Social Justice, Equality and Vulnerability in Health and Social Care Module Handbook 2026 | OBU

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 26 Sep, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Healthcare
University Module Title HWSC6002 Social Justice, Equality and Vulnerability in Health and Social Care

HWSC6002 Introduction

We would like to welcome you to this module and look forward to working with you! To get the most out of this module, it is important that you consistently attend your classes throughout the teaching period. This will enable you to:

  • get to know your lecturer and other students to enhance your experience and learn from each other
  • benefit from access to the experience of your lecturer and being able to ask them questions directly
  • receive ongoing feedback on your progress and support on your assessment.

Please begin by familiarising yourself with this handbook. If you have questions about the module content, ask your lecturer during class or on MS Teams.
Your Programme Handbook contains important information about relevant policies, regulations, and all available student support services, including our wellbeing offer. You will also find key contacts for your programme and a summary of all the modules you will study to earn your award.

Module information

This module is one part of a coherent package of modules that all contribute to the achievement of your programme learning outcomes (see your programme handbook for details) and to your student learning journey at GBS.

This module builds on the learning from the following module(s):

This module builds on the knowledge and skills you developed in earlier modules. In HWSC3005: Care, Compassion and Communication, you were introduced to the principles of care and the importance of effective communication in health and social care practice. These foundations were expanded in HWSC4004: Culture and Society in Health, where you explored cultural values and their significance in delivering person-centred care. Your understanding was further deepened in HWSC5001: Equality and Social Justice in Health, Illness and Society, which examined issues of equity and social justice, and in HWSC5002: Safeguarding Adults and Children in Health and Social Care, where you developed knowledge of safeguarding principles and multi-agency approaches. Together, these modules have prepared you to engage with active citizenship, collaborative working, and the application of ethical and inclusive practices in health and social care.

In addition, this module will prepare you for the following module(s),

Level 6 Module 4 (HWSC 6004) Leadership and management, where you would learn to evaluate leadership approaches and theories behind leadership. This will enhance personal reflection opportunities on leadership in Health and Social care practice.  

Module aims

This module aims to equip you with the critical thinking and leadership skills necessary to manage risk, vulnerability, and complaints in complex health and social care settings. You will apply theoretical frameworks to identify potential risks and assess vulnerabilities among service users, while also reflecting on the professional capabilities required to respond to challenges. Through the analysis of real-world scenarios, you will develop and communicate effective, evidence-based strategies for managing complaints and leading service improvement.

This module aims to:

  • Apply risk identification theories to assess sources of patient or service user vulnerability in complex care contexts.
  • Critically evaluate your own and others’ professional development needs in relation to complaint management and leadership. 
  • Propose evidence-based strategies for leading and managing complaints effectively. 
  • Communicate a professional and appropriate written response to a patient or service user complaint.

Module learning outcomes (LOs)

On successful completion of this module, you will be able to: 

LO1 Analyse a complaint letter and apply theories of vulnerability and risk in a Health and Social Care context.
LO2 Critically evaluate the role of services involved and reflect on own leadership capabilities to manage complaints using evidence-based strategies.
LO3 Communicate a professional and evidence-informed response to a complaint, demonstrating an appropriate tone, structure, and language for a health and social care context.

Changes to the module

Any changes to this module that are made in response to student and other feedback will be included in this section. Throughout the module you will be participating in independent, peer and guided learning activities to improve your critical thinking, analytical approaches and develop your professional skills.

Date of change Reason for change Details of change made
Summer 2026 Programme Major Modifications   Major Modifications were made to the programme in summer 2025 based on student and staff feedback. The modifications aimed to improve student outcomes and make the programme more relevant and engaging. These included changes to the module learning outcomes and assessments.

Module delivery

Learning hour breakdown

The table below gives you a breakdown of the total study hours expected for this module.

Scheduled learning and teaching activities Contact hours
Lectures 30
Seminars 0
Practical classes/workshops 20
Tutorials 0
Fieldwork/external visits 0
Guided independent study Learning hours
Directed/independent study 100
Preparation for assessments 50
Placement/Study Abroad 0
TOTAL: 200

What will be covered each week?

