitoring Plan: Outline a plan for ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
9.Conclusion
9.1.Summary: Recap the key findings and recommendations.
9.2.Impact: Discuss the potential impact of the project on the organization.
9.References
Use APA style to  list of all the sources cited in the report.

APPENDIX SECTION

10.Appendices

  • Group Planning documents (10% no word count)
    oCompleted and signed group code of conduct
    oGantt chart of project tasks including what each group member is doing
    oAttendance list for each group meeting 
    oRoles and Responsibilities – including your Belbin team roles 
    oAgenda, short minutes and actions, (please use the template provided for each meeting)
    Further points:
  • Additional information referred to in the main report should be referred to in this section.
  • Each section in bold in the above structure should start on a new page to provide a professional look to the report.
  • Try to avoid splitting tables and diagrams/images over multiple pages – you can turn specific pages to landscape to provide a better presentation of the information in the table. The rubric below is an excellent example of this.  

Marking Criteria

  • Executive Summary - 
  • Introduction- background, aims and objectives of the project including the scope and research approach
  • Business Problem/Opportunity Analysis - describing the problem/opportunity the impact and the goals of the project.
  • Background Research - providing background research for the project to provide a context, using situational analysis and relevant academic literature
  • Approach and process – describing the approach the project will take to achieve the objectives, the analysis techniques used, the work plan and timelines and any ethical concerns.
  • Findings - provide a very brief overview of the approach used to achieve the objectives, summarize the key findings from the sources reviewed, present your analysis, including themes, trends. Use charts, graphs, and tables to illustrate key points, interpret your findings in the context of your objectives, summarize the main findings relevant to the project objectives
  • Recommendations - Provide actionable recommendations based on the findings.
  • Implementation- Provide a detailed action plan for implementing the recommendations, Include a timeline with milestones and deadlines, identify the resources required for implementation (e.g., personnel, budget, technology), discuss potential risks and mitigation strategies.
  • Evaluation and Monitoring - Define the metrics and KPIs to measure the success of the implementation. Outline a plan for ongoing monitoring and evaluation.
  • Conclusion - Recap the key findings and recommendations. Discuss the potential impact of the project on the organization.
  • References - Use APA style to list of all the sources cited in the report.
  • Quality of writing - good writing skills evidenced by very little to no spelling or grammatical errors, messages clearly present the aims of the project.
  • Presentation - professionally presented business project, using visuals where appropriate
  • Groupwork and group documentation – good teamwork is important, hence evidence of this via the group documentation is important Group planning documents 
  • Completed and signed group code of conduct
  • Gantt chart of project tasks including what each group member is doing
  • Attendance list for each lecture, seminar and group meetings 
  • Roles and Responsibilities – including your Belbin team roles 
  • Agenda, minutes and actions documents 
  • Quality of writing: Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section.
  • Quality of Presentation: A clearly structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

MN-D019 Report

%

0-9 Missing (Fail)

10-19 Inadequate (Fail)

20-29 Very Poor (fail)

30 – 39 Poor - Fail

40-44 Tolerable Fail

45-49 Basic fail

50-54 satisfactory (pass)

55-59 Fair - Pass

60-64 favourable (merit)

65-69 good Merit

70-74 very good

75-79 great

80-89 Excellent

90-99 Outstanding - Distinction

100 Impeccable Distinction

Executive Summary

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Very poor identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Poor identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Tolerable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Basic identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Satisfactory identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Fair identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Favourable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Good identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Very good identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Great identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Excellent identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Outstanding identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Impeccable identification of the purpose of the proposal and outline of the content covered

Introduction and Business Problem

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Very poor identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Poor identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Tolerable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Basic identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Satisfactory identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Fair identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Favourable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Good identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Very good identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Great identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Excellent identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Outstanding identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Impeccable identification of the company, proposal and identification of the current situation/problem/opportunity including aim and objectives

Background Research

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Very poor application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Poor application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Tolerable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Basic application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Satisfactory application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Fair application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Favourable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Good application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Very good application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Great application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Excellent application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Outstanding application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Impeccable application to academic context and appropriate references for the background in which the project operates

Approach and Process (desk Based research)

