Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Healthcare |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Module Title | HWSC6002 Social Justice, Equality and Vulnerability in Health and Social Care |
We would like to welcome you to this module and look forward to working with you! To get the most out of this module, it is important that you consistently attend your classes throughout the teaching period. This will enable you to:
Please begin by familiarising yourself with this handbook. If you have questions about the module content, ask your lecturer during class or on MS Teams.
Your Programme Handbook contains important information about relevant policies, regulations, and all available student support services, including our wellbeing offer. You will also find key contacts for your programme and a summary of all the modules you will study to earn your award.
This module is one part of a coherent package of modules that all contribute to the achievement of your programme learning outcomes (see your programme handbook for details) and to your student learning journey at GBS.
This module builds on the learning from the following module(s):
This module builds on the knowledge and skills you developed in earlier modules. In HWSC3005: Care, Compassion and Communication, you were introduced to the principles of care and the importance of effective communication in health and social care practice. These foundations were expanded in HWSC4004: Culture and Society in Health, where you explored cultural values and their significance in delivering person-centred care. Your understanding was further deepened in HWSC5001: Equality and Social Justice in Health, Illness and Society, which examined issues of equity and social justice, and in HWSC5002: Safeguarding Adults and Children in Health and Social Care, where you developed knowledge of safeguarding principles and multi-agency approaches. Together, these modules have prepared you to engage with active citizenship, collaborative working, and the application of ethical and inclusive practices in health and social care.
In addition, this module will prepare you for the following module(s),
Level 6 Module 4 (HWSC 6004) Leadership and management, where you would learn to evaluate leadership approaches and theories behind leadership. This will enhance personal reflection opportunities on leadership in Health and Social care practice.
This module aims to equip you with the critical thinking and leadership skills necessary to manage risk, vulnerability, and complaints in complex health and social care settings. You will apply theoretical frameworks to identify potential risks and assess vulnerabilities among service users, while also reflecting on the professional capabilities required to respond to challenges. Through the analysis of real-world scenarios, you will develop and communicate effective, evidence-based strategies for managing complaints and leading service improvement.
This module aims to:
On successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
| LO1 | Analyse a complaint letter and apply theories of vulnerability and risk in a Health and Social Care context. |
| LO2 | Critically evaluate the role of services involved and reflect on own leadership capabilities to manage complaints using evidence-based strategies. |
| LO3 | Communicate a professional and evidence-informed response to a complaint, demonstrating an appropriate tone, structure, and language for a health and social care context. |
Any changes to this module that are made in response to student and other feedback will be included in this section. Throughout the module you will be participating in independent, peer and guided learning activities to improve your critical thinking, analytical approaches and develop your professional skills.
| Date of change | Reason for change | Details of change made |
| Summer 2026 | Programme Major Modifications | Major Modifications were made to the programme in summer 2025 based on student and staff feedback. The modifications aimed to improve student outcomes and make the programme more relevant and engaging. These included changes to the module learning outcomes and assessments. |
The table below gives you a breakdown of the total study hours expected for this module.
| Scheduled learning and teaching activities | Contact hours |
| Lectures | 30 |
| Seminars | 0 |
| Practical classes/workshops | 20 |
| Tutorials | 0 |
| Fieldwork/external visits | 0 |
| Guided independent study | Learning hours |
| Directed/independent study | 100 |
| Preparation for assessments | 50 |
| Placement/Study Abroad | 0 |
| TOTAL: | 200 |
What will be covered each week?
| Week | Session & Overview | Independent Study | Related Learning Outcomes |
| Week 1 |
Exploring the Complaint Context and Professional Communication in Practice Snapshot of what we will cover:
After this Week, you will be:
How this will support your success in this module and beyond: These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3. In addition, the capability of understanding risk within a health and social care setting is essential for early identification of potential adverse outcomes. It allows you to create preventative measures before risk factors impact service users. |
Read it: Take some time to read Social Work Model Complaints Handling Procedure (2016) from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) to develop your understanding of formal complaint-handling frameworks in social work and complete a reflective exercise using the guidelines to be uploaded on the Moodle forum. Take some time to read the Regulation 16: Receiving and Acting on Complaints (CQC guidance) to deepen your understanding of how complaints must be handled in health and social care. You will complete the assigned task to be submitted on the Moodle platform. Read it and Try It: Make time to read Lonbay, S.P. (2018) ‘“These Are Vulnerable People Who Don’t Have a Voice” and Ageing in the Context of Safeguarding Older People |
LO1, LO2, LO3 |
| Week 2 |
Applying Concepts and Theories of Risk to Social Care to Identify Factors of Systematic Failures Snapshot of what we will cover:
Apply theories to understanding risk in health and social care settings.
