OFFERS! offer image Get Expert-crafted assignments
Save 51%

7051MHR Leading Strategic Change Through Creativity and Innovation Assignment Brief 2026 | CU

Looking for Plagiarism-Free Answers for Your US, UK, Singapore, New Zealand, and Ireland College/University Assignments?

Talk to an Expert
Published: 20 May, 2026
Category Assignment Subject Management
University Coventry University Module Title 7051MHR Leading Strategic Change Through Creativity and Innovation
Word Count 3500 words +/- 10%
Assessment Title Critical Analysis of a Case Study
Academic Year 2026

You can see the related solution of this brief: Management Assignment Example

7051MHR Leading Strategic Change Through Creativity and Innovation Assignment Brief

Assignment Task

This is an individual assignment based on a critical analysis of a real organisational issue based on ONE of the case studies listed below. To complete this assignment, you must submit three tasks:

Based on one of three case studies:

  • a written Strategy Report for Task 1
  • a Creative Brief and Supporting Notes for Task 2
  • A written Reflective Element for Task 3 - Based on your own plans and objectives, not the case study

To complete this assignment, you must choose one of the case studies from the choice of three provided on Aula for this semester as below:

  • Legal and General affordable homes;
  • Coventry Cathedral; or
  • IMPAKT housing

Notes:

In your responses to Tasks 1 and 2, you are allowed to make reasonable research- based assumptions to the case study details provided. However, the case study should not be changed or compromised in any way.

Failure to use one of the three case studies above for Task 1 and/or Task 2 will result in a mark of zero for the entire assignment. Task 3 is not related to these case studies.

Task 1 - Strategy Report (1,500 words, 40% of the marks)

Produce a 1,500-word report on your chosen case study company, including a case study introduction, to:

  • Critically evaluate the operating environment.
  • propose a strategic change;
  • complete a strategic analysis; and
  • Propose a strategic change management plan.

Your Task 1 Strategy Report, based on the case study, should be structured as follows: 

Using definitions, appropriate tools and/or models:

Write a short introduction to the case study company (100 words).

1.1 Define "drivers of change", then analyse the internal and external pressures on the case study company (400 words).

1.2 Define "strategy", then analyse the current strategy, propose a strategic change to aid the development of the case study company and then analyse the proposed strategy. Use the same appropriate strategy model to analyse the current and proposed strategy (500 words).

1.3 Define "change and change management", then describe the process by which you will manage your proposed change programme, recognising the effect that the change will have on employees (500 words).

Include a Task 1-specific list of references.

Task 2 - Launch Materials (1000 words, 30% of the marks)

You have been allocated an appropriate budget to outsource the design and creation of a set of Launch Materials for the change you have proposed in Task 1 for the Case Study company. No pricing or costing is required.

2.1 Creative Brief

You are therefore required to write a 500-word Creative Brief with descriptions, diagrams, sketches and drawings, as you see fit, to specify the creative and innovative nature of the change programme that you want to be communicated to your stakeholders and peers. Your Creative Brief will be sufficiently developed and detailed to allow a creative contractor to prepare a first draft of the Launch Materials without significant further reference to you.

The Launch Materials will consist of:

  • a Project Name and Tagline, which are specified and created by you; and
  • a Logo; and two A4 page leaflets, which are specified, but not created by you; and
  • one other intervention, specified, but not created by you, that you feel will further enhance the launch in the case study company (500 words).

In essence, your Creative Brief needs to include all the core information (what is your message and how you want it to look) that your selected contractor needs to correctly interpret your vision for the Launch Materials.

Note: If a submission includes a complete or essentially complete logo, and/or leaflet, and/or other intervention, these aspects will be ignored from a marking perspective.

2.2 Supporting Notes: Analysis, theories and methods

You are required to document the creative process that you followed as you wrote the Creative Brief in a Supporting Notes document.

There are two key aspects to the Supporting Notes document:

  • Your analysis of the process you followed – how and why you made the decisions inherent in the Creative Brief (250 words); and
  • identification of the specific creativity and innovation theories, approaches and methods that you followed (250 words).

In essence, how you did it, why you did it and the academic approaches you followed for each of those decisions.

Note: If a submission includes generic or essentially generic material in the Supporting Notes, this will be ignored from a marking perspective; it must be specific to your creative brief.

Include a Task 2-specific list of references.

Task 3: (1,000 words, 30% of the marks)

Note: Task 3 is about you and NOT the case study company.

Describe your specific Target Career in terms of a job role, industry sector and, if appropriate, prospective employers. (100 words).

