UK's No.1 Assignment Help, Trusted Since 2018
Get Expert-crafted assignments
Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Healthcare |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | New Zealand Skills and Education College (NZSE) | Module Title | GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand |
| Course Code & Title: | GCHG704: Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand | ||
| Assessment Title: | Assignment 1 | Assessment Type: | Essay |
| Level: | 7 | Course Credits: | 15 |
| Due date: | Week 5, 1 June 2026 | ||
| Overall Weighting: | 30% | ||
| Total marks available: | 100 | ||
You are required to ensure you have carried out the following before submitting your assessment:
When learners cannot complete an assessment because of exceptional circumstances they will be provided an extension. If a learner needs an extension, they must apply to their lecturer in writing by email at least 3 days prior to the assessment submission due date. If the learner fails to submit by this time, they will fail the assessment.
Learners are encouraged to submit by the assessment due date. However, learners who are regularly late submitting their assessments will be offered support. Formative assessments should support learners to be able to submit on time.
Late assessments will incur a penalty of 5% per day (unless an extension is granted before the due date). Any assessment received later than 5 working days after the due date will be marked to a maximum of 50% with no re-submission or re-submit allowed.
There are no resubmissions in this course.
All courses have a 50% pass grade and all assessments within a course must be the learner’s best attempt and passed with a 50% grade to achieve a successful outcome for that course.
Appeals will be processed according to NZSEG A10 Appeals Policy.
The use of Canvas LMS allows the use of the authenticity checking Turnitin software to be used as part of the submission process for written assessments where plagiarism may be a concern.
Current student Policies allow for the use of plagiarism software or other means to confirm an assessment is a learner’s own work. Assessments may be retained on a plagiarism detection database for ongoing comparison with other assessments submitted.
NZSE have an AI policy [Academic Policy A20 – Generative AI Policy] in place that encourages the use of AI tools by learners to supplement their studies but prohibits its use for assessments (unless otherwise directed) to discourage plagiarism and to maintain academic integrity.
If an assessor has doubts over the authenticity of assessment answers, the learner may be requested to demonstrate understanding in front of the assessor.
This programme will comply with NZSE Quality Management System and Policies. Academic policies have been hyperlinked from within the Student Handbook.
Throughout this programme, lecturers will emphasise the importance of professionalism in the health sector. Learners are expected to demonstrate professionalism within the class settings and will be assessed on their abilities to apply such professionalism in their written work presented as part of their summative assessments.
Professionalism may include but is not limited to cultural responsibility, ethical behaviour, morality, honesty, integrity, empathy, and confidentiality.
These traits, skills and attributes are expected of health graduates.
Throughout this programme, learners are applying academic skills such as critical thinking, utilising multiple peer-reviewed journal articles, writing evidence-informed inferences, constructing and evidencing specific academic arguments, and using critical reasoning.
Refer to the information provided on Canvas LMS during the Academic Writing workshop regarding critical analysis, critical evaluation, referencing, etc.
The purpose of this assessment is to assess the learner’s ability to analyse ethical, legal and professional standards and guidelines to establish their relevance and impact on hauora for New Zealand’s diverse communities.
This course is mapped to the following GPO:
| GPO 1: | Critically evaluate advanced concepts, frameworks, policies, and culturally responsive strategies in mental health, community health, and addiction services to promote holistic, equitable, and socially just health outcomes for diverse populations in Aotearoa New Zealand. |
| GPO 2: | Critically evaluate legal standards, ethical approaches, and culturally reflective practices of mental health, community health and addiction challenges, for the enhancement of hauora, harm reduction, and equitable health outcomes for indigenous and vulnerable communities in Aotearoa New Zealand. |
When you successfully complete this course, you will be able to:
| LO 1: | Evaluate ethical guidelines and approaches, examining their relevance and impact on hauora for Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population. (4 credits) |
| LO 1: | Critically examine healthcare strategies and policies contributing to equitable health outcomes within Aotearoa New Zealand. (5 credits) |
| LO 3: | Critically examine healthcare strategies and policies contributing to equitable health outcomes within Aotearoa New Zealand. (6 credits) |
Do you Need Help With GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa NZ Assignment 1 Essay?
Chat With NZ Experts NowYou are to write an essay in which you evaluate the ethical guidelines and approaches that apply in health practice in Aotearoa New Zealand. Examine their relevance and impact on the holistic wellbeing (hauora) of Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population, with particular attention to cultural responsiveness and equity for marginalised people. Read all tasks before you start your essay.
You need to:
From your findings in Task Two,
Provide an in-depth discussion of how one ethical guideline and/or approach is clearly relevant and impactful on hauora for the same diverse population in Aotearoa New Zealand, chosen above. Support your discussion with evidences from your evaluation.
Explain on how you would apply this guideline and/or approach through professional conduct.
Use at least 5 relevant sources (government or sector reports and peer-reviewed academic articles) and include in-text citations and referencing, using APA 7th edition style, to acknowledge all the sources of information you have used. Sources should be current (within the last 10 years), with emphasis on recent developments and contemporary evidence. Blog posts and non-academic websites are not acceptable as primary sources.
