Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Oxford Brookes University (OBU) | Module Title | BMGT7075 Integrated Business Reserch Project Pathway (IBRP) |
| Assessment Type | Summative Assessment |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2025 |
| Assignment 1: | International Case Study (60%) |
| Assignment 2: | Oral Examination |
| Level: | 7 |
The purpose of this Module Handbook is to provide you with specific information that under-pins the design, delivery and management of this module. It is your responsibility to familiarise yourself with the contents of this Module Handbook and to talk to your seminar tutor if you have any questions. This isn’t the only handbook available to you. Alongside this handbook you will also have access to the Institutional University Handbook which will provide you with information that is central to your studies, including policies and regulations, student support and wellbeing and all the services available to you through Student Support. You will also be given a Programme Handbook which will detail the design, delivery principles and management of your programme. It will also provide you with an overview of your key contacts for your programme of study and list all the modules you will be / might be studying throughout the duration of your award.
Your Module Leader is responsible for the student experience within this module. They ensure that the teaching and learning approach will enable you to achieve all of the learning outcomes for this module and that all of the learning resources are made available to you. They also have responsibility to ensure that you understand what is expected of you regarding the assessment package and that there are
appropriate adjustments in place if you have any specific learning support entitlements. Your Module Leaders will also ensure that the marking of your assessments is fair, consistent and reliable.
This is a capstone module in which students are expected to integrate, apply and extend the knowledge and skills gained within the core modules of the field. It is conceptualised as a retrospective and integrative academic experience. This module provides students with a structured opportunity to integrate their learning by developing their capacity for synthesis, and applying and connecting the learning
gained in core modules of the programme.
Students apply business and management knowledge to a complex, integrative, international case with the expectation that they demonstrate within an extended piece of writing their academic and research literacies through a critical understanding and application of relevant disciplinary concepts, intellectual and research skills.
In addition, the module requires students to demonstrate a systematic understanding of current business and management issues and the ability to synthesise understandings drawn from a number of key knowledge areas within an oral examination. The oral exam assesses students’ critical understandings drawn from their project, integrated learning from prior modules and their position on responsible
management and current business issues.
The module is largely self-directed and therefore requires students to show initiative and personal responsibility supported by formative tutorial discussions on draft work that enable student discussion and feedback on their performance.
The Moodle site is organised under semesters and weeks. As this module runs differently from most of the modules you have studied previously it is important that you ensure on a weekly basis what is expected and how the teaching is organised
Reading List and Other Resources
The indicative reading list is largely drawn from core texts used in the pre-requisite and co-requisite modules of the programme. On Moodle under ‘Module Information’, you will find other key resources that we consider useful to read in the first instance.
● Clippinger, D. (2016) Planning and Organizing Business Reports, Sterling Forest: Business Expert Press.
● Saunders, M.N.K. & Lewis, P. (2018) Doing research in business and management: an essential guide to planning your project. 2nd edn. Harlow, England: Pearson.
● Sharp, J.A., Peters, J. & Howard, K. (2002). The management of a student research project. Aldershot, England: Gower.
Reading list specific to the international business case study:
● Tapper, J. (2023) 'Brands to avoid': Mars and Cadbury among chocolate firms criticised in ethics report, The Guardian, 2 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/food/2023/dec/02/brands-to-avoid-mars-cadbury-chocolate-firms-criticised-ethics-report
● Poelmans, E. and Rousseau, S. (2016), "How do chocolate lovers balance taste and ethical considerations?", British Food Journal, Vol. 118 No. 2, pp. 343-361. BFJ-06-2015-0208Savage, S. (2023)
Reasons Not To Take
● Chocolate For Granted, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensavage/2023/07/21/reasons-not-to-take-chocolate-for-granted/.
● Stichting Social Enterprise (2022). Tony's Chocolonely: How a Social Enterprise Is Changing the Chocolate Industry. The Case Centre.