3.1. Using definitions, and based on your Target Career

Define “leadership”; then reflect on where leadership, innovation and creativity will be essential in your Target Career. Use an appropriate leadership model to explore the key leadership qualities and skills you will need to lead a team tasked with managing a strategic change with creativity and innovation in your Target Career, and why leadership innovation and creativity will be essential in your target career (450 words)

3.2 Having identified the key leadership qualities and skills you will require:

Identify the gaps between your current and ideal position, then decide which are the two most important skills and/or behaviours you want to develop and why. Use SMART objectives to identify the key aspects of your Personal Development Plan to demonstrate how you plan to achieve this (450 words).

Note: 3.1 and 3.2 are specifically in the context of your Target Career; this is not a generic question.

Include a Task 3-specific list of references.

For ALL Tasks

It is expected that appropriate models, academic sources and good practice will be applied and be academically rigorous to support your work throughout.

You should focus your report primarily (at least 60% of references overall) on learning material from Aula and CMI Leadership Direct. Submissions without references or with less than 60% CMI/Aula-based references will be marked out of 90%.

You must include appropriately listed and cited references, using APA 7 for each task. Students on law-related courses where OSCOLA is used may continue to do so in this assignment.

A typical APA 7 Aula page reference should include the specific page title, with it’s Aula Page ID number. For example Burke and Litwin, in Short Course 1:1 would be referenced as “Aula 7051CRB. (2025a). Applying Burke & Litwin [P1:1-106]. https://coventry.aula.education”.
The in text citation would be (Aula 7051CRB, 2025a). Each Aula reference and matching citation has a unique suffix on the date field. See the assignment support material and support sessions for further examples including CMI LeadershipDirect referencing.
 
Your report must include a cover sheet (from Aula) and a contents page, with your student number (NOT your name), your chosen employer case study and your word count.

It must be typed in MS Word (do NOT upload PDF versions of your work); include page numbers; be written in font size 12 and be 1.5 line-spaced and submitted as a single, complete MS Word document to Turnitin. You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with the appropriate Turnitin submission link before submission. Ensure that you have saved a copy of your submission, and save a copy of the Turnitin receipt after you have submitted.

The word count is 3,500. There is an allowance of plus or minus 10% of the word count limit, excluding the lists of references, table of contents and the cover sheet.

Additional guidance is available on Aula.

Marking and Feedback

How will my assignment be marked?

Your assignment will be marked by the module marking team.

How will the marks be allocated?

Your 3,500-word equivalent submission will be assessed on the following areas:

Marks out of:

Task 1 - Developing a Change Management Strategy

40%

Task 2 - Developing presentation materials to support the change

30%

Task 3 - Reflective personal and professional development account

30%

How will I receive my grades and feedback?

Your final results will be published and made available via SOLAR. Feedback will be provided on Turnitin using the Rubric icon.

What will I be marked against?

Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief.

Assessed Module Learning Outcomes

The Learning Outcomes for this module align with the marking criteria, which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure successful achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:

LO1: Critically evaluate approaches to organisational strategy and managing change in professional practice.

LO2: Critically review the application of creativity and innovation in changing an organisational strategy to achieve a business objective

LO3: Critically reflect on the leadership qualities for effectively managing strategic change with creativity and innovation in relation to professional development

Professional Standards and Regulatory Body (CMI) Learning Outcomes:

LO1: Understand how to develop a strategy
LO2: Know how to develop a strategy
LO3: Understand the scope and context of strategic change
LO4: Know how to propose a strategy for leading strategic change