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Very poor Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Poor Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Tolerable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Basic Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Satisfactory Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Fair Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Favourable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Good Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Very good Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Great Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Excellent Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Outstanding Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Impeccable Inclusion of appropriate methods to answer the project objectives and explanation of the chosen methods

Findings and analysis

15

This section is completely missing

Inadequate explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Very poor explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Poor explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Tolerable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Basic explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Satisfactory explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Fair explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Favourable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Good explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Very good explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Great explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Excellent explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Outstanding explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Impeccable explanation and review of how you delivered and implemented the aims and objectives of the project brief

 

Recommendations

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Very poor identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Poor identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Tolerable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Basic identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Satisfactory identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Fair identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Favourable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Good identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Very good identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Great identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Excellent identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Outstanding identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Impeccable identification and assessment of risks along with a discussion of risk factors

Conclusions

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Inadequate recommendations

Very poor demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and very poor recommendations

Poor demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and poor recommendations

Tolerable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Tolerable recommendations

Basic demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aim and objectives of the project brief and Basic recommendations

Satisfactory demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Satisfactory recommendations

Fair demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Fair recommendations

Favourable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Favourable recommendations

Good demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Good recommendations

Very good demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Very good recommendations

Great demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Great recommendations

Excellent demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and excellent recommendations

Outstanding demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and outstanding recommendations

Impeccable demonstration that students have understood key topics in relation to the aims and objectives of the project brief and Impeccable recommendations

References

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate APA 7 referencing

Very poor APA 7 referencing

Poor APA 7 referencing

Tolerable APA 7 referencing

Basic APA 7 referencing

Satisfactory APA 7 referencing

Fair APA 7 referencing

Favourable APA 7 referencing

Good APA 7 referencing

Very good APA 7 referencing

Great APA 7 referencing

Excellent APA 7 referencing

Outstanding APA 7 referencing

Impeccable APA 7 referencing

Appendices

10

Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Inadequate Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Very Poor Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Poor Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Tolerable Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Basic Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Satisfactory Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Fair Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Favourable Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Good Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Very good Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Great Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Excellent Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Outstanding Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Impeccable Missing ethics form and group planning documents

Quality of Writing

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Very poor Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Poor Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Tolerable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Basic Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Satisfactory Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Fair Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Favourable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Good Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Very good Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Great Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Excellent Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Outstanding Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Impeccable Readability and ability to convey key message(s) concisely in a logical manner within each section

Quality of Presentation

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequately structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant.

Very poorly structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant.

Poorly structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant.

Tolerable structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant.

Basic structured report that is difficult to follow. The use of headings should be more significant.

Satisfactory structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Fair structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Favourable structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Good structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Very good structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Great structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Excellent structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Outstanding structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Impeccable structured report that is easy for the reader to follow.  Headings are used to set out the sections.

Group work and project documentation

10

This section is completely missing

Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work

Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work

Some documents included, not enough evidence of group work

Some  documents included, not enough evidence of group work

Most documents included, some missing evidence of group work

Most documents included, some good evidence of group work

Most documents included, some good evidence of group work

All  documents included, some good evidence of group work

All  documents included, good evidence of group work

All  documents included, very  good evidence of group work

All  documents included, very  good evidence of group work

All  documents included, very  good evidence of group work

All  documents included, excellent  evidence of group work

All  documents included, excellent  evidence of group work

Step 3: Individual Reflection

The third coursework assignment for this module is an individual assignment worth 30% of the overall module mark. 

Coursework Brief 

Using the Gibbs Reflective Cycle (1988) as shown and supported by Reflective Writing by J Moon) you are expected to develop a reflection of your positive and negative experiences associated with completing the Business Project.

MN- D019 MSC Business Project

Please FOCUS your reflection on the following elements:

  • Time management
  • Group engagement, communication and performance
  • Completion of the aim and objectives

The individual reflection provides an opportunity for you to look back on the business project and consider the progress made over the course of the module. 

As part of the reflection, you need to consider what actions could have been taken and would need to be taken if you experienced a similar situation in the future. 

Word count = 2,000

Submission

You are required to submit your INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION Turnitin on Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 3pm

For more information on submission guidelines please see section 8. Submission. 

