6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology CW1 Assignment Brief | CU

Published: 14 Feb, 2025
Category Assignment Subject Science
University Coventry University (CU) Module Title 6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology
Word Count 1500 words +/- 10%
Assessment Type CW1
Assessment Title Case study (clinical biochemistry-focused)

6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology CW1 Assignment Brief

6037BMS Assignment Brief

Assignment Task

  • You are required to interpret a case study by evaluating biochemical data and integrating this with clinical symptoms. In some cases, the question will ask you to come to a differential diagnosis, while in others, you will be given a diagnosis and need to use the evidence to justify it. Please read the question carefully to ensure you know what you need to do.
  • This is a time-constrained assessment ie you have TWO weeks in which to answer the question assigned to you. The module leader will post a spreadsheet in the Assessment section on Aula to indicate which case study you should answer – please do NOT attempt to answer a different case study, as you will receive zero marks. Details of the case studies will be uploaded to the Assessment section on Aula on Monday 17 th June.
  • The question will assess your understanding of the biochemistry of a specific disease state and your ability to interpret case studies. The module workshops will teach you how to approach different case studies and indicate the depth of information required in your coursework.
  • Your work should be informed by the learning you have experienced within the taught components of the module, but should be supplemented by reference to relevant published literature (contemporary text books and journal articles). Please do NOT cite lecture or workshop material in your essays. You are advised to use at least 15 suitable references in your work.
  • Your work will be subject to plagiarism checks through Turnitin so you are reminded that you should synthesise information from sources and express this in your own words in your answers.
  • The word limit for this assignment is 1500 words and you should state your word count at the end of your work.

The word count includes the following:

  • The text of your written work
  • Reference citations and references to figures and tables within the text
  • Descriptive paragraphs as Figure or Table legends
  • Narrative text included in Tables

The following are excluded from your word allowance:

  • The title
  • Figure and Table headings
  • Words, sequences and numbers associated with figures and tables (however, extensive narrative text presented in Tables will count – see above)
  • Reference list
  • The word count details

Submission Instructions:

Your work should be submitted to the Resit or Deferral CW1 July 2024 (Resit/Deferral) Turnitin link on the module Aula page.

Please submit your work in a Microsoft Word format.

Academic staff will not be responsible for removing submissions that are made in error. Therefore, please take care in checking your submission before uploading to the final assessment submission link. You may submit multiple times to the final assessment link, but do remember that obtaining a similarity report may take up to 24 hours, and this should not be attempted close to the deadline. You may also utilise the draft link in the community pages for checking your similarity scores before the deadline.

The Turnitin UK system will record the date and time of your submission and cannot be over-written.

If you experience any technical problems when trying to submit your work, please consult Aula help via the question mark link. If these problems are experienced at the time of the submission deadline and cannot be quickly resolved, please capture screenshots as evidence and email these and your completed assessment to the module leader as soon as possible. 

As this assessment is time-constrained, extensions to the deadline are NOT permitted.

Achieve Higher Grades with 6037BMS Assignment Solutions

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Development of Skills and Attributes:

The following Graduate Attributes will be developed by this assessment:

  • communicate effectively;
  • get things done. 

Marking and Feedback

How Will My Assignment be Marked?

Your assignment will be marked by the module team.

How Will I Receive My Grades and Feedback?

Provisional marks will be released once internally moderated.
Feedback will be provided by the module team alongside grade release. 
Feedback comments can be accessed by clicking on your submission in Turnitin and selecting the comments icon. The completed marks rubric can be accessed through the rubric icon.
Your provisional marks and feedback should be available within 2 weeks (10 working days).

What Will I be Marked Against?

Details of the marking criteria for this task can be found at the bottom of this assignment brief. 

6037BMS Assessed Module Learning Outcomes

The Learning Outcomes for this module align with the marking criteria, which can be found at the end of this brief. Ensure you understand the marking criteria to ensure achievement of the assessment task. The following module learning outcomes are assessed in this task:

  • Apply understanding of biochemical and physiological mechanisms to explain the laboratory investigations of biochemical and endocrine parameters, including regard for quality control and quality assurance.
  • Explain, interpret, and critically evaluate laboratory data in patient-based case studies and other problem-based scenarios in clinical biochemistry and immunology.