Administration of Assessment

Task 1 Drivers of change and analysis Current and proposed strategy Change and change management Quality/referencing
80 to 100% Exceptional work. Professionally addressed; accurate definition; precise analysis of pressures; insightful analysis; precise supporting evidence; strong case study linkage Exceptional work. Professionally addressed; accurate definition; insightful current and proposed strategy; strong case study linkage Exceptional work. Professionally addressed; accurate definition; insightful process; precise impact analysis; strong case study linkage Exceptional work. Language particularly clear/expressive; full range of appropriate sources; correct APA71 referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references present.
70 to 79% Excellent work. Fully addressed; clear definition; comprehensive analysis of pressures; full supporting evidence; clear case study linkage Excellent work. Fully addressed; clear definition; comprehensive current and proposed strategy; clear case study linkage Excellent work. Fully addressed; clear definition; comprehensive process; strong impact analysis; clear case study linkage Excellent work. Language clear/ expressive; wide range of appropriate sources; correct APA7 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
60 to 69% Very good work. Largely addressed; largely clear definition; analysis of pressures mostly developed; mainly appropriate evidence; largely clear case study linkage Very good work. Largely addressed; largely clear definition; mainly comprehensive current and proposed strategy; largely clear case study linkage Very good work. Largely addressed; largely clear definition; mainly clear process; mostly developed impact analysis; largely clear case study linkage Very good work. Language generally clear/expressive; appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
50 to 59% Good work. Appropriately addressed; some irrelevance; sufficient definition; satisfactory analysis of pressures; sufficient evidence; sufficient case study linkage Good work. Generally addressed; some irrelevance; satisfactory current and proposed strategy; sufficient case study linkage Good work. Generally addressed; some irrelevance; sufficient definition; satisfactory process; appropriate impact analysis; sufficient case study linkage Good work. Minor/infrequent clarity/accuracy lapses; mostly appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
40 to 49% Outcomes met. Attempt to address: significant irrelevance; adequate definition; analysis of pressures undeveloped; some evidence present; passable case study linkage Outcomes met. Attempt to address: significant irrelevance; adequate definition; acceptable current and proposed strategy; passable case study linkage Outcomes met. Attempt to address: significant irrelevance; adequate definition; acceptable process; adequate impact analysis; passable case study linkage Outcomes met. Frequent clarity/accuracy lapses; some inappropriate/ absent sources; attempt at APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
Fail - 30 to 35% Outcomes not met. Limited attempt to address; considerable irrelevance; poor definition; poor analysis of pressures; little or no evidence; little or no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Limited attempt to address; considerable irrelevance; poor definition; poor current and proposed strategy; little or no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Limited attempt to address; considerable irrelevance; poor definition; poor process; little or no impact analysis; little or no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Language often unclear/confusing; inappropriate/ absent sources; insufficient/ weak referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references generally not present
Fail - 0 to 29% Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt to address; mostly irrelevant; no/incorrect definition; little/no analysis of pressures; little/no evidence; little/no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt to address; mostly irrelevant; no/incorrect definition; little/no current and proposed strategy; little/no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt to address; mostly irrelevant; no/incorrect definition; little/no valid process; little/no meaningful impact analysis; little/no case study linkage Outcomes not met. Language unclear/ confusing; entirely inappropriate/ absent sources; absent/invalid referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references not present
Task 2 Creation/innovation Analysis/reflection Quality/referencing
80 to 100% Exceptional work. Professional quality; all expected interventions present; strong message; fully integrated; astute thoughts; highly original creativity/innovation; great care demonstrated; no contractor issues Exceptional work. Professionally addressed; insightful analysis/reflection on creation/ innovation process; what/how/why done meticulously and individually; strong theoretical process and methods Exceptional work. Language particularly clear/expressive; full range of appropriate sources; correct APA71 referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references present.
70 to 79% Excellent work. All expected interventions present; clear message; fully integrated; insightful thoughts; original creativity and innovation; good care demonstrated; few contractor issues Excellent work. Analysis/reflection on creation/ innovation process fully developed; what/how/why done clear and individual; full theoretical process and methods Excellent work. Language clear/ expressive; wide range of appropriate sources; correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
60 to 69% Very good work. All expected interventions present; largely clear message; mostly integrated; sensible thoughts; largely original creativity/innovation; care demonstrated; some contractor issues Very good work. Analysis/reflection on creation/innovation process largely developed; what/how/why done largely clear and individual; theoretical process and methods mostly addressed Very good work. Language generally clear/expressive; appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
50 to 59% Good work. All expected interventions2 reasonably present; reasonably clear message; reasonably integrated; modest thoughts; sufficient creativity/ innovation; reasonable care demonstrated; some contractor guidance will be needed. Good work. Insightful analysis/reflection on creation/innovation process generally developed; what/how/why done sufficient with little generic content; theoretical process and methods partly addressed Good work. Minor/infrequent clarity/accuracy lapses; mostly appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
40 to 49% Outcomes met. Expected interventions2 mostly present; quite clear message; some integration; adequate thoughts; some creativity and innovation; adequate care demonstrated; significant contractor guidance will be needed Outcomes met. Analysis/reflection on creation/innovation process attempted; significant irrelevance; what/how/why done undeveloped, some generic content; theoretical process and methods addressed adequately Outcomes met. Frequent clarity/accuracy lapses; some inappropriate/ absent sources; attempt at APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
Fail - 30 to 35% Outcomes not met. Limited attempt; expected interventions 2 only partly present; unclear message; little integration; inadequate thoughts; original creativity and innovation; little care demonstrated; contractor will struggle Outcomes not met. Limited attempt; generic in nature; limited analysis/reflection on creation/innovation process; considerable irrelevance; what/how/why done poorly; little or no theoretical process or methods Outcomes not met. Language often unclear/confusing; mostly inappropriate/ absent sources; insufficient/ weak referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references generally not present
Fail - 0 to 29% Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt; expected interventions mostly absent; vague message; no integration; mostly absent thoughts; no creativity and innovation; no care demonstrated; contractor will probably decline the work Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt; analysis/ reflection on creation/innovation process missing, generic or mostly irrelevant; no attempt or generic what/how/why done; theoretical process and methods absent or generic Outcomes not met. Language unclear/ confusing; entirely inappropriate/ absent sources; absent/invalid referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references not present
Task 3 Leadership skills SMART objectives Quality/referencing
80 to 100% Exceptional work. Target career described particularly clearly; application to target career described meticulously; appropriate model selected; key leadership qualities identified and justified; clearly personal, not generic Exceptional work. Skills gaps identified particularly clearly; two most important skills/behaviours identified clearly and justified; thoughtful, individual and practical SMART objectives; clearly personal, not generic Exceptional work. Language particularly clear/expressive; full range of appropriate sources; correct APA71 referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references present.
70 to 79% Excellent work. Target career described clearly; application to target career described fully; appropriate model selected; key leadership qualities identified and justified; clearly personal, not generic Excellent work. Skills gaps identified clearly; two most important skills/behaviours identified clearly and justified; thoughtful, individual and practical SMART objectives; clearly personal, not generic Excellent work. Language clear/ expressive; wide range of appropriate sources; correct APA7 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
60 to 69% Very good work. Target career described; application to target career described largely clearly; appropriate model selected; key leadership qualities identified and justified largely clearly; clearly personal, not generic Very good work. Skills gaps identified; two most important skills/behaviours identified largely clearly and mostly justified; largely clear individual and practical SMART objectives; clearly personal, not generic Very good work. Language generally clear/expressive; appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
50 to 59% Good work. Target career described reasonably; application to target career described sufficiently; generally appropriate model selected; some key leadership qualities identified and justified sufficiently; mostly personal, not generic Good work. Skills gaps identified; two most important skills/behaviours identified sufficiently clearly and suitably justified; sufficiently clear, individual, probably practical SMART objectives; mostly personal, not generic Good work. Minor/infrequent clarity/accuracy lapses; mostly appropriate sources; mostly correct APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
40 to 49% Outcomes met. Target career described adequately; application to target career attempted; model selected, but application unclear; some leadership qualities identified and justified adequately; mostly personal, not generic Outcomes met. Skills gaps identified adequately; one or two important skills/behaviours identified adequately and passably justified; adequate SMART objectives; mostly personal, not generic Outcomes met. Frequent clarity/accuracy lapses; some inappropriate/ absent sources; attempt at APA71 referencing; 60% references Aula/CMI
Fail - 30 to 35% Outcomes not met. Target career described loosely; application to target career vague; if a model was selected, its application was poor; if leadership qualities were identified, the justification was poor; segment not personal, mostly generic Outcomes not met. Skills gaps identified loosely, if at all; identification of skills/behaviours vague; SMART objectives-based plan, inconsistent or incomplete; segment not personal, mostly generic Outcomes not met. Language often unclear/confusing; mostly inappropriate/ absent sources; insufficient/ weak referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references generally not present
Fail - 0 to 29% Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt; target career not described; little or no application to target career; no model selected; little, if any, attempt to identify leadership qualities; segment not personal but generic Outcomes not met. Minimal attempt; little/no learning style summary; skills/behaviours identification absent or weak; little or no SMART objectives-based plan created; segment not personal but generic Outcomes not met. Language unclear/ confusing; entirely inappropriate/ absent sources; absent/invalid referencing; 60% Aula/CMI references not present