Key Marking criteria will include: 

  • Description – description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.
  • Feelings – explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience 
  • Evaluation – evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience. 
  • Analysis – that identifies honest insights into the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.
  • Conclusion – which identifies multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward.
  • Action Plan – detailed action plan and outstanding feed-forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a given timeframe. 
  • Quality/Scope of Literature Review: use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and analysis of the critical incident, problem, or issue, as well as identify options for improvement. 
  • Understanding: Assignment demonstrates students have understood key topics and reflective practice
    Readability - ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

MN-D019

Individual Reflection

Weighting (100%)

0-9 Missing (Fail)

10-19 Inadequate (Fail)

20-29 Very Poor (fail)

30 – 39 Poor - Fail

40-44 Tolerable Fail

45-49 Basic fail

50-54 satisfactory (pass)

55-59 Fair - Pass

60-64 favourable (merit)

65-69 good Merit

70-74 very good

75-79 great

80-89 Excellent

90-99 Outstanding - Distinction

100 Impeccable Distinction

Description

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Very Poor description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Poor description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Tolerable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Basic description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Satisfactory description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Fair description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

 

Favourable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

 

Good description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Very Good description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Great description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

 

Excellent description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

Outstanding description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

 

Impeccable description of the issue or experience (critical incident) that you are reflecting on.

 

Feelings

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Very Poor explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Poor explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Tolerable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Basic explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Satisfactory explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Fair explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Favourable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Good explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Very Good explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Great explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Excellent explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Outstanding explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Impeccable explanation of your thoughts and feelings on your chosen experience

Evaluation

15

This section is completely missing

Inadequate evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Very Poor evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Poor evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Tolerable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Basic evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Satisfactory evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Fair evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Favourable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Good evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Very Good evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Great evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Excellent evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Outstanding evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Impeccable evaluative discussion on what was both beneficial and detrimental about the experience

Analysis

15

This section is completely missing

Inadequate Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Very Poor Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Poor Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Tolerable Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Basic Analysis that does not identify honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty and are not related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Satisfactory Analysis that identifies some honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, with minimal relation to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Fair Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Favourable Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Good Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Very Good Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Great Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Excellent A Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Outstanding Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Impeccable Analysis that identifies honest insights the underlying root cause of the issue or difficulty, related to supporting theory and examples from practice.

Conclusion

15

This section is completely missing

Inadequate conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Very Poor conclusions which do not identify any options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Poor conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Tolerable conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Basic conclusions which do not identify one options for improving practice in the future. These are not evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Satisfactory conclusions which identify minimal options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Fair conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Favourable conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Good conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Very Good conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Great conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Excellent conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Outstanding conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Impeccable conclusions which identify multiple options for improving practice in the future. These are evaluated as to the extent to which they address the root causes of difficulty identified in the analysis section and clear options chosen to take forward

Action Plan

15

This section is completely missing

Inadequate and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Very Poor and missing action plan and missing time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Poor and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Tolerable and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Basic and incomplete action plan and incomplete amount of time specific feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Satisfactory and includes only a basic action plan and minimal feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Fair and detailed action plan and Fair feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Favourable and detailed action plan and Favourable feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Good action and detailed action plan and good feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Very Good and detailed action plan and very good feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Great and detailed action plan and Great feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Excellent and detailed action plan and excellent feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Outstanding and detailed action plan and outstanding feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Impeccable and detailed action plan and Impeccable feed forward which commit the learner to tangible actions and improvements in a set timeframe

Quality and Scope of the literature and structure of references

10

This section is completely missing

Inadequate use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Inadequate analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Inadequate identification of options for improvement.

Very Poor use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and very poor analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as very poor identification of options for improvement.

Poor use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and poor analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as poor identification of options for improvement.

Tolerable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Tolerable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Tolerable identification of options for improvement.

Basic use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Basic analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Basic identification of options for improvement.

Satisfactory use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and satisfactory analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as satisfactory identification of options for improvement.

Fair use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Fair analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Fair identification of options for improvement

Favourable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Favourable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Favourable identification of options for improvement

Good use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and good analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as good identification of options for improvement

Very Good use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and very good analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as very good identification of options for improvement

Great use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Great analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Great identification of options for improvement

Excellent use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and excellent analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as excellent identification of options for improvement.