These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3. Furthermore, utilising theory to holistically explore multi-level organisation-wide risk allows for effective evaluation to both identify individual risks and their wider impact that contribute to macro risk. |
Read it and Try it: Take out some time to read the article from the link: to deepen your understanding of perspectives relevant to complaints, safeguarding, or social care practice. Reflect on the authors arguments about power, ethics, accountability, or organisational dynamics. Use the guide provided to complete your reflection and post it onto the Moodle forum. Read it and Try it: Take out some time to access and read the BMJ Open article Key findings or themes. Write a 150–200-word critique of the author’s discussion using the task guidance and post your critique on Moodle platform. |
LO1, LO2, LO3 |
|
Week 3 |
Using Professional Complaint Resolution Tactics to Draft Complaint Responses through Professional Communication Snapshot of what we will cover:
After this week, you will be able to:
How this will support your success in this module and beyond: These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1 and LO2. In addition, the capability to utilise evidence-informed strategies to achieve desirable resolutions is a key facet of professional practice in health and social care. This shows an ability to evaluate unique risk factors that may be organisation-specific and consider how best to resolve issues. |
Listen carefully to the audio recordings or read the transcript. Critique the recording by identifying the good practices and the poor practices and discuss how to improve complaint handling in not more than 200 words. Upload your critique on Moodle platform. Read it and Try it: Take out some time to access and read the chapter from the book Writing Skills for Social Workers using the link: As you read, identify the main purpose of professional writing in social work practice, the types of writing tasks used in professional settings (e.g., reports, case notes, letters), and the key principles of effective written communication discussed in the text. Post it: Write a 150–200 word critique explaining how professional writing supports communication, accountability and decision-making in health and social care practice. Post your 150–200 word critique on the Moodle platform. |
LO1, LO2 |
|
Week 4 |
Mastering Oral Interviews and Presentation Skills Workshops Snapshot of what we will cover:
After this week, you will be able to:
How this will support your success in this module and beyond: These activities will help your development towards completing LO1, LO2, and LO3. Additionally, the capability of professional communication is an essential skill for both interviewing for a new role and maintaining success in health and social. The capacity to communicate complex information in a simple manner is essential for preventing the development of risk in organisations due to miscommunication of outcomes. |
Watch it: view the SCIE training video on poor practice in resident care homes: Explore: identify examples of: - Poor Practice (e.g., dignity violations, unsafe care, poor communication) - Missed opportunities for person-centred care. - Risk factors affecting residents’ health, safety, and wellbeing. Do it: write a short reflection (200-250 words) discussing: - What went wrong and why - The impact of these poor practices - How to improve the situation using good practice. Post it: upload your reflection to this week’s Moodle platform. |
LO1, LO2, LO3 |
|
Week 5 |
Using CINAHL for Evidence-Based Research in Health and Social Care and Plotting a Career Trajectory from Classroom to Practice Snapshot of what we will cover: · Plan professional development in Health & Social Care. · Explore career trajectories to identify key skills & competencies for future success. · Begin to develop a professional portfolio. · Utilise the CINAHL database to locate and evaluate evidence. · Explore importance of Boolean operators in evidence searches. After this week, you will be able to: · Identify the necessary skills and training required to achieve success. · Develop a professional portfolio of achievement and identify areas for Continuous Professional Development (CPD) that is essential for maintaining up-to-date standards in a health and care setting. · Evaluate the quality of evidence and consider its’ use in both academic writing and implementation in professional settings. How this will support your success in this module and beyond: In addition to your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3, you will be able to plan a trajectory for your own development to achieve a successful career. Moreover, you will be able to critically evaluate the quality of peer-reviewed research to conclude if it should be utilised in academic assignments and/or implemented in professional practice. |
Read it and try it: that interests you and read the job description noting the main duties and responsibilities, key skills and competencies and a write a brief (150-200 words) summary of the role and why it appeals to you. Upload your reflection [Here].
Read it and try it:
|
LO1, LO2, LO3. |
You have access to the GBS library (see Moodle or library@globalbanking.ac.uk) and specific elements of the OBU library.
The sections below detail your module reading list. This includes 'core reading', which are the texts you are required to read as part of the module, as well as a list of recommended readings to enhance your learning further.
The module’s assessment is split into two components to capture both analytical depth and the ability to communicate in a professional, real-world context. Both components must achieve a minimum of 40 to pass the overall module.