Buy Answer of 7051MHR Leading Strategic Change Through Creativity and Innovation Assignment

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

If you are preparing for the 7051MHR Leading Strategic Change Through Creativity and Innovation at Coventry University(CU) and need guidance, our academic experts are here to support you. We provide reliable Leadership Assignment Help that follows university guidelines and focuses on clear, well-structured content. Our experienced writers ensure that every solution is easy to understand and properly researched. With our trusted Assignment Help UK, students can complete their assessments with confidence and meet tight deadlines. You can also check our Free List of Assignment Samples Examples to understand the correct format and improve your assignment writing skills.

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

FDY3001 Preparing for University Success Portfolio Example SOLUTION PDF | Arden University

Category: Portfolio (Assignment)

Subject: Education

University: Arden University

Module Title: FDY3001 Preparing for University Success Portfolio

View Free Samples

Digital Marketing Assignment Sample PDF For Students

Category: Assignment

Subject: Marketing

University: Wrexham University

Module Title: Digital Marketing

View Free Samples

AUEC3-059 Obtaining resources for engineering activities Assignment Answers Solution PDF

Category: Assignment

Subject: Engineering

University: _

Module Title: AUEC3-059 Obtaining resources for engineering activities

View Free Samples

EAL L3 Eng AUEC3-003 Working efficiently and effectively in advanced manufacturing and engineering Assignment Answers

Category: Assignment

Subject: Engineering

University: EAL Level 3 Diploma in Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering – Technical Support Technician

Module Title: EAL Level 3 AUEC3-003 Working efficiently and effectively in advanced manufacturing and engineering

View Free Samples

QUALIFI L5 BUS503 Business Development Assignment

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business Management

University: Qualifi

Module Title: BUS503- Business Development

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK