Executive Leadership and Governance CW5 Summative Assessment Brief | BPP

Programme

Module name

Student Reference Number (SRN)

Report/Assignment Title

Date of Submission

(Please attach the confirmation of any extension received)

Declaration of Original Work:

§  I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work, and that I have researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements of BPP School of Business.

§  I declare that where I have used any AI tools, it was for the following reasons (highlight as appropriate):

o   To review a draft

o   To correct language errors

o   Other (please describe

§  I have copied & retained for BPP University’s reference, all AI prompts used in the creation of AI content and all AI-generated responses in support of my assignment and attached relevant evidence in the appendices.

§  I understand that I may be required to participate in a viva voce, where I will be questioned on any aspect of my assignment, including key concepts, theories, examples used, & any sources included.

§  The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is       words.

Student Reference Number:                                                                                       Date:

By submitting this coursework you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards for programmes. Please note, submission is your declaration you are fit to sit.

BPP University reserves the right to use all submitted work for educational purposes and may request that work be published for a wider audience.

BPP School of Business

Task 1- Leadership and Management

1,250 Words

Task 2 – Corporate Governance and Regulation

1,250 Words

Task 3 – Risk Management

1,250 Words

Task 4 – Ethical Leadership

1,250 Words

Total

5,000 Words

Learning Outcome

Marginal Fail

Pass

Merit

Distinction

High Distinction

0% – 39%

40% – 49%

50% – 59%

60% – 69%

Fail70% – 79%

80% - 100%

LO1: Develop your

Weak or

Limited knowledge of

Satisfactory

Good level of

Excellent knowledge

Outstanding

knowledge of

inadequate

critical leadership

knowledge and

knowledge and

and understanding of

knowledge and

critical leadership

knowledge of

capability in leading

understanding of

understanding of

critical leadership

understanding of

capability in

critical

organisations. Limited

critical leadership

critical leadership

capability in leading

critical leadership

leading

leadership

evaluation of the

capability in

capability in leading

organisations. An

capability in leading

organisations

capability in

company's leadership

leading

organisations. A good

excellent critical

organisations. An

leading

and management

organisations.

critical evaluation of

evaluation of the

outstanding critical

organisations.

style. Limited research

Satisfactory

the company's

company's leadership

evaluation of the

Weak or no

and analysis of the

evaluation of the

leadership and

and management

company's leadership

evaluation of

company’s leadership

company's

management style,

style, that objectively

and management

the company's

and management.

leadership and

with some discussion

weighs the strengths

style, that objectively

leadership and

management

of the strengths and

and weakness of the

weighs all the

management

style. Some

weakness of the

company’s

strengths and

style. Weak or

research and

company’s

leadership and

weakness of the

inadequate

analysis, of the

leadership and

management. An

company’s

research and

company’s

management. Good

excellent and

leadership and

analysis of the

leadership and

application of

detailed application

management. An

company’s

management.

relevant leadership

of relevant

outstanding and

leadership and

and management

leadership and

extensive application

management.

models to the

management models

of relevant

company. Evidence-

to the company.

leadership and

backed analysis of

Excellent evidence-

management models

the company’s

backed analysis of

to the company.

leadership and

the company’s

Outstanding and

management.

extensive evidence-

backed analysis of

leadership and management.

the company’s leadership and management.

LO4: Critically

Weak or

Limited evaluation of

Satisfactory

Good evaluation of

Excellent evaluation

Outstanding

evaluate the

inadequate

the impact of the

evaluation of the

the impact of the

of the impact of the

evaluation of the

impact of the

evaluation of

governance and

impact of the

governance and

governance and

impact of the

governance and

the impact of

regulatory context on

governance and

regulatory context on

regulatory context on

governance and

regulatory context

the governance

the success of an

regulatory context

the success of an

the success of an

regulatory context on

on the success of

and regulatory

organisation. Limited

on the success of

organisation. Good

organisation.

the success of an

an organisation

context on the

knowledge of the

an organisation.

and clear

Thorough and deep

organisation.

success of an

Corporate Governance

Satisfactory

understanding of the

knowledge and

Thorough, balanced,

organisation.

Framework at the

appreciation of

Corporate

understanding of the

and deep knowledge

Weak or

company. Limited

the Corporate

Governance

Corporate

and understanding of

inadequate

explanation of internal

Governance

Framework at the

Governance

the Corporate

knowledge of

governance in the

Framework at the

company. Good

Framework at the

Governance

the Corporate

company and external

company.

explanation of

company. Excellent

Framework at the

Governance

governance rules and

Satisfactory

internal governance

and detailed

company.

Framework at

regulations.

explanation of

in the company and

discussion of internal

Outstanding and

the company.

internal and

external governance

governance in the

extensive discussion

Weak or

external

rules and regulations.

company and

of internal

inadequate

governance rules

A good discussion on

relevant external

governance in the

explanation of

and regulations.

how the company

governance rules and

company and

internal

Some discussion

complies with these

regulations that

relevant external

governance in

on how the

rules and regulations.

apply to the

governance rules and

the company

company complies

company. An

regulations that

and external

with these rules

excellent discussion

apply to the

governance

and regulations.

on how the company

company. An

outstanding and

rules and regulations.

complies with these rules and regulations.

extensive discussion on how the company complies with these rules and regulations.