Assignment Support and Academic Integrity

If you have any questions about this assignment, please see the Student Guidance on Coursework for more information. 

Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar:

You are expected to use effective, accurate, and appropriate language within this assessment task. 

Academic Integrity:

The work you submit must be your own, or in the case of group work, that of your group. All sources of information need to be acknowledged and attributed; therefore, you must provide references for all sources of information and acknowledge any tools used in the production of your work, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). We use detection software and make routine checks for evidence of academic misconduct.

Definitions of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and collusion, can be found on the Student Portal. All cases of suspected academic misconduct are referred for investigation, the outcomes of which can have profound consequences for your studies. For more information on academic integrity, please visit the Academic and Research Integrity section of the Student Portal.

Support for Students with Disabilities or Additional Needs:

If you have a disability, long-term health condition, specific learning difference, mental health diagnosis or symptoms and have discussed your support needs with health and wellbeing, you may be able to access support that will help with your studies.

If you feel you may benefit from additional support, but have not disclosed a disability to the University, or have disclosed but are yet to discuss your support needs, it is important to let us know so we can provide the right support for your circumstances. Visit the Student Portal to find out more.

Unable to Submit on Time?

The University wants you to do your best. However, we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you cannot submit your assessment by the deadline or sit a scheduled exam. If you think this might be the case, guidance on understanding what counts as an extenuating circumstance and how to apply is available on the Student Portal. 

Administration of Assessment

Assignment Category:  Time Constrained
Attempt Type: Resit / Deferral
Component Code: Cw1

Buy Answer to This Assignment & Raise Your Grades

Buy Today, Contact Us

6037BMS Assessment Marking Criteria

 

Biochemical abnormalities

 

Weighting: 40%

Evaluation

 

Weighting: 30%

Communication

 

Weighting: 20%

Referencing

 

Weighting: 10%

82, 85, 88, 90, 95, 100

An outstanding interpretation of a case study. Extensive links between analyte levels and pathophysiology/ patient symptoms. Outstanding appreciation of biochemical tests.

An excellent selection of peer-reviewed articles has been used to support an outstanding evaluation of the data. An excellent attempt at differential diagnosis.

An outstanding essay – scientific writing will be of publishable quality.

Extensive reference to contemporary peer-reviewed sources. All statements supported by literature. Citations and references formatted correctly.

72, 75, 78

An excellent understanding of the biochemical basis of disease states. Analyte levels are clearly linked to pathophysiology and clinical symptoms. Biochemical tests are clearly understood.

Information is taken from a wide array of peer-reviewed source(s). Evidence of good level of evaluation and careful selection of relevant supportive information. A logical differential diagnosis.

Information is synthesised into a coherent account. The structure is excellent, evidencing a high level of planning. Explanations are very clear throughout and show excellent evaluation of available information.

Sources used are of an excellent standard and suitable evidence has been used to support arguments. Citations and references formatted correctly.

62, 65, 68

A very good attempt has been made to relate the biochemical findings to the pathophysiology of the disease in question and the clinical information provided, but finer detail may be lacking. A good explanation of the biochemical tests has been provided, but some detail may be missing.

Information is taken from source(s) to support a good evaluation and a coherent answer. Addresses the question directly with a selection of supportive material. There is a good attempt at differential diagnosis, but some detail may be missing

Information is synthesised into a generally coherent account, although some clarity may be lacking in places. The structure is very good, evidencing a reasonably high level of planning. Paragraphs are well formulated and information is presented logically.

Most of the narrative is supported by suitable peer-reviewed references. Citations and references are generally correctly formatted

52, 55, 58

A reasonable attempt has been made to relate the biochemical findings to disease pathophysiology, but scientific details may be missing or information may be inaccurate. Some explanation relating the biochemical findings to the clinical presentation is provided. There is some understanding of the biochemical tests involved, but the explanation is lacking in detail.

There is some evidence of interpretation/ evaluation, but insufficient focus on the particular question and insufficient detail to answer the question fully. Differential diagnosis has been attempted, but needs to be more extensive.