Learning outcomes
LO1: Evaluate ethical guidelines and approaches, examining their relevance and impact on hauora for Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse population. (4 credits)
LO2: Critically analyse the legal and professional standards that regulate community health, mental health, and addiction services in Aotearoa New Zealand. (5 credits)
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Adequate | Inadequate | Poor |
| A compelling hook to the introduction which has set the stage for an in-depth essay and provides engaging detail of the evaluation and analysis, background information and a proposition statement. | A clear hook to the introduction which has set the stage for a good essay and provides engaging detail of the evaluation and analysis, background information and a proposition statement. | An essay introduction which includes details of the evaluation and analysis including a satisfactory hook, background information and a proposition statement. This intro lacks some clarity. | A sufficient introduction to the essay with an adequate hook, background information and proposition statement. | An inadequate introduction to the essay including some irrelevant details, and lacking a hook, background information and/or proposition statement. | Little or no evidence or an introduction to the essay. |
| 14 to 15 marks | 10 to 13 marks | 8 to 10 marks | 5 to 7 marks | 2 to 4 marks | 0-1 marks |
a) Evaluate at least two ethical guidelines and two approaches, as apply in healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand, using the four principles of ethics (beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice)
b) Examine the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled.)
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Adequate | Inadequate | Poor |
| An in-depth and insightful evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including all (11) of the following:
An insightful examination of the relevance and impact of these two guidelines and two approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s [clearly identified] diverse populations (i.e., Māori, Pasifika, or disabled). Throughout the details there is ample evidence of critical thinking and use of credible evidence from more than three peer reviewed sources. |
A clear, logical evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches
using the 4 principles of ethics, including 9 of the following:
There is good evidence of critical thinking, and use of credible evidence from 3 peer reviewed sources. |
A satisfactory evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including 7 of the following:
|
A sufficient evaluation of two ethical guidelines and two approaches using the 4 principles of ethics, including 5 of the following:
|
An insufficient evaluation of ethical guidelines and approaches. Inadequate examination of with minimum relevance OR impact of these guidelines and approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s diverse populations. | Little or no evaluation of ethical guidelines and approaches.
Little or no examination of the relevance and/or impact of these guidelines and approaches on hauora for one of New Zealand’s diverse populations.
|
| 39 to 45 marks | 31 to 38 marks | 23 to 30 marks | 15 to 22 marks | 7 to 14 marks | 0 to 6
marks |
| Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Adequate | Inadequate | Poor |
| Provides an in-depth, coherent, and persuasive discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn clearly from the evaluation.
Demonstrates strong insight into why it is especially relevant and impactful for the hauora of the chosen population. Integrates evidence effectively from Task 2 and extends the evaluation meaningfully. Explains professional application with excellent clarity. Demonstrates a strong understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.
|
Provides a clear and well-developed discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn clearly from the evaluation. Demonstrates insight into why it is especially relevant and impactful for the hauora of the chosen population. Integrates evidence effectively from Task 2 and extends the evaluation well. Explains professional application with clarity. Demonstrates a good understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.
|
Provides a general discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates some insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains professional application with some clarity. Demonstrates a basic understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.
|
Provides an adequate discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates sufficient insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains professional application with limited clarity. Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.
|
Provides inadequate discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from the evaluation. Demonstrates insufficient insight into why it is especially relevant for the hauora of the chosen population. Explains unclear professional application. Demonstrates
an insufficient understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct.
|
Little or no discussion nor arguments on the discussion of ethical guideline and/or approach drawn from evaluation. Poor insight into why it is especially relevant for the Hauora of the chosen population. Little or no explanation about professional application. Little or poor
understanding of ethical and culturally responsive professional conduct. |
| 26 to 30 marks | 21 to 25 marks | 15 to 20 marks | 10 to 14 marks | 5 to 9 marks | 0 to 4 marks |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent |
| Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. | Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. | Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-
text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. |
Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been included in both in-
text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. |
Ten or more appropriate and relevant references,
which have been included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. |
Ten or more appropriate and relevant references, which have been
included in both in-text citations and reference list in the correct APA 7th edition format. |
| 9 to 10 marks | 9 to 10 marks | 9 to 10 marks | 9 to 10 marks | 9 to 10 marks | 9 to 10 marks |
Get Answer of GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa NZ Assignment 1 Before Deadline
Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized AssignmentNeed support with your GCHG704 Health Practices and Policies in Aotearoa New Zealand Assignment 1 Essay? Our expert New Zealand Assignment Help service provides well-researched, plagiarism-free, and academically sound assistance tailored to university requirements. We help students understand complex healthcare policies, health practices, and the New Zealand healthcare system with clear explanations and quality guidance. With reliable Healthcare Assignment Help, you can improve your understanding, meet deadlines, and achieve better grades. Get personalised academic support designed to make your assignment process easier, more effective, and stress-free from start to finish.
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