Outstanding use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and outstanding analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as outstanding identification of options for improvement

Impeccable use and referencing of established knowledge to inform the evaluation and Impeccable analysis of the critical incident, problem or issue, as well as Impeccable identification of options for improvement

Understanding

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Very Poor demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Poor demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Tolerable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Basic demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Satisfactory demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Fair demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Favourable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Good demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Very Good demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Great demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Excellent demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Outstanding demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Impeccable demonstration of understanding of the key topics and reflective practice

Readability

5

This section is completely missing

Inadequate ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Very poor ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Poor ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Tolerable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Basic ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Satisfactory ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Fair ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Favourable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Good ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Very good ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Great ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Excellent ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Outstanding ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Impeccable ability to convey key message(s) concisely in each of the key areas listed above

Stuck MN- D019 Assignment? Deadlines Are Near?

Hire Assignment Helper Now!

8. Submission

There are different submission deadlines for the different assignments of the Business Projects Module. These can be seen above in relation to the different assignments. 

Overall, the following items should be submitted for fulfilment of the MN-D019 Business Projects Module

The following requirements must be adhered to:
 
1.One electronic copy of your GROUP CODE OF CONDUCT must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 21st June at 2 pm – this will only be reviewed in the event of group issues.

2.One electronic copy of your GROUP PRESENTATION SLIDES must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th July at 2 pm

3.One electronic copy of your PRE-RECORDED GROUP PRESENTATION must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th July at 2 pm

4.One electronic copy of your GROUP ETHICS FORM must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 19th  July at 2 pm (to be confirmed if Programme Director can submit this on the students behalf)

5.One electronic copy of your GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm

6.One electronic copy of your INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm

7.ONLY IN THE EVENT OF ISSUES: One electronic copy of your INDIVIDUAL PEER REVIEW FORM must be submitted for examination to the University via Canvas (module MN-D019) by 30th September at 2 pm.

8.Students must ensure that their Group Business Project and Individual Reflection includes the required signed Declarations and Statements form (Appendix B).

Failure to meet the submission requirements set out in points 2-6 above will result in a mark of 0 and work classified as an incomplete submission. No further re-submission opportunities will be available to submissions that are deemed to be incomplete.

7.When your submission has been successful you will be given a submission receipt. You must keep a note of this, either by saving it or taking a screenshot. If there are any problems with your submission, we will need this before we can resolve them. 

8.Students may be required to submit a copy of their data upon request by their supervisors or the assessment team. 

Plagiarism detection software will be used to check your report, and any unfair practices will be dealt with strictly. Information about unfair practice can be found in the University’s Academic Guide available at:

9.www.swan.ac.uk/registry/academicguide/assessmentandprogress/unfairpracticeprocedure/1definitionofunfairpractice/

10.For postgraduate students, the School operates a late penalty system of awarding zero marks for any late submissions.

11.Business projects which are of particular relevance to Wales or Celtic Studies may be deposited in the University Library (copies retained by Swansea University may be decommissioned after one year).

If you have any queries regarding your submission, please contact the assessments team within the School of Management Reception or e-mail at the assessment team

Digital Submission of Coursework Instructions

  • Log on to Canvas.
  • Access the appropriate Course site from your dashboard. 
  • Click the Assignments menu button which appears on the left of the screen.
  • Click on the relevant assignment for submission.
  • In this page you will see a file entitled ‘Submission coversheet’.  You need to complete this form and incorporate it as the first page of your coursework (not two separate files). 
  • Please read the statement of originality before you click ‘Upload Submission’. 
  • By submitting work you are agreeing to this statement and confirming it to be true. 
  • Click ‘Choose File’ to select your assignment file. 
  • Click ‘Upload and Review’ to upload your assignment. 
  • Click to finalise your submission

You will then see a message saying “Submission Complete” 

9. Notes on Style and Word Count

Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University.  Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:

Group Presentation

Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University.  Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:

The maximum word limit for the main assignment (excluding tables, contents page, footnotes, charts, graphs, figures but including in-text references) is 2000 words. The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet. 

Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work. 

Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.

The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:

APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing

To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University). 

Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.  

Video, Audio or other Assessment Types

For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.

Proof Reading

Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.

Group Business Project

Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University.  Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:

The word limit is 7,500 words; this is a maximum limit and is for the main text. 