The quality of communication could be improved. Explanations may lack clarity or scientific detail. Not all the information available has been evaluated in the answer. The structure is generally good, showing an above average level of planning. Paragraphs are generally well formulated and the information is logically ordered.

Narrative requires supportive evidence in places. Suitable sources have been used but not all the appropriate information has been extracted. Some errors in formatting of citations/references.

42, 45, 48

Some attempt has been made to link the biochemical findings to the clinical symptoms or to the pathophysiology of the disease in question, but there are several omissions or errors in key facts. Information provided on the biochemical tests may be lacking in scientific accuracy or may not be appropriate to the disease

Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Some of the sources may be unsuitable at this level. Errors and gaps with insufficient detail to answer the question. A sensible diagnosis has been reached, but there is little consideration of alternatives.

The quality of communication could be improved. Explanations may lack clarity or scientific detail. Only part of the information given has been evaluated in the answer. The structure and cohesion are fair, evidencing some planning. Fair paragraph formulation and some order to the information given.

Limited use of evidence to support the narrative. May rely on inappropriate sources e.g. old references or not peer-reviewed. Errors in formatting of citations or references

Fail

30, 35%

Limited understanding is shown of the biochemical test results. The analyte levels are not appropriately linked with disease pathology or clinical findings. Explanations lack scientific detail or clarity.

Inadequate selection of material to address the question; lacking in detail and accuracy. Information may be taken only from lecture notes and teaching material. The diagnosis does not fit with the data provided.

Explanations lack scientific accuracy. The work is in need of structure and coherence, with specific need for the following; (i) planning, (ii) paragraph formulation or (iii) logical ordering of information.

Little or no reference to data from literature. Sources are mostly inappropriate for this level of study. Citations/references missing or incorrectly formatted

Fail
0 to 29%

Little or no relevant information on biochemical abnormalities. Errors in interpretation of test results. Little or no attempt to link analyte levels with appropriate disease pathology. Information provided is too simplistic for Level 6.

Little or no attempt to support the case study interpretation with scientific evidence. Diagnosis is not clearly made or does not fit with data provided.

Little to no structure or coherence. Narrative is very difficult to follow.

No reference to data from the literature. Citations and references are missing.

Buy Answer of 6037BMS Assignment 1 & Raise Your Grades

Pay & Buy Non Plagiarized Assignment

Do you need assignment help in the UK for your 6037BMS Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology CW1? Our experienced team is ready to help with your case study, covering all essential aspects of the subject. We provide plagiarism-free solutions and ensure each piece is AI-free, offering AI reports for peace of mind. If you’re looking for case study writing services, we’ve got you covered with expertly crafted content that meets your specific requirements.  We also provide assignment examples for your needs. Pay our experts to help you succeed in your course and get top marks!

see the related solution of this brief, then click here:- 6037BMS CW1 Case Study Assignment 

Workingment Unique Features

Hire Assignment Helper Today!


Latest Free Samples for University Students

ICT239 Web Application Development Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Computer Science

University: Singapore University of Social Science (SUSS)

Module Title: ICT239 Web Application Development

View Free Samples

OST166 Understanding Leadership through Place-Based Education Assignment Sample | SUSS

Category: Assignment

Subject: Education

University: Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS)

Module Title: OST166 Understanding Leadership through Place-Based Education

View Free Samples

BE469-7-SP-CO Managing Across Cultures Assessment Example 2025-26 | UoE

Category: Assignment

Subject: Business

University: University of Essex

Module Title: BE469-7-SP-CO Managing Across Cultures

View Free Samples

BABM1003 Accounting and Budget Management Assignment 1 Example 2025-26 | DMU

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: De Montfort University

Module Title: BABM1003 Accounting and Budget Managemen

View Free Samples

ULMS55O Human Resources Management at Affluent: Academic and Practitioner’s Perspective Assessment 2 Example

Category: Assignment

Subject: Management

University: University of Liverpool

Module Title: ULMS55O Human Resources Management at Affluent: Academic and Practitioner’s Perspective

View Free Samples
Online Assignment Help in UK