Your ability to write clearly and concisely is an important academic and professional skill. While there are no automatic penalties for exceeding the word count, your mark will be impacted if your work is overly long or short, as you will not have been able to show sufficient knowledge or the ability to be able to write a clear argument.
For information on extenuating circumstances, additional support and assessment guidance, please refer to your programme handbook.
| Type of assessment: | Written assignment (individual) |
| Component weighting: | Contributes 60 % of the total module grade. |
| Learning outcomes assessed: | LO1 & LO3 |
Task: In the written section of your assessment, you will write a 2000-word essay in response to the complaint letter provided below in order to demonstrate the
In this assessment, you will write an essay responding to the provided complaint letter. The task requires you to identify and analyse the key issues raised such as safeguarding, communication, and neglect while considering the underlying organisational and systemic factors that contributed to the situation. You must apply and critically evaluate relevant theories of risk and vulnerability to explain what happened and assess how well these theories account for the identified failings. Your analysis should be supported by appropriate legislation, policy, and professional standards (for example, the Care Act, CQC, and NMC/HCPC frameworks), demonstrating an evidence-informed understanding. You will also draft a professional response letter that is empathetic, accountable, and solution-focused, drawing on recognised guidelines such as NICE and CQC standards. The response letter should show evidence of organisational learning by outlining how the issues will be addressed and prevented through investigation, staff training, and policy review. Finally, you should conclude with a reflective discussion on your findings, highlighting the importance of professional, evidence-based communication, and maintain an academic tone with accurate referencing throughout
Suggested Framework to present: not more than 2000 words, including the following sections:
Begin by establishing the central focus of the essay, articulating the relevance of the issue within contemporary Health and Social Care practice. Situate the discussion within a broader professional, organisational, or policy context. Highlight why the issue is significant to practitioners, organisations, and service users, and outline the potential implications for practice and professional responsibility. Identify and briefly justify the theoretical perspectives, models, and legislative frameworks that will underpin your analysis. Demonstrate an awareness of how these frameworks inform understanding of vulnerability, risk, and professional accountability. Provide a concise overview of how the essay will be organised, indicating the key areas of analysis and how they interconnect.
Part A:
Part B:
Summarise the key findings from your analysis.
Reflect briefly on the importance of professional, evidence-informed communication in maintaining trust between service users, families, and Health and Social Care providers.
Please check that you have used the OBU Harvard Referencing system and make sure that all references in the main body of your work are in the list at the end of your essay and vice versa.
NOTE: The title and the reference list are excluded from the word limit.
This assessment should be submitted as a complete document:
| Type of assessment: | Oral assessment (individual) |
| Component weighting: | Contributes 40% of the total module grade (equivalent to 1000 words. |
| Learning outcomes assessed: | LO2 |
Specific guidance to complete oral assessment (40% of marks)
In the oral section of your assessment, you will focus on learning outcome two .To meet the learning outcomes, you are required to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of key concepts related to risk and vulnerability, as well as how these inform professional responses to complaints within health and social care settings. Your work should show awareness of the relevant legislation and policy frameworks that guide practice and accountability. In addition, you should consider the influence of different leadership styles and examine the roles and responsibilities of the services involved, as outlined in the complaint letter. Finally, you should evaluate effective complaint resolution strategies, highlighting how they contribute to improved service quality, professional learning, and the protection of service users.
Suggested content Framework to conduct 40% - 8–10-minute Oral interview:
Service Roles and Responsibilities
Leadership in Complaint Management
Evidence-Based Strategies
Personal Reflection and Development
Both parts of the component should be submitted as one document.
File type: You must save your Essay in MS Word format using the template provided. Please note that if the file type is unreadable by Turnitin, it will receive a grade of 0
Please reference your work according to the OBU Harvard style.
Wherever possible, submitted work will be marked anonymously to ensure impartiality; therefore, please ensure that you include your student ID on your submission instead of your name.
All files should be submitted before 23:59 on Monday 12th October 2026 via Turnitin on Moodle.
We recommend that you aim to submit well before the deadline in case you encounter any problems. This video shows how to submit your work on Moodle. You should retain your digital receipt in case of any issues.
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated criteria in the level-appropriate marking rubrics provided in this document.
Once the submission date has passed, your module tutors will begin to mark your work. There are a number of phases to this to ensure fairness is maintained across the whole cohort. Following this process, a sample of work is reviewed by a subject expert at Oxford Brookes University and an External Examiner for the programme to ensure that the standards applied are comparable to those at other institutions.
