A3289C Pharmacotherapeutics II Graded Assignment 2026 | Republic Polytechnic

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert

Published: 09 Jun, 2026

Category	Assignment	Subject	Science
University	Republic Polytechnic (RP)	Module Title	A3289C: Pharmaceutical Science

A3289C Graded Assignment

Module Code	:	A3289C
Module Name	:	Pharmacotherapeutics II
Submission Date/ Time	:	8^th July 2026, 2359 hrs

Your answers to this assignment should not be more than 1000 words.

1) You are working as a pharmacy technician in a hospital pharmacy. You have been tasked to review the three patients below.

Patient A: A 55-year-old male with chronic eczema, concerned about long-term steroid use. He has no drug allergy and no other medical conditions.

Patient B: A 68-year-old female with osteoarthritis of the knee with a history of gastric irritation. She has no drug allergy and no other medical conditions.

Patient C: A 30-year-old female with hypothyroidism and poor medication adherence due to work schedule. She has no drug allergy and no other medical conditions.

For Patients A, B and C, you are to:

a) Identify ONE appropriate medication you have learnt in this module.

b) Explain ONE reason the medication is suitable, supported by a reliable reference source.

c) Determine ONE patient-specific limitation or risk when using the medication suggested in part a, supported by a reliable reference source.

d) Recommend TWO counselling or monitoring strategies according to the patient’s profile and what you have learnt in this module.

(15 marks)

2) The following week, you are attached to a community health screening programme for adults aged 40–65 in Singapore. Recent screening data indicate a high prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. You are tasked with developing content for a public education poster targeting ONE specific modifiable cardiovascular risk factor relevant to this population.

You must include the following:

a) List ONE specific risk factor, supported by local relevance in the Singapore context.

b) List TWO evidence‑based, non‑pharmacological strategies to address the selected risk factor. Justify with an appropriate reference for each.

c) For EACH strategy, illustrate with ONE example for the public how it can be implemented practically.

d) For EACH strategy, list ONE measurable outcome that can be easily used by the public to evaluate its effectiveness.

There is no need to create a visual poster; you only need to write down the content for your poster. Your content should be appropriate, feasible, and culturally relevant for adults aged 40–65 in Singapore.

(15 marks)

Tips for Referencing

1) Credible sources you should cite from:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
sciencedirect.com
google.com/

2) Follow the referencing methods shown below:

Book

Authors Last name, First initial. (Year published). Title of book. Edition if applicable. Publisher, Page(s).

For example:

Golan, D., Tashjian A., Armstrong E., Galanter J., Armstrong A., Arnaout R. and Rose H. (2012) Principles of Pharmacology: the Pathophysiologic Basis of Drug Therapy. 3rd Ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 100-130.

Journal Article

Last name, First initial. (Year published). Article title. Journal, Volume (Issue), Page(s).

For example:

Dismuke, C. and Egede, L. (2015). The Impact of Cognitive, Social and Physical Limitations on Income in Community Dwelling Adults With Chronic Medical and Mental Disorders. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(5), 183-195.

Grading Criteria

Grading Criteria

Very Good (A)

Good (B)

Average (C)

Below Average (D and below)

Content and relevance (75%)

Details of content and rigour of analysis

Consistently builds upon the breadth of concepts required of the questions. Consistently and accurately employs terminologies commonly used within the pharmaceutical industry.

Largely builds upon the breadth of concepts required of the questions. Accurately employs terminologies commonly used within the pharmaceutical industry.

Occasionally builds upon the breadth of concepts required of the questions. Loosely employs terminologies commonly used within the pharmaceutical industry.

Content lacks the breadth of concepts required of the questions and/or with some misconceptions. Loosely employs terminologies commonly used within the pharmaceutical industry with some misrepresentations.

Content does not cover the concepts of the questions. Does not employ terminologies commonly used within the pharmaceutical industry.

Feasibility and relevance of solution(s) presented to real-life situation

Critically and accurately analyses case studies, and makes clear inference to the objective(s) of the assignment to formulate a solution. Includes a comprehensive and accurate analysis on the potential problems and/or limitations of the solution, drawing links to real-life examples. [60-75%]

Accurately analyses case studies, and makes inference to the objective(s) of the assignment to formulate a solution. Includes a brief but accurate analysis on the potential problems and/or limitations of the solution(s). [52.5-60%]

Loosely analyses case studies, and makes weak inference to the objective(s) of the assignment to formulate a solution. Includes an incomplete analysis on the potential problems and/or limitations of the solution(s). [45-52.5%]

Misinterpretation of case studies. Unable to link back to the assignment to formulate a solution. Includes an inaccurate analysis on the potential problems and/or limitations of the solution(s). [37.5-45%]

No analysis of case studies. Unable to link back to the assignment to formulate a solution. No discussion on the potential problems and no solution(s) provided. [0-37.5%]

Format (12.5%)

Adherence to format requirements as specified by assignment question

Free of typographical, grammar, and other such error

Format uses prescribed standards and is consistent throughout. No typographical or grammatical errors. [10-12.5%]

Format uses prescribed standards but with few inconsistencies. A few typographical and/or grammatical errors, but did not impede readability. [7.5-10%]

Format uses prescribed standards but with many inconsistencies. Many or repetitive typographical and grammatical errors, but generally did not impede readability. [6.25-7.5%]

Format does not use prescribed standards. Typographical and grammatical errors throughout the paper and/or errors impeded readability. [0-6.25%]

Reference (12.5%)

Reliable sources of references are cited to support statements

All references cited are from sources that are considered reliable by industry practitioners, such as PubMed and Google Scholar. [10-12.5%]

Most references cited are from sources that are considered reliable by industry practitioners, such as PubMed and Google Scholar. [7.5-10%]

Some references cited are from sources that are considered reliable by industry practitioners. [6.25-7.5%]

No references cited are from sources that are considered reliable by industry practitioners. [0-6.25%]

Request Answer of this Assignment

Share this with your Friends

Facebook

Instagram

Are you a Singapore University student and need help with your A3289C Pharmacotherapeutics II Graded Assignment? Our academic experts provide comprehensive support for students seeking high-quality, well-researched assignment solutions. With professional Singapore Assignment Help, you can gain a deeper understanding of pharmacotherapeutic principles, drug management, patient care, and clinical applications. We offer plagiarism-free sample answers, detailed explanations, and academic guidance tailored to your assignment requirements, helping you complete your work confidently and achieve better results.