The word limit does NOT include: 

  • Title page
  • Declarations and Statements
  • Ethical Approval Certificate
  • Acknowledgements
  • Contents Page
  • List of Tables
  • Figures
  • References
  • Appendices

The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet. 

Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work. 

Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.

The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:

APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing

To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University). 

Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.  

Video, Audio or other Assessment Types

For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.

Proof Reading

Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.

Formatting 

Character or Print Height

Text-size would be equivalent to 12pt Times New Roman.  (The size of text used in this sentence.)  

Margins

Margins should be 4cm (1½ inches) wide on the left-hand side and 2cm (¾ inch) on the right-hand side.

Line Spacing 

Double or one-and-a-half line spacing should be used in the main text.  However, single spacing should be used in the abstract and in any indented quotations and footnotes.

Page Numbering

Pages in the Business project should be numbered sequentially.  Page numbers should be placed top-right or bottom centre.

Individual Reflection

Assignments are a critical part of the learning experience and development for scholars at Swansea University.  Practice will pay dividends when it comes to honing your skills in report and essay writing. Students are therefore encouraged to submit the highest quality work they can to reach their maximum potential. Students with concerns about how to present their work can consult with the Module Co-ordinator for guidance in addition to the notes listed below:

The word limit is 2000 words; this is a maximum limit and is for the main text. 

The word limit does NOT include: 

  • Title page
  • Declarations and Statements
  • Acknowledgements
  • Contents Page
  • List of Tables
  • Figures
  • References
  • Appendices

The word count must be stated in the assignment cover sheet. 

Markers will stop marking once the word count [or time limit] limit has been reached, likely leading to a reduced overall mark as key arguments or conclusions will not be included in the marked work. 

Students who submit work that is below the word limit will not be penalised. This is because students will not have taken full advantage of the word limit available to them, which in itself may constitute a penalty.

The assignment should be in extended essay format (i.e. use headings/sub-headings). Full academic referencing using the Harvard APA (7th Edition) [note that we are working to 7th edition from AY 20-21 onwards] referencing style should be used throughout the assignment. Guidance on how to reference using the APA style can be found at:

APA Referencing Guide: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/APA7Referencing

To gain higher marks students are required to show analysis and reflection rather than simple description. They should use multiple sources of academic literature to frame and justify their analysis. All sources should be correctly identified - students are reminded the University enforces strict penalties for plagiarism (up to and including withdrawal from the University). 

Correct English spelling and grammar should be used at all times. Students who have been formally diagnosed with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) and assessed by the Disability Office should indicate ‘SpLD’ on the Student Declaration form included with their coursework submission.  

Video, Audio or other Assessment Types

For some assessments students may be required to submit a video, audio or other digital media item. The University’s overarching privacy policy advises students that the University will collect photographs and video recordings for the purpose of recording lectures, student assessment and examinations. This processing and storage of this information is lawful as it is necessary for the performance of a contract with the student and will apply to any personal data that we process for the purposes of administering and delivering their course of study.
https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/Student-Data-Protection-Statement-18-19.pdf

Formatting 

Character or Print Height

Text-size would be equivalent to 12pt Times New Roman.  (The size of text used in this sentence.)  

Margins

Margins should be 4cm (1½ inches) wide on the left-hand side and 2cm (¾ inch) on the right-hand side.

Line Spacing 

Double or one-and-a-half line spacing should be used in the main text.  However, single spacing should be used in the abstract and in any indented quotations and footnotes.

Page Numbering  

Pages in the Business project should be numbered sequentially.  Page numbers should be placed top-right or bottom centre.

Proof Reading

Please be aware of the university’s Proof Reading policy which sets outs what the university considers to be good academic practice in relation to proof reading. The School of Management allows proof reading but please be aware of the requirements around this including keeping an evidence trail relating to any proof reading and whether it is formal or informal. Further information can be found here.

10. Extenuating Circumstances

Extenuating Circumstances are defined as serious and acute problems or events which are beyond your control or ability to foresee which may have affected your performance and/or may have impeded your ability to complete or submit an assessment on time.

If you feel you are dealing with extenuating circumstances please contact your supervisor, the assessments team (assessment-management@swansea.ac.uk) who will be able to discuss the extenuating circumstances process with you. 

If you require an extension to your business project please complete the form in Appendix C. 