This module follows the principles of the University’s Assessment and feedback policy developed in conjunction with the Student Union, to ensure good practice and transparency in assessment and feedback processes. The Assessment and feedback policy can be found on your Programme’s Moodle site. Please note: the Institutional University Handbook which will provide you with information that is central to your studies, including policies and regulations, student support and wellbeing and all the services available to you through Student Support.
The core information is also available on Moodle via the drop-down menu under ‘Student Help’. Learning on this module is largely self-directed requiring students to demonstrate personal initiative and responsibility. The module is a capstone that pulls together prior learning and runs over two semesters.
There are two assessments. In the first assessment students apply business and management knowledge to a complex, integrative, international case study with the expectation that they demonstrate a critical understanding and application of relevant disciplinary concepts and research skills. Four workshops support students in undertaking the case study along with formative, one-to-one or small group tutorials similar in nature to dissertation supervision.
The second assessment is a 15-minute oral exam that assesses students’ critical understandings drawn from their project, integrated learning from prior modules and their position on responsible management and current business issues. A final workshop is offered in support of the oral exam. Opportunities for formative feedback on your work are provided at multiple points in this module. Individual or small group tutorials provide opportunities for students to obtain formative feedback from tutors in Weeks 5, 6, 7, 10, and 13 on drafts of their international case study. Upon submission of a draft of the first question of assessment 1 students’ will receive written formative feedback.
Do You Need BMGT7075 Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment| Assessment Tasks | Word count & duration of exam | Learning hours | Learning outcomes assessed | Weighting % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written Assignment Individual | 8000 words | 150 | All | 60% |
| Oral assessment/presentation (Individual) Complex Oral Exam (face-to-face VIVA), individual | 15 mins | 92 | 1, 2, 3 & 5 | 40% |
Inclusive Support Plan (ISP) arrangements
Recommendations for Reasonable Adjustments are made in accordance with the provisions of the Equality Act 2010. These are detailed in Inclusive Support Plans (ISPs) and need to be implemented unless there is a clear rationale for this not being possible, in which case we are accountable as a university for this decision. Students who have an extension because of an ISP, please contact your Module
Leader if you are unclear about your revised deadlines. If you would like to request a review of your Inclusive Support Plan (ISP) or to have your needs assessed for an ISP, contact the Inclusive Support Service.on inclusivesupport@brookes.ac.uk
The Blue Marking Card adjustment is only available to students who have an Inclusive Support Plan (ISP) specifying this adjustment. Eligible students who wish to use this adjustment must add a blue card:
inclusive support service of exams and assessments
Inclusive Support Plan (ISP) extensions of up to 3 weeks are applicable for some students on all assignments in this module. If you have an Inclusive Support Plan you can check the full details of the adjustments, including whether you have coursework extensions, in Student Self Service. BannerExtensibility
You are expected to use all of the following readings in answering the question. Note: this is just a starting point. You will have to do substantive further research to be successful on this module.