Week Session & Overview Independent Study Related Learning Outcomes
Week 1

Exploring the Complaint Context and Professional Communication in Practice

Snapshot of what we will cover:

  • Explore concepts such as risk, vulnerability, safeguarding, and complaints.
  • Consider how risks influence safe, ethical, and accountable practice.
  • Explore how complaints can highlight failures in care and create opportunities for development.
  • Explore the rise of vulnerability and how to safeguard against such risks.
  • Understand how professional communication produces accountability and trust in healthcare.
  • Consider how legal and organisational expectations guide communication.
  • Critically evaluate the link between communication and risk and safe practice.

After this Week, you will be: 

  • Identify key factors associated with organisational risk.
  • Understand the impact of risk on practice.
  • Utilise professional communication to reduce risk and improve accountability and trust in healthcare settings.

How this will support your success in this module and beyond:

These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3. In addition, the capability of understanding risk within a health and social care setting is essential for early identification of potential adverse outcomes. It allows you to create preventative measures before risk factors impact service users.

Read it: Take some time to read

Social Work Model Complaints Handling Procedure (2016) from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) to develop your understanding of formal complaint-handling frameworks in social work and complete a reflective exercise using the guidelines to be uploaded on the Moodle forum. 

Take some time to read the Regulation 16: Receiving and Acting on Complaints (CQC guidance) to deepen your understanding of how complaints must be handled in health and social care. You will complete the assigned task to be submitted on the Moodle platform.

Read it and Try It: Make time to read Lonbay, S.P. (2018) ‘“These Are Vulnerable People Who Don’t Have a Voice” and Ageing in the Context of Safeguarding Older People

LO1, LO2, LO3
Week 2

Applying Concepts and Theories of Risk to Social Care to Identify Factors of Systematic Failures

Snapshot of what we will cover:

  • Explore theories to understand how risk is perceived, managed, and communicated in health and social care organisations.
  • Learn about Beck’s Risk Society, Lupton’s Sociocultural Theory of risk, as well as cultural theory of risk.
  • Apply theory to real world scenarios to understand why failures in care occur and can be addressed.
  • Explore how systematic factors contribute to safeguarding failures.
  • Explore impact of communication failures, system pressures, and organisational culture impact service users.
  • After this week, you will be able to:

 

Apply theories to understanding risk in health and social care settings.

  • Holistically evaluate the individual and combined impact of risk factors on both micro and macro-organisational levels.
  • How this will support your success in this module and beyond:

These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3. Furthermore, utilising theory to holistically explore multi-level organisation-wide risk allows for effective evaluation to both identify individual risks and their wider impact that contribute to macro risk.

Read it and Try it: Take out some time to read the article from the link:

to deepen your understanding of perspectives relevant to complaints, safeguarding, or social care practice. Reflect on the authors arguments about power, ethics, accountability, or organisational dynamics. Use the guide provided to complete your reflection and post it onto the Moodle forum.

Read it and Try it: Take out some time to access and read the BMJ Open article
 as you read, identify the study’s aims, research questions, or objectives, the methodology used.

Key findings or themes. Write a 150–200-word critique of the author’s discussion using the task guidance and post your critique on Moodle platform.

LO1, LO2, LO3

Week 3

Using Professional Complaint Resolution Tactics to Draft Complaint Responses through Professional Communication

Snapshot of what we will cover:

  • Explore evidence-informed approaches and strategies to resolving complaints in health and social care.
  • Consider how research, policy, and professional guidance shape effective complaint handling and support transparent and accountable practice.
  • Explore real-world scenarios to develop constructive responses to concerns and complaints.
  • Practice developing and communicating responses to complaints that instils trust, accountability, and engagement.
  • Consider how to align responses to CWC Regulation 16 and the Duty of Candour.

After this week, you will be able to:

  • Utilise evidence-informed strategies to resolve conflicts in real-world settings.
  • Effectively communicate and engage with complaints to instil trust, accountability and engagement.

