| Category | Assignment | Subject | Programming |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Cardiff Metropolition University (CMU) | Module Title | CMP7001 Advanced Programming |
| Word Count | 1000 (10 minute presentation) |
|---|---|
| Assessment Type | PRES1 |
| Assessment Title | Presentation of a System Design |
| Academic Year | 2025/26 |

|
Assessment title |
Abr. |
Weighting |
|
Presentation of a System Design |
PRES1 |
25% |
|
Pass marks are 40% for undergraduate work and 50% for postgraduate work unless stated otherwise. |
||
To demonstrate the system design skills you have developed in CMP7001 you are required to work in teams of two or three to design, build, and test a software system to meet the scenario below.
You may choose who to work with.
Myriad Medical Services (MMS) Ltd. is a private medical centre offering its patients a wide range of services. The centre relies on multiple Airtable databases to book in patients, assign patients to clinicians, record treatments and charges, and record when patients pay the charges in full. MMS would like to replace its current system as it is obsolete and no longer supports its key business processes.
The company has approached you to develop a new system with the following requirements:
Do You Need CMP7001 S1 PRES1 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized AssignmentIt is up to you how you choose to divide the tasks between the team members, but each team member must contribute an equivalent amount, and present their own presentation on the system.
For this part of the project, you are required to record a 10-minute video presentation discussing your initial system design, the object-oriented principles used, explaining the rationale behind your decisions. A working implementation prototype is not required at this stage. The format of the presentation is up to you, and you can be as creative as you like. You may choose to use presentation slides (e.g. PowerPoint).
Presentations are an important means of professional and academic communication, and it is important that as engineers, scientists, and analysts, you enhance your skills to communicate your ideas and arguments effectively. You should view this presentation as an opportunity to showcase your system design skills learnt both within and outside this module.
Although the format of the presentation is up to you, the following elements should be included:
-Introduction to the project and your contributions to it so far.
-Overview of the use case model.
-Overview of the class model.
-Discussion of how polymorphism was used.
-Discussion of any design patterns included in your design.
-Discussion of how exception handling will be used.
-Discussion of design issues and challenges faced in the design. Note: Do not be afraid to discuss elements that are incomplete – discussion of how you analysed the problems and attempted to fix them is invaluable to the learning process.
-A reflection of the object-oriented techniques you have learned on the module and which elements you found challenging.
-Conclusion.
If you use slides, you do not have to include everything on them – use the slides to provide the overall structure of the presentation, but you can jump out of the slides to show diagrams, code, or testing, for example.
Your video presentation should ideally be presented as an unlisted YouTube video, but if you prefer you can also store the video file on your student OneDrive with appropriate access setup for your tutor.
Place a link to the video in a txt file for submission to Moodle.
Please test your video before submission – checking the audio and screen capture worked correctly.
Word count (or equivalent): 1000 (10 minute presentation)
This a reflection of the effort required for the assessment. Word counts will normally include any text, tables, calculations, figures, subtitles and citations. Reference lists and contents of appendices are excluded from the word count. Contents of appendices are not usually considered when determining your final assessment grade.
Academic or technical terms explained:
Object Orientation – A means of structuring software systems around separate, functionally specialised, reusable objects that interact to form a working application.
Design Pattern – A template that outlines the classes and their relationships to accomplish different tasks and solve different problems in software engineering.
Polymorphism – The ability to represent multiple implementations using a single interface or representation.
Exception Handling – A method of cleanly capturing errors and propagating them to calling functions to handle as needed.
Unit Testing – A unit test is a single, discrete test of one aspect of a system. The test runs and either passes or fails, the results of which are reported back to the developer.
VCS – Version Control System. Software used in conjunction with good developer practices to track and manage changes to source code. Git is an example of a distributed version control system, and GitHub is a service built around Git. Bitbucket is an alternative also built around Git.
|
Submission Deadline: |
This will be provided on the Moodle submission point. |
Estimated Feedback Return Date |
This will normally be 20 working days after initial submission. |
|
SubmissionTime: |
By 4.00pm on the deadline day. |
|
|
|
Moodle/Turnitin: |
Any assessments submitted after the deadline will not be marked and will be recorded as a non-attempt unless you have had an extension request agreed or have approved mitigating circumstances. See the School Moodle pages for more information on extensions and mitigating circumstances. |
||
|
File Format: |
A link to your video (e.g. on YouTube) should be submitted to Moodle in a txt file. Your assessment should be titled with your: student ID number, module code and assessment ID, e.g. st12345678-CMP7001-PRES1.txt |
||
|
Late Submission Window Eligibility |
Where submissions are eligible for the late-submission window this will be communicated in the relevant assessment submission point within Moodle. |
||
|
Feedback |
Feedback for the assessment will be provided electronically via Moodle. Feedback will be provided with comments on your strengths and the areas which you can improve. View the guidance on how to access your feedback. All marks are provisional and are subject to quality assurance processes and confirmation at the programme Examination Board. |
||
On successful completion of this module, students will be able to:
This includes elements of the Cardiff Met EDGE (Ethical, Digital, Global and Entrepreneurial skills) and other attributes developed in students through the completion of the module and assessment. These will also be highlighted in the module guidance, which should be read by all students completing the module. Assessments are not just a way of auditing student knowledge. They are a process which provides additional learning and development through the preparation for and completion of the assessment.
