Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | SEGI University | Module Title | BUS4023 Business Ethics |
| SEGI Course Code: BUS4023 |
| Course/ Module: Business Ethics |
| Number of Assessments | Form of Assessment | %
weighting |
Size of Assessment/Duratio n/
Word count |
Category of assessment | Learning Outcomes being assessed |
| 1 | Individual Assignment | 25% | 2000 words | Coursework | 1 |
| 1 | Mini Project | 15% | 1500 words | Coursework | 2 |
| 1 | Mini Project: Presentation | 10% | 15 minutes | Coursework | 2 |
| 1 | Project | 50% | Case Study | 3 and 4 |
| Learning Outcomes tested | Assessment Criteria:
Students must demonstrate the ability to: |
| CLO1 : Evaluate the nature of philosophy and framework of corporate governance within a business context.
CLO2 : Demonstrate the comprehension of business ethical issues and theories of moral development in the current business practices. CLO3 : Appraise the ethical business perspective of inter-relationships between business, governments and global market place. |
|
Students are required to investigate and critically analyse a real-life business ethical issue involving a company, industry, or government-business relationship.
The assignment focuses on evaluating how ethical philosophies, corporate governance, and moral development theories influence decision-making in modern business environments.
Students are expected to connect theoretical knowledge with contemporary business cases and provide critical evaluation supported by evidence.
You are appointed as an Ethics and Governance Consultant for a business organisation that is currently facing ethical and governance challenges.
Your task is to prepare a professional analytical report evaluating:
Students must select ONE current or recent ethical business issue from the following areas:
Students may choose any local or international organisation related to the issue.
Students must:
1. Clearly introduce the selected organisation, industry, and ethical business issue.
2. Critically evaluate the ethical issue using relevant ethical philosophies, business ethics concepts, and moral development theories.
3. Analyse the effectiveness of the organisation’s corporate governance practices and ethical decision-making.
4. Discuss the impact of the issue on stakeholders, including the relationship between business, government, society, and the global marketplace.
5. Propose practical recommendations to improve ethical practices and corporate governance within the organisation.
Your report format should be as follow:
Cover Page Marking Rubric Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Ethical Theory Application
3.0 Issue Impact
4.0 Ethical Recommendations
Recommend FIVE (5) practical and ethically sound actions the company should take to overcome the issues
References
(Total marks: 100)
The total marks for this assignment is 100% but it carries 25% of overall assessment for this module.
Length Required
2000 words +/- 10%. Any deviation from this will be penalized.
| Assessment Criteria | Excellent (85–100%) | Good (70–
84%) |
Satisfactory (50–69%) | Needs Improvement (Below 50%) | Weig ht |
|
Introduction |
Clear, concise introduction; company and issue are well contextualized with strong rationale | Clear introduction; company and issue stated
with some justification |
Basic introduction; limited justification or lacks focus |
Poor or missing introduction; issue unclear or irrelevant |
10% |
|
Application of Ethical Theories |
Excellent application and comparison of at least three relevant theories; critical insight provided |
Good application of two theories; some comparison and interpretation |
Basic application; theories described more than analyzed |
Poor understanding or misapplication of ethical theories |
30% |
|
Advertisement Impact |
Comprehensiv e impact are well explained | Clear impact
and shows understanding of impact |
Impact not fully developed |
Vague or
minimal of impact discussion |
25% |
|
Ethical Recommendati ons |
Thoughtful, well-reasoned ethical evaluation; realistic and creative recommendati ons with strong ethical justifications |
Good evaluation and recommendati ons; most are feasible and justified |
Some evaluation present; recommendati ons are general or weakly justified |
Limited or no evaluation; vague or impractical recommendati ons |
25% |
|
Report Structure & Presentation |
Professionally structured; logical flow; error-free language |
Well-structured; minor language or formatting issues | Acceptable structure; some disorganizatio n or language issues | Poor structure; frequent language, grammar, or formatting problems |
10% |
Students are required to prepare a professional report proposing an ethical business policy or improvement plan for an organisation facing ethical or governance-related challenges.