How this will support your success in this module and beyond:

These outcomes will facilitate your development towards achieving LO1 and LO2. In addition, the capability to utilise evidence-informed strategies to achieve desirable resolutions is a key facet of professional practice in health and social care. This shows an ability to evaluate unique risk factors that may be organisation-specific and consider how best to resolve issues.

Listen carefully to the audio recordings or read the transcript.

 Critique the recording by identifying the good practices and the poor practices and discuss how to improve complaint handling in not more than 200 words. Upload your critique on Moodle platform.

Read it and Try it:​

 Take out some time to access and read the chapter from the book Writing Skills for Social Workers using the link:​

As you read, identify the main purpose of professional writing in social work practice, the types of writing tasks used in professional settings (e.g., reports, case notes, letters), and the key principles of effective written communication discussed in the text. 

Post it: Write a 150–200 word critique explaining how professional writing supports communication, accountability and decision-making in health and social care practice. Post your 150–200 word critique on the Moodle platform.

LO1, LO2

Week 4

Mastering Oral Interviews and Presentation Skills Workshops

Snapshot of what we will cover:

  • Develop professional communication skills.
  • Practice oral interview skills through simulations.
  • Consider how to articulate ideas clearly and concisely.
  • Critically apply structure, evidence, empathy, and professional standards to delivery.
  • Evaluate performance through recording, feedback, and reflection.

After this week, you will be able to:

  • Professionally communicate complex and innovate ideas with clarity and precision.
  • Maintain professional standards that provide high standards of delivery.
  • Reflect on events and engage in meaningful rumination to improve future outcomes.

How this will support your success in this module and beyond:

These activities will help your development towards completing LO1, LO2, and LO3. Additionally, the capability of professional communication is an essential skill for both interviewing for a new role and maintaining success in health and social. The capacity to communicate complex information in a simple manner is essential for preventing the development of risk in organisations due to miscommunication of outcomes.

Watch it: view the SCIE training video on poor practice in resident care homes:

Explore: identify examples of:

- Poor Practice (e.g., dignity violations, unsafe care, poor communication)

- Missed opportunities for person-centred care.

- Risk factors affecting residents’ health, safety, and wellbeing.

Do it: write a short reflection (200-250 words) discussing:

- What went wrong and why

- The impact of these poor practices

- How to improve the situation using good practice.

Post it: upload your reflection to this week’s Moodle platform.

LO1, LO2, LO3

Week 5

Using CINAHL for Evidence-Based Research in Health and Social Care and Plotting a Career Trajectory from Classroom to Practice

Snapshot of what we will cover:

·         Plan professional development in Health & Social Care.

·         Explore career trajectories to identify key skills & competencies for future success.

·         Begin to develop a professional portfolio.

·         Utilise the CINAHL database to locate and evaluate evidence.

·         Explore importance of Boolean operators in evidence searches.

After this week, you will be able to:

·         Identify the necessary skills and training required to achieve success.

·         Develop a professional portfolio of achievement and identify areas for Continuous Professional Development (CPD) that is essential for maintaining up-to-date standards in a health and care setting.

·         Evaluate the quality of evidence and consider its’ use in both academic writing and implementation in professional settings.

How this will support your success in this module and beyond:

In addition to your development towards achieving LO1, LO2, and LO3, you will be able to plan a trajectory for your own development to achieve a successful career. Moreover, you will be able to critically evaluate the quality of peer-reviewed research to conclude if it should be utilised in academic assignments and/or implemented in professional practice.

Read it and try it:

 that interests you and read the job description noting the main duties and responsibilities, key skills and competencies and a write a brief (150-200 words) summary of the role and why it appeals to you. Upload your reflection [Here].  

 

Read it and try it:
Read the academic integrity policy document and write a (150-200) reflection on the importance of honesty, integrity and credibility in academic writing. Upload on Moodle platform. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LO1, LO2, LO3.

Module reading

You have access to the GBS library (see Moodle or library@globalbanking.ac.uk) and specific elements of the OBU library. 
The sections below detail your module reading list. This includes 'core reading', which are the texts you are required to read as part of the module, as well as a list of recommended readings to enhance your learning further.