This module assessment provides opportunities for students to demonstrate development of the following EDGE Competencies:
|
Contribution |
Description |
Learning Outcomes |
Marks |
|
15% |
Presentation clarity, structure and demonstrated knowledge of the class design. |
LO1 |
15 |
|
15% |
Presentation clarity, structure and demonstrated knowledge of included polymorphism features. |
LO1, LO2 |
15 |
|
30% |
Presentation clarity, structure and demonstrated knowledge of the design principles used. |
LO1, LO4 |
30 |
|
15% |
Presentation clarity, structure and demonstrated knowledge of exception handling. |
LO3, LO4 |
15 |
|
15% |
Discussion of analysis and problems faced |
LO1, LO3 |
15 |
|
10% |
Reflection of object-oriented techniques learned on the module. |
LO1 |
10 |
|
Total |
100 |
||
|
Grade |
Criteria |
|
70 – 100% (Distinction) |
An excellent presentation is given with clear audio, well-structured slides and suitable length / timing. The discussion of the class diagram is both clear and detailed, and an excellent understanding of object-oriented principles is evident. The discussion of polymorphism is also detailed, demonstrating a deep understanding of the different polymorphic methods used. An excellent understanding of the design patterns employed along with their implementation and function is also evident. A very detailed, discussion of the exception handling code is also given, with both the capture of API exceptions and the throwing of custom exceptions discussed. The reflection of techniques used is honest and goes into detail about what was learned, and the difficulties overcome. |
|
60 - 69% (Merit) |
A very good presentation is given with clear audio, well-structured slides and good length / timing, though some aspects could be expanded upon. The discussion of the class diagram is both clear and a very good understanding of object-oriented principles is evident. The discussion of polymorphism is also detailed, demonstrating a very good understanding of the different polymorphic methods used. A very good understanding of the design patterns employed along with their implementation and function is also evident, though some technical elements could be expanded upon and some minor errors are evident. A very good discussion of the exception handling code is also given, with both the capture of API exceptions and the throwing of custom exceptions discussed, but this could be expanded upon and some minor errors are evident. The reflection of techniques used is honest and goes into detail about what was learned, and the difficulties overcome. |
|
50 - 59% (Pass) |
A good presentation is given with clear audio, but the structure and timing could be improved upon. The discussion of the class diagram is clear a good understanding of object-oriented principles is evident, though some errors are present. A good discussion of the polymorphic methods used is also given but could be expanded upon. A good understanding of the design patterns employed along with their implementation and function is also evident, though some technical elements could be expanded upon, and some minor errors are also present. A good discussion of the exception handling code is given, but more is needed on throwing custom exceptions and some minor errors are evident throughout. The reflection of techniques used describes the different approaches learned, reading more like a syllabus, but more personal aspects such as how challenges were approached could be included. |
|
40 - 49% (Narrow Fail) |
A basic presentation is given – the audio is unclear in places and the structure and timing could also be improved upon. A basic discussion of the class diagram is given but more is needed on the object-oriented principles used and some errors are present throughout. The discussion of the polymorphic methods used could also be expanded upon. Only a basic understanding of the design patterns employed along with their implementation and function is evident, much more is needed on how the patterns have been implemented and some errors are evident throughout. A basic discussion of exception handling is given, but it is not clear the student fully understands the mechanisms from the given presentation. The reflection of techniques used describes the different approaches learned, reading more like a syllabus, little to no personal aspects such as how challenges were approached are evident. |
|
35 - 39% (Fail) |
A very basic presentation is given – the audio is unclear throughout; the structure is confusing, and the presentation length does not fit the requirements. Little to no understanding of object-oriented principles is evident from the class diagram discussion. The discussions of the design patterns, polymorphism and exception handling are basic, and need to be significantly expanded. Numerous technical errors are evident throughout the presentation of these elements. The reflection of techniques is very basic and needs to be significantly expanded. |
|
<35% (Low Fail) |
No meaningful presentation is given. The audio is of poor quality and there is little to no structure. Very poor understanding of object-oriented principles is presented, and little to no functioning design patterns, polymorphism or exception handling is evident. Many details are left out and many technical errors are present throughout. |
Buy Custom Answer Of CMP7001 S1 PRES1 Assignment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free QuoteNeed last-minute online assignment help with your CMP7001 Advanced Programming PRES1 Assessment? We’re here for you! Our experienced writers deliver high-quality, AI-free, and plagiarism-free assignments at affordable rates. We know how important your grades are, which is why we guarantee on-time delivery and full academic support. You are assured that our Computer Science Assignment Help will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. We’ve got you covered. Check out our free assignment samples and see the quality for yourself. We’re available 24/7 to help you succeed in your academic journey. Contact us now to get expert help and score better—without any stress!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content