The report should critically evaluate the selected issue and develop practical policy recommendations to strengthen ethical practices, corporate governance, stakeholder trust, and responsible business conduct within the organisation.
Students may select any local or international organisation related to current ethical business issues.
Students must:
1. Introduce the selected organisation and explain the ethical or governance issue involved.
2. Analyse the causes and ethical challenges related to the issue within the business environment.
3. Apply relevant ethical theories, moral development concepts, and corporate governance principles in the analysis.
4. Develop and propose an ethical business policy or improvement strategy which may include:
5. Evaluate how the proposed policy or strategy can improve ethical practices, organisational reputation, and stakeholder confidence.
The total marks for this assignment is 100% but it carries 15% of overall assessment for this module.
Length Required: 1500 words +/- 10%. Any deviation from this will be penalized.
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
| Introduction (10%) | 20- 16 marks Context and purpose of the report are well explained-Rationale is clear and relevant to ethical concerns | 15 – 11 marks Good introduction with appropriate context- Some rationale provided | 10 – 6 marks Basic context provided- Limited explanation of relevance or rationale | 5 – 1 marks Incomplete or vague introduction No clear rationale for selection |
| Ethical Issues (10%) | 10-8 marks
Issues are critically discussed. |
7-5 marks Issues are explained with some discussions. | 4 – 3 marks Issues are moderately discussed. | 2-1 mark Issues are identified but there is no discussion |
| Application of Ethical Theories (30%) | 30 –23 marks Ethical theories are applied accurately and critically-Demonstrates deep understanding of theory | 22 – 16 marks Ethical theories applied well, though analysis could be deeper | 15 – 8 marks Theories are mentioned but may be superficially applied or partially inaccurate |
7 – 1 marks Ethical theories are misapplied or absent |
| Stakeholder Analysis (20%) | 20- 15 marks Insightful evaluation of how each is affected ethically and socially | 14- 10 marks
Identifies most key stakeholders-Adequate analysis of stakeholder impact |
9- 6 marks
Some stakeholders identified-Limited or generic analysis of effects |
5- 1 mark Stakeholders not clearly identified-Minimal or unclear analysis |
|
Recommendation (25%) |
25- 20 marks Recommendations are creative, ethical, and feasible- Clearly aligned ethics principles | 19 – 15 marks Good recommendations with ethical consideration-Some creativity shown | 14 – 9 marks Basic recommendations, may lack creativity or full feasibility | 8 – 1 marks Vague, unrealistic, or no ethical improvements proposed |
| Structure, Language & Referencing (5%) | 5 marks
Clear structure, minimal language errors- Consistent APA referencing-High readability |
4 marks Minor issues in structure or language- Mostly accurate APA referencing | 3-2 marks Acceptable structure- Some referencing or grammar issues | 1 mark Poor structure- Major referencing or language errors |
| Evaluation Criteria | Marks |
| Power Point Slides | / 20 |
| Creativity and attractiveness of slides. | /10 |
| Integration and synthesis of information. | /5 |
| Information is presented orderly and clearly. | /5 |
| Content of the Report | / 40 |
| Incorporated relevant concepts relating to business ethics. | / 8 |
| Clear application of theories in analysis. | / 8 |
| Credible sources of information. | / 8 |
| Evidence of critical evaluation. | / 8 |
| Recommendations are relevant. | / 8 |
| Speech | / 30 |
| Correct and consistent use of appropriate language. | / 10 |
| Clear and confident voice. | / 10 |
| Maintained eye contact throughout. | / 5 |
| Appropriate body language. | / 5 |
| Dressing | / 10 |
| Smart and appropriate. | /10 |
| TOTAL | / 100 |
| / 10 |
Get BUS4023 Business Ethics Assessment Answers Before Deadline
Hire Malaysian Assignment HelperLooking for reliable BUS4023 Business Ethics Assessment Answers? Our malaysian assignment helper provides professionally written sample solutions to help you understand key business ethics concepts, improve your academic performance, and complete your assessment with confidence. Every solution is prepared by experienced writers, ensuring original content, proper referencing, and timely delivery to support your studies.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
bgdfg