Feedback on your work will be provided in a range of ways at various times throughout this module to support your learning and help you to improve subsequent work.
Feedback provided throughout the module will not be limited to the assessed tasks but will include areas such as your contribution in class and formative assessments.
Assessment feedback will normally be provided within 15 working days of submission. All marks are provisional until they have been ratified by the Examination Committee and are visible in your Oxford Brookes student record.
If you would like further information about feedback, or how to use it, please talk to your module leader on this module or your level leader.
|
Criteria |
Pass |
Fail |
|||||
| 85 – 100% |
70-84% |
60-69% |
50-59% |
40-49% |
30-39% |
0-29% |
|
|
Analysis of complaint letter (LO1) 15/100 |
Analysis of the complaints letter goes beyond application, offering original critique and fresh insight into theoretical limitations. | Analysis of the complaints letter demonstrates a sophisticated understanding, effectively integrating theory and evidence to produce well-reasoned evaluation. | Analysis of the complaint letter demonstrates perceptive understanding and depth, effectively synthesising theory and evidence to produce nuanced, well-supported evaluation. | Analysis of the complaint letter shows strong engagement with theory and context, with clear evaluation and some independent interpretation. | Analysis of the complaint letter applies theoretical ideas accurately, showing awareness of implications and limitations, though evaluation may lack depth or originalit.y | Analysis of the complaint letter lacks coherence and understanding, offering little or no meaningful evaluation. | No analysis of the complaint letter with no coherence and understanding, offering no meaningful evaluation. |
|
Application of theories of vulnerability and risk (LO1) 20/100 |
The discussion of vulnerability and risk integrates multiple specialist theories and frameworks with exceptional precision. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates in-depth understanding of a wide range of relevant theories and frameworks. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates consistent depth by selecting theories and methods that are highly relevant to the context. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk shows detailed understanding of several relevant theories and concepts. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates clear understanding of relevant concepts and applies them appropriately. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk applies some relevant concepts but with limited depth of explanation. | The discussion of vulnerability and risk applies no concepts and in-depth knowledge to explanation. |
|
Response letter (LO3) 25/100 |
Organises ideas into a highly coherent, logical argument, where each point builds convincingly on the last and supports sophisticated conclusions supported by evidence. | Organises ideas into a coherent, logically structured argument, with each point building on evidence and analysis. | Constructs arguments where each point builds logically on the previous, demonstrating critical reasoning throughout supported by evidence. | Organises ideas logically, with a generally coherent argument, supported by evidence. | Organises ideas in a recognisable structure, though argumentation may be basic or partially supported by evidence. | Organises ideas inconsistently, with little coherence or logical structure, lacking support from evidence. | Organises ideas inconsistently, with no coherence or logical structure, limited or no support from evidence. |
|
Evaluation of the role of services (LO2) 20/100 |
Evaluation synthesises multiple perspectives with original insight, revealing nuanced understanding and offering innovative conclusions about the role of services. | Evaluation considers multiple perspectives, strengthening the depth and clarity of conclusions about the role of services. | Evaluation draws on a range of perspectives to form balanced, coherent judgments that enhance the overall conclusions about the role of services. | Evaluation integrates a range of viewpoints, demonstrating clear understanding and supporting well-reasoned conclusions about the role of services. | Evaluation acknowledges different perspectives and supports conclusions with relevant reasoning, though depth may lack consistent justification about the role of services. | Evaluation is limited or one-sided, with minimal reference to contrasting viewpoints or supporting evidence about the role of services. | No evaluation , limited or no reference to contrasting viewpoints or supporting evidence about the role of services. |
|
Reflect on leadership and use of evidence-based strategies (LO2) 20/100 |
Reflection demonstrates sophisticated self-awareness and critical evaluation of leadership practice, integrating evidence-based strategies with originality and clear impact on professional growth. | Reflection shows deep insight into personal leadership strengths and areas for development, effectively linking actions to evidence-based strategies and measurable outcomes. | Reflection demonstrates clear and insightful evaluation of personal leadership practice, effectively integrating evidence-based strategies to enhance decision-making and impact. | Reflection identifies leadership competencies with thoughtful evaluation, using relevant evidence-based strategies to justify approaches and improvements. | Reflection shows awareness of leadership skills and applies evidence-based strategies appropriately, though analysis of effectiveness may be limited. | Reflection is descriptive, outlining leadership actions with minimal connection to evidence-based strategies or personal development | Reflection is limited, no outlining of leadership actions with no connection to evidence-based strategies or personal development. |
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
dfghj