How will I be assessed?

The module’s assessment is split into two components to capture both analytical depth and the ability to communicate in a professional, real-world context. Both components must achieve a minimum of 40 to pass the overall module.  

Your ability to write clearly and concisely is an important academic and professional skill. While there are no automatic penalties for exceeding the word count, your mark will be impacted if your work is overly long or short, as you will not have been able to show sufficient knowledge or the ability to be able to write a clear argument.

For information on extenuating circumstances, additional support and assessment guidance, please refer to your programme handbook.

Component 1

Type of assessment: Written assignment (individual)
Component weighting: Contributes 60 % of the total module grade.
Learning outcomes assessed: LO1 & LO3

Task: In the written section of your assessment, you will write a 2000-word essay in response to the complaint letter provided below in order to demonstrate the

learning outcomes of this module:

Specific Guidance on the Assignment

In this assessment, you will write an essay responding to the provided complaint letter. The task requires you to identify and analyse the key issues raised such as safeguarding, communication, and neglect while considering the underlying organisational and systemic factors that contributed to the situation. You must apply and critically evaluate relevant theories of risk and vulnerability to explain what happened and assess how well these theories account for the identified failings. Your analysis should be supported by appropriate legislation, policy, and professional standards (for example, the Care Act, CQC, and NMC/HCPC frameworks), demonstrating an evidence-informed understanding. You will also draft a professional response letter that is empathetic, accountable, and solution-focused, drawing on recognised guidelines such as NICE and CQC standards. The response letter should show evidence of organisational learning by outlining how the issues will be addressed and prevented through investigation, staff training, and policy review. Finally, you should conclude with a reflective discussion on your findings, highlighting the importance of professional, evidence-based communication, and maintain an academic tone with accurate referencing throughout
Suggested Framework to present: not more than 2000 words, including the following sections:

Introduction:

Begin by establishing the central focus of the essay, articulating the relevance of the issue within contemporary Health and Social Care practice. Situate the discussion within a broader professional, organisational, or policy context. Highlight why the issue is significant to practitioners, organisations, and service users, and outline the potential implications for practice and professional responsibility. Identify and briefly justify the theoretical perspectives, models, and legislative frameworks that will underpin your analysis. Demonstrate an awareness of how these frameworks inform understanding of vulnerability, risk, and professional accountability. Provide a concise overview of how the essay will be organised, indicating the key areas of analysis and how they interconnect.

Part A:

  • Critically explain why key issues raised in the complaint letter led to a particular outcome, evaluating the interplay of underlying causes and wider systemic factors in health and social care practice.
  • Compare and integrate different risk and vulnerability theories and analyse how combining them provides deeper insights into the situation described in the letter,
  • Analyse the patient/service-user rights and responsibilities of professionals, evaluating which are most probable, beneficial, or feasible and provide reasoned justification based on evidence when forming a response that adheres to legislation and policy.

Part B:

  • Draft a professional, evidence-informed response letter to the complainant, using an appropriate tone, structure, and language. Organise your ideas into a coherent, logically structured argument. Ensure that each point builds on the previous one, supported by evidence, and that the overall narrative demonstrates critical reasoning and depth of insight
  • Ensure your response addresses the concerns raised in the original complaint while demonstrating empathy, accountability, and commitment to safeguarding and improvement.
  • Incorporate evidence of professional standards and good practice (e.g., NICE guidelines, CQC regulations, organisational policies).
  • Demonstrate how the organisation will acknowledge, investigate, and address the identified failings, linking back to theories of vulnerability and risk where appropriate.
  • Determine which actions should be immediate, medium-term, or long-term. Justify this sequence by critically evaluating likely impact, risks, feasibility, interdependencies, and how progress would be monitored and adapted.

Conclusion:

Summarise the key findings from your analysis.

Reflect briefly on the importance of professional, evidence-informed communication in maintaining trust between service users, families, and Health and Social Care providers.