LO3: Critically

Weak or

Limited appreciation

Satisfactory

Good critical

Excellent critical

Outstanding critical

evaluate risk

inadequate

of critical evaluation of

appreciation of

evaluation of risk

evaluation of risk

evaluation of risk

management at a

appreciation of

risk management at a

critical evaluation

management at a

management at a

management at a

corporate level

critical

corporate level,

of risk

corporate level. A

corporate level.

corporate level.

evaluation of

Limited analysis, and

management at a

good and clear

Thorough and deep

Thorough, balanced,

risk

evaluation of three

corporate level.

analysis and

knowledge and

and deep knowledge

management at

risks faced by the

Satisfactory

evaluation of three

understanding of risk

and understanding of

a corporate

company. Limited

analysis and

significant risks faced

management. A

risk management. An

level. Weak or

recommendations for

evaluation of

by the company.

thorough an

outstanding analysis

inadequate

the management of

three risks faced

Good and

excellent analysis and

and evaluation of

analysis and

the risks identified.

by the company.

appropriate

evaluation of three

three significant risks

evaluation of

Limited discussion on

Satisfactory

recommendations

significant risks faced

faced by the

three risks faced

the board’s role in

recommendations

for the management

by the company.

company.

by the

managing these risks.

for the

of the risks identified.

Excellent, realistic,

Outstanding,

company. Weak

management of

A good discussion on

and appropriate

realistic, and

or inadequate

the risks

the board’s role in

recommendations

insightful

recommendatio

identified. A

managing these risks.

for the management

recommendations

ns for the

Satisfactory

some application of a

of the risks identified.

for the management

management of

discussion on the

risk management

An excellent

of the risks identified.

the risks

board’s role in

model or framework

discussion on the

An outstanding

identified. Weak

managing these

such as the Three

board’s role in

discussion on the

or inadequate

risks.

Horizon Model or

managing these risks.

board’s role in

discussion on

Risk Heat Maps.

Excellent and

managing these risks.

the board’s role

detailed application

Outstanding and

of a risk management

extensive application

in managing these risks.

model or framework such as the Three Horizon Model, the 4T Model or Risk Heat Maps.

of one or more risk management modes or frameworks such as the Three Horizon Model, the 4T Model or Risk Heat Maps.

LO2: Apply your

Weak or

Limited application of

Satisfactory

Good application of

Excellent application

Outstanding

understanding of

inadequate

how an understanding

application of how

how an

of how an

application of how an

leadership

application of

of leadership

an understanding

understanding of

understanding of

understanding of

principles to key

how an

principles can be

of leadership

leadership principles

leadership principles

leadership principles

business

understanding

applied to key

principles can be

can be applied to key

can be applied to key

can be applied to key

challenges

of leadership

business challenges.

applied to key

business challenges.

business challenges.

business challenges.

principles can

Limited knowledge

business

Good and clear

Thorough, and

Thorough, balanced,

be applied to

displayed of a

challenges.

evaluation of a

balanced evaluation

and deep evaluation

key business

significant ethical

Satisfactory

significant ethical

of a significant

of a significant

challenges.

challenge that the

appreciation of a

challenge that the

ethical challenge that

ethical challenge that

Weak or

company faces.

significant ethical

company faces. Good

the company faces.

the company faces.

inadequate

Limited demonstration

challenge that the

demonstration of

Excellent

Outstanding

knowledge

of how this challenge

company faces.

how this challenge

demonstration of

demonstration of

displayed of a

impacts the company

Some

impacts the company

how this challenge

how this challenge

significant

and its stakeholders.

demonstration of

and its stakeholders.

impacts the company

impacts the company

ethical

Limited or

how this challenge

Appropriate

and its stakeholders.

and its stakeholders.

challenge that

inappropriate

impacts the

leadership-level

Excellent, realistic,

Outstanding,

the company

recommendations on

company and its

recommendations on

and appropriate

realistic, and

faces. Weak or

how the company can

stakeholders.

how the company

leadership-level

insightful leadership-

no

address this ethical

Appropriate

can address this

recommendations on

level

demonstration

challenge.

recommendations

ethical challenge.

how the company

recommendations on

of how this

on how the

Some application of

can address this

how the company

challenge

company can

an ethical leadership

ethical challenge.

can address this

impacts the

address this

framework or model,

Excellent application

ethical challenge.

company and its

ethical challenge.

such as the Triple

of an ethical

Outstanding

stakeholders.

Bottom Line.

leadership

application of one or

Weak or

frameworks or

more ethical

inadequate

model, such as the

leadership

recommendatio

Triple Bottom Line.

framework or model

ns on how the

such as the Triple

company can

Bottom Line.

address this

ethical

challenge.

Research Skills

Weak or poor

research skills exhibited through an overreliance on some sources and limited use of academic sources.

Limited research skills

exhibited through the use of a narrow range academic sources – and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.

Satisfactory

demonstration of research skills exhibited through the use of some academic sources – and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.

Good demonstration

of research skills through the use of a somewhat broad range of academic sources – and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.

Excellent

demonstration of research skills through the use of a broad range of academic sources – and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.

Outstanding

demonstration of research skills through the use of a broad range of academic sources – and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.

Incorporates wider

reading and evidence of engagement

Incorporates the

module reading list and extensive additional references