MGT6220E Business Research Methods Final Assessment 2026 | IIU

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert

Published: 05 May, 2026

Category	Assignment	Subject	Business
University	INTI International University (IIU)	Module Title	MGT6220E Business Research Methods

MGT6220E Final Assessment

Programme	Master of Business Administration (Online & Distance Learning) – MBA LS
Course Name	Business Research Methods
Course Code	MGT6220E
Academic Session	March 2026
Assessment Type	Final Assessment (FA)
Marks	30% out of 100%

FA Type	Weight	Hand-out Week	Due Week
Individual Project	30%	Week 1	Week 6

Learning Outcome Assessed
CLO2	Produce initial business research proposal to solve business problem. (C6, PLO2)

Assignment Details

Assignment Overview

This assessment requires learners to develop a refined and integrated business research proposal based on a selected organisational problem.

Learners will build on prior learning to justify, integrate, and strengthen their methodological decisions.

The focus is on:

coherence
justification
methodological integration
decision relevance

The focus is on coherence, justification, methodological integration, and decision relevance.

This assessment is aligned with CLO2 (C6: creation of a research proposal).

Assignment Requirements

Learners must complete the following:

1. Define Business Problem and Objectives

Clearly describe the organisational issue
Formulate focused and relevant research objectives

2. Develop Conceptual Foundation (with supporting literature)

dentify key variables or constructs
Define constructs using relevant academic sources
Explain proposed relationships (if applicable)
Present a simple framework or logical model

3. Develop Research Design (CORE)

Select appropriate research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed)
Propose a suitable research design
Justify alignment with research objectives

4. Develop Data Collection Method

Identify appropriate data collection technique(s)
Explain how data will be collected – Justify the choice

5. Develop Measurement Strategy (CORE)

Identify key variables
Select existing validated measurement scales from academic literature
Provide sample items (2–3 per construct) – Justify the suitability of selected scales

6. Develop Sampling Plan – Define target population

Select sampling technique
Provide basic justification for sample size

7. Demonstrate Integration & Coherence (CORE)

Ensure consistency across objectives, variables, design, and methods – Demonstrate logical flow of the research proposal

8. Link to Managerial Decision-Making

Explain how the proposed research supports business decisions

Looking Plagiarism Free Answers For MGT6220E Business Research Methods Final Assessment Before Deadline?

Hire Malaysia Assignment Helper

Reporting Structure

The report must include the following sections:

[Cover Page with student details]

[Table of Content]

1. Introduction

- Business problem
- Research questions
- Research objectives

2. Conceptual Foundation (with supporting literature)

- Key variables and definitions
- Proposed relationships
- Hypotheses or research propositions
- Conceptual framework

3. Research Design (CORE)

- Approach, design type, and justification

4. Methodological Design (CORE)

- Data collection method
- Measurement (variables and selected scales)
- Sampling plan

5. Measurement Justification

- Selected validated scales with sources
- Justification of scale suitability

6. Integration & Coherence (CORE)

- Alignment across all research components

7. Managerial Relevance

- Implications for business decision-making

8. Conclusion

References (APA style)

Submission Guidelines

Item	Requirement
Format	Microsoft Word document
Length	2000 – 2500 words
Font	Times New Roman / Arial
Font Size	12
Spacing	1.5
Referencing	APA style
File Naming	ID_Name_MGT6202E_A3IP_Section e.g., 0123455_PriscoLim_MGT6202E_A3IP_3A1
Submission	Upload to CANVAS/LMS
Similarity Index	Below 20%

MGT6202E Individual Project : Proposed Rubric 3 – 30%

This individual assignment accounts for 30% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics below:

Criteria	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Satisfactory (2)	Weak (1)	Marks
Problem Definition & Research Objectives	Problem is clearly defined, specific, and grounded in a realistic organisational context. Objectives are precise, logically derived, and fully aligned with the problem.	Problem is clear with adequate context. Objectives are relevant and mostly aligned with the problem.	Problem is general or lacks clarity. Objectives are present but partially aligned or vague.	Problem is unclear, unrealistic, or poorly explained. Objectives are missing, unclear, or not aligned.	/4
Conceptual Foundation (Variables / Framework)	Key variables are clearly identified and logically structured. Relationships are explicitly explained and conceptually sound. Framework or logic model is coherent and supported by relevant literature.	Variables are identified with reasonable clarity. Relationships are generally explained but may lack depth or literature support.	Variables are partially identified. Relationships are unclear or weakly explained. Limited use of supporting sources.	Variables are missing, incorrect, or not linked. No meaningful conceptual basis.	/4
Research Design (Appropriateness & Justification)	Research approach and design are highly appropriate to the objectives. Strong and explicit justification is provided. Clear alignment between problem, objectives, and design.	Design is appropriate with reasonable justification. Minor gaps in alignment or explanation.	Design is basic or partially appropriate. Limited or weak justification. Alignment is unclear.	Design is inappropriate, unclear, or not justified. No alignment with objectives.	/6
Methodological Design (Data Collection, Measurement & Sampling)	Data collection, use of validated measurement scales, and sampling are fully appropriate and logically aligned. Clear justification of scale selection and strong alignment with research objectives.	Methods are appropriate with some justification. Measurement scales are relevant, but explanation is limited. Minor inconsistencies present.	Methods are basic or partially appropriate. Measurement approach is weak or insufficiently justified. Some inconsistencies present.	Methods are inappropriate, unclear, or poorly explained. Measurement scales not appropriate or missing. No justification or alignment.	/6
Integration & Coherence (C6 – Creation)	All components (problem, variables, design, methods) are fully integrated. Strong logical flow across the proposal. No inconsistencies. Demonstrates clear synthesis and creation of a coherent research plan.	Components are mostly integrated. Logical flow is present with minor inconsistencies.	Partial integration. Some components are disconnected or weakly linked.	No integration. Components are fragmented, inconsistent, or contradictory.	/6
Managerial Relevance	Clear and strong explanation of how the proposed research informs business decision-making. Practical implications are explicit and relevant.	Explanation is relevant but lacks depth or clarity.	Basic or vague link to decision-making.	No clear link to decision-making.	/2
Clarity, Structure & Academic Writing	Writing is clear, concise, and wellstructured. Logical flow throughout. Academic tone is consistent. Referencing is accurate and consistent.	Generally clear with minor issues in structure or expression. Some referencing errors.	Writing lacks clarity in parts. Organisation is weak. Several referencing errors.	Poor writing quality. Disorganised structure. Referencing missing or incorrect.	/2
				TOTAL	/30

Deadline Near for MGT6220E Business Research Methods Final Assessment? We Are Here to Help!

Get Urgent Help Now

Request Answer of this Assignment

Share this with your Friends

Facebook

Instagram

At INTI International University (IIU), MBA students often struggle with the MGT6220E Business Research Methods Final Assessment—not for lack of understanding, but due to challenges in structuring coherent research designs, aligning objectives with methodology, and ensuring academic rigor. If you need expert support, Assignment Helper Malaysia offers specialized Business Management Assignment Help tailored to postgraduate standards. Our AI-free, plagiarism-free solutions ensure clarity, proper data analysis, and compliance with university guidelines. Review samples, gain confidence, and secure higher grades with professional assistance designed specifically for Malaysia students in your studies today.