References

Please check that you have used the OBU Harvard Referencing system and make sure that all references in the main body of your work are in the list at the end of your essay and vice versa.

NOTE: The title and the reference list are excluded from the word limit.

Formatting guidelines

This assessment should be submitted as a complete document:

  • Use Arial font.
  • Set the font size to 12pt for the main text.
  • Apply 1.5 or double-spacing throughout the document.
  • Clearly indicate each part of the assessment, following the suggested structure.
  • OBU Harvard referencing should be applied throughout the assessment.
  • Wherever possible, submitted work will be marked anonymously to ensure impartiality; therefore, please ensure that you include your student ID on your submission instead of your name.

Component 2

Type of assessment: Oral assessment (individual)
Component weighting: Contributes 40% of the total module grade (equivalent to 1000 words.
Learning outcomes assessed: LO2

Individual work

Specific guidance to complete oral assessment (40% of marks)

In the oral section of your assessment, you will focus on learning outcome two .To meet the learning outcomes, you are required to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of key concepts related to risk and vulnerability, as well as how these inform professional responses to complaints within health and social care settings. Your work should show awareness of the relevant legislation and policy frameworks that guide practice and accountability. In addition, you should consider the influence of different leadership styles and examine the roles and responsibilities of the services involved, as outlined in the complaint letter. Finally, you should evaluate effective complaint resolution strategies, highlighting how they contribute to improved service quality, professional learning, and the protection of service users.

Suggested content Framework to conduct 40% - 8–10-minute Oral interview:

Service Roles and Responsibilities

  • How do different Health and Social Care services contribute to managing complaints, and what are the challenges of ensuring effective multi-agency collaboration?

Leadership in Complaint Management

  • Reflect on your own leadership capabilities: how would you approach managing a complex complaint involving vulnerable service users?

 Evidence-Based Strategies

  • Which evidence-based strategies, models, or frameworks can be used to improve complaint handling? What skills do you have as a leader that would be needed to implement them

Personal Reflection and Development

  • What personal leadership strengths and areas for development have you identified in relation to managing complaints and use of evidence-based strategies, and how will you address these in future professional practice?

Formatting guidelines

Both parts of the component should be submitted as one document.

File type: You must save your Essay in MS Word format using the template provided. Please note that if the file type is unreadable by Turnitin, it will receive a grade of 0

  • Font: Arial
  • Font size: 12
  • 1.5 line spacing

Please reference your work according to the OBU Harvard style.

Wherever possible, submitted work will be marked anonymously to ensure impartiality; therefore, please ensure that you include your student ID on your submission instead of your name.

Submission instructions

All files should be submitted before 23:59 on Monday 12th October 2026 via Turnitin on Moodle.
We recommend that you aim to submit well before the deadline in case you encounter any problems. This video shows how to submit your work on Moodle. You should retain your digital receipt in case of any issues.

How will my work be marked?

Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated criteria in the level-appropriate marking rubrics provided in this document.

Once the submission date has passed, your module tutors will begin to mark your work. There are a number of phases to this to ensure fairness is maintained across the whole cohort. Following this process, a sample of work is reviewed by a subject expert at Oxford Brookes University and an External Examiner for the programme to ensure that the standards applied are comparable to those at other institutions.

How will I get feedback?

Feedback on your work will be provided in a range of ways at various times throughout this module to support your learning and help you to improve subsequent work.

Feedback provided throughout the module will not be limited to the assessed tasks but will include areas such as your contribution in class and formative assessments.
Assessment feedback will normally be provided within 15 working days of submission. All marks are provisional until they have been ratified by the Examination Committee and are visible in your Oxford Brookes student record.

If you would like further information about feedback, or how to use it, please talk to your module leader on this module or your level leader.

Marking rubrics for:  HWSC6002

 

Criteria

Pass

Fail

85 – 100%

70-84%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

0-29%

Analysis of complaint letter (LO1)

15/100

Analysis of the complaints letter goes beyond application, offering original critique and fresh insight into theoretical limitations. Analysis of the complaints letter demonstrates a sophisticated understanding, effectively integrating theory and evidence to produce well-reasoned evaluation. Analysis of the complaint letter demonstrates perceptive understanding and depth, effectively synthesising theory and evidence to produce nuanced, well-supported evaluation. Analysis of the complaint letter shows strong engagement with theory and context, with clear evaluation and some independent interpretation. Analysis of the complaint letter applies theoretical ideas accurately, showing awareness of implications and limitations, though evaluation may lack depth or originalit.y Analysis of the complaint letter lacks coherence and understanding, offering little or no meaningful evaluation. No analysis of the complaint letter with no coherence and understanding, offering no meaningful evaluation.

Application of theories of vulnerability and risk (LO1)

20/100

The discussion of vulnerability and risk integrates multiple specialist theories and frameworks with exceptional precision. The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates in-depth understanding of a wide range of relevant theories and frameworks. The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates consistent depth by selecting theories and methods that are highly relevant to the context. The discussion of vulnerability and risk shows detailed understanding of several relevant theories and concepts. The discussion of vulnerability and risk demonstrates clear understanding of relevant concepts and applies them appropriately. The discussion of vulnerability and risk applies some relevant concepts but with limited depth of explanation. The discussion of vulnerability and risk applies no concepts and in-depth knowledge to explanation.

Response letter (LO3)

25/100

Organises ideas into a highly coherent, logical argument, where each point builds convincingly on the last and supports sophisticated conclusions supported by evidence. Organises ideas into a coherent, logically structured argument, with each point building on evidence and analysis. Constructs arguments where each point builds logically on the previous, demonstrating critical reasoning throughout supported by evidence. Organises ideas logically, with a generally coherent argument, supported by evidence. Organises ideas in a recognisable structure, though argumentation may be basic or partially supported by evidence. Organises ideas inconsistently, with little coherence or logical structure, lacking support from evidence. Organises ideas inconsistently, with no coherence or logical structure, limited or no support from evidence.

Evaluation of the role of services (LO2)

20/100

Evaluation synthesises multiple perspectives with original insight, revealing nuanced understanding and offering innovative conclusions about the role of services. Evaluation considers multiple perspectives, strengthening the depth and clarity of conclusions about the role of services. Evaluation draws on a range of perspectives to form balanced, coherent judgments that enhance the overall conclusions about the role of services. Evaluation integrates a range of viewpoints, demonstrating clear understanding and supporting well-reasoned conclusions about the role of services. Evaluation acknowledges different perspectives and supports conclusions with relevant reasoning, though depth may lack consistent justification about the role of services. Evaluation is limited or one-sided, with minimal reference to contrasting viewpoints or supporting evidence about the role of services. No evaluation , limited or no reference to contrasting viewpoints or supporting evidence about the role of services.

Reflect on leadership and use of evidence-based strategies (LO2)

20/100

Reflection demonstrates sophisticated self-awareness and critical evaluation of leadership practice, integrating evidence-based strategies with originality and clear impact on professional growth. Reflection shows deep insight into personal leadership strengths and areas for development, effectively linking actions to evidence-based strategies and measurable outcomes. Reflection demonstrates clear and insightful evaluation of personal leadership practice, effectively integrating evidence-based strategies to enhance decision-making and impact. Reflection identifies leadership competencies with thoughtful evaluation, using relevant evidence-based strategies to justify approaches and improvements. Reflection shows awareness of leadership skills and applies evidence-based strategies appropriately, though analysis of effectiveness may be limited. Reflection is descriptive, outlining leadership actions with minimal connection to evidence-based strategies or personal development Reflection is limited, no outlining of leadership actions with no connection to evidence-based strategies or personal development.

 

60-Second Quote

Get Your Free Academic Quote

No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential

Workingment Unique Features

Latest Free Samples for University Students

FLAT 15% OFF

AVAIL FLAT 10% OFF

+ Extra 5% OFF

FREE PLAGIARISM REPORT
Applicable on all orders
ORDER NOW →
★★★★★ 4.9/5 | 5118+ Reviews
WhatsApp
Online Assignment Help in UK
dfghj