11. Non-submission and Re-submissions

Any students who fail the Directed Independent Learning element, will automatically be eligible for one attempt to resubmit (capped) in line with current academic regulations and time limits set out below. Any additional University fees incurred will be waived.

If a student chooses not to submit a 1st attempt then they will not be eligible to resubmit. 

Please see the following link for the Flexible Postgraduate Taught Masters Safety Net Regulations.

Mode of Study

 

Full-time

3 months

Part-time

6 months

Resubmission Guidance

  • Where students need to redeem failure on this module, they will be expected to resubmit the largest individual portion of work. In the case of MN-D019 Business Projects this is the Individual Reflective Portfolio.
  • There will be an increased word count and additional guidelines when resubmitting the Individual Reflective Portfolio to take into account the fact it will be redeeming the failure of the entire module.
  • To redeem failure students would be expected to complete an individual report (12,000 words) encompassing both the reflective and project elements of the module. Clear structure and guidance would be available in the handbook as to how failure can be redeemed. This would involve:

oStep 1: A review of the feedback on their own project compared against another project that has passed. What are the similarities, differences, what is better in their project and vice versa? Students should also make sure they focus on the reasons where both projects could be improved. They need to clearly focus on the feedback provided by the marker. 

oStep 2: Reflect and discuss what they learnt when completing each of the assignments in relation to:

  • Understanding the project brief
  • The data collection approach
  • Working as a group
  • Working independently
  • Any other relevant issues 

oStep 3: Develop an updated proposal considering the comparisons conducted in step 1 and the feedback from step 2. The structure of the proposal should be as follows: 

  • Introduction (500 words)
  • Literature Review (1,500 words)
  • Methodology (1,000 words)
  • Recommendations (1,000 words)
  • Word count for Resubmission – 12,000 words
    oStep 1 – 5,000 words
    oStep 2 – 3,000 words
    oStep 3 – 4,000 words 
  • Student resubmitting on this module are entitled to one formal feedback session with their supervisor including written feedback on the reasons for failure.
  • Students are expected to contact their supervisors to arrange this meeting.
  • Your supervisor should ensure that feedback reflects all comments from the Examiners (Internal and External) and that you are informed of the necessary changes required.  
  • Students resubmitting their business project shall be considered as enrolled resubmitting.  Full-time students will be expected to be available for supervision during the resubmission period.
  • For September Entry students the resubmission period will be from the release of marks following the Exam Board in November and submission point would be February.
  • For January Entry students the resubmission period will be from the Exam Board following the completion of all taught elements so February and the submission point will be May.
  • If you have failed this module, you will be contacted by the assessment team to provide you exact details on the resubmission guidelines and resubmission period. 

You will NOT be eligible to graduate until you have passed the resubmission of this module and there is option to resubmit early

12 Good Academic Practice

Academic integrity is fundamental to the values promoted by Swansea University. It is important that all students are judged on their ability, and that no student is allowed unfairly to take an advantage over others, to affect the security and integrity of the assessment process, or to diminish the reliability and quality of the qualification awarded.

Academic misconduct is to commit any act where a student may obtain an unpermitted advantage for themselves or another. This can relate to any form of assessed work including:

  • Open book examination taken on-line
  • A piece of coursework
  • Any form of assessment undertaken in pursuit of an academic or professional qualification at Swansea University.

Academic misconduct can be committed on an individual or group basis.

There are different types of academic misconduct including:

  • Plagiarism 
  • Collusion 
  • Commissioning 

The University takes academic misconduct very seriously and it can have a detrimental effect on your results as where academic misconduct is found to have taken place penalties will be applied. 

Students should note that a claim of ignorance of the University’s expectations on good academic practice is not an acceptable defence to an allegation of academic misconduct.

Self-plagiarism is the copying of work that was originally completed and submitted by the student and resubmitted for another purpose, without acknowledgement.  While self-plagiarism is not considered as academic misconduct by the University it is treated as poor academic practice by the School and this is reflected in the marks awarded. 

How can students learn about good academic practice?

At the start of term the library offers induction sessions for new and continuing students.  These include a complete guide to academic referencing and details of further training such as EndNote.  

You can also access information on good academic practice through the Academic Success Programme at http://www.swansea.ac.uk/asp/ 

A short course on good academic practice can be found on a Canvas site called ‘Academic Integrity’ found under ‘My Studies’, listed under the ‘My Organisations’ section. Following completion of the self-directed learning, there is an online quiz (takes about 5 minutes), which assess your level of understanding of the learning material. You can revisit the training material and retake the quiz as many times as you wish.

