Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?
Talk to an Expert| Category | Assignment | Subject | Business |
|---|---|---|---|
| University | Module Title | BM301 An Introduction to the Business Environment |
Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:
In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.
Your accredited study centre will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity. Qualifi recommends the use of https://www.turnitin.com as a part of the assessment.
Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.
Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence
Please familiarise yourself on Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information
All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre’s advice.
All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file), or via Turnitin, where applicable.
This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)
Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document.
Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.
Assignment Question
Task 1 – 350 words
Carry out an investigation into two contrasting types of business organisation from different sectors (you could choose one in the private sector and one in the public sector or voluntary sector.)
You should consider stakeholder influence in the two organisations, and your report should focus on:
1.1: Describe two different types of business, and their ownership
1.2: Describe different types of stakeholders whose presence affect the purpose of two organisations.
Assessment Guidance
|
Task 2 – 500 words
You work as a junior journalist for the local newspaper, which is planning to run feature article on local businesses. Produce an article on two local, contrasting businesses covering:
2.1: Identify how two different businesses are organised.
3.1: Describe different types of business targets
3.2: Identify how a business can achieve a target.
Remember that organisations need to be arranged into a structure that will enable them to meet their purposes - for example, to make a profit or to achieve their mission aims as a charity. Can you identify a chain of command or line of control in the organisations? How do you think this helps the organisations to control their activities?
Task 3 – 150 words
As you have been examining two contrasting business organisations. The final part of the assessment asks you to examine how your chosen organisations are affected by changes in their political, legal and social environments.
1. Describe how political, legal and social factors are impacting upon the business activities of selected organisations and their stakeholders.
4.1: Describe how political, legal, and social factors affect business.
You only need to examine the main political, legal and social factors that affect your business. It is helpful to use the three headings but remember that there will be a certain amount of overlap between the three areas. To achieve a pass, you simply need to describe some of the important changes that are taking place using appropriate facts and figures.
|
|
Distinguished | Excellent | Good | Proficient | Basic | Marginal | Unacceptable |
| Criteria | 80+ | 70 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 0 |
|
Content (alignment with assessment criteria)
|
Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking |
Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinking |
Adequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking |
Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking |
Describes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking |
Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking |
Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic |
|
Application of Theory and Literature |
In-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept |
Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts |
Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts |
Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts |
Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently |
Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support |
Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature |
| Knowledge and Understanding |
Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and concepts |
Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts |
Sound understanding of principles and concepts |
Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles |
Limited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles |
Confused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles |
Little or no evidence |
| Presentation and Writing Skills |
Logical, coherent and |
Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating |
Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning |
Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax |
Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning |
Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often |
Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning |
| Referencing | Advanced use of intext citation and references | Mastery of in-text citation and referencing |
Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing | Adequate use of intext citation and referencing | Limited use of intext citation and referencing | Inadequate use of citation and referencing |
Little or no evidence of appropriate |
Directions:
1. For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
2. Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
3. To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final mark.
Get Your Free Academic Quote
No hidden fees · Instant response · 100% confidential
Let's Book Your Work with Our Expert and Get High-Quality Content
gsd