BMGT7075 Oral Examination
| Assessment Criteria | Outstanding (85-100%) | Excellent (70-84%) | Very Good (60-69%) | Threshold Pass (50-59%) | Marginal Refer (40-49%) | Refer (0-39%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does it answer the question? | Outstanding work entirely focused on the assignment question and meeting all required objectives. | Very effective work entirely focused on the assignment question and meeting most required objectives. | Effective work highly focused on the assignment question and objectives. | Satisfactory work focused on the main purpose of the assignment question and objectives. | Unsatisfactory work that is not focused on the main purpose of the assignment question and objectives. | Failing work that has not addressed the assignment question or objectives. |
| Is the knowledge up to date, from sources from a wide range of literature and well-integrated? | The work shows up-to-date, comprehensive and detailed knowledge of the subject area and of relevant literature, which integrates theory and practice. | The work shows comprehensive knowledge of the area and of relevant literature and reasonably integrates theory with practice. | The work shows effective knowledge of the subject area and relevant literature. | The work shows satisfactory knowledge of the subject area and relevant literature. | The work contains some shortcomings in terms of evidence of familiarity with the subject area and relevant knowledge. | The work has serious shortcomings in terms of evidence of familiarity with the subject area and relevant knowledge. |
| Are the student’s arguments clear and supported / illustrated with theory and practice? | The work demonstrates the student has fully developed their own ideas based on a wide range of evidence that has been thoroughly analysed, applied, and discussed. | The work demonstrates insightful use of theory to illuminate most of practice, showing development of the student’s own ideas applied and discussed and related to a wide variety of sources of evidence. | The work demonstrates well-supported arguments of theory to illuminate key aspects of practice, showing some development of the student’s own ideas applied and discussed and related to a variety of sources of evidence. | The work demonstrates an attempt to use theory in a straightforward manner with appropriate application of theory and/or practice where appropriate. | The work demonstrates little evidence of the application of literature to illuminate theory and/or practice where appropriate. | The work demonstrates hardly any evidence of the application of literature to theory or practice where appropriate. |
| Does the work show evidence of critical analysis and synthesis with good practice? | The work demonstrates that the student can critically review evidence outstandingly, achieving real credibility, and draw very good and appropriate conclusions that effectively integrate theory and practice. | The work demonstrates that the student can effectively critically review evidence and draw a reasonable range of good and appropriate conclusions that well integrate theory and practice. | The work demonstrates that the student can critically review evidence and draw some good conclusions that integrate theory and practice. | The work demonstrates that some evidence has been collected and some ideas have been developed through a mixture of description and criticism and some integration of theory and practice. | Evidence is weak and ideas are underdeveloped through lack of critical edge, tendency towards description, and fail to appropriately integrate theory and practice. | Evidence is very weak and ideas are underdeveloped through an absence of critical edge, overwhelmingly descriptive and fails to appropriately integrate theory and practice. |
| Is it well presented and structured, with appropriate acknowledgement for sources? | The assignment is presented fully professionally, communicates key messages and arguments with conviction, substantial, and contains accurate referencing in an appropriate format. | The assignment is highly organised with clear and credible messages and arguments that are substantial with evidence and contains accurate referencing in an appropriate format. | The assignment is well organised with clear messages and arguments that are substantial with evidence and contains accurate referencing in an appropriate format. | The assignment is organised to structure material that is relevant with some coherence of message, and argument are backed by a limited range of references in an appropriate format. | The assignment fails to organise ideas coherently, to provide an exact message and argument, or substantiation and is supported by an inadequate range of references. | The assignment fails to organise ideas coherently, to provide a clear message, argument or substantiation and is supported by an inadequate range of references. |
| Type of Assessment: | Oral Examination |
The complex oral examination (sometimes referred to as a viva) aims to test your systematic understanding and learning of business and management. It seeks to assess your capacity to synthesise and apply knowledge from a range of subject areas, and your ability to engage in personal reflection.
The content of the complex oral examination will focus on TWO overarching areas:
(i) In-depth critical questioning about your first assignment (the international case study).
In this part of the oral exam, you will be expected to defend your written work on the international case study, and demonstrate developed and wider knowledge of the subject area than is asserted in the case study.
(ii) Complex questioning about your knowledge of previously taken modules.
In this part of the oral exam, you will be expected to demonstrate systematic knowledge and understanding of the modules you have been taking on the MSc degree programme. Questions may be about theories, concepts, issues and themes within these modules as well as your position on current business events and issues.
Are you searching the best assignment help for the BMGT7075 Integrated Business Research Project (IBRP) Assignment? Our expert UK writers are here to simplify your academic journey. With in-depth knowledge of the module handbook, policies, and student support, we provide top-quality assignment samples and personalized help. Whether you need Business Management Assignment Help or understanding course materials, our PhD writers offer clear, actionable insights. Don’t wait—hire us today for tailored solutions that ensure academic success!
Hire Assignment Helper Today!
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content