Full information on Academic Misconduct can be found at http://www.swansea.ac.uk/academic-services/academic-guide/assessment-and-progress/academic-misconduct-procedure/

13 Feedback

  • Final Feedback will be available on Canvas following the release of marks in November. Please contact the student that submitted the work for a copy of the feedback.
  • You will receive ongoing feedback on this module during each meeting when you meet your supervisor.
  • You will also receive feedback on your pre-recorded group presentation with 2 calendar weeks of submission. If this does not happen please contact assessment-management@swansea.ac.uk and myself Sam Buxton s.l.buxton@swansea.ac.uk as a matter of urgency.
  • Some supervisors may request that you send work in advance, so they have a chance to review it before discussion in the meetings.

14. Submission Checklists

Group Presentation

DOES YOUR GROUP PROJECT PRESENTATION INCLUDE THESE THINGS?

Please complete this checklist:

  • Title Slide – including title (business project), word count, names, student numbers, pathway, group name/number, month and year of submission
  • Project Summary including 1 CLEAR AIM, associated objectives, tasks and activities
  • Supporting Academic Literature
  • Current Progress
  • Obstacles to progress
  • Methodology – how do you intend to find the answers to the problem/opportunity faced by the company
  • Future Project Timeline Interpretation of the business problem/opportunity
  • References (and in-text citations of the referenced work)
  • Group Project Presentation slides to be submitted electronically via Canvas by  19h  July at 2pm.
  • Group Project Presentation  recording to be submitted electronically via Canvas by  19th  July at 2pm.
  • Group ETHICS form to be submitted electronically via Canvas by 19th  July at 2pm (to be confirmed if programme director can submit on your behalf)

Group Business Project

DOES YOUR GROUP BUSINESS PROJECT INCLUDE THESE THINGS?

Please complete this checklist:

  • Title Page – including title (business project), word count, name, student number, pathway, group name/number, month and year of submission
  • Declarations and Statements – signed and dated 
  • Ethics Approval Certificate
  • Acknowledgements
  • Executive Summary
  • Contents Page 
  • Introduction
  • Literature Review 
  • Methodology 
  • Results
  • Risk Analysis and mitigation
  • Evaluation
  • Conclusion 
  • Recommendations 
  • References (and in-text citations of the referenced work)
  • Appendices to include the following 
  • Business project to be submitted electronically via Canvas by 30th  September at 2pm.
  • ONLY IF GROUP ISSUES: Individual peer review form to be submitted electronically via Canvas by 30th  September at 2pm.

Individual Reflection

DOES YOUR INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE RESEARCH PORTFOLIO INCLUDE THESE THINGS?

Please complete this checklist:

  • Title Page – including title, word count, name, student number, pathway, month and year of submission
  • Declarations and Statements – signed and dated 
  • Acknowledgements
  • Main body Chronological critical reflection
  • Business project to be submitted electronically via Canvas by 30th  September at 2pm.

15 Appendices 

  • Appendix A: Supervision Meetings and Milestones    46
  • Appendix B: Declaration and Statements    48
  • Appendix C: Extension Request Form    50

Buy Answer of your MN- D019 Assignment & Raise Your Grades

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Do you need last-minute online assignment help with your MN- D019 MSC Business Project Assignment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Business Management Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment example and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!

See the solution of this document click here: MN- D019 MSC Business Project Assignment Sample

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

Customer Experience Strategy CW4 Formative Assessment Report Example | BPP

Category: Report Writing Example

Subject: Management

University: BPP Business School

Module Title: Customer Experience Strategy

View Free Samples

BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan) Assignment Sample 2024-25, Sem3 | BCU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: Birmingham City University

Module Title: BUS7095 Business and Management Research Project Option 4 (Business Plan)

View Free Samples

RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Roehampton

Module Title: RBP020L063H Leadership and Change Management

View Free Samples

HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership AS2 Reflective Portfolio Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Northampton

Module Title: HRMM080 Ethical and Responsible Leadership

View Free Samples

ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners Assignment Sample

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: University of Greenwich (UOG)

Module Title: ACAD1346 The child’s live Experience Developing Confidence Learners

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK